Sequential Arm Research Articles

Interarm systolic blood pressure difference is associated with left ventricular concentricity and concentric remodeling.

Interarm systolic blood pressure difference (IASD) values >15 mmHg (IASD > 15) are associated with increased cardiovascular risk, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This report evaluated whether IASD >15, assessed by different protocols [sequential or simultaneous; based on one or several blood pressure (BP) readings], was associated with adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling. This cross-sectional study evaluated 605 individuals who underwent clinical and echocardiography evaluation and three pairs of simultaneous arm BP readings. IASD was estimated by seven distinct protocols (three simultaneous and four sequential BP measurements criteria). The cohort had a mean age of 53.5 ± 15.4 years, with 51% being women, 23% with LV hypertrophy, 14% with LV concentricity, 69% with normal geometry, 8% with concentric remodeling, 17% with eccentric hypertrophy and 6% with concentric hypertrophy. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that IASD >15 defined by simultaneous measures of the last two pairs of BP readings (IASDsim2) and sequential arm BP readings (right-left-right arm sequence; IASDseq3) were related to LV concentricity (odds ratio [95% CI] = 3.24 [1.02-10.28], P = 0.046 and 2.56 [1.09-6.00], P = 0.030, respectively) and LV concentric remodeling (odds ratio [95% CI] = 4.12 [1.08-15.78], P = 0.039 and 4.16 [1.61-10.76], P = 0.003, respectively). Conversely, IASD >15 defined by any criteria showed no association with LV hypertrophy. Individuals with IASD >15 defined by IASDsim2 and IASDseq3 are associated with adverse LV remodeling, namely LV concentricity and LV concentric remodeling. These findings suggest that both criteria might be potentially used to preferentially assess abnormal IASD in the setting of clinical practice.

Future movement plans interact in sequential arm movements.

Real-world actions often comprise a series of movements that cannot be entirely planned before initiation. When these actions are executed rapidly, the planning of multiple future movements needs to occur simultaneously with the ongoing action. How the brain solves this task remains unknown. Here, we address this question with a new sequential arm reaching paradigm that manipulates how many future reaches are available for planning while controlling execution of the ongoing reach. We show that participants plan at least two future reaches simultaneously with an ongoing reach. Further, the planning processes of the two future reaches are not independent of one another. Evidence that the planning processes interact is twofold. First, correcting for a visual perturbation of the ongoing reach target is slower when more future reaches are planned. Second, the curvature of the current reach is modified based on the next reach only when their planning processes temporally overlap. These interactions between future planning processes may enable smooth production of sequential actions by linking individual segments of a long sequence at the level of motor planning.

Future movement plans interact in sequential arm movements

Real-world actions often comprise a series of movements that cannot be entirely planned before initiation. When these actions are executed rapidly, the planning of multiple future movements needs to occur simultaneously with the ongoing action. How the brain solves this task remains unknown. Here, we address this question with a new sequential arm reaching paradigm that manipulates how many future reaches are available for planning while controlling execution of the ongoing reach. We show that participants plan at least two future reaches simultaneously with an ongoing reach. Further, the planning processes of the two future reaches are not independent of one another. Evidence that the planning processes interact is twofold. First, correcting for a visual perturbation of the ongoing reach target is slower when more future reaches are planned. Second, the curvature of the current reach is modified based on the next reach only when their planning processes temporally overlap. These interactions between future planning processes may enable smooth production of sequential actions by linking individual segments of a long sequence at the level of motor planning.

