Self-reported Cancer Research Articles

Providing mammography in workplaces improved screening rates: cluster randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Despite sufficient evidence on the importance of breast cancer screening, the screening rate has remained less than 50% in Japan. To promote behavioral change of individuals, it is important to reduce barriers to taking screening. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of an environmental approach providing opportunities for mammography (MMG) in workplaces. Methods Female employees aged 40 years or older were eligible. Supermarket stores were randomly assigned into two groups, the intervention arm (leaflet and MMG) and the control arm (leaflet). From May to July 2018, participants in the intervention arm were given a leaflet informing the subsidies for breast cancer screening and were provided the opportunity to have MMG in their workplace. Participants in the control group were given the same leaflet, but they had to take the screening outside the workplace as usual. The primary outcome was the breast cancer screening rate in 2018, evaluated using self-administered questionnaires. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the screening rate in the intervention arm compared with the control arm was estimated using multilevel logistic regression. Results We analyzed 1624 participants (mean age was 53 years) from 25 supermarket stores (intervention: 578 patients in 8 stores, control: 1046 patients in 17 stores). The screening rate in the intervention arm was 312 (54%) and was 125 (12%) in the control arm. The OR (and 95% CIs) was 7.81 (5.03-12.12) in the final model adjusted store level effects (i.e., stores and screening rate in 2017 at each store) and individual age and current smoking. Conclusions In a worksite-based cluster-randomized controlled trial conducted in a Japanese population, an environmental approach providing MMG opportunities in workplaces significantly increased the self-reported breast cancer screening rate within one year. (UMIN000030465) Key messages Providing the opportunity of mammography in Japanese supermarket stores improved the breast cancer screening rate. An environmental approach reducing barriers to screening may be more effective than conventional approaches in improving breast cancer screening rate.

Characteristics of Online Crowdfunding Campaigns for Urological Cancers in the United States.

We examined the characteristics and financial outcomes of online crowdfunding campaigns for patients with major urological cancers in the U.S. This cross-sectional study analyzed publicly available data from GoFundMe, the largest online medical crowdfunding service, via automated web scraping. Online campaigns from 2010 to 2018 with the following primary cancer types were included: kidney, prostate, bladder and testicular. Financial outcomes were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Multivariable analyses were utilized to identify predictors of campaign financial outcomes. Kidney cancers were the most frequent online campaign type (478), followed by prostate (379), bladder (202) and testicular (175) malignancies. Urological cancer campaign recipients frequently requested funding for medical expenses (71%) during active treatment (57%). After adjustment, testicular cancer and children's cancer campaigns generated more donations than other urological and adult cancer campaigns (p <0.05). Family and friend-authored campaigns generated more donations and average donation amounts than self-authored campaigns (p <0.05). Campaign narratives focused on disheartening circumstances received fewer donations than narratives focused on the recipient's high moral character or contributions to society (p <0.05), and unclear narratives received the smallest donation amounts (p <0.05). Urological cancer crowdfunding in the U.S. is primarily used to finance uncovered costs associated with medical care during active treatment. Crowdfunding financial outcomes are likely related to the campaign recipient's age, malignancy type, social network and primary appeal of the narrative. Urologists should be aware of trends in medical crowdfunding in order to better understand the financial burden this patient population faces.

Validation of self-reported incident cancer diagnoses in the U.S. Health and Retirement Study: A tool for population-based cancer and aging research.

