Abstract

e18026 Background: Head and neck cancer is the third most frequent cancer in Indian men, it is a growing public health problem. Given the numerous disparities in head and neck cancer biology, etiologic and demography between the developing world and the developed world, management guidelines should be based on Indian literature rather than western data. This study aims to define role of Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer In Indian population by comparing the outcomes which are Overall response rate (O.R.R), Progression free survival (P.F.S), overall survival (O.S) between patients who received Induction chemotherapy followed by CTRT vs CTRT. Methods: Patients who were registered for treatment between jan-2018 to dec-2022 who met the selection criteria were included for the study. Selection criteria: Patients who were diagnosed with Stage III OR IV (a & b, non-metastatic) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma from age group of 20 to 70 who were HPV negative or unknown status were included for study. Total of 50 patients were chosen for the study after stringent selection criteria. Out of 50 ,23 patients received Induction chemotherapy and 27 patients received only CTRT. Results: Overall response rate was analysed using Interim PET CT after Induction chemotherapy and PET CT after 3 to 6 months of CTRT. Complete response and partial response is considered as ORR. It was observed that ORR in sequential therapy arm is 42% and only CTRT arm is 36%, however this is not statistically significant with p value of 0.54. Median PFS for CTRT arm is 8 months and median PFS for IC +CTRT arm is 12 months with p value = 0.97(>0.05) (Log rank test) which is not statistically significant. Median OS for CTRT is 60 months and IC+ CTRT is 18 months. The log rank test has been used for comparing the overall survival outcomes of both the groups , and thus the p-value obtained is 0.56(>0.05), which shows that there is no statistically significant difference in the survival outcome of the two groups. Conclusions: In conclusion, our study on induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer did not identify statistically significant differences in O.R.R, PFS and OS between the two treatment arms which is concordant with MACH- NC updated 2021 data. Several factors, including patient heterogeneity, sample size, treatment protocol, follow-up, duration, may have contributed to these results, it is essential to interpret these results in the context of the study's limitations. [Table: see text]

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.