Serious Infections Research Articles

33150 Safety of guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: Pooled analyses across clinical studies

Introduction: Studies of guselkumab in plaque psoriasis have established a favorable safety profile for the drug. To evaluate the cumulative safety experience in psoriasis, we pooled safety data from phase 2/3 studies of guselkumab (CNTO1959PSO2001, CNTO1959PSO3001/3002, CNTO1959PSO3003, CNTO1959PSO3004, CNTO1959PSO3006, and CNTO1959PSO3009). Methods: Safety data were summarized for the placebo-controlled (wk 0-16 in CNTO1959PSO2001, CNTO1959PSO3001/3002, and CNTO1959PSO3006) and end-of-reporting (wk 0-40 for CNTO1959PSO3006; wk16-44 for CNTO1959PSO3003; wk0-52 for CNTO1959PSO2001 and CNTO1959PSO3004; wk0-56 for CNTO1959PSO3009; and through wk264 for CNTO1959PSO3001/3002) periods. Pooled data were adjusted by exposure per 100 patient-years of follow-up [100PY]). Results: During the placebo-controlled period, 544 patients received placebo (165 PY) and 1220 received guselkumab (378 PY). Adverse event (AE) rates were similar for placebo (341.12/100PY) and guselkumab (345.63/100PY); corresponding serious AE (SAE) rates were 6.66/100PY and 6.34/100PY. Infection rates were 83.61/100PY (placebo) and 95.92/100PY (guselkumab). Serious infections (SIs) occurred at rates of 1.21/100PY and 1.06/100PY in the placebo and guselkumab groups, respectively. The rate was 0.26/100PY for both NMSC and malignancies other than NMSC in the guselkumab group (none in the placebo group). Through the end-of-reporting period (n = 2891 patients; 8662 PY), rates remained low for guselkumab-treated patients: 169.02/100PY (AE), 5.26/100PY (SAE), 65.92/100PY (infections), and 0.88/100PY (SIs). Other AEs of interest rates were 0.43/100PY (malignancies), 0.35/100PY (NMSC), and 0.33/100PY (MACE). In guselkumab-treated patients, there were no reported active tuberculosis or opportunistic infections; no serum sickness-like/anaphylactic reactions related to guselkumab were reported. Conclusions: Pooled analyses confirm the established safety profile of guselkumab for patients treated for up to 5 years.

Risk of respiratory tract infections and serious infections in psoriasis patients treated with biologics: Results from the BioCAPTURE registry

AbstractBackgroundLimited real‐world studies are available comparing infection risk between biologics for psoriasis.ObjectivesThe primary aim was to determine the differential effect of currently available biologics on the risk of respiratory tract infections (RTI) among psoriasis patients in a real‐world setting. Secondary aims were to explore the differential risk of all types of serious infections (SI) between biologics and to provide an early overview of SARS‐CoV‐2 infections during the pre‐vaccine era.MethodsCrude incidence rates of RTI and SI were calculated per 100 patient‐years (PY) per biologic using prospective BioCAPTURE data. Negative Binomial Regression modeling was used to explore the risk of RTI. Frailty Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to estimate hazard ratios for the risk of the first SI. Confounders adjusted for both models were selected by a directed acyclic graph. A post hoc exploratory analysis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection incidence rates during 2020 was performed.ResultsWe included 714 patients with 1325 treatment episodes (3607.7PY between 2005 and 2020), in which 2224 RTI and 63 SI occurred. Among RTI, 1.3% were serious. The crude incidence rates were 61.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.1–64.3) per 100PY for RTI, and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.4–2.2) per 100PY for SI. Confounder adjusted analyses showed no differential risk of RTI between adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab and guselkumab. For SI, no differential risk was found between biologics either. Extended single‐center data showed 3.8 (95% CI: 2.2–6.1) SARS‐CoV‐2 infections per 100PY in 2020.ConclusionsConfounder adjusted analyses showed no differential risks of RTI or SI between included biologics (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab and guselkumab) in a prospective psoriasis patients cohort. In general, absolute numbers of all types of SI were low.

Evaluation of Serious Infection in Pediatric Patients with Low Immunoglobulin Levels Receiving Rituximab for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis or Microscopic Polyangiitis.

IntroductionThe aim of this work was to assess the impact of prolonged low immunoglobulin (IgG or IgM) serum concentrations on the potential cumulative serious infection (SI) risk in pediatric patients following rituximab treatment for granulomatosis with polyangiitis or microscopic polyangiitis (GPA/MPA) in PePRS.MethodsPatients aged ≥ 2 to < 18 years received four weekly intravenous rituximab infusions of 375 mg/m2 and concomitant glucocorticoid taper. After 6 months, patients could receive further rituximab and/or other immunosuppressants per investigator discretion. Immunoglobulin levels and SIs were assessed throughout the 4.5-year observation period. Prolonged low IgG or IgM was defined as below the lower limit of normal age-specific reference range for ≥ 4 months.ResultsA total of 25 patients were included, of whom 19 (76%) had GPA and six (24%) had MPA; 18 (72%) had newly diagnosed disease and seven (28%) had relapsing disease. All 25 patients completed the rituximab induction regimen; 24 completed ≥ 18 months of follow-up. At month 18, eighteen patients (72%) had prolonged low IgG; 19 (76%), prolonged low IgM; and 15 (60%), both. Seven patients (28%) had nine SIs; one occurred during or after prolonged low IgG only, two during or after prolonged low IgM only, and six during or after concurrent prolonged low IgG and IgM. No patients died or discontinued the study due to SI. All patients had complete and sustained peripheral B-cell depletion for ≥ 6 months.ConclusionsThe majority of pediatric patients who received rituximab for GPA/MPA with prolonged low immunoglobulin levels did not experience SIs. In patients with SIs, these events were manageable, and the number of SIs did not increase over time or with multiple rituximab treatments. These observations are consistent with the rituximab safety profile in adults with GPA/MPA.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01750697.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00433-0.