Perioperative Outcomes Using Single-Fire Stapler

BackgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric surgery performed worldwide. The Titan stapler aims to standardize the sleeve gastrectomy by eliminating inconsistencies and simplifying the procedure.MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed on all patients > 18 years of age undergoing LSG using the Titan. Pre-operative demographics, perioperative findings, and post-operative complications were all abstracted from the MBSAQIP database.ResultsA total of 807 LSG have been performed using the latest iteration of the Titan stapler since November 2022. Data from these patients was compared to 3829 patients who underwent LSG using a sequential staple firing technique from September 2016–September 2021. The median age of Titan patients was 42 years (IQR 33–52) compared to 44 years (IQR 35–54) for sequential firing. The median pre-operative BMI was 47.1 (IQR 43.5–52.1) for Titan versus 47.6 (IQR 43.1–53.3) for sequential staple firing. After propensity matching, operative duration was significantly less for the Titan. Titan patients had decreased hospital length of stay, experienced fewer 30-day readmissions, and had less post-operative nausea/vomiting. Post-op bleed rates were similar between the two cohorts. Weight loss at 6 months favored the sequential fire arm, but our preliminary data shows this difference diminishes at 1 year.ConclusionsHere we report our data on patients undergoing LSG using the latest Titan stapler. We show the device is safe, effective, and has resulted in an improvement in length of stay, readmissions, and post-operative nausea/vomiting. We also noted reduced operative time with this technique.Graphical

Role of induction chemotherapy in locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma in Indian population.

e18026 Background: Head and neck cancer is the third most frequent cancer in Indian men, it is a growing public health problem. Given the numerous disparities in head and neck cancer biology, etiologic and demography between the developing world and the developed world, management guidelines should be based on Indian literature rather than western data. This study aims to define role of Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer In Indian population by comparing the outcomes which are Overall response rate (O.R.R), Progression free survival (P.F.S), overall survival (O.S) between patients who received Induction chemotherapy followed by CTRT vs CTRT. Methods: Patients who were registered for treatment between jan-2018 to dec-2022 who met the selection criteria were included for the study. Selection criteria: Patients who were diagnosed with Stage III OR IV (a & b, non-metastatic) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma from age group of 20 to 70 who were HPV negative or unknown status were included for study. Total of 50 patients were chosen for the study after stringent selection criteria. Out of 50 ,23 patients received Induction chemotherapy and 27 patients received only CTRT. Results: Overall response rate was analysed using Interim PET CT after Induction chemotherapy and PET CT after 3 to 6 months of CTRT. Complete response and partial response is considered as ORR. It was observed that ORR in sequential therapy arm is 42% and only CTRT arm is 36%, however this is not statistically significant with p value of 0.54. Median PFS for CTRT arm is 8 months and median PFS for IC +CTRT arm is 12 months with p value = 0.97(>0.05) (Log rank test) which is not statistically significant. Median OS for CTRT is 60 months and IC+ CTRT is 18 months. The log rank test has been used for comparing the overall survival outcomes of both the groups , and thus the p-value obtained is 0.56(>0.05), which shows that there is no statistically significant difference in the survival outcome of the two groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study on induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer did not identify statistically significant differences in O.R.R, PFS and OS between the two treatment arms which is concordant with MACH- NC updated 2021 data. Several factors, including patient heterogeneity, sample size, treatment protocol, follow-up, duration, may have contributed to these results, it is essential to interpret these results in the context of the study's limitations. [Table: see text]

Comparison of Outcome of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Sequential Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced, Inoperable Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck Region

