Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Research Articles

De-Escalating the Extent of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Undergoing Mastectomy

BackgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for axillary staging in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing mastectomy is debated due to low nodal positivity rate and risk of morbidity. Standard SLNB entails removing all lymph nodes (LN) that have a radioactive count > 10% of the most radioactive node, contain blue dye or are palpably suspicious. In this study, we hypothesize that judicious SLNB with attempt to remove only the node with the highest radioactive count provides sufficient pathologic information while minimizing morbidity. MethodA single institution prospective database was retrospectively reviewed to identify women with DCIS who underwent mastectomy and SLNB between 2010 and 2022. Patient characteristics, number of SLNs retrieved, pathologic results and long-term upper extremity complications were analyzed. ResultsA total of 743 LNs were removed in 324 pts. Median (IQR) age was 62 (51-70) years. Dual tracer technique, with technetium-99m labeled radiocolloid and blue dye, was used in 311 (96%) pts, whereas single agent (radioisotope or blue dye alone) was utilized in 9 (2.8%) and 4 (1.2%) patients, respectively. Median (IQR) number of SLN removed was 2 (1-3) (range 1-9). In 99% of cases, the SLN with the highest radioactive count was identified among the first 3 dissected LNs. Final pathology revealed upstaging to invasive cancer in 27.5% (n = 89) of the breasts and nodal positivity in 1.9% (n = 6) of the patients. In all 6 cases, metastatic disease was identified in the LN with highest radioactive count among the LNs retrieved. No additional metastatic nodes were identified after > 3 SLN had been removed. At median follow-up of 57 (range 28-87) months, 8.3% (n = 27) of pts complained of long-term upper extremity symptoms. 7.1% (23 pts) were referred to physical therapy for symptoms such as swelling, fullness, heaviness, stiffness, or sensory discomfort in the upper extremity and/or axillary cording. Long-term upper extremity complications were higher when > 3 SLNs compared to ≤ 3 SLNs were removed (10.4% vs. 6.5%, P = .005). ConclusionIn this cohort of patients with DCIS undergoing mastectomy who were upstaged on final pathology to node positive invasive cancers, the SLN with the highest radioactive count provided sufficient information for axillary staging. Acknowledging that the “hottest” LN is not always the first 1 removed, these data support an increased likelihood of developing long-term complications when more than 3 SLNs are removed. Rather than comprehensive removal of all SLNs meeting the standard “10% rule,” prioritizing the sequence of removal to the highest count provides the same prognostic information with reduced morbidity.

Intraoperative Nodal Palpation is a Mandatory Component of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Breast Cancer

Background: In the era of Z-0011, it is mandatory to decrease not only the false negative rate (FNR) of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy but also the risk of residual metastatic nodes after SLN biopsy. Method: SLN biopsy with intraoperative nodal palpation (INP) was performed in patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer. All identified blue and hot nodes were removed as blue/hot SLNs, and any suspicious palpable nodes were removed as palpable SLNs. Nodes that were incidentally removed with neighboring the blue/hot SLNs were classified as para-SLNs. Patients with positive SLNs on frozen section underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) except for patients who met the Z-0011 and AMAROS criteria for exemption. Results: Palpable SLNs and para-SLNs were identified in 202 patients. Of 200 patients, excluding 2 patients only with palpable SLNs, 46 patients had involvements of blue/hot SLNs, and 14 had palpable and para-SLNs harboring additional metastasis. When false negative rate (FNR) was calculated based on blue/hot SLNs and palpable SLNs, the additional use of INP resulted in a FNR of 45.2%. Subsequently, ALND was performed in 43 patients with positive blue/hot or palpable SLNs. Residual nodal involvement was found in 28 (65%) of 43 patients after removing blue/hot SLNs. However, after removing palpable SLNs, the rate of residual nodal metastases significantly decreased from 65% (28/43) to 36% (13/36) (p=0.0133). Conclusion: INP decreased both the FNR of SLN biopsy and the risk of residual metastatic nodes after SLN biopsy.

