Accuracy Of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Research Articles

The accuracy of sentinel node biopsy after primary systemic therapy is comparable with the results of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients with primary surgery

Objectives. To evaluate microstaging by means of quantifying the depth of invasion of the subepithelial connective tissue in pT1 transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder for its additional prognostic value with respect to disease recurrence and progression.Methods. We reviewed the pathologic findings of a consecutive series of 124 patients with pT1 tumors entered in a prospective randomized multicenter trial comparing mitomycin C and bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment, with at least 3 years of follow-up and clinical outcome hidden from reviewers. The depth of invasion was established by identifying submucosal tumor invasion up to, in, or beyond the muscularis mucosae or vascular plexus and classified as pT1a, pT1b, or pT1c, respectively. In addition to tumor grade, the presence of carcinoma in situ (CIS) near the primary tumor or in biopsy specimens taken from abnormal looking mucosa was taken into account. The risks of recurrence and progression were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and modeled with proportional hazard models.Results. pT1 subclassification was possible in more than 90% of the specimens. The 3-year risk of recurrence was not different in any of the subgroups. By contrast, the Kaplan-Meier 3-year risk for progression was 6%, 33%, and 55% for pT1a, pT1b (hazard ratio [HR] 5.51), and pT1c (HR 12.35) tumors, respectively (log-rank test P < 0.001). The Kaplan-Meier 3-year risk of progression was 9% versus 39% (HR 5.62) for the absence or presence of CIS in the tumor (P = 0.001) and 8% versus 49% (HR 6.72) for CIS in biopsy specimens (P < 0.001). Tumor grade had no statistically significant prognostic value with respect to progression, nor had tumor volume or multifocality. The combination of the parameters (pT1c and CIS) increased the risk of progression by a factor of 27 (P < 0.0001) compared with the absence of pT1c and CIS.Conclusions. These data show that the extent of lamina propria invasion (pT1a, pT1b, pT1c) is a clinically relevant prognostic factor for progression of pT1 TCC of the bladder. With the combination of this pT1 subclassification and the presence of CIS subgroups, distinct risks of progression can be identified that may give additional information for follow-up and treatment policies.

Clinical study of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

目的 探讨乳腺癌化疗后前哨淋巴结活检术(SLNB)的准确性及临床意义.方法 用美蓝作为示踪剂,对90例临床分期为Ⅱ、Ⅲ期,并已行化疗后临床检查腋窝淋巴结阴性的乳腺癌患者进行SLNB,术中均同时行腋窝淋巴结清扫术.结果 90例中前哨淋巴结成功检出82例,检出率91.1%,每例检出前哨淋巴结的数量为1～4枚,平均1.6枚.82例前哨淋巴结成功检出的患者中,45例患者有腋窝淋巴结转移,其中前哨淋巴结有转移者40例,前哨淋巴结未发现转移而非前哨淋巴结有转移者5例,8例只有前哨淋巴结为阳性淋巴结,前哨淋巴结预测腋窝淋巴结状态准确率为93.9%(77/82),灵敏度为88.9%(40/45),阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为88.1%,假阴性率为11.1%(5/45).原发肿瘤为T2、T3/T4组检出率分别为96.1%(49/51)、84.6%(33/39);假阴性率分别为5.3%(1/19)、15.4%(4/26),差异无统计学意义.肿瘤对化疗反应为完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解(PR)、稳定(SD)的前哨淋巴结检出率分别为92.3%、93.1%、84.2%,差异无统计学意义;假阴性5例均发生在PR、SD患者.结论 化疗后腋窝淋巴结阴性的Ⅱ、Ⅲ期乳腺癌患者,行SLNB可获得与早期未行新辅助化疗乳腺癌SLNB相似的结果;化疗前原发肿瘤为T2的乳腺癌患者,SLNB能较准确预测腋窝淋巴结的状态。

The Predictive Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients who Have Undergone Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