Background: Head and neck cancer is prevalent in Bangladesh, with a majority of patients presenting with locally advanced, inoperable disease. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and accessibility of concurrent and sequential (CCRT with RT) chemoradiotherapy in treating this condition, addressing a debate among oncologists. Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental study at Rajshahi Medical College Hospital (June 2019 - May 2020) involved 60 inoperable head and neck cancer patients, comparing concurrent chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin and sequential chemoradiotherapy with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin, monitoring treatment response and toxicities. Results: The mean age was 56.1 (±9.5) years in Arm-A and 56.9 (±9.4) years in Arm-B. The primary endpoint was loco-regional control and early toxicities. In the final response, 14 weeks after the completion of treatment, the overall loco-regional control rate was 86.67% and 76.67% in Arm-A and Arm-B, respectively. Severe toxicities include grade 3 reaction only and happened 18(58%) vs 13(42%) in Arm-A and Arm-B, respectively. Among severe toxicities, mucositis and skin reaction were higher in the concurrent Arm and anemia and neutropenia were higher in the sequential Arm. However, there was no actual difference in the two treatment modalities (p=>0.05). The overall treatment time was short in concurrent chemoradiotherapy (49 vs 133 days) and lower treatment cost as well, which was statistically significant (p=<0.0001). Conclusion: concurrent chemoradiotherapy proves cost-effective and accessible, demonstrating outcomes similar to sequential chemoradiotherapy. It stands as a viable treatment choice for locally advanced, inoperable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy after progression on prior palbociclib in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer: A single center real-world study in China.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy (ET) become standard-of-care for patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the optimal therapeutic paradigm after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib with switching ET versus chemotherapy after progression on prior palbociclib-based ET in Chinese patients with HR+/HER2- MBC. From 414 consecutive patients with HR+/HER2- MBC who had been treated with palbociclib plus ET from September 2018 to May 2022 in Peking University Cancer Hospital, we identified 80 patients who received abemaciclib plus switching ET or chemotherapy after progression on palbociclib, matched for age, original stage at diagnosis, disease-free interval, and tumor burden at 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazard model was performed to identify clinical factors associated with PFS in the abemaciclib group. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.94-8.06) in abemaciclib group and 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.52-5.49) in chemotherapy group (p = 0.667). And, there was no difference in median PFS between the sequential and nonsequential arm (6.0 vs. 6.0 months) in the abemaciclib group though fewer lines of prior systemic therapy and longer PFS from prior palbociclib in the sequential arm. However, patients with prior palbociclib as the first-line therapy had a significantly longer median PFS versus prior palbociclib as ≥2nd-line therapy (11.0 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.043). Based on multivariable analysis, ER+/PR+ was an independent factor associated with longer PFS. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the abemaciclib and chemotherapy groups (p = 0.069). Our findings indicate that abemaciclib plus switching ET might be one of feasible treatment options for Chinese patients with HR+/HER2- MBC after progression on prior palbociclib-based therapy in addition to chemotherapy.

Evaluation of the inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a post hoc analysis of the randomized phase III XELAVIRI trial (AIO KRK0110)

The inflammation-based modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) combines serum levels of C-reactive protein and albumin and was shown to predict survival in advanced cancer. We aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of mGPS on survival as well as its predictive value when combined with gender in unselected metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients receiving first-line chemotherapy in the randomized phase III XELAVIRI trial. In XELAVIRI, mCRC patients were treated with either fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab followed by additional irinotecan at first progression (sequential treatment arm; Arm A) or upfront combination of fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab/irinotecan (intensive treatment arm; Arm B). In the present post hoc analysis, survival was evaluated with respect to the assorted mGPS categories 0, 1 or 2. Interaction between mGPS and gender was analyzed. Out of 421 mCRC patients treated in XELAVIRI, 362 [119 women (32.9%) and 243 men (67.1%)] were assessable. For the entire study population a significant association between mGPS and overall survival (OS) was observed [mGPS= 0: median 28.9 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 25.9-33.6 months; mGPS= 1: median 21.4 months, 95% CI 17.6-26.1 months; mGPS= 2: median 16.8 months, 95% CI 14.3-21.2 months; P < 0.00001]. Similar results were found when comparing progression-free survival between groups. The effect of mGPS on survival did not depend on the applied treatment regimen (P= 0.21). In female patients, a trend towards longer OS was observed in Arm A versus Arm B, with this effect being clearly more pronounced in the mGPS cohort 0 (41.6 versus 25.5 months; P= 0.056). By contrast, median OS was longer in male patients with an mGPS of 1-2 treated in Arm B versus Arm A (20.8 versus 17.4 months; P= 0.022). We demonstrate the role of mGPS as an independent predictor of OS regardless of the treatment regimen in mCRC patients receiving first-line treatment. mGPS may help identify gender-specific subgroups that benefit more or less from upfront intensive therapy.

Investigator choice of standard therapy versus sequential novel therapy arms in the treatment of relapsed follicular lymphoma (REFRACT): study protocol for a multi-centre, open-label, randomised, phase II platform trial

BackgroundRelapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (rrFL) is an incurable disease associated with shorter remissions and survival after each line of standard therapy. Many promising novel, chemotherapy-free therapies are in development, but few are licensed as their role in current treatment pathways is poorly defined.MethodsThe REFRACT trial is an investigator-initiated, UK National Cancer Research Institute, open-label, multi-centre, randomised phase II platform trial aimed at accelerating clinical development of novel therapies by addressing evidence gaps. The first of the three sequential novel therapy arms is epcoritamab plus lenalidomide, to be compared with investigator choice standard therapy (ICT). Patients aged 18 years or older with biopsy proven relapsed or refractory CD20 positive, grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma and assessable disease by PET-CT are eligible. The primary outcome is complete metabolic response by PET-CT at 24 weeks using the Deauville 5-point scale and Lugano 2014 criteria. Secondary outcomes include overall metabolic response, progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, and quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5 L and FACT-Lym. The trial employs an innovative Bayesian design with a target sample size of 284 patients: 95 in the ICT arm and 189 in the novel therapy arms.DiscussionWhilst there are many promising novel drugs in early clinical development for rrFL, understanding the relative efficacy and safety of these agents, and their place in modern treatment pathways, is limited by a lack of randomised trials and dearth of published outcomes for standard regimens to act as historic controls. Therefore, the aim of REFRACT is to provide an efficient platform to evaluate novel agents against standard therapies for rrFL. The adaptive Bayesian power prior methodology design will minimise patient numbers and accelerate trial delivery.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05848765; 08-May-2023.EudraCT2022-000677-75; 10-Feb-2022.

Overall Survival From the EORTC LCG-1613 APPLE Trial of Osimertinib Versus Gefitinib Followed by Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Osimertinib has been established as a standard of care for patients with common sensitizing EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) although the sequential approach (first-generation inhibitor gefitinib followed by osimertinib) has not been formally compared. The phase II APPLE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02856893) enrolled 156 treatment-naïve patients, and two treatment strategies were evaluated: osimertinib up front or the sequential treatment approach with gefitinib up front followed by osimertinib at the time of progression, either molecular progression (detection of plasma T790M resistance mutation) regardless of the radiologic status or just at the time of radiologic progression. Patients' characteristics were well balanced, except for the higher proportion of baseline brain metastases in the sequential approach (29% v 19%). Per protocol, 73% of patients switched to osimertinib in the sequential arm. Up-front treatment with osimertinib was associated with a lower risk of brain progression versus the sequential approach (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.34 to 0.86]), but a comparable overall survival was observed between both strategies (HR, 1.01 [90% CI, 0.61 to 1.68]), with the 18-month survival probability of 84% and 82.3%, respectively. The APPLE trial suggests that a sequential treatment approach is associated with more frequent progression in the brain but a similar survival in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) Versus Sequential Boost in Anal Cancer Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of care for the treatment of anal cancer. Radiation can be delivered by sequential or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) approach. The present study was conducted to compare the treatment outcomes and toxicity profile of patients with anal cancer treated with sequential boost and SIB approach. A single-institution retrospective analysis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal treated between 2019 and 2022 with radical chemoradiation was performed. The sequential boost schedule consisted of 45Gy in 25 fractions (1.8Gy daily) to the gross tumor, nodes, and elective nodal volume, followed by a 9Gy in five fractions boost to the gross disease. Patients receiving SIB were treated as per RTOG 0529 protocol. In both the groups, patients were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The two groups were compared in terms of overall survival (OS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and acute toxicity profile. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The patient and disease characteristics in both treatment arms were comparable. The only difference was a significantly longer overall treatment time of ≥ 50days in the sequential arm (77.8% vs 43.8%, p = 0.04). The median follow-up was 18months. The 2-year CFS was 80% in sequential vs 87.5% at 2years for the SIB arm, 2-year OS 83.3% vs 58.6%, and 2-year RFS was 38.9% vs 41.7%, respectively. A total of 14 (77.8%) in sequential and 8 (50%) in the SIB arm had disease relapse. On univariate analysis, the involved pelvic lymph node significantly affected OS (HR 10.45, p = 0.03) while inguinal lymph node involvement adversely affected RFS (HR 6.16, p = 0.02). The most common acute toxicity was radiation-induced dermatitis, 15 (83.4%; 5 grade II, 10 grade III) in sequential vs 7 (43.8%; 3 each grade II and III) in the SIB group followed by hematological (61.1% vs 68.75%). However, the incidence of overall acute toxicities was significantly less in the SIB arm (p = 0.006). Our study showed that concurrent chemoradiation with the SIB-VMAT approach is well tolerated in patients of anal carcinoma and resulted in lesser treatment interruptions and comparable outcomes as compared to the sequential approach. Our results warrant further evaluation in a prospective study.

