Seronegative Recipients Research Articles

Pretransplantation assessment of BK virus seropositivity in kidney donors and recipients

Background: BK virus (BKV) is a member of the polyomavirus family. The determination of anti-BKV immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels in kidney donors and recipients has been reported as a possible predictor of the risk of BK nephropathy. Allograft dysfunction is a significant risk factor. The main objective of this study was to address the high prevalence of renal failure due to BKV nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients. This investigation aims to determine whether donors and recipients of renal transplants had BKV IgG antibodies before transplantation. Methods: Blood samples were collected from 46 kidney transplant recipients and their corresponding 46 donors. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to qualitatively analyze human BKV IgG. Results: Ninety-two participants, 46 kidney transplant donors, and 46 kidney transplant recipients, were analyzed. Pretransplantation anti-BKV antibody levels were higher in kidney transplant donors (73%) than in recipients (63%). Donors and recipients included in the study were grouped into seropositive and seronegative recipients, with the highest proportion of seropositive recipient-donor groups (48%) and the lowest percentages in the seronegative donor and seronegative recipient groups. Fifty-one percent of the participants were male and 49% were female. The age distribution of most subjects was >50 years old. Conclusion: BKV can cause kidney transplant rejection. Routine screening of transplant recipients and donors for BKV IgG seropositivity is recommended before renal transplantation. This can improve transplant outcomes and prevent rejection.

Dynamics and Evolution of Donor-derived Cytomegalovirus Infection in 3 Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With the Same Multiorgan Donor.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses a significant risk to immunosuppressed transplant recipients, manifesting through primary infection, reinfection, or reactivation. We analyzed the emergence of drug resistance in CMV infection in 3 patients who were later found to have received an allograft from a shared, deceased donor. The seronegative transplant recipients developed symptomatic CMV infections after bowel/pancreas, kidney, or lung transplantation. Prospective Sanger sequencing was used to identify mutations in the viral DNA polymerase (DP) and protein kinase (PK). DP and PK variants were retrospectively quantified by targeted next-generation sequencing. The impact of the novel DP-A505G substitution on drug susceptibility was assessed using a recombinant virus. Whole-genome sequencing of clinical CMV samples was enabled through target DNA enrichment. The DP-A505G substitution was found in all patient samples and could be associated with a natural polymorphism. A subsequent review of the patients' clinical histories revealed that they had all received organs from a single donor. The CMV infection exhibited divergent evolution among the patients: patient 1 developed resistance to ganciclovir and foscarnet because of 2 DP mutations (V715M and V781I), patient 2 showed no genotypic resistance, and patient 3 developed ganciclovir (PK-L595S) and maribavir resistance (PK-T409M). Interpatient variation across the entire CMV genome was minimal, with viral samples clustering in phylogenetic analysis. All 3 transplant recipients were infected with the same donor-derived CMV strain and readily developed different drug susceptibility profiles. This underscores the importance of judicious antiviral drug use and surveillance in preventing antiviral resistance emergence.

Neospora caninum is not transmissible via embryo transfer, but affects the quality of embryos in dairy cows

The aim of this study was to evaluate embryo transfer in cattle as a pathway of transmitting neosporosis and to quantitatively and qualitatively compare the embryo production from seropositive and seronegative donors. Superovulatory treatments were performed on eight Girolando donors (four seropositive and four seronegative for N. caninum), resulting in the recovery of ninety-one structures (embryos and non-fertilized structures). Embryos collected and classified as viable were transferred to seronegative recipients and analyzed by PCR to identify N. caninum. No difference was observed in the number of structures collected from seropositive and seronegative donors (40 and 51; P = 0.64). There was a significant difference in the percentages of freezable (25 % and 74 %, P = 0.04) and transferable (27.5 % and 78.4 %, P = 0.003) embryos. The recipients had similar pregnancy rates (60 % and 57.1 %, P = 0.97) and pregnancy loss (50 % and 43.8 %, P = 0.58). There was no change in the serological status of the recipients, and no protozoan DNA was identified in none of the samples. It was concluded that the embryo transfer technique is safe regarding the transmission of neosporosis; however, the quality of embryo production was compromised from donors seropositive for N. caninum.

