Serum Pepsinogen Test Research Articles

Analysis of high risk factors for chronic atrophic gastritis.

Screening for chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) is crucial for the prevention and early detection of gastric cancer. Endoscopy is the main method of CAG diagnosis, with high training requirements and limited accuracy, making it difficult to popularize. The study attempts to improve the positive rate and accuracy of CAG screening through non-invasive testing. A total of 2564 patients who underwent gastroscopy were included in this study. The results of gastroscopic evaluation, histological biopsy results (including H. pylori biopsy), urea breath test (UBT) results, serum pepsinogen, and testosterone were statistically analyzed. We found significant differences in the diagnosis of CAG between endoscopy and histological biopsy. Pepsinogen II and pepsinogen I/II ratio were more useful for the diagnosis of CAG compared with pepsinogen I. The risk of CAG was increased when pepsinogen II exceeded 11.05 μg/L, and the pepsinogen I/II ratio was less than 3.75. CAG positivity was higher in patients with positive H. pylori infection on UBT screening. In addition, higher levels of testosterone, SHBG and HSD17B2, and lower level of GNRH1 were found in CAG mucosa. Patients with high serum testosterone had a higher risk of CAG. CAG screening should be combined with endoscopic evaluation, biopsy, and other non-invasive tests. Non-invasive tests include the combination of serum pepsinogen II protein and pepsinogen I/II ratio and high level of serum testosterone. UBT combined with serum pepsinogen testing may improve the positive rate of CAG and reduce gastric mucosal damage from multiple biopsies.

Helicobacter pylori Infection Combined with OLGA and OLGIM Staging Systems for Risk Assessment of Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study in Eastern China.

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a high-risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of H. pylori on gastritis staging systems and the value of H. pylori combined with gastritis staging systems in predicting GC risk. This study enrolled 609 patients with gastric atrophy (GA) and 527 patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM), who were graded by the OLGA and OLGIM staging systems, respectively. Each individual underwent serum pepsinogen (PG) test, H. pylori detection and questionnaire investigation. We did a real-world retrospective follow-up survey for them in April 2022. Compared with H. pylori-negative patients, H. pylori-positive patients had higher serum PGs/gastrin-17 (G-17) levels and lower PGR levels, regardless of OLGA/OLGIM stages I-II or III-IV. Furthermore, eight patients with atrophic gastritis who progressed to GC were previously in OLGA stages III-IV and OLGIM stages II-IV. The average duration of this process was 2.19±1.03 years. Logistic regression analysis indicated that PGI and H. pylori infection were independent risk factors of individuals with OLGA stages III-IV. Age and PGR were independent risk factors of patients with OLGIM stages III-IV. PGI and PGR had good clinical diagnostic values for OLGA stages III-IV and OLGIM stages III-IV, respectively. Patients with OLGA/OLGIM stages III-IV should undergo endoscopic surveillance regardless of H. pylori infection. H. pylori-positive patients with OLGIM stage II also have a high risk of GC. H. pylori combined with PGI and PGR is helpful to evaluate the severity of chronic gastritis.

Assessment of Serum Pepsinogens with and without Co-Testing with Gastrin-17 in Gastric Cancer Risk Assessment-Results from the GISTAR Pilot Study.

Introduction––Serum pepsinogen tests for gastric cancer screening have been debated for decades. We assessed the performance of two pepsinogen assays with or without gastrin-17 for the detection of different precancerous lesions alone or as a composite endpoint in a Latvian cohort. Methods––Within the intervention arm of the GISTAR population-based study, participants with abnormal pepsinogen values by ELISA or latex-agglutination tests, or abnormal gastrin-17 by ELISA and a subset of subjects with all normal biomarker values were referred for upper endoscopy with biopsies. Performance of biomarkers, corrected by verification bias, to detect five composite outcomes based on atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia or cancer was explored. Results––Data from 1045 subjects were analysed, of those 273 with normal biomarker results. Both pepsinogen assays showed high specificity (>93%) but poor sensitivity (range: 18.4–31.1%) that slightly improved when lesions were restricted to corpus location (40.5%) but decreased when dysplasia and prevalent cancer cases were included (23.8%). Adding gastrin-17 detection, sensitivity reached 33–45% while specificity decreased (range: 61.1–62%) and referral rate for upper endoscopy increased to 38.6%. Conclusions––Low sensitivity of pepsinogen assays is a limiting factor for their use in population-based primary gastric cancer screening, however their high specificity could be useful for triage.