Moderators of a Diet and Physical Activity Intervention: who Responds Best to Sequential vs. Simultaneous Approaches.

Given that low physical activity levels and poor dietary intake are co-occurring risk factors for chronic disease, there is a need for interventions that target both health behaviors, either sequentially or simultaneously. Little is known about participant characteristics that are associated with better or worse response to sequential and simultaneous interventions. The 12-month Counseling Advice for Lifestyle Management (CALM) randomized trial (N = 150; Mage = 55.3years) targeted these two behaviors either via a sequential approach - dietary advice first then exercise advice added ("Diet-First") or exercise advice first then dietary advice added ("Exercise-First") - or via a simultaneous approach. The objective was to examine demographic, clinical, and psychosocial moderators of intervention effects on 12-month change in (1) moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), (2) fruit/vegetable intake, (3) caloric intake from saturated fat, and (4) weight. Hierarchical regressions first compared Diet-First to Exercise-First, followed by comparisons of these arms combined ("sequential") to the simultaneous arm. Older age, higher baseline BMI, and lower social support were associated with higher MVPA in Exercise-First vs. Diet-First, while lower tangible support was associated with higher fruit/vegetable intake in Exercise-First but not in Diet-First. Poor sleep was associated with higher levels of MVPA in the sequential arm than in the simultaneous arm. Lower vitality was associated with greater weight loss in the sequential arm than in the simultaneous arm, while the opposite was true for those who were not married. Identifying moderators of treatment response can allow the behavioral medicine field to enhance intervention efficacy by matching participant subgroups to their best-fitting interventions. NCT00131105.

Surgical outcomes after chemotherapy plus nivolumab and chemotherapy plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with non–small cell lung cancer

ObjectiveChemotherapy plus nivolumab is the standard of care neoadjuvant treatment for patients with resectable stage IB to IIIA non–small cell lung cancer. The influence of dual checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy on surgical outcomes remains unknown. We aimed to determine operative complexity and perioperative outcomes associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and nivolumab with or without ipilimumab. MethodsA total of 44 patients with stage IB (≥4 cm) to IIIA non–small cell lung cancer were treated on sequential platform arms of the NEOSTAR trial. A total of 22 patients were treated with nivolumab + chemotherapy, and 22 patients were treated with ipilimumab + nivolumab + chemotherapy. The safety of surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy was estimated using 30-day complication rates. Operative reports and surgeons' narratives were evaluated to determine procedural complexity and operative conduct. ResultsAll 22 of 22 patients (100%) treated with nivolumab + chemotherapy underwent surgical resection: 20 R0 (90.9%), 17 (77.3%) lobectomies, 1 wedge resection, 2 segmentectomies, and 2 pneumonectomies. The majority, 21 of 22 (95%), were performed by thoracotomy. A total of 13 of 22 (59.1%) were rated as challenging resections. A total of 4 of 22 patients (18.2%) experienced grade 3 or greater Clavien-Dindo complication. A total of 20 of 22 patients (90.9%) treated with ipilimumab + nivolumab + chemotherapy underwent surgical resection: 19 R0 (95%), 18 (90%) lobectomies, 1 pneumonectomy, and 1 segmentectomy. A total of 16 of 20 (80%) resections were performed via thoracotomy, 3 of 20 (15%) via robotics, and 1 of 20 (5%) via thoracoscopy. A total of 9 of 20 (45%) resections were considered challenging. A total of 4 of 20 patients (20%) experienced grade 3 or greater Clavien-Dindo complication. ConclusionsSurgical resections are feasible and safe, with high rates of R0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and nivolumab with or without ipilimumab. Overall, approximately half of cases (22/42, 52.3%) were considered to be more challenging than a standard lobectomy.

A phase I study of bintrafusp alfa and NHS-IL12 (M9241) alone and in combination with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with metastatic genitourinary (GU) malignancies.