With the increasing usage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), there is the need to investigate the routine axillary node dissections performed in this group of patients. Controversy exists about the utility of sentinel node biopsy (SNB), either before or after NAC. With the addition of trastuzumab in the treatment of Her2/neu-positive LABC patients, the validity of SNB in this subset population needs to be investigated. A retrospective study of 20 patients who underwent NAC for LABC was undertaken. The pathology of the axillary nodes, sentinel nodes, and primary tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were examined. Twenty patients underwent NAC with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, followed sequentially by paclitaxel and carboplatin, with or without trastuzumab based on Her2/neu status. Post chemotherapy, 20 patients underwent mastectomy or lumpectomy with SNB with axillary node dissections. The overall accuracy of SNB was 95 per cent with a false-negative rate of 14 per cent (1/7). In Her2/neu-positive patients, overall accuracy was 100 per cent (8/8) and a false-negative rate of zero per cent. Sentinel node biopsy is a viable option in patients who have undergone NAC. Her2/neu-positive patients who had undergone NAC with trastuzumab had comparable accuracy for sentinel node biopsy in predicting axillary node status.

Prognostic value of sentinel node biopsy in 327 prospective melanoma patients from a single institution

Aim To confirm the accuracy of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) procedure and its morbidity, and to investigate predictive factors for SN status and prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Materials and methods Between October 1997 and December 2004, 327 consecutive patients in one centre with clinically node-negative primary skin melanoma underwent an SNB by the triple technique, i.e. lymphoscintigraphy, blue-dye and gamma-probe. Multivariate logistic regression analyses as well as the Kaplan–Meier were performed. Results Twenty-three percent of the patients had at least one metastatic SN, which was significantly associated with Breslow thickness ( p < 0.001). The success rate of SNB was 99.1% and its morbidity was 7.6%. With a median follow-up of 33 months, the 5-year DFS/DSS were 43%/49% for patients with positive SN and 83.5%/87.4% for patients with negative SN, respectively. The false-negative rate of SNB was 8.6% and sensitivity 91.4%. On multivariate analysis, DFS was significantly worsened by Breslow thickness (RR = 5.6, p < 0.001), positive SN (RR = 5.0, p < 0.001) and male sex (RR = 2.9, p = 0.001). The presence of a metastatic SN (RR = 8.4, p < 0.001), male sex (RR = 6.1, p < 0.001), Breslow thickness (RR = 3.2, p = 0.013) and ulceration (RR = 2.6, p = 0.015) were significantly associated with a poorer DSS. Conclusion SNB is a reliable procedure with high sensitivity (91.4%) and low morbidity. Breslow thickness was the only statistically significant parameter predictive of SN status. DFS was worsened in decreasing order by Breslow thickness, metastatic SN and male gender. Similarly DSS was significantly worsened by a metastatic SN, male gender, Breslow thickness and ulceration. These data reinforce the SN status as a powerful staging procedure.

Sentinel node biopsy in patients with multiple breast cancer

Multicentric or multifocal breast cancer is considered a limitation for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Studies showing that all quadrants of the breast drain via common afferent lymphatic channels indicate that multiple tumors do not affect lymphatic drainage. We therefore assessed the accuracy of SLNB in patients with multiple breast tumors. Of the 942 breast cancer patients who underwent SLNB using radioisotope at Asan Medical Center between January 2003 and December 2006, 803 had unifocal and 139 had multiple tumors. Axillary dissection after SLNB was performed on 884 patients, 757 with unifocal and 127 with multiple tumors. All patients underwent lymphatic scintigram for removal of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). The clinical characteristics and accuracy of SLNB was compared in patients with unifocal and multiple breast cancer. In the multiple tumor group, 2.68 +/- 0.84 SLNs were identified in 136 of 139 patients (identification rate, 97.84%); 81.5% of SLNs were identified by scintigram. The incidence of axillary metastases was 29.50% (41/139). SLNB accuracy was 97.63% (124/127), with a false negative (FN) rate of 7.89% (3/38). In the unifocal group, 2.67 +/- 0.96 SLNs were identified in 787 of 803 patients (identification rate, 98.00%); 84.8% of SLNs were identified by scintigram. The incidence of axillary metastasis was 22.04% (177/803). SLNB accuracy was 98.02% (742/757), with a FN rate of 8.62% (15/174). The accuracy and FN rate of SLNB did not differ significantly between unifocal and multiple breast cancer. The accuracy of SLNB in multiple breast cancer is comparable to its accuracy in unifocal cancer. These findings indicate that SLNB can be used an as alternative to complete axillary lymph node dissection in patients with multiple breast tumors.