#1569 Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in renal transplant patients managed with early pre-emptive treatment

Abstract Background and Aims Human Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause significant morbidity in transplant recipients. Primary CMV infection in CMV seronegative recipients (R−) and reactivation of CMV in seropositive recipients (R+) post-transplant can lead to CMV end organ disease (EOD). At Royal Free Hospital (RFH), London, United Kingdom, CMV EOD is prevented through pre-emptive therapy (PET), which utilises quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) in whole blood to monitor all transplant patients and guide therapeutic interventions (1). PET is started in D+R− transplant patients following the first detectable CMV DNA (≥200 copies/ml) in blood (2). For CMV seropositive patients, PET is started when CMV DNA is ≥3000 copies/ml. This differs from many transplant centres which provide CMV anti-viral prophylaxis for the first 3-6 months post-transplant to patients at high risk of developing CMV EOD. In this observational study, the effectiveness of our PET approach and differences in CMV viral replication kinetics was retrospectively analysed in renal transplant recipients of differing CMV serostatus. Method A retrospective review of results from electronic patient records and laboratory information management system for patients who underwent renal transplantation from April 2021 to January 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into four groups based on organ donor and recipient CMV IgG serostatus (D+R−, D+R+, D−R+, D−R−). Those who were followed up for less than 90 days or had unknown donor serostatuses were excluded. Results A total of 227 patients who received renal transplantation between April 2021 to January 2023 were identified. Of which, 11% (25/227) were D+R−, 42.3% (96/227) were D+R+, 33% (75/227) were D−R+ and 13.7% (31/227) were D−R−. Within each group, 60% (15/25) of D+R−, 61.5% (59/96) of D+R+ and 48% (36/75) of D−R+ patients developed CMV viraemia during the monitoring period. Of CMV viraemic patients, all D+R− (15/15), 54.2% (32/59) of D+R+ and 27.8% (10/36) of D−R+ patients were treated with valganciclovir as per our PET protocol. None of the D−R− patients developed any CMV viraemia. The mean peak viral load for patients with viraemia requiring treatment with valganciclovir was 4772 copies/ml (range 210-30000 copies/ml) in D+R−, 5050 copies/ml (range 3000-30000 copies/ml) and 5050 copies/ml (range 3300-18000 copies/ml) in D+R+ and D−R+ groups respectively. The mean time to first viraemia was 59 days (range 15-332) for the D+R−, 40 days (range 7-177) for D+R+ and 43 days (range 15-91) for D−R+ patients. Furthermore, the mean duration of viraemia was 34 days for D+R−, 37.5 days for D+R+ and 30.5 days for D−R+ groups. 19 patients had CMV viraemia recurrence requiring re-treatment, 63%were D+R− (12/19), 32% were D+R+ (6/19) and 5% (1/19) were D−R+. Across all four groups, two patients developed CMV EOD. One D+R+ patient was found to have CMV in respiratory sample and one D−R+ patient had CMV on colon biopsy. One D+R− patient developed UL97 mutations (M460I and A594V) conferring ganciclovir resistance due to poor compliance and was treated with maribavir. Conclusion PET is a safe and effective approach which reduces the risk of CMV EOD and antiviral medication resistance in SOT patients. Our PET approach provides monitoring of all patients regardless of CMV serostatus thereby reducing the risk of CMV EOD in all patients by ensuring early treatment of viraemia.

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation.