4571 Background: Bintrafusp alfa is a novel bifunctional fusion protein targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β which has demonstrated clinical efficacy in some tumor types and a manageable safety profile. M9241 is an immunocytokine that allows targeting of the pro-inflammatory IL-12 cytokine to exposed DNA in necrotic portions of tumors. SBRT can help promote anti-tumor responses and may potentially synergize with immunotherapy by inducing DNA damage. Methods: This is an open label, non-randomized, three arm phase I trial of bintrafusp alfa and M9241 combination therapy administered alone (Arm 1), or with either sequential (Arm 2), or concurrent (Arm 3) SBRT. Eligible patients must have metastatic non-prostate GU cancers with measurable disease. Bintrafusp alfa was used at a flat dose of 1200mg (q2w) for arms 1-3 and a fixed dose of SBRT (24Gy in 3 fractions) was used for arms 2-3. M9241 was administered at 16.8mcg/kg (q4w) for Arm 1 and decreased if side effects occur. Arm 1 used bintrafusp alfa and M9241 alone, with the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of M9241 being dose level 1 (DL1) for Arm 2. Arm 2 used SBRT followed by bintrafusp alfa and M9241, with the MTD of M9241 being DL1 for Arm 3. Arm 3 used concurrent SBRT with bintrafusp alfa and M9241. The primary objective was to determine the safety and highest tolerable doses of each arm. Secondary objectives include objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Study enrollment began in 12/2019, with interim safety analyses performed quarterly. A total of 16 patients have enrolled, 12 in Arm 1, three in Arm 2, and one in Arm 3 at data cutoff 1/2/23. The first six patients enrolled in Arm 1 had no DLTs allowing Arm 2 to open, Arm 2 had no DLTs after 3 patients enrolled allowing Arm 3 to open. At data cut off four of 16 patients remained on treatment. The median age was 63 and 19% were female. The most frequent TRAEs were fatigue (grade 2, 38%), lipase increase (grade 2+3, 31%), and anemia (grade 2+3, 31%). Grade 3 hematuria occurred in 2 patients (13%); a grade 4 creatinine increase occurred in one (8%). There were no grade 5 TRAEs. Two (13%) patients had treatment discontinued and 5 (31%) had dose reductions due to AEs. Of the 16 patients enrolled on study, 11 were evaluable at data cutoff. Currently three patients (38%) on Arm 1 and one patient (50%) in Arm 2 had objective responses, corresponding to an ORR of 36.4% (4/11). All responses have been partial responses. On Arm 1 the responding patients included one with small cell carcinoma of the renal pelvis, one with Leydig cell tumor, and one with urothelial carcinoma. On Arm 2 the responding patient had a Sertoli cell tumor. Conclusions: The use of bintrafusp alfa and M9241 either alone or in combination with sequential or concurrent SBRT has shown clinical activity in pts with GU tumors and has not been associated with any DLTs. Clinical trial information: NCT04235777 .

Ten-year distant-recurrence risk prediction in breast cancer by CanAssist Breast (CAB) in Dutch sub-cohort of the randomized TEAM trial

BackgroundHormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2/neu-negative breast cancers have a sustained risk of recurrence up to 20 years from diagnosis. TEAM (Tamoxifen, Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational) is a large, multi-country, phase III trial that randomized 9776 women for the use of hormonal therapy. Of these 2754 were Dutch patients. The current study aims for the first time to correlate the ten-year clinical outcomes with predictions by CanAssist Breast (CAB)—a prognostic test developed in South East Asia, on a Dutch sub-cohort that participated in the TEAM. The total Dutch TEAM cohort and the current Dutch sub-cohort were almost similar with respect to patient age and tumor anatomical features.MethodsOf the 2754 patients from the Netherlands, which are part of the original TEAM trial, 592 patients’ samples were available with Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC). The risk stratification of CAB was correlated with outcomes of patients using logistic regression approaches entailing Kaplan–Meier survival curves, univariate and multivariate cox-regression hazards model. We used hazard ratios (HRs), the cumulative incidence of distant metastasis/death due to breast cancer (DM), and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFi) for assessment.ResultsOut of 433 patients finally included, the majority, 68.4% had lymph node-positive disease, while only a minority received chemotherapy (20.8%) in addition to endocrine therapy. CAB stratified 67.5% of the total cohort as low-risk [DM = 11.5% (95% CI, 7.6–15.2)] and 32.5% as high-risk [DM = 30.2% (95% CI, 21.9–37.6)] with an HR of 2.90 (95% CI, 1.75–4.80; P < 0.001) at ten years. CAB risk score was an independent prognostic factor in the consideration of clinical parameters in multivariate analysis. At ten years, CAB high-risk had the worst DRFi of 69.8%, CAB low-risk in the exemestane monotherapy arm had the best DRFi of 92.7% [vs CAB high-risk, HR, 0.21 (95% CI, 0.11–0.43), P < 0.001], and CAB low-risk in the sequential arm had a DRFi of 84.2% [vs CAB high-risk, HR, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.28–0.82), P = 0.009].ConclusionsCost-effective CAB is a statistically robust prognostic and predictive tool for ten-year DM for postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2−, early breast cancer. CAB low-risk patients who received exemestane monotherapy had an excellent ten-year DRFi.