Micrometastases in axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer, post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy

IntroductionThe significance of minimal residual axillary disease, specifically micrometastases, following neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) remains largely unexplored. Our study aimed to elucidate the prognostic implications of micrometastases in axillary and sentinel lymph nodes following NST.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed primary breast cancer patients who underwent surgery after NST from September 2006 through February 2018. All patients received axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), either with or without sentinel lymph node biopsy. Recurrence-free survival (RFS)-associated variables were identified using a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model.ResultsOf the 978 patients examined, 438 (44.8%) exhibited no pathologic lymph node involvement (ypN0) after NST, while 89 (9.1%) had micrometastases (ypN1mi) and 451 (46.7%) had macrometastases (ypN+). Notably, 51.1% of the patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastases (SLNmi) had additional metastases, nearly triple that of SLN-negative patients (P < 0.001), and 29.8% of SLNmi patients were upstaged with the ALND. Although ypN1mi was not associated with RFS in patients post-NST (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.42–2.49; P = 0.958), SLNmi patients experienced significantly worse RFS compared to SLN-negative patients (hazard ratio [HR], 2.23; 95% confidence intervals [CI], 1.12–4.46; P = 0.023). Additional metastases in SLNmi were more prevalent in patients with larger residual breast disease greater than 20 mm, HR-positive/HER2-negative subtype, and low Ki-67 LI (< 14%).ConclusionsSLNmi is a negative prognostic factor significantly associated with additional non-SLN metastases, while ypN1mi does not influence the prognosis compared to ypN0. Hence, additional ALND may be warranted to confirm axillary nodal status in patients with SLNmi.

The surgical technique and protocol for dynamic sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer at a Southeast Asian regional hospital.

Lymph node status is a key prognostic factor in penile cancer. The European Association of Urology (EAU) recommends intermediate-risk (pT1a, Grade 2) or high-risk (pT1b or greater) penile cancer patients with clinically non-palpable inguinal lymph node (cN0) to undergo either an invasive bilateral modified inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) or dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB). DSNB has been reported to have acceptable false negative rates, and lower rates of long-term morbidity compared to ILND. We developed a protocol for DSNB at a regional hospital in Singapore that was adopted from St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust. Four patients with cN0 penile cancer underwent DSNB between November 2021 and October 2022 according to this protocol. Our surgical technique and protocol are described. The patients' oncological characteristics and their outcomes were evaluated. In this small case series, there was no complication attributable to the performance of DSNB, and there was no groin that was documented to be false negative over a median follow up of 15.5 months (range, 12 to 22 months). Using our protocol, 5 of 8 groins (62.5%) were able to avoid ILND in the cN0 setting. We recommend the adoption of DSNB for the surgical staging of inguinal lymph nodes for patients with intermediate to high-risk penile cancer and non-palpable inguinal nodes due to its significantly lower risks of long-term morbidity compared to ILND. Appropriate specialist training and a multi-disciplinary team is vital to ensure the success of the procedure.

Real-time detection and resection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer through a rare earth nanoprobe based NIR-IIb fluorescence imaging

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a commonly employed procedure for the routine assessment of axillary involvement in patients with breast cancer. Nevertheless, conventional SLN mapping cannot reliably distinguish the presence and absence of metastatic disease. Additionally, the complex anatomical structures and lymphatic drainage patterns surrounding tumor sites pose challenges to the sensitivity of the near-infrared fluorescence imaging with subcutaneously injected probes. To identifying the SLN metastases, we developed a novel nanoprobe for in vivo fluorescence imaging within the second near-infrared (NIR-II) range. This nanoprobe utilizes rare-earth nanoparticles (RENPs) to emit bright fluorescence at 1525 nm and is conjugated with tumor-targeted hyaluronic acid (HA) to facilitate the detection of metastatic SLN. Upon intravenous administration, RENPs@HA effectively migrated to SLNs and selectively entered metastatic breast tumor cells through CD44-mediated endocytosis. The RENPs@HA nanoprobes exhibited rapid accumulation in metastatic inguinal lymph nodes in mouse model, displaying a 5.8-fold-stronger fluorescence intensity to that observed in normal SLNs. Consequently, these nanoprobes effectively differentiate metastatic SLNs from normal SLNs. Importantly, the probes accurately detected micrometastases. These findings underscore the potential of RENPs@HA for real-time visualization and screening of SLNs metastasis.