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

(1393) - Comparison of Cytomegalovirus Infection Risk Following 3 or 6 Months of Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Among Donor Seropositive/Recipient Seronegative Heart Transplant Recipients

(1393) - Comparison of Cytomegalovirus Infection Risk Following 3 or 6 Months of Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Among Donor Seropositive/Recipient Seronegative Heart Transplant Recipients

Predictors of cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: Insights from a real-world experience

BackgroundWe aimed to investigate factors associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia and CMV disease and its impact on post-transplant outcomes including overall survival (OS) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT). MethodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study including 452 Allo-SCT recipients (matched unrelated donor, MUD 61%; haploidentical, haplo 39%) from 2016 to 2021. Data were analyzed using SPSS v28. Descriptive (chi-square and t-test), Kaplan-Meier and regression analyses were conducted. ResultsThe median age was 57 years. Sixty-one percent were males and 84.3% were Caucasians. CMV serostatus was positive in 59.1% of recipients. The median follow-up was 24.4 months. CMV viremia and CMV disease were observed in 181 (40%) and 32 (7%) patients, respectively. Among CMV seropositive recipients, 65% developed CMV viremia and 11% were noted to have CMV disease compared to 4% and 1% in seronegative recipients, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with CMV disease had significantly lower OS than those without CMV disease (median 14.1 months vs. not reached, p = 0.024); however, OS was not associated with CMV viremia (median not reached in both groups, p = 0.640). Letermovir prophylaxis was used in 66% (n = 176/267) of CMV seropositive recipients, but no impact was observed on the incidence of CMV viremia or CMV disease and OS. ConclusionsCMV disease leads to significantly inferior survival after an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Recipient CMV seropositive status was associated with the risk of CMV viremia and CMV disease, and this was not abrogated with the use of Letermovir prophylaxis.

Outpatient COVID-19 convalescent plasma recipient antibody thresholds correlated to reduced hospitalizations within a randomized trial.

BACKGROUNDCOVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) virus-specific antibody levels that translate into recipient posttransfusion antibody levels sufficient to prevent disease progression are not defined.METHODSThis secondary analysis correlated donor and recipient antibody levels to hospitalization risk among unvaccinated, seronegative CCP recipients within the outpatient, double-blind, randomized clinical trial that compared CCP to control plasma. The majority of COVID-19 CCP arm hospitalizations (15/17, 88%) occurred in this unvaccinated, seronegative subgroup. A functional cutoff to delineate recipient high versus low posttransfusion antibody levels was established by 2 methods: (i) analyzing virus neutralization-equivalent anti-Spike receptor-binding domain immunoglobulin G (anti-S-RBD IgG) responses in donors or (ii) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.RESULTSSARS-CoV-2 anti-S-RBD IgG antibody was volume diluted 21.3-fold into posttransfusion seronegative recipients from matched donor units. Virus-specific antibody delivered was approximately 1.2 mg. The high-antibody recipients transfused early (symptom onset within 5 days) had no hospitalizations. A CCP-recipient analysis for antibody thresholds correlated to reduced hospitalizations found a statistical significant association between early transfusion and high antibodies versus all other CCP recipients (or control plasma), with antibody cutoffs established by both methods-donor-based virus neutralization cutoffs in posttransfusion recipients (0/85 [0%] versus 15/276 [5.6%]; P = 0.03) or ROC-based cutoff (0/94 [0%] versus 15/267 [5.4%]; P = 0.01).CONCLUSIONIn unvaccinated, seronegative CCP recipients, early transfusion of plasma units in the upper 30% of study donors' antibody levels reduced outpatient hospitalizations. High antibody level plasma units, given early, should be reserved for therapeutic use.TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NCT04373460.FUNDINGDepartment of Defense (W911QY2090012); Defense Health Agency; Bloomberg Philanthropies; the State of Maryland; NIH (3R01AI152078-01S1, U24TR001609-S3, 1K23HL151826NIH); the Mental Wellness Foundation; the Moriah Fund; Octapharma; the Healthnetwork Foundation; the Shear Family Foundation; the NorthShore Research Institute; and the Rice Foundation.