Serious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: data from register linkage of the NOR-DMARD study

ObjectivesTo estimate the incidence of serious infections (SIs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), and compare risk of SIs...

A pooled analysis of serious infections and herpes zoster-related disease in Asian patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with peficitinib (ASP015K) over a median of 3 years.

To analyse serious infection (SI) and herpes zoster-related disease (HZD) during long-term treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with the oral Janus kinase inhibitor, peficitinib (ASP015K). This was a post hoc analysis of pooled data from one Phase 2b study and two Phase 3 studies and final data from a long-term extension study of peficitinib in Asian rheumatoid arthritis patients. Two pooled datasets were analysed (Phase 3 studies and Phase 2/3 studies). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses explored relationships between exposure-adjusted incidence rate of SI and HZD, peficitinib dose, and baseline factors. Total peficitinib exposure for 1052 patients receiving once-daily peficitinib in the pooled Phase 2/3 Asian studies was 2998.9 patient-years. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (95% confidence interval) of SI and HZD were 2.7 (2.2, 3.4) and 6.9 (6.0, 8.0) per 100 patient-years, respectively, in pooled Phase 2/3 studies. Advanced age was prognostic for SI and HZD, while baseline prednisolone dose was prognostic for SI. There was no temporal relationship between either adverse event and prolonged peficitinib administration. As expected in this peficitinib-treated population, older patients had increased risk of SI and HZD, and those receiving higher prednisolone doses had increased risk of SI.

Safety of Ocrelizumab in Patients With Relapsing and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Background and ObjectivesTo report safety of ocrelizumab (OCR) up to 7 years in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) enrolled in clinical trials or treated in real-world postmarketing settings.MethodsSafety analyses are based on integrated clinical and laboratory data for all patients who received OCR in 11 clinical trials, including the controlled treatment and open-label extension (OLE) periods of the phase 2 and 3 trials, plus the phase 3b trials VELOCE, CHORDS, CASTING, OBOE, ENSEMBLE, CONSONANCE, and LIBERTO. For selected adverse events (AEs), additional postmarketing data were used. Incidence rates of serious infections (SIs) and malignancies were contextualized using multiple epidemiologic sources.ResultsAt data cutoff (January 2020), 5,680 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) received OCR (18,218 patient-years [PY] of exposure) in clinical trials. Rates per 100 PY (95% confidence interval) of AEs (248; 246–251), serious AEs (7.3; 7.0–7.7), infusion-related reactions (25.9; 25.1–26.6), and infections (76.2; 74.9–77.4) were similar to those within the controlled treatment period of the phase 3 trials. Rates of the most common serious AEs, including SIs (2.01; 1.81–2.23) and malignancies (0.46; 0.37–0.57), were consistent with the ranges reported in epidemiologic data.DiscussionContinuous administration of OCR for up to 7 years in clinical trials, as well as its broader use for more than 3 years in the real-world setting, are associated with a favorable and manageable safety profile, without emerging safety concerns, in a heterogeneous MS population.Classification of EvidenceThis analysis provides Class III evidence that long-term, continuous treatment with OCR has a consistent and favorable safety profile in patients with RMS and PPMS. This study is rated Class III because of the use of OLE data and historical controls.

The risk of serious infection in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tocilizumab compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in Korea

ObjectivesTo examine the risk of serious infections (SIs) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tocilizumab compared with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in Korea. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance data. The study cohort included patients ≥18 years with RA who were initiated with tocilizumab or TNFi between January 2013 and June 2018. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of SIs, defined as an infection resulting in intravenous antimicrobial therapy or hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were organ-specific SIs. To control for confounders, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity score. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a multivariable Cox regression model. ResultsA total of 8794 patients were identified: 1395 and 7399 patients initiated with tocilizumab and TNFi, respectively. The mean follow-up durations were 1.2 years for tocilizumab initiators and 1.0 year for TNFi initiators. After IPTW and adjustment, no increased risk of SIs was observed in tocilizumab versus TNFi (HR, 1.00; 95%CI, 0.90–1.11). In the secondary analysis, tocilizumab was associated with a higher risk of skin and subcutaneous tissue infections (HR, 1.26; 95%CI, 1.02–1.54) and a lower risk of urological and gynecological infections (HR, 0.65; 95%CI, 0.49–0.87) compared to TNFi. ConclusionIn this population-based cohort of RA patients in Korea, tocilizumab was not associated with a higher risk of SI compared to TNFi. However, tocilizumab should be carefully used for patients at high risk for skin-related infections.