Axillary management and long-term oncologic outcomes in breast cancer patients with clinical N1 disease treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BackgroundLow false negative rates can be achieved with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer (BC) patients with clinical N1 (cN1) disease. We examined changes in axillary management and oncologic outcomes in BC patients with cN1 disease receiving NAC.MethodsBC patients with biopsy proven cN1 disease treated with NAC were selected from our institutional cancer registry (2014–2017). Patients were grouped by axillary management, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), SLNB followed by ALND, or SLNB alone. Univariable and multivariable survival analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed.Results81 patients met inclusion criteria: 31 (38%) underwent ALND, 25 (31%) SLNB + ALND, and 25 (31%) SLNB alone. A SLN was identified in 45/50 (90%) patients who had SLNB. ALND was performed in 25/50 (50%) patients who had SLNB: 18 for a + SLNB, 5 failed SLNB, and 2 insufficient SLNs. 25 patients had SLNB alone, 17 were SLN- and 8 SLN+. In the SLNB alone group, 23/25 (92%) patients received adjuvant radiation (RT). 20 (25%) patients developed BC recurrence: 14 distant (70%), 3 local (15%), 2 regional + distant (10%), and 1 contralateral (5%). In the SLNB alone group, there was 1 axillary recurrence in a patient with a negative SLNB who did not receive RT. Univariable survival analysis showed significant differences in RFS and OS between axillary management groups, ALND/SLNB + ALND vs. SLNB alone (RFS: p = 0.006, OS: p = 0.021). On multivariable survival analysis, worse RFS and OS were observed in patients with TNBC (RFS: HR 3.77, 95% CI 1.70–11.90, p = 0.023; OS: HR 8.10, 95% CI 1.84–35.60, p = 0.006).ConclusionsSLNB alone and RT after NAC in BC patients with cN1 disease who have negative SLNs at surgery provides long-term regional disease control. This analysis provides support for the practice of axillary downstaging with NAC and SLNB alone.

Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Omitting Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients with Chest Wall Recurrence after Mastectomy.

The management of the axilla in breast cancer patients with isolated chest wall recurrence (CWR) after mastectomy remains controversial. Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for restaging is feasible, its role is unclear. We aimed to determine if the omission of axillary restaging surgery in female patients with operable presumably isolated CWRs could result in an increased risk of second recurrences. In this retrospective multicentre study, patients who developed CWRs were reviewed. We excluded patients with suspected or concomitant regional/distant metastases, bilateral cancers and patients without CWR surgery. Patients' demographics, pathological data and subsequent recurrences were collected from a prospective database and were compared between patients with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and/or SLNB versus no axillary operation at CWR. A total of 194 patients with CWRs were eligible. The median age at CWR was 56.0 (IQR 47.0-67.0) years old. At recurrence, 8 (4.1%), 5 (2.6%) and 181 (93.3%) patients had ALND, SLNB and no axillary operation, respectively. Patients with no axillary surgery during CWR were associated with, at primary cancer, a lower incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ as diagnosis (p = 0.007) and older age (p = 0.022). Subsequent ipsilateral axillary (p = 0.768) and second recurrences (p = 0.061) were not statistically different between patients with and without axillary surgery at CWR on median follow-up of 59.5 (IQR 27.3-105) months. In patients without evidence of concomitant regional or distant metastasis at CWR diagnosis, omission of axillary restaging surgery was not associated with an increased ipsilateral axillary or second recurrences on long-term follow-up.

