Septic Shock Patients Research Articles

Incidence of mortality and its predictors among septic shock patients admitted to the intensive care unit of comprehensive specialized hospitals in the northwest of Amhara, Ethiopia

IntroductionSeptic shock is a global health issue causing high mortality rates in intensive care units, with limited evidence in Africa, including Ethiopia, regarding its incidence and predictors. The aim of this study was assess the incidence and predictors of mortality among patients with septic shock admitted to the ICU of Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals of the Northwest Amhara region.MethodsA study involving 386 ICU patients with septic shock from 2019 to 2023 was conducted using a random sampling method and structured data extraction tool. Data was analyzed using EpiData and STATA, with variables selected for multivariate analysis.ResultThe overall incidence rate of septic shock was 10.4 per 100-person day of observation with a median survival time of 7, days and the proportion of deaths during the study period was 58.29%. In multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis, age 40–59 years (HR: 1.77, p = 0.005), age > 60 years (HR: 3.52, p < 0.001), delay ICU admission (HR: 1.93, p = 0.001), low MAP (HR: 2.56, p < 0.001), comorbidity (HR: 2.74, p < 0.001), complication (HR: 1.87, p = 0.012), ALF (HR: 1.84, p = 0.037), no pathogen identification (HR: 1.69, p = 0.035) were found significant predictors of mortality for patients with septic shock in the ICU.ConclusionThe incidence of mortality in patients with septic shock admitted to the ICU was high and the main predictors were age> 60 years, low MAP, comorbidity, and delay ICU admission >6 h, Hence, Early recognition and appropriate treatment recommended by the International Sepsis Survival Campaign guideline should be implemented.

Circulating Nucleosomes as a Novel Biomarker for Sepsis: A Scoping Review.

Circulating nucleosome levels are commonly elevated in physiological and pathological conditions. Their potential as biomarkers for diagnosing and prognosticating sepsis remains uncertain due, in part, to technical limitations in existing detection methods. This scoping review explores the possible role of nucleosome concentrations in the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic management of sepsis. A comprehensive literature search of the Cochrane and Medline libraries from 1996 to 1 February 2024 identified 110 potentially eligible studies, of which 19 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 39 SIRS patients, 893 sepsis patients, 280 septic shock patients, 117 other ICU control patients, and 345 healthy volunteers. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] was the primary method of nucleosome measurement. Studies consistently reported significant correlations between nucleosome levels and other NET biomarkers. Nucleosome levels were higher in patients with sepsis than in healthy volunteers and associated with disease severity, as indicated by SOFA and APACHE II scores. Non-survivors had higher nucleosome levels than survivors. Circulating nucleosome levels, therefore, show promise as early markers of NETosis in sepsis, with moderate diagnostic accuracy and strong correlations with disease severity and prognosis. However, the available evidence is drawn mainly from single-center, observational studies with small sample sizes and varied detection methods, warranting further investigation.

Enhancing SAPS-3 Predictive Accuracy with Initial, Peak, and Last Lactate Measurements in Septic Shock.

Background/Objectives: Septic shock is a severe condition with high mortality necessitating precise prognostic tools for improved patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the collective predictive value of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS-3) and lactate measurements (initial, peak, last, and clearance rates within the first 24 h) in patients with septic shock. Specifically, it sought to determine how these markers enhance predictive accuracy for 28-day mortality beyond SAPS-3 alone. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 66 septic shock patients at two ICUs of Vienna General Hospital (2017-2019). SAPS-3 and lactate levels (initial, peak, last measurement within 24 h, and 24 h clearance) were obtained from electronic health records. Logistic regression models were constructed to identify predictors of 28-day mortality, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves assessed predictive accuracy. Results: Among 66 patients, 36 (55%) died within 28 days. SAPS-3 scores significantly differed between survivors and non-survivors (76 vs. 85 points; p = 0.016). First, last, and peak lactate were significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (all p < 0.001). The combination of SAPS-3 and first lactate produced the highest predictive accuracy (AUC = 80.6%). However, 24 h lactate clearance was not predictive of mortality. Conclusions: Integrating SAPS-3 with lactate measurements, particularly first lactate, improves predictive accuracy for 28-day mortality in septic shock patients. First lactate serves as an early, robust prognostic marker, providing crucial information for clinical decision-making and care prioritization. Further large-scale studies are needed to refine these predictive tools and validate their efficacy in guiding treatment strategies.