Validity of sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

11023 Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a potential alternative procedure to conventional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard of care for patients with locally advanced breast cancer and indications of NAC have been widespread to operable breast cancer patients to facilitate breast conserving surgery. However, the validity of SLNB in breast cancer patients who received NAC is still controversial. Methods: Forty-six patients with stage II or III breast cancer who were treated with NAC from January 2002 to May 2006 were included in the study. Consecutive 122 patients who had SLNB without NAC during the same period were used as a control group. All patients underwent SLNB followed by completion ALND. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) was detected using a combined method of injecting isosulfan blue dye and small-sized technetium- 99m-labeled tin colloid (particle size: 200–400 nm in diameter) peritumorally and subcutaneously. SLNs were evaluated by means of H&amp;E and immunohistochemical staining. Results: SLNs were successfully identified in 42/46 patients (91.3%) treated with NAC and 112/113 patients (99.1%) without NAC (p=0.01). Metastases in the SLNs were found in 16/42 patients (38.1%) with NAC and 32/112 patients (28.6%) without NAC (p=0.2). There were 5 false negative cases (false negative rate: 23.8%) in the NAC group and 2 false negative cases (false negative rate: 5.9%) in the control group (p=0.05). Accuracy of SLNB in the NAC group was also significantly inferior to the control group (88.1% vs. 98.2%, p&lt;0.01). The presence of clinically positive axillary lymph nodes before NAC was not correlated with false negative rate. Conclusions: These data suggest that NAC might be considered a contraindication to SLNB even in patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes before NAC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Feasibility and Accuracy of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Preoperative Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients With Documented Axillary Metastases

The feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy has been demonstrated in a number of large, single-institution studies. However, a relative contraindication to SLN biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy is the presence of axillary metastases at initial diagnosis. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and accuracy of SLN biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with documented axillary metastases at presentation. Between 1994 and 2002, 69 patients who had axillary metastases identified by ultrasound-guided, fine-needle aspiration underwent SLN biopsy after treatment on prospective, preoperative chemotherapy protocols. All but 8 patients underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Those 8 patients either declined additional surgery or were offered enrollment in other institutional protocols. The median patient age was 49 years, and the median primary tumor size was 4 cm. The SLN identification rate was 92.8%. Thirty-one of 64 patients (48.4%) had successfully mapped, positive SLNs. Sixty-one patients underwent ALND, including 5 patients who did not have an SLN identified. In the 56 patients in whom a SLN was identified and an ALND was performed, 10 patients had a false-negative SLN (25%). SLN biopsy was feasible after preoperative chemotherapy, even in patients who initially presented with cytologically proven, lymph node-positive disease. However, the false-negative rate of SLN biopsy in this group of patients was much higher than that observed in clinically lymph node-negative patients. Based on the current results, the status of the SLN cannot be used as a reliable indicator of the presence or absence of residual disease in the axilla in this patient population.

Incidence of Axillary Recurrence in 344 Sentinel Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients after Intermediate Follow-Up. A Prospective Study into the Accuracy of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been validated in the treatment of breast carcinoma and is considered to stage the axilla adequately in this disease. However, long-term follow-up data are scarce. We evaluated the results of SLNB with respect to loco-regional failures in the axilla in SN-negative patients with invasive breast carcinoma and analysed their causal factors.Between 1997 and May 2004, 656 patients without clinically palpable lymph nodes were included in our study. Data with regard to demographics, diagnostics, therapy and follow up were gathered prospectively from all patients. Patients treated after May 2004 were excluded from this study to permit at least one year of follow-up.Out of the 656 patients, 344 patients with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy did not undergo axillary dissection and were followed up clinically. Median follow up was 43 months. In 3 patients (0.9%) axillary recurrences developed. All three patients subsequently underwent a completion axillary dissection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy.The low rate of clinical axillary recurrence after an intermediate follow up period suggests that a negative SN biopsy accurately reflects the nodal stage in patients with breast cancer.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is feasible for breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Despite the increasing use of both sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with operable breast cancer, information on the feasibility and accuracy of sentinel node biopsy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still quite limited. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer patients after NAC. A total of 104 patients with Stage II and III breast cancers, previously treated by NAC, were enrolled in the study. All patients were clinically node-negative after NAC. The patients underwent SLN biopsy, which involved a combination of an intradermal injection of radiocolloid and a subareolar injection of blue dye over the tumor. This was followed by completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). SLN could be identified in 97 of 104 patients (identification rate, 93.3%). In 93 of the 97 patients (95.9%), the SLN accurately predicted the axillary status. Four patients' SLN biopsies were false negative, resulting in a false-negative rate of 10.0%. The SLN identification rate tended to be lower among patients with T4 primary tumors prior to NAC (62.5%). The SLN identification and false-negative rates were similar to rates in non-neoadjuvant studies. The SLN accurately predicted metastatic disease in the axilla of patients with tumor response following NAC.