Screening for Tuberculosis Infection among Migrants: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Italian Context.

Screening of tuberculosis infection (TBI) among migrants from high-incidence countries is a cornerstone of tuberculosis control in low-incidence countries. However, the optimal screening strategy has not been defined yet. A quasi-experimental study involving migrants residing in the province of Brescia was carried out that aimed at assessing the completion rate, time to completion, preventive treatment initiation rate, and cost-effectiveness of two strategies for TBI screening. They underwent TBI screening with the IGRA-only strategy (arm 1) or with the sequential strategy (tuberculin skin test, TST, followed by IGRA in case of a positive result-arm 2). The two strategies were compared in terms of screening completion, time to complete the screening process, therapy initiation, and cost-effectiveness. Between May 2019 and May 2022, 657 migrants were evaluated, and 599 subjects were included in the study, with 358 assigned to arm 1 and 237 to arm 2. Screening strategy was the only factor associated with screening completion in a multivariable analysis, with the subjects assigned to the IGRA-only strategy more likely to complete the screening cascade (n = 328, 91.6% vs. n = 202, 85.2%, IRR 1.08, 95% CI (1.01-1.14), p = 0.019). The time to complete the screening process was significantly longer for patients assigned to the sequential strategy arm (74 days vs. 46 days, p = 0.002). Therapy initiation did not significantly differ between the two arms, and cost-effectiveness was higher for the sequential strategy. Sequential strategy implementation for TBI screening among migrants may be justified by its higher cost-effectiveness in spite of the lower completion of the screening cascade.

Randomized Trial of Facilitated Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy vs Sequential Fecal-Based Blood Test

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines include screening colonoscopy and sequential high-sensitivity fecal occult blood testing (HSgFOBT), with expectation of similar effectiveness based on the assumption of similar high adherence. However, adherence to screening colonoscopy compared with sequential HSgFOBT has not been reported. In this randomized clinical trial, we assessed adherence and pathology findings for a single screening colonoscopy vs sequential and nonsequential HSgFOBTs. Participants aged 40-69 years were enrolled at 3 centers representing different clinical settings. Participants were randomized into a single screening colonoscopy arm vs sequential HSgFOBT arm composed of 4-7 rounds. Initial adherence to screening colonoscopy and sequential adherence to HSgFOBT, follow-up colonoscopy for positive HSgFOBT tests, crossover to colonoscopy, and detection of advanced neoplasia or large serrated lesions (ADN-SERs) were measured. There were 3523 participants included in the trial; 1761 and 1762 participants were randomized to the screening colonoscopy and HSgFOBT arms, respectively. Adherence was 1473 (83.6%) for the screening colonoscopy arm vs 1288 (73.1%) for the HSgFOBT arm after 1 round (relative risk [RR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.10-1.19; P ≤ .001), but only 674 (38.3%) over 4 sequential HSgFOBT rounds (RR, 2.19; 95% CI, 2.05-2.33). Overall adherence to any screening increased to 1558 (88.5%) in the screening colonoscopy arm during the entire study period and 1493 (84.7%) in the HSgFOBT arm (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07). Four hundred thirty-six participants (24.7%) crossed over to screening colonoscopy during the first 4 rounds. ADN-SERs were detected in 121 of the 1473 participants (8.2%) in the colonoscopy arm who were adherent to protocol in the first 12 months of the study, whereas detection of ADN-SERs among those who were not sequentially adherent (n= 709) to HSgFOBT was subpar (0.6%) (RR, 14.72; 95% CI, 5.46-39.67) compared with those who were sequentially adherent (3.3%) (n= 647) (RR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.61-3.98) to HSgFOBT in the first 4 rounds. When including colonoscopies from HSgFOBT patients who were never positive yet crossed over (n= 1483), 5.5% of ADN-SERs were detected (RR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.15-1.96) in the first 4 rounds. Observed adherence to sequential rounds of HSgFOBT was suboptimal compared with a single screening colonoscopy. Detection of ADN-SERs was inferior when nonsequential HSgFOBT adherence was compared with sequential adherence. However, the greatest number of ADN-SERs was detected among those who crossed over to colonoscopy and opted to receive a colonoscopy. The effectiveness of an HSgFOBT screening program may be enhanced if crossover to screening colonoscopy is permitted. gov, Number: NCT00102011.