A retrospective review of serious infections in febrile infants 0–90 days old

Background: Fever without source in infants is a common clinical problem that accounts for many ambulatory care visits and hospitalisations. Currently, there is no reliable method of identifying those at risk of serious infection (SI). Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the incidence and identify the predictors of SI in febrile infants who presented to the emergency department (ED). Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective cohort study of children presenting to a Singapore tertiary hospital paediatric unit between 1 July 2018 and 31 December 2018. Children were included if they were aged 0–90 days and presented to the ED with a fever. SI was defined as urinary tract infection (UTI), sepsis, bacteraemia, meningitis (viral and bacterial), enterocolitis, osteomyelitis, abscess or pneumonia. Results: Of the 659 infants, 161 (24.4%) were diagnosed with SI. Meningitis (49.7%) was the most common SI, followed by UTI (45.3%), enterocolitis (5.6%), sepsis (3.1%) and bacteraemia (2.5%). Factors significantly associated with SI were aged 29–60 days, male sex, Severity Index Score (SIS) &lt;10, absolute neutrophil counts &gt;10×109/L, C-reactive protein (CRP) &gt;20 mg/L and procalcitonin &gt;0.5 ng/mL. Multivariate analysis entering all these items retained only male sex, SIS &lt;10 and CRP &gt;20. Conclusion: Among hospitalised infants aged 0–90 days, the incidence of SI was 24.4%, and invasive bacterial infection was 0.6%. Meningitis was the most common SI followed by UTI. SIS and CRP can be used to predict SI in infants &lt;90 days old.

OP0126 INFECTIONS AND SERIOUS INFECTIONS IN THE FILGOTINIB RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PROGRAM

Background:The Janus kinase (JAK)-1 preferential inhibitor filgotinib (FIL) improved rheumatoid arthritis (RA) signs and symptoms in 3 phase (P)3 trials.1–3 Like other RA therapies, JAK inhibition is associated with increased infection rates.4Objectives:To assess long-term safety across the FIL program regarding infections, including serious infections (SI).Methods:Patients (pts) meeting 2010 ACR/EULAR RA criteria in pooled analysis of P2 DARWIN 1–2 (D1–2), P3 FINCH 1–3 (F1–3), and long-term extension studies (DARWIN 3, FINCH 4) were included. The placebo (PBO)-controlled as-randomised data set included pts receiving FIL 100 mg (FIL100), FIL 200 mg (FIL200), or PBO up to week (W)12 (D1–2, F1–2). The active-controlled as-randomised data set included pts receiving FIL100, FIL200, adalimumab (ADA), or methotrexate (MTX) up to W52 (F1, F3). The long-term as-treated data set included pts in all 7 studies receiving FIL100 or FIL200; data after rerandomisation were included and contributed to treatment received.Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years exposure (PYE) and differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Poisson regression; EAIRs for tuberculosis (TB) in active controlled sets were calculated using an Exact Poisson method. Kaplan-Meier (KM) event probabilities with 95% CIs were provided for SI. If pts had multiple events within the same treatment period, only the first event was counted in EAIR calculation; PYE were calculated up to the last follow-up time or day before next treatment, including after first event. For KM analysis, time to event was calculated until the first event.Results:Of 2267/1647 pts in as-treated set receiving FIL200/FIL100, 1697 had treatment-emergent infection; 118 were SI. Baseline potential risk factors for pts with SI are in Table.Table 1.Baseline characteristics of pts with/without treatment emergent SIaParameter, n (%)SIN = 92No SIN = 2491Medical history Chronic lung disease13 (14.1)125 (5.0) Chronic renal disease3 (3.3)23 (0.9) Infections and infestations29 (31.5)499 (20.0)Baseline body mass index, kg/m2 &lt;3064 (69.6)1749 (70.2) ≥3028 (30.4)742 (29.8)Age, years &lt;6567 (72.8)2006 (80.5) ≥6525 (27.2)485 (19.5)Former/current smoker30 (32.6)677 (27.2)Oral corticosteroids, mg &lt;7.528 (56.0)731 (66.1) ≥7.522 (44.0)375 (33.9) Missing data421385aPhase 3 (FINCH 1-4) studies, as randomised.SI, serious infection.In 12W PBO-controlled period, infection rates were 17.9%/15.6%/13.3% for FIL200/FIL100/PBO. In 52W ADA-controlled period, infection EAIRs (95% CIs)/100 PYE were 46.9 (40.9, 53.7)/43.7 (38.0, 50.4)/43.4 (36.5, 51.5), FIL200/FIL100/ADA; and 38.5 (33.8, 43.9)/39.0 (31.1, 48.8)/42.2 (36.1, 49.3), FIL200/FIL100/MTX in 52W MTX-controlled period; 24.8 (23.1, 26.5)/34.4 (30.4, 38.8), FIL200/FIL100 in long-term analysis. In 12W PBO-controlled period, there was no active TB for FIL200/FIL100/PBO. In 52W ADA-controlled period, active TB EAIRs (95% CIs)/100 PYE were: 0 (0.0, 0.8)/0 (0.0, 0.8)/0.3 (0.0, 1.9), FIL200/FIL100/ADA and 0 (0.0, 0.6)/0 (0.0, 1.9)/0 (0.0, 1.0), FIL200/FIL100/MTX in 52W MTX-controlled period; 0/0.1 (0.0, 0.5), FIL200/FIL100 in long-term analysis.SI rate or EAIRs are in Figure. Most common infections were upper respiratory tract infection and nasopharyngitis; majority were low grade. Pneumonia was most common SI (&lt;1%). In long-term population, event probability (95% CI) of SI was 2.2% (1.6, 2.9)/2.5% (1.8, 3.4) for FIL200/FIL100 at 52W. In F1–3 (excluding data after rerandomisation), there were no significant changes in mean neutrophil and lymphocyte counts; values remained within normal limits up to W52 for all arms.Conclusion:EAIRs of infections and SI for FIL were similar to PBO, ADA, and MTX. At 52W, incidence rates of SI were comparable for FIL100 and FIL200. Long-term SI EAIR for FIL100 was slightly higher than for FIL200.