Multifocality and multicentricity are not contraindications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer surgery.

BackgroundAfter the availability of the results of validation studies, the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced routine axillary dissection (AD) as the new standard of care in early unifocal breast cancers. Multifocal (MF) and multicentric (MC) tumors have been considered a contraindication for this technique due to the possible incidence of a higher false-negative rate. This prospective study evaluates the lymphatic drainage from different tumoral foci of the breast and assesses the accuracy of SLNB in MF-MC breast cancer.Patients and methodsPatients with preoperative diagnosis of MF or MC infiltrating and clinically node-negative (cN0) breast carcinoma were enrolled in this study. Two consecutive groups of patients underwent SLN mapping using a different site of injection of the radioisotope tracer: a) "2ID" Group received two intradermal (ID) injections over the site of the two dominant neoplastic nodules. A lymphoscintigraphic study was performed after each injection to evaluate the route of lymphatic spreading from different sites of the breast. b) "A" Group had periareolar (A) injection followed by a conventional lymphoscintigraphy. At surgery, both radioguided SLNB (with frozen section exam) and subsequent AD were planned, regardless the SLN status.ResultsA total 31 patients with MF (n = 12) or MC (n = 19) invasive, cN0 cancer of the breast fulfil the selection criteria. In 2 ID Group (n = 15) the lymphoscintigraphic study showed the lymphatic pathways from two different sites of the breast which converged into one major lymphatic trunk affering to the same SLN(s) in 14 (93.3%) cases. In one (6.7%) MC cancer two different pathways were found, each of them affering to a different SLN. In A Group (n = 16) lymphoscintigraphy showed one (93.7%) or two (6.3%) lymphatic channels, each connecting areola with one or more SLN(s). Identification rate of SLN was 100% in both Groups. Accuracy of frozen section exam on SLN was 96.8% (1 case of micrometastasis was missed). SLN was positive in 13 (41.9%) of 31 patients, including 4 cases (30.7%) of micrometastasis. In 7 of 13 (53.8%) patients the SLN was the only site of axillary metastasis. SLNB accuracy was 96.8% (30 of 31), sensitivity 92.8 (13 of 14), and false-negative rate 7.1% (1 of 14). Since the case of skip metastasis was identified by the surgeon intraoperatively, it would have been no impact in the clinical practice.ConclusionOur lymphoscintigraphic study shows that axillary SLN represents the whole breast regardless of tumor location within the parenchyma. The high accuracy of SLNB in MF and MC breast cancer demonstrates, according with the results of other series published in the literature, that both MF and MC tumors do not represent a contraindication for SLNB anymore.

Sentinel node identification rate, but not accuracy, is significantly decreased after pre-operative chemotherapy in axillary node-positive breast cancer patients

The aim was to prove the low identification rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) and to determine the feasibility of replacing axillary lymph node dissection (AND) in axillary lymph node positive patients after chemotherapy. From October 2001 to July 2005, 875 consecutive patients with primary operable breast cancer underwent SNB and AND. Among them, 238 received pre-operative chemotherapy. We compared the identification rate, false negative rate (FNR), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of SNB in clinically node-positive patients with or without chemotherapy. The identification rate was significantly lower in patients received chemotherapy (77.6%) than in those not received it (97.0%) (P<0.001). In those received the therapy, the FNR was 5.6%, the NPV was 86.8%, and the accuracy was 95.9%. In those not received therapy, the FNR was 7.4% and the accuracy was 92.6% (differences not statistically significant). The identification rate in confirmed axillary lymph node-positive patients was significantly lower in patients received pre-operative chemotherapy, but accuracy did not differ significantly between the two groups. Thus, for patients who achieve complete axillary clearance by chemotherapy, SNB could replace AND.