Exploring the optimal range of central venous pressure in sepsis and septic shock patients: A retrospective study in 208 hospitals

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the optimal CVP range in sepsis and septic shock patients admitted to intensive care unit. MethodsWe performed a retrospective study with adult sepsis patients with CVP records based on the eICU Collaborative Research Database. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to explore the associations between CVP level and hospital mortality. Non-linear correlations and optimal CVP range were explored using restricted cubic splines (RCS). ResultsA total of 5302 sepsis patients were included in this study. Patients in 4-8 mmHg group owned the lowest odds ratio for raw hospital mortality (19.7%). The logistic regression analyses revealed that hospital death risk increased significantly when mean CVP level exceeds 12 mmHg compared to 4-8 mmHg level. U-shaped association of CVP with hospital mortality was revealed by RCS model in septic shock patients and the optimal range was 5.6-12 mmHg. While, there was a J-shaped trend for non-septic shock patients. For non-septic shock patients, patients had an increased risk of hospital death only if CVP exceeded 11 mmHg. ConclusionsWe observed U-shaped association between mean CVP level and hospital mortality in septic shock patients and J-shaped association in non-septic shock patients. This may imply that patients with different severity of sepsis have different CVP requirements. We need to monitor and manage CVP according to the circulatory status of the sepsis patient.

Association of chronic or acute systolic and diastolic heart failure with incidence rates of pneumonia, sepsis, and septic shock in patients with lung cancer.

e24005 Background: Systolic heart failure (SHF) and diastolic heart failure (DHF) can lead to volume overload and cause pulmonary venous congestion and pulmonary edema. While an association between lung cancer (LC) and increased infection rates is well established, we investigated whether chronic SHF or DHF, as well as acute SHF or DHF in concomitance with LC, influenced the incidence of pneumonia (PNA), sepsis, and septic shock. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted by obtaining patients with LC by applying specific ICD 10 codes (C34.0 - C34.9 including all sub-codes) from the National Inpatient Sample 2019-2020. Among this cohort, patients with acute and chronic SHF or DHF were further identified by applying specific ICD 10 codes ((I50.1 - I50.4 including all sub-codes). Pneumonia, sepsis, and septic shock outcomes were compared between LC patients with each of these types of heart failures versus those without using multivariate regression analysis (MVRA), adjusting for demographic factors, hospital-specific characteristics, common comorbidities and alcohol, smoking, or substance use. Results: 802,230 patients were identified with LC. 48.7% were female. 77.9% were Caucasian, 12.8% were African American, 4.6% were Hispanic, and 3.5% belonged to other ethnicities. Patients with LC and chronic SHF (n = 25880) had no significant difference in rates of PNA [Adjusted (Ad) odds ratio (OR): 0.9, p = 0.13] and sepsis (Ad OR: 0.9, p = 0.59) but had higher rates of septic shock (Ad OR: 1.4, p &lt; 0.001) compared to those LC patients without any heart failure (HF). Patients with LC who had acute SHF (n = 22295) showed higher rates of PNA (Ad OR: 1.4, p &lt; 0.001), sepsis (Ad OR: 1.5, p &lt; 0.001), as well as septic shock (Ad OR: 1.6, p &lt; 0.001) versus those without any HF. Patients with LC and concurrent chronic DHF (n = 31580) had similar rates of PNA (Ad OR: 1, p = 0.64), sepsis (Ad OR: 1.1, p = 0.62) and septic shock (Ad OR: 1, p = 0.77) compared to LC patients without any HF. However, acute DHF (n = 24080) led to a higher incidence of PNA (Ad OR: 1,4, p &lt; 0.001) and sepsis (Ad OR: 1.2, p = 0.05) in patients with LC, but no difference in the incidence of septic shock (Ad OR: 0.8, p = 0.072). Conclusions: Chronic SHF led to an increased incidence of septic shock, whereas acute SHF was associated with accentuated rates of PNA, sepsis, and septic shock in patients with LC. Chronic DHF did not predict an increased risk of infections; however, acute DHF was associated with enhanced rates of PNA and sepsis. Future investigations may focus on the effect of SHF or DHF on outcomes beyond hospitalization in patients with LC and the subtypes of LC and infection risk. Based on this signal-finding analysis, it may be postulated that early inter-disciplinary collaboration between oncology and cardiology may be crucial in managing patients with heart failure and LC and potentially lead to better patient outcomes.