Association between dental caries and Helicobacter pylori infection in Japanese adults: A cross-sectional study.

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is widely known as a cause of gastric disorders. Presence of H. pylori in dental pulp has been reported. Dental caries may influence the presence or absence of systemic H. pylori infection by serving as a source of H. pylori. In this cross-sectional study, we examined whether H. pylori infection in blood were associated with dental caries in Japanese adults. The participants were 752 individuals (513 males and 239 females, mean age 53.8 years) who underwent both H. pylori testing (H. pylori antibody test and pepsinogen test) and dental checkups at the Asahi University Hospital Human Health Center between April 2018 and March 2019. Those diagnosed as positive for H. pylori antibody test or positive for serum pepsinogen test as H. pylori test in the human health checkup were judged as those with H. pylori infection in the blood. In our study, 83 participants (11%) were determined to be infected with H. pylori in the blood. The proportion of those with decayed teeth was higher in participants with H. pylori infection in blood than in those without H. pylori infection in blood (p< 0.001). The logistic analysis showed that presence of H. pylori infection in blood was positively associated with those with decayed teeth (OR, 5.656; 95% CI, 3.374 to 9.479) after adjusting for age, gender, gastric disease, regular dental checkups, antibiotic medication history, and decayed teeth. Furthermore, the proportion of H. pylori infection in blood increased according to number of decayed teeth (p< 0.001). The results indicate that H. pylori infection in blood were associated with decayed teeth. Untreated dental caries may have an impact on systemic H. pylori infection.

Factors Associated with False Negative Results in Serum Pepsinogen Testing for Precancerous Gastric Lesions in a European Population in the GISTAR Study.

The accuracy of plasma pepsinogen (Pg) as a marker for precancerous gastric lesions (PGL) has shown variable results. We aimed to identify factors associated with false negative (FN) cases in Pg testing and to adjust cut-off values for these factors in order to improve Pg yield. Plasma Pg was measured and upper endoscopy with biopsy was performed within the “Multicentric randomized study of Helicobacter pylori eradication and pepsinogen testing for prevention of gastric cancer mortality: the GISTAR study”. A multivariable logistic model was built for FN and multiple factors. Values of Pg were compared and sensitivity and specificity were calculated using pre-existing Pg cut-offs for factors showing strong associations with FN. New cut-offs were calculated for factors that showed substantially lower sensitivity. Of 1210 participants, 364 (30.1%) had histologically confirmed PGL, of which 160 (44.0%) were FN. Current smokers, men, and H. pylori positives were more likely FN. Smoking in H. pylori negatives was associated with a higher Pg I/II ratio and substantially lower sensitivity of Pg testing than in other groups. Adjusting Pg cut-offs for current smokers by H. pylori presence improved sensitivity for detecting PGL in this group. Our study suggests that adjusting Pg cut-offs for current smokers by H. pylori status could improve Pg test performance.

Forthcoming Step in Gastric Cancer Prevention: How Can Risk Stratification Be Combined with Endoscopic Screening for Gastric Cancer?