Place et perspectives du ganglion sentinelle dans les tumeurs des voies aérodigestives supérieures

Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of sentinel node biopsy for assessing the neck status for those patients with squamous cell carcinoma T1T2N0 of oral cavity. Patients and Methods 55 patients were included in a prospective study between 2000 and 2003. 53 underwent a sentinel node biopsy (SNB) followed by an elective neck dissection (END). Pathological examination with stepped serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry of sentinel node (SN) has been compared with routine pathology examination of remaining END nodes. Results 12 patients had a positive SN. No false negative was found. Patient follow up on, at less of 3 years, did not show any node recurrence for those patients with negative SN. After that study, 44 patients had a SNB without END. 7 patients had a positive SN. Follow up showed a node recurrence for 3 patients. In two of these, pathological reexamination showed a micrometastase in SN. SN failure rate is less than 3% for those 99 patients. Conclusion SNB is a liable procedure. Failure rate is the same as in END. We plan to use this procedure in orophyngeal tumors where it could be possible to reduce irradiation fields and treatment sequels for those patients with negative SN.

Does sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma alter disease outcome?

In the head and neck region, value, reliability, and safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) have not yet been determined conclusively. The aim of study was to assess impact of SLNB on disease outcome in cutaneous head and neck melanoma. Thirty-six patients with a clinically node-negative head and neck melanoma, > or =1.0 mm Breslow thickness, participated in a prospective study from 1995 to 2005. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) tumor-positive patients underwent completion lymphadenectomy. SLN tumor-negative patients underwent clinical monitoring. Median follow-up was 54 (range 10-114) months. Recurrence-free and overall survival curves were constructed by Kaplan-Meier. SLNs could be identified in 33 patients (92%). In 7 patients (21%) the SLN was tumor-positive. In 1 patient (13%) the SLNB was false-negative. In 17 patients (47%) SLNs could be identified in the parotid region (success rate parotid region 100%). This study showed no significant difference in recurrence-free and overall survival between patients with tumor-positive and tumor-negative SLN. The safety and accuracy of SLNB in the neck and parotid nodal basins were similar to those in non-head and neck sites. However, the technique is technically demanding in this region. In this small series SLNB did not alter disease outcome.

The role of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in surgery planning for sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant melanoma

To evaluate four years of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy experience and the accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in our institution in melanoma patients with various tumor thicknesses. An additional aim was to evaluate the recurrence rate related to pathohistological findings. During the period from February 2002 to November 2005, 201 patients underwent sentinel node biopsy. Lymphoscintigraphy for identification of sentinel nodes was performed four to six hours prior to operation of the patient. Sentinel lymph node biopsy using an intraoperative hand-held gamma probe was performed in all patients, together with wide local excision of biopsy wound or primary lesion (N=56). Immediate complete basin dissection was performed in patients with sentinel node metastases. In four patients delayed complete lymph node dissection was performed after definitive histopathologic examination of sentinel nodes. The accuracy of sentinel node biopsy was determined by comparing the intraoperative rates of sentinel node identification and the subsequent development of nodal metastases in regional nodal basins in patients with tumor-negative sentinel nodes and in those with tumorpositive sentinel nodes. Using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, we identified sentinel nodes in all but one of the 201 patients (99.0%), and in 248 nodal basins (1.2/patient) we observed 372 sentinel nodes (1.52 sentinels/basin; 1.8 sentinels/patient). The highest number of sentinel nodes was noticed in the groin of patients with melanoma on the lower extremities (1.5/patient), followed by the axilla (1.3/patient). Anomalous lymphatic drainage patterns were observed in 15.0% of all patients. The identification rate of sentinel nodes was 99.0% overall: 100% for the groin basins, and 98.0% for the axilla and head and neck basin. Forty-two patients (20.8%) had tumor-positive sentinel nodes. Ten patients (5.0%) had local or distant recurrences during a median follow-up of 23.1 months (range 2-46). The rate of false-negative lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy as measured by nodal recurrence in patients with tumor-negative sentinel nodes was 1.3%. During the follow-up period, three of 201 patients died from other diseases and three patients died as the result of melanoma metastases, with a median follow-up of 13.5 months (range 12-22). Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is a sensitive, inexpensive and essential method for the identification of drainage basins, determination of the number and position of sentinel nodes and their location outside the usual nodal basins. Scintigraphic findings may lead to changes in surgical management due to the unpredictability of lymphatic drainage. The low incidence of regional disease recurrence in patients with tumor-negative sentinel nodes supports the use of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node biopsy as a safe and accurate procedure for staging the regional nodal basin in patients with malignant melanoma.

Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer – results of the ALMANAC validation phase

Despite the widespread application of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for early stage breast cancer, there is a wide variation in reported test performance characteristics. A major aim of this prospective multicentre validation study was to quantify detection and false-negative rates of SLNB and evaluate factors influencing them. Eight-hundred and fourty-two patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer underwent SLNB according to a standardised protocol that used a combination of radiopharmaceutical 99mTc-albumin colloid and Patent Blue V dye. SLNB was followed by standard axillary treatment at the same operation in all patients. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified in 803 (96.1%) of 836 evaluable cases. The median number of SLNs removed per patient was 2 (range 1-9). There were 19 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 263/282 (93.3%) and accuracy 782/803 (97.6%). SLNs were successfully identified by blue dye in 698 (85.6%), by isotope in 698 (85.6%), and by the combination of blue dye and isotope in 782 (96.0%) of 815 patients. Among 276 node positive patients, one or more positive SLNs were identified by blue dye in 251 (90.9%), by isotope in 246 (89.1%) and by the combination of blue dye and gamma probe in 258 (93.5%). Obesity, tumor location other than upper outer quadrant and non-visualisation of SLNs on the pre-operative lymphoscintiscan were significantly associated with failed localisation (p<0.001, p=0.008, p<0.001, respectively). The false-negative rate in patients with grade 3 tumors was 9.6%, compared with 4.7% in those with grade 2 tumors (p=0.022). The false-negative rate in patients who had one SLN harvested was 10.1%, compared with 1.1% in those who had multiple SLNs (three or more) removed (p=0.010). SLNB can accurately determine whether axillary metastases are present in patients with early stage breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes. Both success and accuracy of SLNB are optimised by the combined use of blue dye and isotope. SLNB success decreases with increasing body mass, tumor location other than the upper outer quadrant and non-visualisation of hot nodes on the pre-operative lymphoscintiscan. This study demonstrates reduction in the predictive value of a negative SLNB in grade 3 tumors.

Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a developing alternative to axillary dissection and may prove to be accurate in the detection of micrometastases in lymph nodes of breast cancer patients. Limited studies exist in the use of SLNB after neoadjuvant therapy. This study was undertaken to determine the accuracy of SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Methods: Thirty-one patients with stage I or II breast cancer underwent SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Results: Lymphatic mapping was performed by radioisotope, blue dye, or both techniques. Sentinel nodes (SN) were identified in 29 patients (93.5%). The SN was positive in 11 patients (38.0%), and was the only positive node in 5 patients (45.5%). There were no false negative SN by hematoxyin and eosin stain or immunohistochemistry (IHC) studies.Conclusions: Sentinel node identification rate is similar to that in nonneoadjuvant studies. The sentinel node accurately predicted metastatic disease in the axilla. IHC studies failed to detect any additional micrometastases. This diagnostic technique may provide treatment guidance for patients after neoadjuvant therapy.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A Rational Approach for Staging T2N0 Oral Cancer

For oral cancer patients, the presence of neck nodal metastases is the most important disease prognosticator. However, a significant proportion of clinically N0 patients harbor occult microscopic nodal metastasis. Our objective was to determine the feasibility and accuracy of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in the staging of T2N0 oral carcinoma patients. Prospective analysis. Twenty patients with previously untreated N0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma were studied. Each patient had an SNB performed using preoperative technetium sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative gamma probe guidance, and intraoperative peritumoral injection of 1% isosulfan blue. All patients underwent neck dissection. The sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were sectioned in 2- to 3-mm intervals, formalin fixed, and sectioned at three levels. The non-SLNs were sectioned in a routine manner for histologic examination. SLNs were identified in all patients (100%) and accurately predicted the pathologic nodal status in 18 of 20 patients (90%). Tumor was found exclusively in the SLNs in six patients (30%). Two patients had positive SLNs at multiple neck levels. Two patients had a negative SLN and a positive non-SLN (false-negative findings). Occult nodal metastases were present in 60% of the cohort. SNB is a technically feasible and accurate procedure for staging the neck in oral carcinoma patients. However, SNB accuracy is lower for floor of the mouth lesions. The rate of occult nodal metastases identified in this cohort is higher than previously reported in the literature. These results suggest that SNB warrants further multi-institutional studies.