Impact of Iron Profile and Vitamin D Levels on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Cross-sectional Analysis at a Tertiary Care Center.

Sepsis is a major global health affecting millions worldwide, hence understanding its contributing factors becomes paramount. This cross-sectional study at a tertiary care center explores the relationship between iron profile, vitamin D levels, and outcomes in sepsis and septic shock patients. The primary objective was to explore the prevalence of iron profile and vitamin D parameters during early intensive care unit (ICU) admission and their association with 28-day mortality. Spanning 18 months, the study enrolled adult patients meeting sepsis or septic shock criteria at the ICU. Data collection included demographic information, clinical characteristics, and blood samples for iron profile and vitamin D levels at admission. Disease severity was assessed using sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, and treatment was administered as per surviving sepsis-3 guidelines. The research involved 142 participants, uncovering prevalent organisms such as Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Noteworthy connections to mortality were identified for factors including vasopressor support, ICU stay duration, SOFA score, and APACHE-II score. Interestingly, age, gender, and vitamin D levels showed no significant associations. However, the study did reveal a significant association between iron, ferritin, and transferrin saturation levels with increased 28-day mortality. Our study concluded that low Iron, elevated ferritin, and decreased transferrin saturation levels maintained associations with the outcome of interest. While no such relationship was established with vitamin D levels. These results suggest potential implications for patient management and prognosis, warranting further exploration in future research. Bairwa M, Jatteppanavar B, Kant R, Singh M, Choudhury A. Impact of Iron Profile and Vitamin D Levels on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Cross-sectional Analysis at a Tertiary Care Center. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(6):569-574.

Association between prehospital ROX index with 30-day mortality among septic shock

PurposeRespiratory dysfunction is one of the most frequent symptoms observed during sepsis reflecting hypoxemia and/or acidosis that may be assessed by the ROX index (ratio of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen to respiratory rate). This study aimed to describe the relationship between the prehospital ROX index and 30-day mortality rate among septic shock patients cared for in the prehospital setting by a mobile intensive care unit (MICU).MethodsFrom May 2016 to December 2021, 530 septic shock patients cared for by a prehospital MICU were retrospectively analysed. Initial ROX index value was calculated at the first contact with MICU. A Cox regression analysis after propensity score matching was performed to assess the relationship between 30-day mortality rate and a ROX index ≤ 10.ResultsPulmonary, digestive and urinary sepsis were suspected among 43%, 25% and 17% patients, respectively. The 30-day overall mortality reached 31%. Cox regression analysis showed a significant association between 30-day mortality and a ROX index ≤ 10: adjusted hazard ratio of 1.54 [1.08–2.31], p < 0.05.ConclusionsDuring the prehospital stage of septic shock patients cared for by a MICU, ROX index is significantly associated with 30-day mortality. A prehospital ROX ≤ 10 value is associated with a 1.5-fold 30-day mortality rate increase. Prospective studies are needed to confirm the ability of prehospital ROX to predict sepsis outcome since the prehospital setting.

Enhancing Survival in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Plasma Exchange Therapy.

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that occurs when the body's immune response to infection becomes unregulated, causing organ dysfunction and a heightened risk of mortality. Despite increased awareness campaigns, its prevalence escalates, annually afflicting over 1.7 million adults in the United States. This research explores the potential of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in septic shock management, aiming to highlight its capacity to improve patient outcomes and reduce mortality. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, our comprehensive search across 51,534 studies, using keywords such as plasmapheresis, plasma exchange therapy, therapeutic plasma exchange, septic shock, and reduction in mortality integrated with medical subject headings terms, led to the meticulous selection of six pivotal studies. Through rigorous evaluation with tools such as the revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and Assessment of Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews, we extracted strong evidence supporting TPE's significant impact on decreasing mortality in septic shock patients compared to standard care, as demonstrated in three randomized controlled trials and one cohort study, with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.43 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.26-0.72). Additionally, two meta-analyses further validate TPE's effectiveness, showing a mortality reduction with an OR of 0.30 (95% CI = 0.20-0.46). This advantage also extends to critically ill COVID-19 patients, underscoring TPE's crucial role in modulating the coagulation cascade, decreasing sepsis-related complications, and reducing the risk of bleeding and organ failure. Nevertheless, the benefits of TPE must be carefully balanced against potential risks such as hypocalcemia, hypotension, and citrate toxicity, especially in patients with underlying renal or liver issues, emphasizing the importance of shared decision-making. While TPE emerges as a promising therapy, its formal integration into standard care protocols awaits further confirmation, highlighting the critical need for more in-depth research to conclusively determine its efficacy and safety in septic shock management.