Early prediction of serious infections in febrile infants incorporating heart rate variability in an emergency department: a pilot study

BackgroundEarly differentiation of febrile young infants with from those without serious infections (SIs) remains a diagnostic challenge. We sought to (1) compare vital signs and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters...

Morbidity and mortality in adult-onset IgA vasculitis: a long-term population-based cohort study.

With sparse data available, we investigated mortality and risk factors in adults with IgA vasculitis (IgAV). This was an observational population-based cohort study using state-wide linked longitudinal health data for hospitalized adults with IgAV (n = 267) and matched comparators (n = 1080) between 1980 and 2015. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and serious infections (SIs) were recorded over an extensive lookback period prior to diagnosis. Date and causes of death were extracted from the Western Australia Death Registry. Mortality rate (deaths/1000 person-years) ratios (MRRs) and hazard ratio (HR) for survival were assessed. During 9.9 (9.8) years lookback patients with IgAV accrued higher CCI scores (2.60 vs 1.50, P < 0.001) and had higher risk of SI (OR = 8.4, P < 0.001), not fully explained by CCI scores. During 19 years' follow-up, the rate of death in patients with IgAV (n = 137) was higher than in comparators (n = 397) (MRR = 2.06, 95% CI: 1.70-2.50; P < 0.01) and the general population (standardized mortality rate ratio = 5.64, 95% CI: 4.25, 7.53; P < 0.001). Survival in IgAV was reduced at 5 (72.7 vs 89.7%) and 20 years (45.2% vs 65.6%) (both P < 0.05). CCI (HR = 1.88, 95% CI: 1.25, 2.73; P = 0.001), renal failure (HR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.04, 2.22; P = 0.03) and prior SI (HR = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.16; P = 0.04) were independent risk factors. Death from infections (5.8 vs 1.8%, P = 0.02) was significantly more frequent in patients with IgAV. Premorbid comorbidity accrual appears increased in hospitalized patients with IgAV and predicts premature death. As comorbidity does not fully explain the increased risk of premorbid infections or the increased mortality due to infections in IgAV, prospective studies are needed.

Incidence, risk factors and validation of the RABBIT score for serious infections in a cohort of 1557 patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Predicting serious infections (SI) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is crucial for the implementation of appropriate preventive measures. Here we aimed to identify risk factors for SI and to validate the RA Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT) risk score in real-life settings. A multi-centre, prospective, RA cohort study in Greece. Demographics, disease characteristics, treatments and comorbidities were documented at first evaluation and one year later. The incidence of SI was recorded and compared with the expected SI rate using the RABBIT risk score. A total of 1557 RA patients were included. During follow-up, 38 SI were recorded [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 2.3/100 patient-years]. Patients who developed SI had longer disease duration, higher HAQ at first evaluation and were more likely to have a history of previous SI, chronic lung disease, cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. By multivariate analysis, longer disease duration (IRR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.005, 1.1), history of previous SI (IRR: 4.15; 95% CI: 1.7, 10.1), diabetes (IRR: 2.55; 95% CI: 1.06, 6.14), chronic lung disease (IRR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.35, 7.27) and daily prednisolone dose ≥10 mg (IRR: 4.77; 95% CI: 1.47, 15.5) were independent risk factors for SI. Using the RABBIT risk score in 1359 patients, the expected SI incidence rate was 1.71/100 patient-years, not different from the observed (1.91/100 patient-years; P = 0.97). In this large real-life, prospective study of RA patients, the incidence of SI was 2.3/100 patient-years. Longer disease duration, history of previous SI, comorbidities and high glucocorticoid dose were independently associated with SI. The RABBIT score accurately predicted SI in our cohort.