Epidemiology of Epstein-Barr Virus Chronic High Viral Load in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Background. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) chronic high viral load (CHVL) may be defined by &gt;16 000 copies/mL whole blood or &gt;200 copies/105 peripheral blood mononuclear cells in &gt;50% samples exceeding 6 mo. EBV CHVL has only been characterized in a few small pediatric studies, with heterogeneous results and unclear clinical significance. Methods. This single-center observational study evaluated adult and pediatric kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2010 and 2021 on tacrolimus/mycophenolate-based/prednisone immunosuppression. The primary outcome was EBV CHVL prevalence. Secondary outcomes included recipient characteristics, DNAemia kinetics, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in recipients with EBV CHVL versus low-grade DNAemia or no DNAemia. Results. Five hundred forty-one recipients had a mean follow-up of 4.6 y. Fourteen recipients (2.6%) developed EBV CHVL, 70 (12.9%) had low-grade EBV DNAemia, and 457 (84.5%) had no EBV DNAemia. EBV CHVL was more common in recipients who were Caucasian (P = 0.04), younger (P = 0.04), received induction immunosuppression (P = 0.02), and had high-risk donor–recipient EBV serologic mismatch (P &lt; 0.0001). CHVL patients had a higher first viral load (P = 0.03), longer time to maximum viral load (P = 0.02), and did not achieve sustained DNAemia clearance versus low-grade DNAemia. Three EBV-positive PTLD cases occurred in recipients with a history of EBV DNAemia. PTLD was present in 7.1% (1/14) CHVL versus 2.9% (2/70) low-grade DNAemia patients (P = 0.002). EBV DNAemia developed in 32 EBV seronegative recipients (32/59; 54%); clearance was achieved in 70% (14/20) with low-grade DNAemia but no CHVL (0/12; P = 0.0001). Conclusions. CHVL was uncommon and appeared to occur after primary EBV infection. Future studies should explore other potentially modifiable risk factors for PTLD, including optimal management of EBV DNAemia.

A practical guide to real-world implementation of pre-emptive therapy for Cytomegalovirus disease prevention in high-risk seronegative liver transplant recipients with seropositive donors.

The Comparison of Antiviral Preventative Strategies In Liver Transplant (CAPSIL) study showed pre-emptive therapy (PET) to be superior to antiviral prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease prevention in high-risk CMV seronegative liver transplant recipients (LTRs)with seropositive donors (D+R-). Despite the statistical superiority of PET over prophylaxis in research settings, PET is perceived as a logistically more complex strategy that requires careful coordination of weekly CMV PCR testing, prompt initiation of CMV antivirals upon viremia detection, and timely cessation of antivirals following viremia resolution. Transplant centers may be hesitant to use PET for CMV disease prevention in D+R- LTRs out of concern that PET coordination is not feasible in clinical practice. We recently described our experience using PET in CMV D+R- LTRs in a real-world setting, and found it to be as effective for CMV disease prevention as PET performed as part of a clinical trial. Here, we describe a systematic approach for PET implementation in real-world settings and provide practical tools to address anticipated challenges. This framework can support transplant programs in overcoming logistical barriers to PET and incorporating an evidence-based and cost-effective CMV prevention strategy into routine care for high-risk CMV D+R- LTRs.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder risk and outcomes in renal transplant patients treated with belatacept immunosuppression.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare but life-threatening malignancy that arises in the setting of immunosuppression (IS) after solid organ transplant. IS regimens containing belatacept have been associated with an increased risk of PTLD in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-seronegative renal transplant recipients, and the use of belatacept is contraindicated in this population. However, the impact of belatacept-based regimens on PTLD risk and outcomes in EBV-seropositive renal transplant recipients is less well characterized. A case-control study was conducted to investigate how combinatorial IS regimens impact the risk of PTLD and survival outcomes in renal transplant recipients at a large transplant center between 2010 and 2019. In total, 17 cases of PTLD were identified and matched 1:2 to controls without PTLD by age, sex, and transplanted organ(s). We compared baseline clinical characteristics, examined changes in IS regimen, viral loads, and renal function over time, and evaluated time-to-event analyses, including graft rejection and survival. Cases of PTLD largely resembled matched controls in terms of baseline characteristics, although expected differences in EBV serostatus trended toward significance (42.9% of PTLD cases were donor-positive/recipient-negative vs. 8.3% controls, p = 0.063). PTLD cases were not more likely to have received belatacept than controls. Belatacept was not associated with graft rejection or failure, re-transplant, hospitalization, or decreased survival. Belatacept was not associated with an increased risk of PTLD, and was not associated with decreased survival in either PTLD cases or in the entire cohort. Our case-control study supports the concept that belatacept remains a safe and effective option for IS in EBV-seropositive renal transplant patients.

Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Guidelines by the Korean Society of Infectious Diseases and the Korean Society for Transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most important opportunistic viral pathogen in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. The Korean guideline for the prevention of CMV infection in SOT recipients was developed jointly by the Korean Society for Infectious Diseases and the Korean Society of Transplantation. CMV serostatus of both donors and recipients should be screened before transplantation to best assess the risk of CMV infection after SOT. Seronegative recipients receiving organs from seropositive donors face the highest risk, followed by seropositive recipients. Either antiviral prophylaxis or preemptive therapy can be used to prevent CMV infection. While both strategies have been demonstrated to prevent CMV infection post-transplant, each has its own advantages and disadvantages. CMV serostatus, transplant organ, other risk factors, and practical issues should be considered for the selection of preventive measures. There is no universal viral load threshold to guide treatment in preemptive therapy. Each institution should define and validate its own threshold. Valganciclovir is the favored agent for both prophylaxis and preemptive therapy. The evaluation of CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity and the monitoring of viral load kinetics are gaining interest, but there was insufficient evidence to issue recommendations. Specific considerations on pediatric transplant recipients are included.

Impact of recipient age on mortality among Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative lung transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors

BackgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative lung transplant recipients (LTRs) with seropositive donors (CMV D+/R-) have the highest mortality of all CMV serostatuses. Due to immunosenescence and other factors, we hypothesized CMV D+/R- status might disproportionately impact older LTRs. Thus, we investigated whether recipient age modified the relationship between donor CMV status and mortality among CMV-seronegative LTRs. MethodsAdult, CMV-seronegative first-time lung-only recipients were identified through the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients between 05/2005-12/2019. We used adjusted multivariable Cox regression to assess the relationship of donor CMV status and death. Interaction between recipient age and donor CMV was assessed via likelihood ratio testing of nested Cox models and by the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and attributable proportion (AP) of joint effects. ResultsWe identified 11,136 CMV-seronegative LTRs. Median age was 59 years, 65.2% were male, with leading transplant indication of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (35.6%); 60.8% were CMV D+/R-. In multivariable modeling, CMV D+/R- status was associated with 27% increased hazard of death (adjusted HR, 1.27 [95%CI: 1.21-1.34]) compared to CMV D-/R-. Recipient age ≥60 years significantly modified the relationship between donor CMV-seropositive status and mortality on the additive scale, including RERI 0.24 and AP 11.4% (p=0.001), i.e., the interaction increased hazard of death by 0.24 and explained 11.4% of mortality in older CMV D+ recipients. ConclusionsAmong CMV-seronegative LTRs, donor CMV-seropositive status confers higher risk of post-transplant mortality which is amplified in older recipients. Future studies should define optimal strategies for CMV prevention and management in older D+/R- LTRs.

Seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is protective against severe COVID-19 disease in heart transplant recipients.