Combating bacterial resistance to Meropenem by infusion strategy applied to septic burn patients with vasopressor requirements or acute kidney injury to achieve the target

Introduction: Faced with the growing challenge to the use of antimicrobials for the adequate and effective therapy of nosocomial infections, international health agencies have reinforced that combating bacterial resistance and preventing the development of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains are urgent, since a significant increase based on minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for therapeutic agents were reported by the committee of hospitals infection. Meropenem, a carbapenem agent, is widely prescribed for therapy of septic shock caused by susceptible Gram-negative bacteria. In general, the prolonged 3-hrs-infusion has been widely applied in these patients over the past 10 years providing coverage only against susceptible Gram-negative pathogens (MIC 2 mg/L), extended also to intermediate susceptible strains up to MIC 4 mg/L, according to Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI database). However, new strategies have been recommended to combat the development of resistance to pathogens isolated from cultures to increase the coverage of this carbapenem agent up to MIC 8 mg/L, to avoid mutant selection with death in ICU. Subject: Clinical protocol was carried out to investigate the efficacy &amp; safety of meropenem at the dose regimen recommended 1g q8h by prolonged infusion, based on serum levels and on cultures monitoring of isolates. Aim of protocol was to assess pharmacodynamics (PD) based on changes of pharmacokinetics (PK), which could affect the coverage of meropenem in septic burns patients with increased or decreased renal function. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) tools were applied to investigate efficacy &amp; safety. Methods-clinical protocol: Forty-eight major septic burn patients with high variability on renal function in ICU were included. Cultures were collected before meropenem therapy starts; all of them had nosocomial infection caused by Gram-negative pathogens isolated. Patients undergoing meropenem therapy at the initial stage of septic shock from day-0 to day-8 (D0-D8) and at the late stage of septic shock from day 8 to day 14 (D-8 to D-14) were investigated according to dose requirements based on creatinine clearance, drug serum levels (TDM), and coverage up to MIC 8 mg/L, dose dependent on renal function. Results: Coverage occurred for all patients of both groups after the extended infusion against susceptible Gram-negative strains up to MIC 2 mg/L (minimum inhibitory concentration), and up to MIC 4 mg/L, strains of intermediate susceptibility, according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, database) of our hospital. It was demonstrated in patients with renal function augmented by vasopressors, the superiority on coverage by trice that occurred in 24/27 patients (89%) after 4 hrs.-infusion at TDM3 against strains MIC 8 mg/L by comparison with coverage registered in 12/39 patients (30%) after 3 hrs.-infusion at TDM2. On the other hand, meropenem dose regimen must be adjusted to 1g q24h in patients with AKI to guarantee effectiveness &amp; safety in those patients. In addition, after continuous venovenous haemodialysis-filtration (CVVHDF) installed in those patients, meropenem PK/PD target was attained up to MIC 8 mg/L in patients with the empirical dose regimen recommended of 1g q8h, 3hrs.-infusion. Conclusion: Precision medicine guarantees meropenem serum levels combined with cultures monitoring; consequently, must be applied routinely to guarantee coverage against Gram-negative nosocomial pathogens susceptible including strains of intermediate susceptibility (MIC 4-8 mg/L) to avoid mutant selection. Therefore, effective, and safe antimicrobial therapy for patients in septic shock, combined with a continuous monitoring of inflammatory biomarkers, should guide clinical management to ensure cure with early ICU discharge.