S0644 Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis: An Updated Analysis of Infection Rates in the Tofacitinib Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Program

INTRODUCTION: Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule JAK inhibitor for the treatment of UC. We present updated infections data from the tofacitinib UC clinical program (1), as of May 2019. METHODS: Infection events were evaluated in a Phase (P)2 induction study (NCT00787202), 2 P3 induction studies (NCT01465763; NCT01458951), a P3 maintenance study (NCT01458574), and an ongoing, open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study (NCT01470612) as 3 cohorts: Induction (P2 and P3; placebo [PBO] or tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily [BID]), Maintenance (P3; PBO, tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID), and Overall (all patients [pts] receiving tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID in P2/P3/OLE studies; by predominant dose [5 or 10 mg BID based on average daily dose < 15 mg or ≥ 15 mg, respectively]; as of May 2019, database not locked). Proportions and incidence rates (IRs; unique pts with events per 100 pt-years [PY] of exposure; censored at time of event) were evaluated for infections, serious infections (SIs), opportunistic infections (OIs; independently adjudicated, incl. non-herpes zoster [HZ] OIs), and HZ. RESULTS: 1,157 pts received ≥ 1 dose of tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg BID (83% predominantly 10 mg BID), with 2,581.3 PY of exposure (up to 6.8 years). Nasopharyngitis was the most frequent infection in the Overall Cohort (251 pts; 21.7%). In induction, SIs and OIs were numerically higher with tofacitinib vs PBO (Table 1). The Overall Cohort SI IR was 1.70, which was generally similar to Maintenance Cohort IRs for tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID and PBO, and the Overall Cohort IR (1.75) in the previous report. No SIs resulted in death. OIs were infrequent (28 pts; IR 1.07), and most OIs were HZ (24 pts; IR 0.92; mostly cutaneous). Overall, 87 pts had HZ (non-serious and serious; IR 3.48 [95% CI 2.79, 4.30]); 7 serious. Maintenance Cohort HZ IR was numerically higher for tofacitinib 10 vs 5 mg BID, but with overlapping 95% CIs; Overall Cohort HZ IRs were similar between doses. CONCLUSION: Overall, SIs were generally infrequent, and similar (indirectly) to other UC therapies, incl. biologics (2). In induction, SIs and OIs were more frequent with tofacitinib vs PBO. In the Maintenance Cohort, HZ IR was numerically higher with tofacitinib 10 vs 5 mg BID. Over time in the Overall Cohort, IRs were similar between doses and remained stable vs the previous data cut (1). Non-HZ OIs and viral infections were rare.Table 1

OP0291 TOFACITINIB FOR THE TREATMENT OF POLYARTICULAR COURSE JUVENILE IDIOPATHIC ARTHRITIS: RESULTS OF A PHASE 3, RANDOMISED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED WITHDRAWAL STUDY

Background: Tofacitinib is an oral JAK inhibitor that is being investigated for JIA. Objectives: To assess tofacitinib efficacy and safety in JIA patients (pts). Methods: This was a Phase 3, randomised, double-blind (DB), placebo (PBO)-controlled withdrawal study in pts aged 2− Results: 225 enrolled pts with pcJIA (n=184), PsA (n=20) or ERA (n=21) received tofacitinib in Part 1. At W18, 173/225 (76.9%) pts entered Part 2 (pcJIA n=142, PsA n=15, ERA n=16). In pcJIA pts, disease flare rate in Part 2 was significantly lower with tofacitinib vs PBO by W44 (p=0.0031; Fig 1a). JIA ACR50/30/70 response rates (Fig 1b) and ΔCHAQ-DI (Fig 1c) at W44, and time to disease flare in Part 2 (Fig 2a), were improved with tofacitinib vs PBO. Tofacitinib reduced JADAS27-CRP in Part 1; this effect was sustained in Part 2 (Fig 2b). Overall, safety was similar with tofacitinib or PBO (Table): 77.3% and 74.1% had adverse events (AEs); 1.1% and 2.4% had serious AEs. In Part 1, 2 pts had herpes zoster (non-serious) and 3 pts had serious infections (SIs). In Part 2, SIs occurred in 1 tofacitinib pt and 1 PBO pt. No pts died. Conclusion: In pcJIA pts, tofacitinib vs PBO resulted in significantly fewer disease flares, and improved time to flare, disease activity and physical functioning. Tofacitinib safety was consistent with that in RA pts. Acknowledgments: Study sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Sarah Piggott of CMC Connect and funded by Pfizer Inc. Disclosure of Interests: Nicolino Ruperto Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lily, F Hoffmann-La Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sobi (paid to institution), Consultant of: Ablynx, AbbVie, AstraZeneca-Medimmune, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lily, EMD Serono, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, R-Pharma, Sanofi, Servier, Sinergie, Sobi, Takeda, Speakers bureau: Ablynx, AbbVie, AstraZeneca-Medimmune, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lily, EMD Serono, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, R-Pharma, Sanofi, Servier, Sinergie, Sobi, Takeda, Olga Synoverska Speakers bureau: Sanofi, Tracy Ting: None declared, Carlos Abud-Mendoza Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Pfizer Inc, Alberto Spindler Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly, Yulia Vyzhga Grant/research support from: Pfizer Inc, Katherine Marzan Grant/research support from: Novartis, Vladimir Keltsev: None declared, Irit Tirosh: None declared, Lisa Imundo: None declared, Rita Jerath: None declared, Daniel Kingsbury: None declared, Betul Sozeri: None declared, Sheetal Vora: None declared, Sampath Prahalad Grant/research support from: Novartis, Elena Zholobova Grant/research support from: Novartis and Pfizer Inc, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer Inc and Roche, Yonatan Butbul Aviel: None declared, Vyacheslav Chasnyk: None declared, Melissa Lerman Grant/research support from: Amgen, Kabita Nanda Grant/research support from: Abbott, AbbVie, Amgen and Roche, Heinrike Schmeling Grant/research support from: Janssen, Pfizer Inc, Roche and USB Bioscience, Heather Tory: None declared, Yosef Uziel Speakers bureau: Pfizer Inc, Diego O Viola Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, GSK, Janssen and Pfizer Inc, Speakers bureau: AbbVie and Bristol-Myers Squibb, Holly Posner Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Keith Kanik Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Ann Wouters Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Cheng Chang Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Richard Zhang Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Irina Lazariciu Consultant of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: IQVIA, Ming-Ann Hsu Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Ricardo Suehiro Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Alberto Martini Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lily, EMD Serono, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Daniel J Lovell Consultant of: Abbott (consulting and PI), AbbVie (PI), Amgen (consultant and DSMC Chairperson), AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb (PI), Celgene, Forest Research (DSMB Chairman), GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffman-La Roche, Janssen (co-PI), Novartis (consultant and PI), Pfizer (consultant and PI), Roche (PI), Takeda, UBC (consultant and PI), Wyeth, Employee of: Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Speakers bureau: Wyeth, Hermine Brunner Consultant of: Hoffman-La Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Aventis, Merck Serono, AbbVie, Amgen, Alter, AstraZeneca, Baxalta Biosimilars, Biogen Idec, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, EMD Serono, Janssen, MedImmune, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Biosciences, Speakers bureau: GSK, Roche, and Novartis