Although the concern for gastric cancer prevention has increased, gastric cancer has remained a heavy burden worldwide and is not just a local issue in East Asian countries. However, as several screening programs (listed below) have shown some success, it is important to determine whether the situation is changing in some other countries and whether similar methods should be recommended. Endoscopic screening has been performed as a national program in South Korea and Japan, and the results have shown a reduction in gastric cancer mortality. Although the efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication has been established, the efficacy of the screen-and-treat strategy is presently being evaluated in randomized controlled trials. The serum pepsinogen test and endoscopic examination can divide high-risk subjects with severe gastric atrophy from average-risk subjects. Risk stratification is anticipated to contribute to an efficient method of prediction of gastric cancer development when combined with endoscopic screening. Countries with a high incidence rate should realize the immediate need to reduce gastric cancer death directly by endoscopic screening and should recognize screen-and-treat as a second option to reduce future risk. However, all forms of gastric cancer prevention programs have some harms and potential to increase unnecessary examinations. A balance of the benefits and harms should be always considered. Although further study is needed to obtain sufficient evidence for gastric cancer prevention, the best available method should be examined in the context of each country.

Serum Pepsinogens Combined with New Biomarkers Testing Using Chemiluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Atrophic Gastritis: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

Background: Analysis of serum biomarkers for the assessment of atrophic gastritis (AG), a gastric precancerous lesion, is of growing interest for identification of patients at increased risk of gastric cancer. The aim was to analyze the diagnostic performance of serum pepsinogen testing using another method, chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA), as well as of other new potential biomarkers. Material and Methods: The sera of patients considered at increased risk of gastric cancer and undergoing upper endoscopy collected in our previous prospective, multicenter study were tested for pepsinogen I (PGI) and II (PGII), interleukin-6 (IL-6), human epididymal protein 4 (HE-4), adiponectin, ferritin and Krebs von den Lungen (KL-6) using the CLEIA. The diagnostic performance for the detection of AG was calculated by taking histology as the reference. Results: In total, 356 patients (162 men (46%); mean age 58.6 (±14.2) years), including 152 with AG, were included. For the detection of moderate to severe corpus AG, sensitivity and specificity of the pepsinogen I/II ratio were of 75.0% (95%CI 57.8–87.9) and 92.6% (88.2–95.8), respectively. For the detection of moderate to severe antrum AG, sensitivity of IL-6 was of 72.2% (95%CI 46.5–90.3). Combination of pepsinogen I/II ratio or HE-4 showed a sensitivity of 85.2% (95%CI 72.9–93.4) for the detection of moderate to severe AG at any location. Conclusion: This study shows that PG testing by CLEIA represents an accurate assay for the detection of corpus AG. Additionally, IL-6 and HE-4 may be of interest for the detection of antrum AG. Mini-abstract: Pepsinogens testing by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay is accurate for the detection of corpus atrophic gastritis. IL-6 and HE-4 maybe of interest for the detection of antrum atrophic gastritis.

Gastric Cancer screening – does it exist or not? - literature review

INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the biggest healthcare problem in the world. Despite the fact that the incidence of this cancer has decreased recently, GC is on the fifth place of causes of morbidity and on the second place of causes of mortality. Therefore, some countries such as Japan and South Korea have decided to establish and develop screening methods to detect GC as early as it is possible and to begin early treatment. DESCRIPTION OT THE STAGE OF KNOWLEDGE: There are many types of screening methods such as: markers of atrophy- serum-pepsinogen test and low serum gastrin-17 concentration, barium photofluorography of mucosa or endoscopy. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy has the highest detection rate in high-incidence areas, compared to other screening methods, because upper endoscopy makes it possible to highlight changes such as flat and non-ulcerative lesions, which are usually invisible in barium examination. An alternative to screening is the massive eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Occasionally some countries recommend genetic testing and prophylactic gastrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high incidence of GC in Asian countries, there is still a lack of data on the cost-effectiveness of mass screening for GC. The main factor influencing the profitability of screening tests for GC is the cost of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Moreover, the value and usefulness of the GC screening program remains controversial in many countries.

Serum pepsinogen levels and OLGA/OLGIM staging in the assessment of atrophic gastritis types

BackgroundWe assessed the validity of using serum pepsinogen tests (sPGTs) to differentiate autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AAG) from environmental atrophic gastritis (EAG). We also investigated the correlation and prognostic value between...

A study protocol for expanding the screening interval of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer based on individual risks: prospective cohort study of gastric cancer screening.