Heart transplant (HTX) recipients are prone to develop complications after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Vaccination is often ineffective due to weaker immunogenicity. In this high-volume single-center study, we aimed to determine factors influencing seroconversion after vaccination and predictors of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two hundred twenty-nineHTX recipients were enrolled. Type of the first two vaccine doses included messenger RNA(mRNA), vector, and inactivated vaccines. We carried out analyses on seroconversion after the second and third doses of vaccination and on severity of infection. Antispike protein SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) was measured after the second and third vaccines and serostatus was defined. Effect of the first two vaccine doses was studied on patients who did not suffer SARS-CoV-2 infection before antibody measurement (n = 175). The effectivity of the third vaccine was evaluated among seronegative recipients after the second vaccine (n = 53). Predictors for severe infection defined as pneumonia, hospitalization or death were assessed in all patients who contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 92). 62% of the recipients became seropositive after the second vaccination. Longer time between HTX and vaccination (odds ratio [OR]: 2.35) and mRNA vaccine (OR: 4.83) were predictors of seroconversion. 58% of the nonresponsive patients became seropositive after receiving the third vaccine. Male sex increased the chance of IgG production after the third dose (OR: 5.65). Clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection was severe in 32%. Of all parameters assessed, only seropositivity before infection was proven to have a protective effect against severe infection (OR: 0.11). We found that longer time since HTX, mRNA vaccine type, and male sex promoted seroconversion after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in HTX recipients. Seropositivity-but not the number of vaccine doses-seemed to be protective against severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Screening of HTX patients for anti-SARS-COV-2 antibodies may help to identify patients at risk for severe infection.

Updates in Cytomegalovirus Prevention and Treatment in Solid Organ Transplantation.

The authors summarize recent updates in the prevention and management of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with a focus on CMV seronegative recipients of organs from seropositive donors (CMV D+/R-) who are at highest risk of CMV infection and disease. They discuss advantages of preemptive therapy for CMV disease prevention in CMV D+/R- liver transplant recipients, letermovir for CMV prophylaxis, and updates in the development of monoclonal antibodies and vaccines as immune-based preventative strategies. They review the roles of maribavir and virus-specific Tcells for management of resistant or refractory CMV infection in SOT recipients.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis and other risk factors for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease after liver transplantation in adults.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a rare but serious complication of liver transplantation (LT) with morbidity and mortality. The risk factors for PTLD in adults are ill-defined. This study aimed to assess the risk factors for PTLD after LT in adults. All adult LT recipients between 1986 and 2016 from 2 centers in the Netherlands were included, with follow-up until 2020. PTLD was diagnosed according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Potential risk factors for PTLD were assessed using multivariate Cox regression analysis. A total of 1281 patients were included, of whom 29 (2.3%) developed PTLD. Results show that independent risk factors for PTLD after LT in adults were no Epstein-Barr virus load monitoring strategy, primary sclerosing cholangitis as an indication for LT, era (historic era linked to more intense long-term immunosuppression), and Epstein-Barr virus-seronegative recipient. No other independent risk factors were identified in this study. Of the 207 patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis as an indication for LT, 13 (6.3%) developed PTLD versus 16 out of 1074 (1.5%) patients with other underlying liver diseases (log-rank p <0.001). The yearly PTLD incidence was higher in the first year than in the later years after LT (2.4%/y vs. 0.6%/y) for primary sclerosing cholangitis, but not for other indications (0.16%/y). In Epstein-Barr virus-seronegative recipients PTLD occurred earlier after LT, while in 97% of seropositive recipients it could occur very late after LT.

Chikungunya virus virus-like particle vaccine is well tolerated and immunogenic in chikungunya seropositive individuals

In a phase 2 safety and immunogenicity study of a chikungunya virus virus-like particle (CHIKV VLP) vaccine in an endemic region, of 400 total participants, 78 were found to be focus reduction neutralizing antibody seropositive at vaccination despite being ELISA seronegative at screening, of which 39 received vaccine. This post hoc analysis compared safety and immunogenicity of CHIKV VLP vaccine in seropositive (n = 39) versus seronegative (n = 155) vaccine recipients for 72 weeks post-vaccination. There were no differences in solicited adverse events, except injection site swelling in 10.3% of seropositive versus 0.6% of seronegative recipients (p = 0.006). Baseline seropositive vaccine recipients had stronger post-vaccination luciferase neutralizing antibody responses versus seronegative recipients (peak geometric mean titer of 3594 and 1728, respectively) persisting for 72 weeks, with geometric mean fold increases of 3.1 and 13.2, respectively. In this small study, CHIKV VLP vaccine was well-tolerated and immunogenic in individuals with pre-existing immunity.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02562482.