Ultrasound Guided Measurement of Inferior Vena Cava Diameter, Common Carotid Artery Diameter versus Central Venous Pressure for Estimation of Intravascular Volume Status in Septic Shock Patients

Background: In critically ill patients, the fluid resuscitation is crucial and is the first step in treatment protocol. Invasive CVP measurement was used to guide fluid resuscitation. However, it is time consuming and invasive maneuver. Ultrasound measurement of inferior vena cave and common carotid arteries are suggest to predict the fluid response as well as CVP or even better. The current work designed to compare inferior vena cava diameter and common carotid artery diameter with central venous pressure for estimation of intravascular volume status in septic shock. Patients and Methods: The study included 60 subjects with septic shock who received vasopressor support. CVP and ultrasound were performed before and after fluid challenge test. Values of inferior vena cava and common carotid arteries were documented and compared to CVP values. This was performed after full clinical assessment by detailed clinical examination and laboratory workup. Results: The MAP was significantly increased and HR decreased after than before procedure. In addition, CVP, (inferior vena cava), ICVmax, ICV min and common carotid artery diameter (CCAD) were significantly increased, IVC CI (%) was significantly reduced after procedure than basal values. There was significant decrease of IVCmax, IVCmin and CCAD while there was significant increase of IVC CI% with lower (&lt;8) than higher (&gt; 8) CVP values. CVP was positively and significantly correlated with IVCmax, IVCmin and CCAD, while it was inversely correlated with IVC CI%. The AUC was over 0.75 for IVCmax, IVCmin and CCAD for prediction of CVP while it was lower than 0.7 for IVC CI%. These data reflected the better predictive power of IVCmax, IVCmin and CCAD. The best cutoff value was 1.35, 1.25, 10.45 and 4.15 for IVCmax, IVCmin, IVC CI% and CCAD successively. Conclusion: IVC and CCA diameters measurement by US may replace CVP measurement for estimation of intravascular volume status in septic shock patients.

The Combination of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Serum Procalcitonin has High Auxiliary Predictive Value for Short-Term Adverse Prognosis in Septic Shock Patients

BackgroundSeptic shock is the most serious complication of sepsis, with more secure and efficient biomarkers urgently needed. Systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and serum procalcitonin (PCT) show involvement in predicting septic shock prognosis. ObjectiveHerein, we explored the clinical value of the SII-PCT combination in the short-term prognosis of septic shock patients. MethodsTotally 200 septic shock patients were analyzed retrospectively and allocated into the survival and death groups upon 28-day in-hospital outcomes. Correlations of SII, PCT, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II)/sepsis-related organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum creatinine (Scr) were analyzed using Spearman. The influencing factors of SII and serum PCT for short-term poor prognosis were analyzed using logistic multivariate regression model. The auxiliary predictive value of SII, PCT, and their combination for short-term adverse septic shock prognosis was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve. Differences in the area under the curve (AUC) were compared using MedCalc. ResultsThe death group had higher APACHE II/SOFA scores, LYM, CRP, Scr, SII, and PCT levels than the survival group. SII and PCT were positively correlated with APACHE II and SOFA scores, LYM, CRP, and Scr, and were independent risk factors influencing the adverse septic shock prognosis. The AUC of the SII-PCT combination in predicting short-term adverse septic shock prognosis was 0.893 (0.841-0.932), with 76.12% sensitivity and 87.97% specificity, with the combination showing a higher AUC than SII/PCT alone. ConclusionsThe SII-PCT combination helps predict the adverse prognosis of septic shock patients.

Protocolized reduction of non-resuscitation fluids versus usual care in septic shock patients (REDUSE): a randomized multicentre feasibility trial