BackgroundThe Japanese government has recommended a 2-year endoscopic screening interval for gastric cancer. However, insufficient resources have constrained participation in endoscopic screening for gastric cancer. One way to avoid endoscopic screening harms and provide equal access is to define the appropriate screening interval.MethodsTo expand screening interval from more than 2 years for low-risk group, a single-arm cohort of endoscopic screening started. At the baseline screening, the participants underwent endoscopic screening for gastric cancer, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antibody test, and serum pepsinogen test (first year), and followed after 2 and 4 years (within the first 5 years). We also assessed H. pylori infection and atrophy status on images of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy at the baseline. A new screening model will be developed by dividing the participants into high-risk and low-risk groups based on demographics, history of H. pylori eradication, serological testing, and endoscopic diagnosis. The cumulative gastric cancer incidence after negative results at baseline are compared between the low-risk group on the 3rd screening round after 4 years from baseline and the total screening group on the 2nd screening round after 2 years. If the cumulative gastric cancer incidence in the low-risk group on the 3rd screening round is lower than that in the total screening group on the 2nd screening round, the screening interval can be expanded to 4 years in the low-risk group.DiscussionTo reduce mortality from gastric cancer, a high participation rate of the target population is required. The screening interval of endoscopic screening can be changed if the individual risks for H. pylori infection are clarified. Our goal in this study is to obtain relevant data that can be used to improve the efficient use of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer by referring to individual risks in Japan.Trial registrationUMIN000025839 (University Hospital Medical Information Network, Japan)

Final results of early non-invasive gastric cancer detection study using the serum pepsinogen test method in Croatian patients.

e15551 Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the 8th most common cancer cause of cancer deaths in Croatia and 2nd most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide. GC of the intestinal type is usually preceded by a chronic atrophic gastritis which is a precancerous change in the stomach. Methods: A reliable diagnostic tool for the early detection of the GC is essential. Screening programs have led to an improvement of overall 5-y survival rate for GC in Japan and Pepsinogen test method was suggested to reduce mortality from gastric cancer. The gold standard for the diagnosis of GC is the pathohistological study of biopsies obtained during an upper GI endoscopy, an invasive method that is too complicated for use in population screening and patients with comorbidity. We have conducted a prospective single center clinical study over a period of &gt; 2 years to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of reagents, and to determine if these reagents can be part of routine. Inclusion criteria for the study were: signed informed consent, life expectancy &gt; 12, and exclusion criteria were: previous treatments for any malignancy, current usage of IPP or NSAIDs medication, poor ECOG performance status ≥3, known history of H. pylori eradication treatment or gastric surgery. We previously reported preliminary results of PG test method in Croatian population. Here, we present mature data after median follow-up of 26 months. Statistical analyses were performed by using a Mann-Whitney U test, multiple logistic regression and the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) to evaluate the predictive power of biomarkers. Results: Blood samples have been collected from patients with suspicious to GC attending for endoscopy or surgery. We used cut off points to evaluate gastric cancer risk: PGI ≤ 70 and PGI/II ratio ≤ 3.0. Of the 116 patients, 25 patients had GC and 91 had non-malignant pathology on tissue biopsy (like atrophic gastritis). Based on an optimal cut-off value calculated by ROC curve analysis had accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 86.2%, 60.0%, 93.4%, 65.2%and 89.47%, respectively, for the diagnosis of GC. AUC was 0.767 (95% CI 64.0-89.0). Conclusions: The single use of pepsinogen tests is not sufficient for stomach cancer detection; however, it provides a valuable test for selecting a population that needs further diagnosing. Meanwhile, its high specificity could also help to avoid unnecessary endoscopy, especially in older population or patients with heavy burden of comorbidity. Clinical trial information: 2016-0019-34.

PMD3 - ROC Analysis of Prediction for Gastric Cancer Development Using Serum Pepsinogen and Helicobacter Pylori Antibody Tests

PMD3 - ROC Analysis of Prediction for Gastric Cancer Development Using Serum Pepsinogen and Helicobacter Pylori Antibody Tests

Long-term outcome of group D patients with negative serum anti-Helicobacter pylori antibody and positive serum pepsinogen test in healthy Koreans.