High-dose aciclovir in CMV infection prophylaxis after allogeneic HSCT: a single-center long-term experience

There is only limited data on cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis with high-dose (HD) aciclovir after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We performed a retrospective analysis on a total of 179 patients who underwent their allo-HSCT with HD-aciclovir prophylaxis at our center. A clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMVi) was observed in 56 (31%) cases with a median time of 49 (range 25–147) days after HSCT. A significantly higher CMV infection rate was observed in seropositive recipients with a seronegative donor (74%) compared to seropositive recipients with a seropositive donor, and seronegative recipients with seropositive and seronegative donors (24%, 18%, 7% respectively; p < 0.001). The CMV serostatus was the only significant risk factor for CMV infection in our analysis. CMV disease developed in three patients with CMV-related death in two cases. During HD-aciclovir prophylaxis, we did not observe any medical condition attributable to HD-aciclovir’s adverse effects. Compared to published results, we observed a low incidence of cs-CMVi with HD-aciclovir prophylaxis in several patient subgroups, especially in seropositive recipients with a seropositive donor. With respect to the determined threshold, HD-aciclovir prophylaxis seems to have good efficacy in an intermediate cs-CMVi risk patients, but prospective randomized trials would be needed for definite conclusions.

Quantitative PCR-based diagnosis and follow-up of Chagas disease primary infection after solid organ transplant: a multicentre study.

Chagas disease in solid organ transplant (Tx) recipients may present as a primary infection (PI). Early detection is crucial for timely treatment. This is the largest observational multicentre study evaluating qPCR for early diagnosis and treatment monitoring of PI in seronegative recipients of organs from seropositive donors. Out of 34 patients, admitted at five health centers, PI was detected by qPCR in 8 (23.5%) within a post-Tx period of 40 days (IQR:31-50). No PI was detected by Strout or clinical symptoms/signs. All patients had favourable treatment outcome with negative qPCR 31 days (IQR:18-35) after treatment, with no post-treatment relapse episodes.

Real world effectiveness and feasibility of pharmacist‐led preemptive CMV treatment in high risk (CMV D+R−) liver transplant

AbstractBackgroundRecent data have demonstrated a lower incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease utilizing preemptive CMV treatment compared to universal prophylaxis in CMV seronegative liver transplant recipients who receive allografts from CMV seropositive donors (donor‐positive [D+]recipient‐negative [R−]). However, there are little data on the feasibility and outcomes after switching transplant center protocols from universal CMV prophylaxis to preemptive treatment.MethodsAll D+R− adult liver transplant recipients underwent pharmacist‐led weekly monitoring of World Health Organization standardized quantitative plasma CMV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) after transplant for 6 months. Valganciclovir was started when plasma CMV viral load (VL) reached 100 IU/mL. All patients who were at least 12 months post‐liver transplant were retrospectively reviewed for incidence of CMV DNAemia and CMV disease in this cohort study.ResultsAmong 30 CMV D+R− liver transplant recipients, 23 (77%) developed target CMV DNAemia (≥100 IU/mL) at a median of 26 (range: 10–37) days after transplant with a median peak CMV VL of 947 IU/mL. Valganciclovir was started promptly with a median lag time of 1 (range: 0–5) day. There were no differences in surgical or infectious complications and readmission rates between patients with and without CMV DNAemia. Two patients had possible CMV disease in the first 6 months. None developed CMV disease in 6–12 months posttransplant. Only two patients who developed CMV DNAemia had acute cellular rejection, and none had graft loss or death. Weekly CMV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing was late on only three occasions for all patients before reaching the target CMV VL (&lt;4%). Among those who remained nonviremic, 85% of scheduled weekly CMV PCR testing was completed in the first 3 months.ConclusionPreemptive CMV treatment in high‐risk liver transplant recipients is feasible and safe. There was a low rate of CMV disease in the first 12 months post‐liver transplant with a pharmacist‐led protocol.