Shear wave logging through casing can be challenging, especially when the surrounding formation is unconsolidated. This study identifies two possible causes of the problem using synthetic microseismograms, dispersion curves, signal processing scheme based on Prony’s method, and frequency-dependent sensitivity coefficients with respect to the layers’ parameters. The first possible cause is eccentering of the tool when the cased hole is well bonded. The second possible cause is poor bonding, which is modeled by the presence of fluid annulus. An off-center dipole source located in a well-bonded cased hole generates a Stoneley wave that is poorly coupled to the surrounding formation and propagates at a velocity close to the compressional velocity of the borefluid. This Stoneley wave can obscure the formation shear wave signal associated with a slow (unconsolidated) formation. In a vertical well-bonded cased hole, shear wave logging slow (unconsolidated) formations can be reliably performed despite the leaky character of the flexural mode if the tool is well centralized, and a low-source frequency (around 2 kHz) is used. In a highly deviated or horizontal well, where the tool cannot be efficiently centralized, reliable measurements can still be obtained provided the directivities of the source and receivers are perpendicular to the direction of eccentricity. In poorly bonded cased holes, a dipole tool, regardless of its position, excites supplementary low-velocity modes that are associated with vibrations of the steel casing and the presence of an external fluid annulus. The maximum excitation of these modes is located in the low-frequency region, similar to that of unconsolidated formation signals. When the cement is not bonded to the casing, depending on the thickness of the fluid annulus, an unconsolidated formation signal may be corrupted, regardless of the tool’s position within the borehole. The Stoneley wave generated by the off-center source is overpowered by the annulus mode. Even when no interference occurs, the supplementary mode exhibits high, low-frequency energy due to a strong low-frequency coupling with the casing which causes the formation signal to be weak, regardless of the type of formation (fast or slow). As a consequence, the source must be powerful and the recording system must have a large dynamic range for the formation signal to be reliably detected. When the cement is well bonded to the casing but not to the formation, the effects of the presence of the annulus mode are less drastic.
Read full abstract