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of group D patients (negative H. pylori antibodies and positive pepsinogen level). Group D patients were divided into two groups, that is, the limited endoscopic atrophic gastritis (EAG) group with EAG confined to the antrum and angle (C1 and C2) and the advanced EAG group with gastric body-involved EAG (C3 to O3). We compared the progression of precursor lesions and the occurrence of gastric neoplasms between the two groups. Among 107 group D patients, the advanced EAG group (n = 60) was elder and had a lower pepsinogen I level and a lower pepsinogen I to II ratio (PGI/II) than the limited EAG group (n = 47). Among the 52 patients who underwent a follow-up endoscopy, three gastric neoplasms were detected (one in the limited and two in the advanced EAG groups). During a median follow-up of 44 months, 10 (43.5%) patients in the limited and 13 (52.0%) in the advanced EAG groups showed EAG progression or newly occurred intestinal metaplasia. A family history of GC (odds ratio [OR] 44.974, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.360-1487.087), a lower PGI/II (OR 0.247, 95% CI 0.085-0.717) and a longer follow-up duration (OR 1.832, 95% CI 1.200-2.796) increased the risk of progression. A family history of GC and low baseline PGI/II were independently associated with an increased risk of progression of precursor lesions of GC.

Update version of the Japanese Guidelines for Gastric Cancer Screening

Although the incidence and mortality of gastric cancer have gradually decreased, its burden remains in East Asian countries. Gastric cancer screening has been performed in Japan since 1983, and the introduction of new screening techniques has been eagerly anticipated. To promote evidence-based screening, the Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening have been revised based on the new studies. The guidelines for gastric cancer screening have been developed according to a previously established method. To assess evidence regarding the effectiveness of the screening methods, a systematic review was conducted based on an analytic framework including clinical questions aiming at reducing mortality from gastric cancer. The following methods were assessed for gastric cancer screening: upper gastrointestinal series (radiographic screening), gastrointestinal endoscopy (endoscopic screening), Helicobacter pylori antibody test and serum pepsinogen tests. Based on the balance of the benefits and harms of each screening method, recommendations for population-based and opportunistic screenings were formulated. After the Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer screening were published in 2005, several observational studies on radiographic and endoscopic screenings have been reported. Three case-control studies have evaluated mortality reduction from gastric cancer by endoscopic screening. Notably, evidence of the H. pylori antibody and serum pepsinogen tests was insufficient. Although false-positive results, false-negative results, and complications were observed in endoscopic and radiographic screenings, the complication rates were higher in endoscopic screening than in radiographic screening. Overdiagnosis was not estimated directly in both methods. Radiographic and endoscopic screenings for gastric cancer are recommended for population-based and opportunistic screenings. The H. pylori antibody and serum pepsinogen tests are not recommended for population-based screening because of insufficient evidence.

Gastric cancer detection using the serum pepsinogen test method in Croatian patients.

e24055Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is the eight most common cancer and fifth leading cause of cancer deaths in Croatia. The gold standard for the diagnosis of gastric cancer is the pathohistolog...

Screening Biomarker as an Alternative to Endoscopy for the Detection of Early Gastric Cancer: The Combination of Serum Trefoil Factor Family 3 and Pepsinogen.

Objective The serum pepsinogen test has limitation in its predictive power as a noninvasive biomarker for gastric cancer screening. We aimed to investigate whether the combination of TFF3 and pepsinogen could be an effective biomarker for the detection of gastric cancer even in the early stages. Methods In total, 281 patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection in Korea, and 708 healthy individuals from Japan were enrolled in the derivation cohort. The validation cohort included 30 Korean patients with EGC and 30 Korean healthy control blood donors. Serum TFF3 levels were examined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results Using a cutoff of 6.73 ng/mL in the derivation cohort, the sensitivity of the combination of tests for EGC detection was superior (87.5%) to that of TFF3 (80.4%) or pepsinogen test alone (39.5%). Similarly, in the validation cohort, the sensitivity of TFF3 plus pepsinogen was higher (90.4%) than that of TFF3 (80.0%) or pepsinogen test alone (33.3%). Conclusion The combination of serum TFF3 and pepsinogen is a more effective noninvasive biomarker for gastric cancer detection compared with pepsinogen or TFF3 alone, even in EGC. This trial is registered with NCT03046745.

