BOB KELLEY'S ARTICLE exhibits that combination of common sense and commitment that marks all of Kelley's professional endeavors and that remains essential as public history grows and prospers. Kelley argues for historical analysis of the policymaking process using the insights and knowledge of other related disciplines. He suggests that historians not only interpret the content of policymaking, but the structure. What are the steps from initiation through implementation? Clearly, he believes such an approach can be instructive to policymakers and historians alike, and he writes that it is both a duty and an obligation for historians to apply their skills to this universalized mode of policy analysis. For Kelley, policy history is not only process-oriented, but also problem-oriented. However, historians and policy analysts may disagree on what the real problem is. In any case, as Richard E. Neustadt and Ernest R. May remind us in Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision Makers, the basic question for both historians and policymakers is What's the story?, not What's the problem?i If the story is told correctly, the real problem will become apparent, and it may not be what people thought it was. Unfortunately, I am a bit pessimistic that senior decisionmakers will accept this sage advice. More commonly, they will agree with Garry Brewer and Peter deLeon, who maintain in The Foundations of Policy Analysis, a book Kelley approvingly mentions, that policymaking begins only when decisionmakers recognize a problem.2