Artificial intelligence assisted ultrasound for the non-invasive prediction of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

PurposeA practical noninvasive method is needed to identify lymph node (LN) status in breast cancer patients diagnosed with a suspicious axillary lymph node (ALN) at ultrasound but a negative clinical physical examination. To predict ALN metastasis effectively and noninvasively, we developed an artificial intelligence-assisted ultrasound system and validated it in a retrospective study.MethodsA total of 266 patients treated with sentinel LN biopsy and ALN dissection at Peking Union Medical College & Hospital(PUMCH) between the year 2017 and 2019 were assigned to training, validation and test sets (8:1:1). A deep learning model architecture named DeepLabV3 + was used together with ResNet-101 as the backbone network to create an ultrasound image segmentation diagnosis model. Subsequently, the segmented images are classified by a Convolutional Neural Network to predict ALN metastasis.ResultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model for identifying metastasis was 0.799 (95% CI: 0.514–1.000), with good end-to-end classification accuracy of 0.889 (95% CI: 0.741–1.000). Moreover, the specificity and positive predictive value of this model was 100%, providing high accuracy for clinical diagnosis.ConclusionThis model can be a direct and reliable tool for the evaluation of individual LN status. Our study focuses on predicting ALN metastasis by radiomic analysis, which can be used to guide further treatment planning in breast cancer.

Is fluorometric sentinel lymph node biopsy in endometrial cancer necessary?

In this study, we collected perioperative and postoperative follow-up data from patients with endometrial cancer (EC) at different stages to evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in endometrial cancer surgery. A total of 186 endometrial cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy from January 2018 to April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into four groups. Group A comprised patients diagnosed with stage IA grade 1 and 2 endometrioid EC who underwent SLNB. Group B comprised patients with stage IA grade 1 and 2 endometrioid EC who did not undergo SLNB. Group C comprised patients with higher-grade endometrioid EC, wherein systematic lymph node dissection was performed based on SLNB results. Group D comprised patients with higher-grade endometrioid EC who did not undergo SLNB and instead underwent direct systematic lymph node dissection. Clinical, pathological data, and follow-up information for all patients were collected. In Group A and B, SLNB was performed on 36 out of 67 patients with IA stage 1 and 2 endometrial cancer, yielding a SLN positivity rate of 5.6%. There were no significant differences observed between the two groups regarding perioperative outcomes and postoperative follow-up. Conversely, among 119 patients with higher-grade endometrial cancer, 52 underwent SLNB, with 20 patients exhibiting SLN positivity, resulting in a SLN positivity rate of 38.4%. However, the decision to undergo SLNB did not yield significant differences in perioperative outcomes and postoperative follow-up among these patients. For stage IA grade 1 and 2 endometrioid EC, the incidence of lymph node positivity is low, omitting SLNB in this subpopulation is a feasible option. In other stages of endometrioid EC, there is no significant difference in perioperative and postoperative follow-up data between patients undergoing routine systematic lymphadenectomy and those undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy based on SLNB results. Therefore, if SLNB is not available, the standard procedure of PLND remains an option to obtain information about lymph node status, despite the surgical complications associated with this procedure.

Elucidating the nature of acinic cell carcinoma of the breast with high-grade morphology: evidence from case report

BackgroundAcinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) of the breast is a rare subtype of breast cancer. It was considered a low-grade triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with the potential to progress or transform into a high-grade lesion because of the molecular similarities with conventional aggressive TNBC in several genetic studies. Microscopically, the coexistence of classical low-grade and high-grade triple-negative components in breast AciCC is not uncommon. However, there is a scarcity of research on the comparative histopathological and genetic aspects of both components.Case presentationA 34-year-old woman with a nontender mass in the upper outer quadrant of the left breast was initially diagnosed with a malignant small round cell tumor (undifferentiated or poorly differentiated carcinoma) based on a preoperative biopsy, which was later identified as breast AciCC with a high-grade solid component. Left breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed. Microscopically, the breast AciCC consisted of a classical acinic component and a high-grade component. The latter demonstrated a solid sheet-like pattern characterized by large, round, pleomorphic or vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and frequent mitotic activities. Classical acinic architectures focally merged together to form solid nests and transited into high-grade areas. Remarkably, in the high-grade lesion, conventional immunochemical markers for breast AciCC, such as α1-antitrypsin (AAT), Lysozyme (LYS), Epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), S100 protein (S100), and cytokeratin (CK) were negative, whereas cell cycle protein D1 (cyclin D1) and vimentin showed diffuse expression. Next‑generation sequencing (NGS) revealed that 43.5% of variants were identical in both components. Furthermore, PAK5 mutation; copy number (CN) loss of CDH1, CHEK1, and MLH1; and CN gains of CDK6, HGF, and FOXP1 were identified in the high-grade lesion. The patient was treated with eight cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide) and radiotherapy after surgery, and she is currently alive for 43 months with no metastases or recurrences.ConclusionsThis case demonstrates a comparative analysis of the histopathological and genetic characteristics of classical low-grade and high-grade components of AciCC within the same breast. This information may serve as a morphological and molecular basis for further investigation into the molecular mechanisms underlying high-grade lesions in breast AciCC.

New Insight for Axillary De-Escalation in Breast Cancer Surgery: "SoFT Study" Retrospective Analysis.

Background: The SOUND study demonstrated that an axillary de-escalation may be sufficient in locoregional and distant disease control in selected early breast cancer (EBC) patients. To establish any preoperative variables that may drive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) omission, a study named sentinel omission risk factor (SOFT) 1.23 was planned. Methods: A single-center retrospective study from a prospectively maintained database was designed, aiming at underlying preoperative prognostic factors involved in sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis (lymph node involvement (LN+) vs. negative lymph node (LN-) group). Secondary outcomes included surgical room occupancy analysis for SLNB in patients fulfilling the SOUND study inclusion criteria. The institutional ethical committee Area Territoriale Lazio 2 approved the study (n° 122/23). Results: Between 1 January 2022 and 30 June 2023, 160 patients were included in the study and 26 (%) were included in the LN+ group. Multifocality, higher cT stage, and larger tumor diameter were reported in the LN+ group (p = 0.020, p = 0.014, and 0.016, respectively). Tumor biology, including estrogen and progesterone receptors, and molecular subtypes showed association with the LN+ group (p < 0.001; p = 0.001; and p = 0.001, respectively). A total of 117 (73.6%) patients were eligible for the SOUND study and the potential operating room time saved was 2696.81 min. Conclusions: De-escalating strategies may rationalize healthcare activities. Multifactorial risk stratification may further refine the selection of patients who could benefit from SLNB omission.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast carcinoma using fluorescein sodium and methylene blue dye: A validation study.

The availability of radioisotopes for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast carcinoma is limited in low- and middle-income countries and thus the need for other reliable tracers exists. We aimed to validate the effectiveness of fluorescein sodium (FS) together with methylene blue dye (MBD) for patients with node-negative early breast carcinoma in a prospective cross-sectional study. Patients underwent SLNB using FS and MBD followed by axillary dissection to validate results. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification rate and false negative rate were assessed for all three tracers/combinations (MBD, FS, and MBD + FS). We concluded that SLNB using a combination of FS and MBD has an acceptable rate of SLN identification but the addition of FS provided no additional benefit.

Detecting Atypical Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using a Standardized Technique with a Hybrid Tracer.