Background/purposeNon-resuscitation fluids constitute the majority of fluid administered for septic shock patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This multicentre, randomized, feasibility trial was conducted to test the hypothesis that a restrictive protocol targeting non-resuscitation fluids reduces the overall volume administered compared with usual care.MethodsAdults with septic shock in six Swedish ICUs were randomized within 12 h of ICU admission to receive either protocolized reduction of non-resuscitation fluids or usual care. The primary outcome was the total volume of fluid administered within three days of inclusion.ResultsMedian (IQR) total volume of fluid in the first three days, was 6008 ml (interquartile range [IQR] 3960–8123) in the restrictive fluid group (n = 44), and 9765 ml (IQR 6804–12,401) in the control group (n = 48); corresponding to a Hodges–Lehmann median difference of 3560 ml [95% confidence interval 1614–5302]; p < 0.001). Outcome data on all-cause mortality, days alive and free of mechanical ventilation and acute kidney injury or ischemic events in the ICU within 90 days of inclusion were recorded in 98/98 (100%), 95/98 (98%) and 95/98 (98%) of participants respectively. Cognition and health-related quality of life at six months were recorded in 39/52 (75%) and 41/52 (79%) of surviving participants, respectively. Ninety out of 134 patients (67%) of eligible patients were randomized, and 15/98 (15%) of the participants experienced at least one protocol violation.ConclusionProtocolized reduction of non-resuscitation fluids in patients with septic shock resulted in a large decrease in fluid administration compared with usual care. A trial using this design to test if reducing non-resuscitation fluids improves outcomes is feasible.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT05249088, 18 February 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05249088

Clinical usefulness of NT-proBNP as a prognostic factor for septic shock patients presenting to the emergency department

Plasma N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level is primarily used as a biomarker for left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. It is influenced by various conditions, such as myocardial strain and situations affecting the clearance of NT-proBNP, including sepsis and shock. In this study, we investigated the appropriateness of NT-proBNP as a prognostic factor for septic shock. Patients with septic shock who visited the emergency department of the Ewha Womans’ University Mokdong Hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were classified into the survival group (those who survived in the hospital and were discharged) and the death group (those who died in the hospital). The effectiveness of NT-proBNP, lactate, and blood urea nitrogen as predictive factors of in-hospital mortality was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. The AUROC curve was 0.678 and 0.648 for lactate and NT-proBNP, respectively, with lactate showing the highest value. However, there was no significant difference between lactate and NT-proBNP levels in the comparison of their AUROC curve (p = 0.6278). NT-proBNP could be a useful predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock who present to the emergency department.

Lactate Levels and Clearance: Key Predictors of Prognosis for COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Septic Shock Patients in the Emergency Department.

This investigation assesses the prognostic value of lactate levels and their clearance in septic shock patients, particularly emphasizing the comparative analysis between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients in the emergency department. This study aims to elucidate the unique prognostic implications of lactate dynamics in these distinct patient groups, thereby enhancing the management of septic shock. An observational prospective study was conducted, enrolling 114 septic shock patients from the Emergency County Hospital Resita, Romania, categorizing them into COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups to examine their initial lactate levels, clearance rates, and their correlation with patient outcomes. This study identified significant differences in the initial lactate levels and clearance rates between the two groups, indicating higher initial lactate levels and slower clearance rates in COVID-19 patients. Survivors demonstrated significantly lower initial lactate levels (1.5 ± 0.4 mmol/L) and higher lactate clearance rates (33 ± 15%) compared to non-survivors (2.5 ± 0.5 mmol/L and 24 ± 9%, respectively; lactate levels p = 0.001, clearance rates p = 0.002). Lactate monitoring, particularly clearance rates, is crucial in the prognostic assessment of septic shock patients. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions in COVID-19 patients to improve outcomes, underscoring lactate dynamics as a vital component of septic shock management in differing patient populations.

Risk Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism among Septic Shock Patients: Single versus Concurrent Insertion of Central Venous Catheters.

Background and Objectives: Thrombosis is a serious complication experienced by some hospitalized patients. While concurrent placement of two catheters (CVCs) in the same central vein offers several benefits in clinical settings, we aimed to investigate the role of this procedure in relation to the risk of thrombosis. Materials and Methods: Over a two-year retrospective analysis, we examined 114 patients with septic shock caused by a pulmonary infection, who underwent the insertion of one or more central lines into a central vein during their ICU stay. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the correlation between the Caprini risk score, the placement of two CVCs in the same vein, COVID-19 infection and the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Results: In total, 53% of the patients underwent the concurrent insertion of two CVCs. The placement of two CVCs in the same vein appears to elevate the VTE risk by 2.5 times (95% CI: 1.03-6.12). Logistic regression analysis indicated that hemodialysis catheters amplify the VTE risk by nearly five times, even when accounting for a series of factors (95% CI: 1.86-12.31). Conclusions: Our study suggests that the elevated risk of VTE is likely associated with the insertion of the hemodialysis catheters rather than solely the presence of two concurrent catheters.