Associated factors to serious infections in a large cohort of juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus from Lupus Registry (RELESSER).

ObjectiveTo assess the incidence of serious infection (SI) and associated factors in a large juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE) retrospective cohort. MethodsAll patients in the Spanish Rheumatology Society Lupus Registry (RELESSER) who meet ≥4 ACR-97 SLE criteria and disease onset <18 years old (jSLE), were retrospectively investigated for SI (defined as either the need for hospitalization with antibacterial therapy for a potentially fatal infection or death caused by the infection). Standardized SI rate was calculated per 100 patient years. Patients with and without SI were compared. Bivariate and multivariate logistic and Cox regression models were built to calculate associated factors to SI and relative risks. ResultsA total of 353 jSLE patients were included: 88.7% female, 14.3 years (± 2.9) of age at diagnosis, 16.0 years (± 9.3) of disease duration and 31.5 years (±10.5) at end of follow-up. A total of 104 (29.5%) patients suffered 205 SI (1, 55.8%; 2-5, 38.4%; and ≥6, 5.8%). Incidence rate was 3.7 (95%CI: 3.2–4.2) SI per 100 patient years. Respiratory location and bacterial infections were the most frequent. Higher number of SLE classification criteria, SLICC/ACR DI score and immunosuppressants use were associated to the presence of SI. Associated factors to shorter time to first infection were higher number of SLE criteria, splenectomy and immunosuppressants use. ConclusionsThe risk of SI in jSLE patients is significant and higher than aSLE. It is associated to higher number of SLE criteria, damage accrual, some immunosuppressants and splenectomy.

P209 Safety profile of upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: integrated analysis from the select Phase 3 clinical programme

Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA), a JAK1-selective inhibitor, significantly improved clinical signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients naïve to methotrexate (MTX) and with an inadequate response to conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARD-IR) or biologic DMARDs (bDMARD-IR). The objective was to assess the safety of UPA as monotherapy (mono) and as combination therapy with background csDMARDs in patients with moderately to severely active RA from the safety database of the Phase 3 clinical programme. Methods Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from 5 pivotal, randomised, double-blind, controlled Phase 3 trials of UPA 15 mg or 30 mg QD in RA patients were analysed using integrated short-term (ST), individual studies with long-term (LT) active comparator and integrated LT (all Phase 3 exposure; E/100PY) analyses sets. Results Across the Phase 3 trials, 3834 patients received ∼1 dose of UPA 15 mg (n = 2630) or 30 mg QD (n = 1204) »4020.1 PY of UPA exposure with no option to switch doses. The ST frequencies of overall SAEs and AEs leading to discontinuation were low, but higher on both UPA doses vs PBO. LT event rates were similar on UPA 15 mg vs ADA and slightly higher on UPA vs MTX mono. Deaths occurred in all treatment groups. Serious infection (SIEs) frequencies were higher on both UPA doses vs PBO. SIE rates on both UPA doses were higher vs MTX, but similar on UPA 15 mg vs ADA. Herpes zoster (HZ) frequencies and rates were higher on both UPA doses vs PBO, and vs MTX, ADA, respectively. The rates of SIE and HZ were higher on UPA 30 vs 15 mg. Adjudicated MACE were reported in all treatment groups including PBO. LT MACE rates were similar on UPA 15 mg and ADA and on UPA 15 mg and MTX mono, but higher on UPA 30 mg mono (low number of events, 2-4 per set). Adjudicated VTEs occurred at comparable frequencies on UPA vs PBO and at comparable rates on UPA vs active comparators. Malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer [NMSC]) rates were similar on UPA vs MTX, UPA 15 mg vs ADA, and 15 vs 30 mg. The NMSC rates on UPA 15 mg and ADA were similar; the rate on 30 mg was higher than 15 mg, but both UPA NMSC rates were in the range reported for RA patients treated with DMARDS. The standardised incidence ratio (95% CI) for malignancy (15 mg: 0.98 [0.61, 1.49], 30 mg: 1.49 [0.85, 2.42]) was not elevated vs the general population. Conclusion Treatment with UPA increased the risk of SIE and HZ, but not those of VTE, MACE, and malignancy vs comparators. These data support that UPA has an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of moderately to severely active RA. Disclosures S.B. Cohen: Grants/research support; Received grants and personal fees from Amgen, Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer and Sandoz. R. van Vollenhoven: Consultancies; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB. Grants/research support; Received grants from AbbVie, Arthrogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Lilly, Pfizer, and UCB. K. Winthrop: Consultancies; Received consulting fees and research grants from UCB Pharma, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, AbbVie, and Roche. C. Zerbini: Consultancies; Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis and Pfizer. Grants/research support; Received research grants from Amgen, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier and Roche. Y. Tanaka: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Sanofi, Abbvie, Pfizer, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Glaxo-Smithkline, UCB, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Takeda, Janssen, Asahi-kasei. Grants/research support; Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Bristol-Myers, Eisai, Chugai, Takeda, Abbvie, Astellas, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ono, MSD, Taisho-Toyama. L. Bessette: Grants/research support; Speaking fees, consulting fees, and research grants from Amgen, BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB Pharma, AbbVie Inc, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Novartis. Y. Zhang: Corporate appointments; Employee of AbbVie. N. Khan: Corporate appointments; Employee of AbbVie. B. Hendrickson: Corporate appointments; Employee of AbbVie. J.V. Enejosa: Corporate appointments; Employee of AbbVie. G. Burmester: Honoraria; Received speaking or consulting fees from AbbVie Inc, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Roche, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma.

P419 Clinical effectiveness and safety of first-line biologic vedolizumab as a monotherapy or combination therapy in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease patients: results from the EVOLVE study

Abstract Background There is little long-term research (≥12 months) in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) patients investigating the impact on clinical effectiveness of combined (combo) therapy of vedolizumab (VDZ) plus immunomodulators/immunosuppressants (IMMs) compared with VDZ monotherapy. Research suggests the use of concomitant aminosalicylates [5-ASAs] in UC may not bolster effectiveness. Finally, it is unclear if the safety profile differs between VDZ monotherapy and combo therapy. This study described clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes in patients with UC or CD treated with first-line biologic VDZ as monotherapy or combo therapy with IMMs or 5-ASAs (UC only). Methods This was a real-world, multi-country (Canada, Greece and the USA), retrospective chart review study of biologic-naïve UC and CD patients (≥18 years old) treated with VDZ (initiated Tx May 2014–March 2018). Data were collected from Tx initiation to the earliest of death and chart abstraction date. Cumulative rates of clinical effectiveness outcomes over 24 months (Tx persistence, clinical response and clinical remission) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with unadjusted comparisons conducted using the log-rank test. Clinical response and remission were assessed from standard disease measures reported in medical records. Analyses of unadjusted incidence rates (per 100 person-years [PYs]) of disease exacerbations, disease-related surgeries, serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) were performed. For these analyses in monotherapy vs. VDZ+IMMs, UC and CD patients were combined due to restrictions of sample size and a number of events. Results This analysis included 318 patients treated with VDZ (monotherapy: UC = 53, CD = 108; VDZ+IMMs: UC = 22, CD = 24; VDZ+5-ASAs: UC = 111). There were no observed differences in age, sex or disease duration between patients on monotherapy vs. VDZ+IMMs or vs. VDZ+5-ASAs. Data trends in effectiveness outcomes were similar in monotherapy vs. VDZ+IMMs over 24 months (Figure 1). Tx persistence (monotherapy: 71.6%; VDZ+5-ASAs: 82.7%; p = 0.40), clinical remission (monotherapy: 54.3%; VDZ+5-ASAs: 87.7%; p = 0.37) and clinical response (monotherapy: 81.7%; VDZ+5-ASAs: 92.2%; p = 0.54) were also similar between monotherapy and VDZ+5-ASAs over 24 months. Safety outcomes were similar between groups (Figure 2). Conclusion Though sample sizes were small, the unadjusted trends in the results of this long-term real-world study suggest that biologic-naïve UC or CD patients treated with VDZ alone may have similar clinical effectiveness outcomes to patients receiving VDZ+IMMs. Trends in data also suggest that in patients with UC, VDZ+5-ASAs may not be more effective than VDZ alone.