Since October 2018, lymph node status has become part of the FIGO staging, given that it is one of the most important prognostic factors among women with CC. The aim was to determine the rate of atypical lymphatic drainage in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer using a hybrid tracer (ICG-99mTc nanocolloid). A prospective, observational, single-centre study conducted at Son Espases University Hospital between January 2019 and October 2023. Patients with clinical early-stage CC who underwent SLN mapping were included. External iliac and obturator nodes were defined as common locations. Para-aortic, common iliac, presacral, internal iliac, and parametrial nodes were defined as atypical locations. Thirty-nine cases of CC were included. The overall SLN detection rate was 97.4%, with 89.5% bilaterally. Positive nodes were found in 21.1% of patients. Atypical lymphatic drainage was present in 8 out of 38 (21.1%) patients. Of all the SLNs biopsied (146), 10.3% corresponded to an atypical zone. SLN in the atypical area had a higher proportion of metastasis than the usual area (37.5% vs. 16.7%; p = 0.327). SLN biopsy can detect unusual drainage in a significant proportion of patients. Atypical lymph nodes have a higher percentage of metastasis, which consequently improves staging and tailoring therapy. SLN mapping performed via a standardized surgical technique using a hybrid tracer (ICG-99mTc) could help in the identification of the "true SLN".

Use of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Particles in Sentinel Node Biopsy—Evaluation of Its Effects on Breast MRI, Full‐Field Digital Mammography, and Contrast‐Enhanced Mammography

Upon surgical removal of solid tumors in patients with breast cancer, the sentinel lymph nodes are mostly concomitantly removed as this is the first site to which tumor cells metastasize. To identify the sentinel lymph nodes, superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) particles can be employed, a method that has several advantages over the classical tracer with radioisotopes. However, one downside of SPIO particles is the formation of artifacts on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. In a previous study, we investigated if lowering the dose of these particles from 2 to 1 mL would prevent the occurrence of these artifacts. In a study of 14 patients, radiologists do not observe any artifacts on the full‐field digital mammography and contrast‐enhanced mammography images, contrary to breast MRI images, in which case artifacts are observed on all images. Hence, lowering the dose from 2 to 1 mL SPIO particles did not change the outcome of the breast MRI images. In this article, based on these results, we discuss the origins of these artifacts from a mathematical and physical point of view.

The Utility of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Elderly Patients with Melanoma

BackgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is performed less often for older patients with melanoma. We investigated the association of SLNB and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) in the elderly.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER: 2010–2019) for patients ≥ 70 years with cT2-4N0M0 melanoma. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the impact of SLNB performance and SLN status on MSS at increasing age cutoffs. In addition, we evaluated the association of different factors with SLNB performance using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsWe identified 11,548 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy occurred in 6754 (58.5%) patients, 1050 (15.5%) of whom had a positive SLN. On adjusted SEER analysis, a negative SLN was independently associated with improved MSS (overall hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–0.67) for patients up to 87 years old. Positive SLNB was independently associated with inferior MSS (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.93–1.98). Increasing age groups were significantly associated with decreased SLNB performance.ConclusionsSentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with cancer-specific survival and adds prognostic information for elderly patients with melanoma. Sentinel lymph node biopsy performance should not be eliminated in elderly patients based on age alone, unless justified by poor performance status, patient preference, or other surgical contraindications. Decreased SLNB performance with increasing age in our cohort may indicate a missed therapeutic opportunity in the care of elderly patients with melanoma.

Implementation of Choosing Wisely® Recommendations for Lymph Node Surgery in Male Breast Cancer