Does Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affect Fluid Resuscitation Volume in Patients with Septic Shock: A Retrospective Review.

Fixed, large volume resuscitation with intravenous fluids (IVFs) in septic shock can cause inadvertent hypervolemia, increased medical interventions, and death when unguided by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The primary study objective was to evaluate whether total IVF volume differs for emergency department (ED) septic shock patients receiving POCUS versus no POCUS. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study from 7/1/2018 to 8/31/2021 of atraumatic adult ED patients with septic shock. We agreed upon a priori variables and defined septic shock as lactate ≥4 and hypotension (SBP <90 or MAP <65). A sample size of 300 patients would provide 85% power to detect an IVF difference of 500 milliliters between POCUS and non-POCUS cohorts. Data are reported as frequencies, median (IQR), and associations from bivariate logistic models. 304 patients met criteria and 26% (78/304) underwent POCUS. Cardiac POCUS demonstrated reduced ejection fraction in 15.4% of patients. Lung ultrasound showed normal findings in 53% of patients. The POCUS vs. non-POCUS cohorts had statistically significant differences for the following variables: higher median lactate (6.7 [IQR 5.2-8.7] vs. 5.6], p = 0.003), lower systolic blood pressure (77.5 [IQR 61-86] vs. 85.0, p < 0.001), more vasopressor use (51% vs. 34%, p = 0.006), and more positive pressure ventilation (38% vs. 24%, p = 0.017). However, there were no statistically significant differences between POCUS and non-POCUS cohorts in total IVF volume ml/kg (33.02 vs. 32.1, p = 0.47), new oxygen requirement (68% vs. 59%, p = 0.16), ED death (3% vs. 4%, p = 0.15), or hospital death (31% vs. 27%, p = 0.48). There were similar distributions of lactate, total fluids, and vasopressors in patients with CHF and severe renal failure. Among ED patients with septic shock, POCUS was more likely to be used in sicker patients. Patients who had POCUS were given similar volume of crystalloids although these patients were more critically ill. There were no differences in new oxygen requirement or mortality in the POCUS group compared to the non-POCUS group.

Trimatch comparison of the prognosis of hypochloremia, normolchloremia and hyperchloremia in patients with septic shock

BackgroundSeptic shock is a lethal disease, and identifying high-risk patients through noninvasive and widely available biomarkers can help improve global outcomes. While the clinical impact of chloride levels on critically ill patients remains unclear, this study aims to investigate the association between hypochloremia and mortality following ICU admission among septic shock patients. MethodsThis is an analysis of data stored in the databases of Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV). The initial chloride levels were classified ashypochloremia, normal chloraemia, and hyperchloraemia. A multivariate logistic regression model was applied, adjusting for age, lactate, pH, PO2, urine volume, RDW, creatinine, and liver disease, to assess the association between the three categories of chloride levels and mortality. ResultsOf 3726 patients included in the study, 470 patients (12.6%) had hypochloremia on ICU admission. During the follow-up period, 1120 (33.5%) patients died. Hypochloremia was significantly associated with increased mortality and the incidence of AKI after adjusting for several variables. ConclusionsHypochloremia is independently associated with higher hospital mortality, AKI incidence among septic shock patients. However, further high-quality research is necessary to establish the precise relationship between hypochloremia and septic shock prognosis.

Comparative efficacy of antioxidant therapies for sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit: A frequentist network meta-analysis