The correlation between histological gastritis staging- ‘OLGA/OLGIM’ and serum pepsinogen test in assessment of gastric atrophy/intestinal metaplasia in China

Background: Serum pepsinogen (PG) test, as an indicator of gastric mucosal atrophy, reflects the functional and morphologic status of gastric mucosal and it is suggested to serve as a useful predictive marker for patients with gastric cancer (GC). The available classifications of gastritis, known as the Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and Operative Link on Gastritis Intestinal Metaplasia (OLGIM), integrating the severity and topography of atrophy/intestinal metaplasia (IM), have been gradually accepted and used in screening for GC in recent years.Goals: To assess whether serum pepsinogen test, including PGI, PGII, PGI/PGII and gastrin-17 (G-17) could reflect the extent and topography of gastric mucosal atrophy/IM. Furthermore, to discuss the relationship between OLGA/OLGIM staging system and serum pepsinogen test in assessment of gastric atrophy/IM.Methods: The OLGA/OLGIM ranks the gastric staging according to both the topography and the severity of gastric atrophy/IM. A retrospective study was conducted with 331 patients who underwent endoscopy with consecutive biopsy sampling and reassessed according to OLGA/OLGIM staging system. Serum pepsinogen test, including PGI, PGII, PGI/PGII and G-17, as well as serological Helicobacter pylori (Hp) antibody were also measured. Results were presented as gastritis stage, serum pepsinogen level and Hp status. Baseline characteristics were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test for continuous data and Pearson’s χ2 test for categorical data. A logistic regression model was used for the correlation analysis between OLGA/OLGIM and serological pepsinogen test.Results: A total of 177 non-atrophic gastritis and 154 atrophic gastritis were analyzed, among which 40 were antrum atrophy, 32 were corpus atrophy and 82 were pan-atrophy. All patients were assessed applying the OLGA/OLGIM criteria with a mean age of 54.7 ± 10.8 years. Patients among OLGA/OLGIM Stage III–IV were presented with a lower level of serum PGI and PGI/PGII (p < .05), especially for Stage IV (p = .01). For both Hp-positive patients and Hp-negative patients according to OLGA system, PGI/PGII level correlated inversely with the rising stage (p = .022; p = .028). As for OLGIM system, similar difference can be seen in PGI/PGII level in either Hp-positive patients, or Hp-negative patients (p = .036; p = .013). In addition, the percentage of G-17 <1 pmol/L combined with PG-negative in antrum atrophy group was much higher than that of non-atrophy group and corpus atrophy group (25 versus 15.8 versus 6.3%) (p = .029). The proportion of G-17 > 15 pmol/L combined with PG-positive was apparently higher in corpus atrophy group, compared with other two groups (25 versus 11.3 versus 8.1%) (p = .023). Logistic regression modeling showed there exist significant connections between OLGA/OLGIM stages and serum pepsinogen test in patient stratification for gastric mucosal atrophy assessment (p < .001, p < .001).Conclusions: Serum pepsinogen test has a strong correlation with OLGA/OLGIM gastritis stage and could provide important information in assessment of atrophy/intestinal metaplasia.