BackgroundThe Choosing Wisely® (CW) campaign recommended de-implementation of surgical management of axillary nodes in specified patients. This study aimed to assess trends in the application of CW guidelines for lymph node (LN) surgery in males with breast cancer.MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for males diagnosed with breast cancer from 2017 to 2020. Patients were categorized into two cohorts based on CW criteria. Cohort 1 included all T1-2, clinically node-negative patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy and with ≤ 2 positive nodes, and Cohort 2 included all T1-2, node-negative, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative patients aged ≥ 70 years. In Cohort 1, patients who underwent sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB) alone were compared with axillary LN dissection (ALND) or no LN surgery, while in Cohort 2, patients who underwent LN surgery were compared with those with no LN surgery.ResultsOf 617 patients who met the criteria for Cohort 1, 73.1% underwent SLNB alone compared with ALND (11.8%) or no LN surgery (15.1%). Those who received SLNB alone were younger (65 vs. 68 vs. 73 years; p < 0.001). The annual proportion of males who underwent SLNB alone remained stable from 2017 to 2020. Overall, 1565 patients met the criteria for Cohort 2, and 84.9% received LN surgery. LN surgery was omitted in older patients (81 vs. 77; p < 0.001). The proportion of elderly males with early-stage breast cancer who underwent LN surgery increased from 2017 to 2020.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that CW recommendations are not being routinely applied to males. These findings reinforce the need for additional studies and subsequent recommendations for optimal application of axillary surgery de-implementation for males diagnosed with breast cancer.

Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy with indocyanine green and site of injection in endometrial cancer.

The aim of the present narrative review is to summarize the state of art on sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in endometrial cancer, with a special focus on indocyanine green (ICG) as adopted tracer. Over the years, the surgical nodal staging in patients with endometrial cancer has been intensively investigated. Traditionally, systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy represented the gold standard surgical treatment to assess nodal involvement of the tumor. Through the last two decades, SLNB has gradually replaced lymphadenectomy as a more targeted procedure. A great heterogeneity of tracers and injection techniques have been proposed to perform SLNB. However, no universally accepted recommendations are still available. SLNB has nowadays almost replaced pelvic lymphadenectomy in low-risk endometrial cancers, offering a better safety profile while being related to a comparable nodal involvement sensitivity. Currently, ICG is considered to be the most used tracer among others. Different injection sites have been proposed, with different detection features. While ICG cervical injection is nowadays the suggested technique for SLNB, noncervical injection techniques, such as hysteroscopic and combined procedures, seem to have a better accuracy in para-aortic nodal assessment, which have a role in high-risk endometrial cancers.

Electronic Health Record–Based Nudge Intervention and Axillary Surgery in Older Women With Breast Cancer

Choosing Wisely recommendations advocate against routine use of axillary staging in older women with early-stage, clinically node-negative (cN0), hormone receptor-positive (HR+), and HER2-negative breast cancer. However, rates of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in this population remain persistently high. To evaluate whether an electronic health record (EHR)-based nudge intervention targeting surgeons in their first outpatient visit with patients meeting Choosing Wisely criteria decreases rates of SLNB. This nonrandomized controlled trial was a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study with subsequent postintervention semistructured interviews and lasted from October 2021 to October 2023. Data came from EHRs at 8 outpatient clinics within an integrated health care system; participants included 7 breast surgical oncologists. Data were collected for female patients meeting Choosing Wisely criteria for omission of SLNB (aged ≥70 years with cT1 and cT2, cN0, HR+/HER2- breast cancer). The study included a 12-month preintervention control period; baseline surveys assessing perceived acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the designed intervention; and a 12-month intervention period. A column nudge was embedded into the surgeon's schedule in the EHR identifying patients meeting Choosing Wisely criteria for potential SLNB omission. The primary outcome was rate of SLNB following nudge deployment into the EHR. Similar baseline demographic and tumor characteristics were observed before (control period, n = 194) and after (intervention period, n = 193) nudge deployment. Patients in both the control and intervention period had a median (IQR) age of 75 (72-79) years. Compared with the control period, unadjusted rates of SLNB decreased by 23.1 percentage points (46.9% SLNB rate prenudge to 23.8% after; 95% CI, -32.9 to -13.8) in the intervention period. An interrupted time series model showed a reduction in the rate of SLNB following nudge deployment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.90; P = .03). The participating surgeons scored the intervention highly on acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Dominant themes from semistructured interviews indicated that the intervention helped remind the surgeons of potential Choosing Wisely applicability without the need for additional clicks or actions on the day of the patient visit, which facilitated use. This study showed that a nudge intervention in the EHR significantly decreased low-value axillary surgery in older women with early-stage, cN0, HR+/HER2- breast cancer. This user-friendly and easily implementable EHR-based intervention could be a beneficial approach for decreasing low-value care in other practice settings or patient populations. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06006910.

