States, reviewed an oncology protocol presenting serious risk to research participants. Given the degree of risk to subjects posed by the study and the potential vulnerability of the study population, the IRB decided that direct monitoring of the informed consent process was required to ensure that subjects were adequately informed and that the decision to participate was voluntary. In this paper, we describe the consent monitoring process devised by the IRB and the results obtained. The study in question was a phase II regimen of dose intensification therapy for women with advanced (stage IIIB, IV, or inflammatory carcinoma) breast cancer ineligible for hormonal therapy (estrogen-receptor negative tumor or failure of two hormonal therapies).' The protocol combined a variety of aggressive (and investigational) treatments for advanced cancer. The induction regimen consisted of treatment with a very high dose of an anthracycline, an experimental cardio-protective drug, methotrexate, and 5-flourouracil. After 6 cycles of induction chemotherapy, patients received 2 sequential autologous bone marrow transplants (ABMT). If after the second ABMT no evidence of tumor was seen in biopsy samples, patients received irradiation to any (previous) areas of bulky disease and to the cranium. Finally, patients received tamoxifen for up to 5 years after completion of radiation therapy. The entire regimen (excluding the tamoxifen) took 10 months to complete, of which an estimated 110 days were spent in hospital. Intensive supportive measures were required, including growth factors, peripheral stem cell transfusion, parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, and, if necessary, admission to the intensive care unit. The anticipated treatment mortality rate was 10 to 15%.
Read full abstract