Frontal theta reveals further information about neural valence-dependent processing of augmented feedback in extensive motor practice-A secondary analysis.

Supplementing an earlier analysis of event-related potentials in extensive motor learning (Margraf et al.,2022a, 2022b), frontal theta-band activity (4-8Hz) was scrutinized. Thirty-seven participants learned a sequential arm movement with 192 trials in each of five practice sessions. Feedback, based on a performance adaptive bandwidth, was given after every trial. Electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded in the first and last practice sessions. The degree of motor automatization was tested under dual-task conditions in a pre-test-post-test design. Quantitative error information was transported in both feedback conditions (positive and negative). Frontal theta activity was discussed as a general signal that cognitive control is needed and, therefore, was expected to be higher after negative feedback. Extensive motor practice promotes automatization, and therefore, decreased frontal theta activity was expected in the later practice. Further, it was expected that frontal theta was predictive for subsequent behavioural adaptations and the amount of motor automatization. As the results show, induced frontal theta power was higher after negative feedback and decreased after five sessions of practice. Moreover, induced theta activity was predictive for error correction and, therefore, an indicator of whether the recruited cognitive resources successfully induced behavioural adaptations. It remains to be solved why these effects, which fit well with the theoretical assumptions, were only revealed by the induced part of frontal theta activity. Further, the amount of theta activity during practice was not predictive for the degree of motor automatization. It seems that there might be a dissociation between attentional resources associated with feedback processing and attentional resources associated with motor control.

Neoadjuvant treatment for stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma.

Neoadjuvant treatment for stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma.

Using joint models to study the association between CD4 count and the risk of death in TB/HIV data

BackgroundThe association structure linking the longitudinal and survival sub-models is of fundamental importance in the joint modeling framework and the choice of this structure should be made based on the clinical background of the study. However, this information may not always be accessible and rationale for selecting this association structure has received relatively little attention in the literature. To this end, we aim to explore four alternative functional forms of the association structure between the CD4 count and the risk of death and provide rationale for selecting the optimal association structure for our data. We also aim to compare the results obtained from the joint model to those obtained from the time-varying Cox model.MethodsWe used data from the Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) AIDS Treatment programme, the Starting Antiretroviral Therapy at Three Points in Tuberculosis (SAPiT) study, an open-label, three armed randomised, controlled trial between June 2005 and July 2010 (N=642). In our analysis, we combined the early and late integrated arms and compared results to the sequential arm. We utilized the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) to select the final model with the best structure, with smaller values indicating better model adjustments to the data.ResultsPatient characteristics were similar across the study arms. Combined integrated therapy arms had a reduction of 55% in mortality (HR:0.45, 95% CI:0.28-0.72) compared to the sequential therapy arm. The joint model with a cumulative effects functional form was chosen as the best association structure. In particular, our joint model found that the area under the longitudinal profile of CD4 count was strongly associated with a 21% reduction in mortality (HR:0.79, 95% CI:0.72-0.86). Where as results from the time-varying Cox model showed a 19% reduction in mortality (HR:0.81, 95% CI:0.77-0.84).ConclusionsIn this paper we have shown that the “current value” association structure is not always the best structure that expresses the correct relationship between the outcomes in all settings, which is why it is crucial to explore alternative clinically meaningful association structures that links the longitudinal and survival processes.