DOP55 A real-world comparison of the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab and anti-TNF therapies in early treatment initiation with first-line biologic therapy in ulcerative colitis: Results from EVOLVE

Abstract Background Evidence suggests that early treatment (Tx) with biologic agents in Crohn’s disease improves long-term clinical outcomes. However, there is less evidence in ulcerative colitis (UC), and data comparing early Tx with first-line biologic vedolizumab (VDZ) to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) in real-world settings is needed. This study compared the clinical effectiveness and safety of UC patients who initiated VDZ or an anti-TNF as a first-line biologic within 2 years following diagnosis. Methods This was a real-world, multi-country, retrospective chart review study in Canada, Greece and the United States where biologic-naïve UC patients (≥18 years old) were treated with VDZ or an anti-TNF (adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab) agent within 2 years following diagnosis (initiated Tx May 2014–March 2018). Clinical effectiveness and safety data were collected from Tx initiation to earliest of chart abstraction date, death, or 6 months post-Tx discontinuation (Canada only). Tx persistence was defined as the duration of time from treatment initiation to discontinuation. Analyses of cumulative rates of Tx persistence, clinical response, clinical remission and mucosal healing over 24 months were estimated using Kaplan–Meier analyses. Clinical response, remission and mucosal healing were assessed using pre-defined hierarchical algorithms of standard disease measures reported in the medical records. Analyses of incidence rates (per 100 person-years [PYs]) of disease exacerbations, disease-related surgeries, serious adverse events (SAEs) and serious infections (SIs) were performed. Adjusted analyses used inverse probability weighting to balance cohorts. Results This analysis included 176 UC patients (VDZ: 86; anti-TNF: 90) from 37 sites. Mean (SD) age at index date: VDZ, 41.4 (18.9); anti-TNF, 36.8 (15.6) years (p = 0.20) and the proportion male: VDZ, 58.1%; anti-TNF, 56.7% (p = 0.84). At 12 months, 72.9% and 58.1% continued VDZ and anti-TNF respectively (p = 0.03) (Figure 1A). Though there were no differences in clinical response, clinical remission or mucosal healing between VDZ and anti-TNF groups; VDZ patients were significantly less likely to experience disease exacerbations (HR = 0.47 [95% CI: 0.32–0.69]) and SAEs (HR = 0.37 [95% CI: 0.19–0.72]) (Figure 2). Adjusted outcomes (Figures 1C and D, and 2B) were similar to unadjusted outcomes. Conclusion EVOLVE is one of the first studies that compared early VDZ Tx to early anti-TNF Tx in biologic-naïve UC patients. Results showed VDZ was associated with higher persistence, lower likelihood of experiencing disease exacerbations and a more favourable safety profile. Thus, in early UC, Tx with VDZ may improve long-term clinical outcomes. Sample size limitations warrant further study.

Serious infections in patients with self-reported psoriatic arthritis from the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR) treated with biologics

BackgroundPatients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have increased risk of adverse events, including serious infections (SI), compared with psoriasis patients.MethodsPatients eligible for, or receiving conventional systemic and biologic agents for psoriasis were followed prospectively using PSOLAR. Cohorts included: ustekinumab, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors; infliximab; etanercept; adalimumab; non-biologic/methotrexate (MTX) (reference group); and non-biologic/non-MTX. Multivariate analyses using Cox hazard regression were used to identify factors associated with time to first SI. Rates of SI in PSOLAR psoriasis patients with self-reported PsA and possible risks with biologic therapy were evaluated.ResultsPSOLAR enrolled 4315 psoriasis patients with self-reported PsA. The overall population (N = 2401) included patients (n): 628 ustekinumab; 1413 TNF inhibitors; 258 infliximab; 481 etanercept; 674 adalimumab; 54 other biologics, 98 non-biologic/MTX; 208 non-biologic/non-MTX. Overall, 138 SI were reported with incidence rates per 100 patient-years as follows: a) ustekinumab: 1.00; b) TNF inhibitors: 2.22; c) infliximab: 2.12; d) etanercept: 2.58; e) adalimumab: 1.99; f) non-biologic/MTX: 3.01; g) and non-biologic/non-MTX: 2.31. Age, time-dependent disease activity Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) of 4, 5, history of infection, and diabetes were associated with increased risk for SI (p < 0.05) in self-reported PsA patients. Biologic groups, other than ustekinumab, had numerically higher rates of SI.ConclusionsPSOLAR psoriasis patients with self-reported PsA in the TNF inhibitors, infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, and MTX cohorts had numerically higher SI rates than the ustekinumab cohort, although not statistically significant. Age, PGA 4, 5, history of infection, and diabetes were associated with an increased risk for SI, irrespective of biologic exposure.Trial registrationNCT00508547; Registered July 30, 2007.

Analysis of emergency department prediction tools in evaluating febrile young infants at risk for serious infections

ObjectiveFebrile infants≤3 months old constitute a vulnerable group at risk of serious infections (SI). We aimed to (1) study the test performance of two clinical assessment tools—the National Institute for...