312 Background: Population aging and improving cancer survival rates are resulting in a growing population of older cancer survivors in the United States (US). As a result, there is an increasing need for longitudinal, population-representative data for interdisciplinary cancer research among older adults. The US Health Retirement Study (HRS) is an ongoing population-representative cohort of US adults over age 50 that contains rich interview and biomarker data on health during aging. Interviews have collected self-reported cancer diagnoses since 1998, but these self-reports have not been validated. We compared first incident cancer diagnoses self-reported in HRS interviews against diagnostic claims from linked Medicare records. Methods: We examined the validity of first incident cancer diagnoses self-reported in biennial HRS interviews from 2000 through 2016 against ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnostic claim records among 8,242 HRS participants aged ≥65 with 90% continuous enrollment in fee-for-service Medicare, using the claim records as the gold standard. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and k for first incident cancer diagnoses (all cancers combined, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, and each of bladder, breast, colorectal/anal, uterine, kidney/renal, lung/bronchus, and prostate cancers) cumulatively over the follow-up, and at each biennial study interview. Results: Self-reports of first incident cancer diagnosis (agnostic of site) between 2000 and 2016 had 73.2% sensitivity and 96.2% specificity against Medicare claims (k = 0.73). For site-specific self-reports, sensitivities ranged from 44.7% (kidney) to 75.0% (breast), and specificities ranged from 99.2% (prostate) to 99.9% (bladder, uterine, and kidney). Results were similar in sensitivity analyses restricting to individuals with 100% continuous fee-for-service Medicare enrollment and when restricting to individuals with at least 24 months of Medicare enrollment. Conclusions: Self-reported cancer diagnoses in the HRS have reasonable validity for population-based research on cancer and aging across cancer types. Apart from breast cancer, cancer site specific analyses will greatly benefit from the improved validity of self-report with Medicare claim linkage.

Health Literacy and Access to Care in Cancer Screening Among Korean Americans.

Background:Health literacy and access to care are critical facilitators for preventive health behaviors. After the passage of the Affordable Care Act in March 2010, little has been studied about how improved health insurance coverage has impacted the use of preventive health services among Korean Americans.Objective:The study assessed the impact of access to care, use of services, and health literacy on cancer screening among Korean Americans.Methods:A descriptive cross-sectional study of 377 Korean Americans age 18 years and older was conducted with a survey and convenient sampling in Texas.Key Results:Although 79% of the sample had health insurance, 32% had never visited a health care provider, and 14% were delayed in care in the past 12 months. Only 11.6% were confident to complete medical forms, and 69.5% had limited levels of confidence. Cancer screening compliance rates were: mammography (50.4% at age 40–54 years; 46.6% at age 55 years and older), a Pap smear (29.4% at age 21–29 years; 78.4% at age 30–65 years; 72.2% at age 66 years and older), and colorectal cancer screening at age 45 years and older (stool tests 15.1%; sigmoidoscopy 27%; colonoscopy 51.3%). Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed that household income, gender, health insurance, and health literacy were significantly associated with self-reported cancer screening.Conclusions:Korean Americans who participated in this study are characterized by marginalized health literacy, underused health care services, and significantly lower cancer screening compliance than the goals of Healthy People 2020. The following interventions are suggested to improve health literacy and health insurance literacy on cancer screening: culturally sensitive and linguistically appropriate education for the guidelines concordant with cancer screening, effective communication skills with health care providers, support for navigating the health care system, and development of internet- or social media-based health education programs to meet the preferred communication methods of this population. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(4):e310–e318.]Plain Language Summary:Despite having improved health insurance coverage, Korean Americans of this study have marginalized health literacy, limited health insurance literacy, low cancer screening compliance, and underused health care services. The results of this study suggest several strategies to improve health literacy and health insurance literacy for Korean Americans, which may also apply to other groups with similar barriers.

Multifactorial causal beliefs and colorectal cancer screening: A structural equation modeling investigation.

We tested a conceptual model that describes the relationship between individuals' understanding of the multifactorial nature of cancer and their self-reported colorectal cancer screening. We collected cross-sectional survey data from 205 men and women age 50-75. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The proposed model had reasonable fit (RMSEA = 0.09, CFI = 0.65). Multifactorial causal beliefs were associated with cancer risk perceptions (β = 0.16, p = 0.019) and more optimistic cancer cognitions (β = 0.17, p = 0.013). However, these constructs were not associated with colorectal cancer screening (p's > 0.05). Further testing could reveal whether this model can be applied to other cancer-related health behaviors including lifestyle changes and genetic testing.

Influence of Health Beliefs on COVID-19 Vaccination among Individuals with Cancer and Other Comorbidities in Puerto Rico.