Cutoff Pepsinogen Level for Predicting Unintendedly Eradicated Cases of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Subjects with Seemingly Normal Pepsinogen Levels

Backgrounds/Aims: In the ABC method, which is a method for risk stratification of gastric cancer using serum anti-Helicobacter pylori antibody and pepsinogen (PG) test, subjects with normal PG and seronegative for H. pylori are named as “Group A” and are regarded as having a low risk of gastric cancer. These “Group A” subjects include unintentionally eradicated cases at relatively high risk, and this study aimed to identify these subjects. Methods: Of the 109 subjects, 76 were classified as uninfected Group A subjects with negative histologic H. pylori infection and no histologic and endoscopic atrophy, and 33 subjects were classified serologically as Group A after successful eradication, which are serologically equal to the unintendedly eradicated cases in Group A. The usefulness of measuring PG levels to detect post-eradication cases was validated by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The area under the ROC curve for PGI level was 0.736 ± 0.06 (p < 0.01; cutoff value, 37.0 ng/mL; sensitivity, 77.6%; specificity, 72.7%), and that for the PGI/II ratio was 0.660 ± 0.06 (p < 0.01; cutoff value, 5.1; sensitivity, 84.2%; specificity, 43.4%). Conclusion: PGI levels of ≤37 ng/mL and PGI/II ratios of ≤5.1 effectively identified unintendedly eradicated cases in Group A.

Economic assessment of Ostertagia ostertagi and Fasciola hepatica infections in dairy cattle herds in Germany using Paracalc®

The aim of the current study was to estimate economic costs of Ostertagia ostertagi and Fasciola hepatica infections in dairy cattle herds in Germany using the online calculation programme Paracalc®. Following a questionnaire, survey data were available from 464 farms in 14 federal states. On those farms bulk tank milk (BTM) samples and additionally up to six serum samples collected from first season grazing calves were analysed, using a commercially available ELISA (Boehringer Ingelheim SVANOVA Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden), an in-house ELISA (F. hepatica) and an in-house serum pepsinogen test. In total, samples obtained from 344 farms were included in the analysis since those were the only farms with complete questionnaires. Median costs per farm and year were estimated for gastrointestinal (GI) nematode infections (€721.38) and F. hepatica infection (€565.61). Decreases in milk yield in multiparous cows were the major reason for annual production losses due to GI nematodes (€13.33 per cow) and F. hepatica infections (€7.95 per cow), which was followed by annual costs for anthelmintic treatment against GI nematode infections in adult cows (€10.00 per cow) and F. hepatica infection associated annual costs due to repeated artificial insemination (€10.13 per cow) and prolonged calving intervals (€9.40 per cow). The study demonstrated that if all required information is provided, the Paracalc® tool can assist to identify productions losses in dairy cattle herds due to helminth infections and to optimise farm economics in Germany.

Receiver operating characteristic analysis of prediction for gastric cancer development using serum pepsinogen and Helicobacter pylori antibody tests

BackgroundChronic Helicobacter pylori infection plays a central role in the development of gastric cancer as shown by biological and epidemiological studies. The H. pylori antibody and serum pepsinogen (PG) tests have been anticipated to predict gastric cancer development.MethodsWe determined the predictive sensitivity and specificity of gastric cancer development using these tests. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed, and areas under the curve were estimated. The predictive sensitivity and specificity of gastric cancer development were compared among single tests and combined methods using serum pepsinogen and H. pylori antibody tests.ResultsFrom a large-scale population-based cohort of over 100,000 subjects followed between 1990 and 2004, 497 gastric cancer subjects and 497 matched healthy controls were chosen. The predictive sensitivity and specificity were low in all single tests and combination methods. The highest predictive sensitivity and specificity were obtained for the serum PG I/II ratio. The optimal PG I/II cut-off values were 2.5 and 3.0. At a PG I/II cut-off value of 3.0, the sensitivity was 86.9% and the specificity was 39.8%. Even if three biomarkers were combined, the sensitivity was 97.2% and the specificity was 21.1% when the cut-off values were 3.0 for PG I/II, 70 ng/mL for PG I, and 10.0 U/mL for H. pylori antibody.ConclusionsThe predictive accuracy of gastric cancer development was low with the serum pepsinogen and H. pylori antibody tests even if these tests were combined. To adopt these biomarkers for gastric cancer screening, a high specificity is required. When these tests are adopted for gastric cancer screening, they should be carefully interpreted with a clear understanding of their limitations.