Sentinel Node Localization in Head and Neck Tumors

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a minimally invasive method that was developed to stage the regional lymphatics of patients with cutaneous melanoma. Many studies performed worldwide have shown that SLNB is a feasible method to stage the cervical lymphatics in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The accuracy of SLNB in patients with HNSCC is currently under investigation in a multicenter study sponsored by the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group that compares the results of SLNB with standard elective neck dissection. Research to date has also shown that multiple SLNs and individualized drainage patterns characterize head and neck mucosal sites. These findings suggest that lymphoscintigraphy alone may be useful to delineate the lymphatic basins that require treatment in patients with HNSCC and in patients whose head and neck lymphatics are disrupted because of prior surgery or irradiation.

Sentinel node biopsy is reliable in early-stage cervical cancer but not in locally advanced disease

Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy based on dual labeling with blue dye and radiocolloid can reliably determine lymph node status in early-stage cervical cancer, but few data are available on its accuracy in more advanced disease. We examined the influence of tumor stage on the accuracy of SN biopsy in patients with cervical cancer. Between July 2001 and June 2004, 33 patients (mean age 52 years) with early-stage or locally advanced cervical cancer underwent laparoscopic SN biopsy based on dual labeling with patent blue and radiocolloid. Patients with early-stage cervical cancer (stages IA and IB1, 23 patients) underwent complete laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy after the SN procedure. Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (stage IB2, IIA or IIB, 10 patients) underwent laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy after SN biopsy and prior neoadjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The SN identification rates and false-negative rates of patients with early-stage and locally advanced disease were compared. The mean numbers of SNs identified per patient with early-stage and locally advanced cervical cancer were 2.3 (range 0-4) and 1.9 (range 0-4), respectively. SNs were identified in 86.9% (20/23) of patients with early-stage disease and in 80% (8/10) of patients with locally advanced disease. When analyzed according to the side of dissection, the identification rate was lower, especially in the patients with locally advanced disease (55% compared with 67.4%). The false-negative rate per patient was zero in early-stage disease and 20% (1/5) in locally advanced disease (no significant difference). When the side of dissection was taken into account, the false-negative rate improved to 42.9% (3/7) in patients with locally advanced disease and remained at zero in early-stage disease (P=0.038). Isolated blue dye was taken up in 53.3% of SNs in patients with locally advanced disease, compared with only 6.4% in patients with early-stage disease. This study suggests that the SN biopsy technique with dual labeling is less accurate in locally advanced cervical cancer than in early-stage cervical cancer.

Sentinel node status in melanoma patients is not predicitive for overall survival upon multivariate analysis

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become a widely accepted standard procedure in the staging of patients with cutaneous melanoma and absence of clinical lymph node metastases, although there is no final proof that SLNB influences overall survival in these patients. This study investigated the accuracy of SLNB and the clinical outcome of patients after a mean follow-up of 22 months. Between 1998 and 2003, SLNB was performed in 309 consecutive patients. Patients with one or more positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were subjected to selective lymphadenectomy (SL). Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier approach. A Cox proportional-hazard analysis was used for univariate and multivariate analysis to explore the effect of variables on survival. Sentinel lymph nodes were identified in 299 of 309 patients (success rate: 96.8%). Of these, 69 (23%) had a positive SLN. The false-negative rate was 9.2%. Recurrence of disease to the regional lymph node basin (3.0%) and to the locoregional skin (2.6%) was rare in SLN-negative patients in contrast to SLN-positive patients (7.2 and 17.4%, respectively). The 3-year overall survival was 93 and 83% for SLN-negative and SLN-positive patients, respectively. Upon multivariate analysis, SLN status (P<0.001), Breslow thickness (P<0.02) and ulceration (P<0.026) were all found to be independent prognostic factors with respect to disease-free survival, whereas Breslow thickness proved to be the only significant factor with respect to overall survival.