BackgroundAntioxidant therapy is gaining traction in managing sepsis and septic shock, owing to its perceived positive impact on patient outcomes. This study sought to compare the efficacy of five antioxidant therapies (melatonin, vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, and N-acetylcysteine, both individually and in combination with other compounds such as vitamin B1, hydrocortisone, propolis, and glutamine) in treating sepsis or septic shock in the intensive care unit (ICU). MethodsThe study involved randomized and multi-arm trials with sepsis or septic shock patients using melatonin, vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, or N-acetylcysteine. Studies were sourced from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO - Clinical Trials Registry Platform for the frequentist network meta-analysis on 28-day mortality and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. The risk of bias was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. Therapies were compared directly and indirectly using R software. ResultsThe study of 56 trials involving 9,366 patients was included. Bias assessment revealed that 89.3 % of trials achieved excellent or good quality. Based on treatment ranking and pairwise comparisons, melatonin with propolis (SUCRA = 93.29 %) is effective in improving SOFA scores, statistically significant, with no publication bias (p= 0.73). High-dose vitamin C (SUCRA = 83.97 %), vitamin C with vitamin B1 (SUCRA = 78.72 %), and melatonin (SUCRA = 67.03 %) are potential therapies for organ dysfunction. Melatonin (SUCRA = 88.22 %) and high-dose vitamin C (SUCRA = 80.75 %) were the most effective in reducing 28-day mortality rates. However, analysis indicated that the results for 28-day mortality rates were not statistically significant. Also, these results contained publication bias (p= 0.02). ConclusionThe study offers fresh perspectives on antioxidant therapy treatments for sepsis or septic shock in ICU, emphasizing the combination of melatonin and propolis notably reduces SOFA scores for those patients.

Central venous oxygen saturation changes as a reliable predictor of the change of CI in septic shock: To explore potential influencing factors

PurposeAssessing fluid responsiveness relying on central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) yields varied outcomes across several studies. This study aimed to determine the ability of the change in ScvO2 (ΔScvO2) to detect fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic shock patients and potential influencing factors. MethodsIn this prospective, single-center study, all patients conducted from February 2023 to January 2024 received fluid challenge. Oxygen consumption was measured by indirect calorimetry, and fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase of cardiac index (CI) ≥ 10% measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of oxygen consumption, arterial oxygen saturation, CI, and hemoglobin on ScvO2 and its change before and after fluid challenge. ResultsAmong 49 patients (31 men, aged (59 ± 18) years), 27 were responders. The patients had an acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score of 24 ± 8, a sequential organ failure assessment score of 11 ± 4, and a blood lactate level of (3.2 ± 3.1) mmol/L at enrollment. After the fluid challenge, the ΔScvO2 (mmHg) in the responders was greater than that in the non-responders (4 ± 6 vs. 1 ± 3, p = 0.019). Multivariate linear regression analysis suggested that CI was the only independent influencing factor of ScvO2, with R2 = 0.063, p = 0.008. After the fluid challenge, the change in CI became the only contributing factor to ΔScvO2 (R2 = 0.245, p < 0.001). ΔScvO2 had a good discriminatory ability for the responders and non-responders with a threshold of 4.4% (area under the curve = 0.732, p = 0.006). ConclusionΔScvO2 served as a reliable surrogate marker for ΔCI and could be utilized to assess fluid responsiveness, given that the change of CI was the sole contributing factor to the ΔScvO2. In stable hemoglobin conditions, the absolute value of ScvO2 could serve as a monitoring indicator for adequate oxygen delivery independent of oxygen consumption.

Adjunctive immunotherapeutic agents in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a multidisciplinary consensus of 23

BackgroundIn the last decades, several adjunctive treatments have been proposed to reduce mortality in septic shock patients. Unfortunately, mortality due to sepsis and septic shock remains elevated and NO trials evaluating adjunctive therapies were able to demonstrate any clear benefit. In light of the lack of evidence and conflicting results from previous studies, in this multidisciplinary consensus, the authors considered the rational, recent investigations and potential clinical benefits of targeted adjunctive therapies.MethodsA panel of multidisciplinary experts defined clinical phenotypes, treatments and outcomes of greater interest in the field of adjunctive therapies for sepsis and septic shock. After an extensive systematic literature review, the appropriateness of each treatment for each clinical phenotype was determined using the modified RAND/UCLA appropriateness method.ResultsThe consensus identified two distinct clinical phenotypes: patients with overwhelming shock and patients with immune paralysis. Six different adjunctive treatments were considered the most frequently used and promising: (i) corticosteroids, (ii) blood purification, (iii) immunoglobulins, (iv) granulocyte/monocyte colony-stimulating factor and (v) specific immune therapy (i.e. interferon-gamma, IL7 and AntiPD1). Agreement was achieved in 70% of the 25 clinical questions.ConclusionsAlthough clinical evidence is lacking, adjunctive therapies are often employed in the treatment of sepsis. To address this gap in knowledge, a panel of national experts has provided a structured consensus on the appropriate use of these treatments in clinical practice.