Future of sentinel node biopsy in ovarian cancer.

The rationale on the use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in the surgical staging of apparent early-stage ovarian cancer (OC) is supported by the fact that diagnostic and prognostic role of systematic staging lymphadenectomy has been determined but its therapeutic significance is still matter of controversy. Moreover, SLN biopsy represents an option to decrease intra- and postoperative morbidity. The present review aims to provide an overview on the current and future role of SLN in OC. Most recent evidence shows that the overall mean per patient SLN detection rate in case of indocyanine green (ICG) alone was 58.6% compared with 95% in case of ICG + technetium, and with 52.9% in case of technetium alone or in combination with blue dye ( P < 0.001). Site of injection has been reported to be in both ovarian ligaments in majority of studies (utero-ovarian ligament and infundibulo-pelvic ligament), before or after ovarian mass removal, at time of primary or re-staging surgery and by minimally invasive or open approach. Cervical injection has been recently proposed to replace utero-ovarian injection. SLN detection rate in patients with confirmed ovarian malignancy varied across different studies ranging between 9.1% and 91.3% for the injection in the utero-ovarian ligament and migration to pelvic lymph nodes and between 27.3% and 100% for the injection in the infundibulo-pelvic ligament and migration to para-aortic lymph nodes. No intra- or postoperative complication could be attributed directly to SLN biopsy. The sensitivity and the accuracy of SLN in detecting lymphatic metastasis ranged between 73.3-100% and 96-100%, respectively. In up to 40% of positive SLNs, largest metastatic deposit was classified as micro-metastasis or isolated tumor cells, which would have been missed without ultrastaging protocol. SLN biopsy represents a promising tool to assess lymph node status in apparent early-stage OC. The type and volume of injected tracer need to be considered as appear to affect SLN detection rate. Ultrastaging protocol is essential to detect low volume metastasis. Sensitivity and accuracy of SLN biopsy are encouraging, providing tracer injection in both uterine and ovarian ligaments.

Utility of Axillary Staging in Older Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

The utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in older patients remains controversial. Advancements in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy have revolutionized disease response rates and prognosis, supporting efforts to re-evaluate the utility of SLNB. We aimed to assess the differences in treatment and overall survival (OS) in older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer based on SLNB. Using the National Cancer Database (2010-2020), patients ≥ 70years of age diagnosed with cT1-2/cN0/M0, HER2-positive breast cancer were identified. Logistic regression assessed associations with SLNB, systemic therapy, and radiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with OS. Analyses were stratified by treatment sequence, i.e. upfront surgery or neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by surgery. Of the 17,609 patients included, 94% underwent upfront surgery (n=16,492) and the remaining underwent NAT (n=1117). Those who underwent SLNB were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy, irrespective of nodal status {upfront surgery/systemic therapy (odds ratio [OR] 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-3.67); upfront surgery/radiation (OR 3.97, 95% CI 3.03-5.21); NAT/radiation (OR 5.69, 95% CI 1.83-17.69)}. The breast pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was highest among the hormone receptor (HR)-negative/HER2-positive subtype (50.0%), of which none were found to be ypN+. Comorbidity burden was associated with significantly lower rates of adjuvant systemic therapy and worse OS. Patients who underwent SLNB, regardless of pN status, were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy. Nodal positivity is exceedingly rare for patients with a breast pCR following NAT, especially among the HR-negative/HER2-positive subtype. It is reasonable to consider omission of SLNB in select subgroups of older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.