Ethnic minority populations are more likely to suffer from chronic comorbidities, making them more susceptible to the poor health outcomes associated with COVID-19 infection. Therefore, ensuring COVID-19 vaccination among vulnerable populations is of utmost importance. We aimed to investigate health behaviors and perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination among adults self-reporting diagnosis of cancer and of other chronic comorbidities in Puerto Rico (PR). This secondary analysis used data from 1911 participants who completed an online survey from December 2020 to February 2021. The Health Belief Model was used to measure perceptions surrounding COVID-19 vaccination among individuals self-reporting diagnosis of cancer and of other chronic comorbidities, and healthy adults. Among study participants, 76% were female, 34% were 50 years or older, 5% self-reported cancer diagnosis, and 70% had other chronic comorbidities. Participants self-reporting a cancer diagnosis had two times higher odds of getting vaccinated than healthy individuals (95% CI: 1.00–4.30). Compared to healthy participants, those self-reporting being diagnosed with cancer and those with chronic conditions other than cancer had significantly higher perceived COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. Our findings elucidate the effect of disease status on health-related decision-making and highlights information needed to be included in education campaigns to increase vaccine uptake among ethnic minority populations.

Prevalence of Breast Cancer in Female Physicians Performing Procedures With Significant Fluoroscopy Exposure: Survey.

The aim of this study was to assess self-reported breast cancer prevalence potentially associated with occupational radiation exposure from fluoroscopy-guided procedures in female physicians using current standard protection measures. An institutional review board-approved survey was shared as a link to self-identified female physicians. We compared self-reported prevalence of breast cancer among women physicians with longer than 10 years of postfellowship practice in specialties with heavy fluoroscopy exposure versus specialties with low fluoroscopy exposure. We compared the distribution of breast cancer risk factors and personal radiation safety measures. A total of 303 women physicians participated in the survey. There were 8 (16%) of 49 from the first study group and 8 (18%) of 44 from the second study group who self-reported a diagnosis of breast cancer. There were no differences in the distribution of breast cancer risk factors between the 2 groups or prevalence of breast cancer (P = 0.81). Self-reported breast cancer prevalence is similar between women physicians who are practicing fluoroscopically heavy and light medical specialties.

602Prevalence of cancer history and association with risk factors in a healthy older population

Abstract Background The ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) study randomised healthy older individuals to 100mg aspirin or placebo, with clinical outcomes and disability-free survival endpoints. Detailed baseline data provides a rare opportunity to explore cancer burden and association with known cancer risk factors in this population. Methods At enrolment (2010-2014), self-reported personal cancer history, cancer type and cancer risk factor data were sought from 19,114 participants (Australia, n = 16,703; U.S., n = 2,411). Participants were healthy and expected to survive 5 years. Results Of those reporting a prior cancer diagnosis (18% women, 22% men), women were diagnosed younger (16% vs 6% of diagnoses &amp;lt;50 years). Cancer prevalence increased with age. Prostate and breast cancer history were higher in U.S. participants; melanoma and colorectal cancer were higher in Australian participants. Cancer history prevalence was not associated with any common risk factors, but was associated with poor health ratings in men. Blood and breast cancer history was more common with past aspirin use. Conclusions Personal cancer history in healthy older ASPREE participants was as expected for the most common cancer types in the respective populations. The lack of alignment with known risk factors is attributable to survivor bias, driven by entry criteria, and to possible molecular differences in cancer between elderly and younger people. Key messages As the prevalence of cancer increases with age, the lack of alignment with known risk factors implies other factors play a significant role.

Cancer symptom experience and help-seeking behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a cross-sectional population survey

ObjectivesTo understand self-reported potential cancer symptom help-seeking behaviours and attitudes during the first 6 months (March–August 2020) of the UK COVID-19 pandemic.DesignUK population-based survey conducted during August and September 2020....

Sensory signs and symptoms in women with self-reported breast cancer-related lymphedema: a case-control study close up.

It is not clear to what extent signs and symptoms other than arm swelling, including pain, altered sensory function, and body perception disturbances, differ between women with measurable and non-measurable breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). A case-control study was performed to compare these signs and symptoms between (1) women with self-reported BCRL with objectively measurable swelling; (2) women with self-reported BCRL without objective confirmation; and (3) a control group with no self-reported BCRL. The three groups were compared for (1) the severity of self-reported signs and symptoms of BCRL, (2) problems in functioning related to BCRL, (3) pain-related outcomes, (4) sensory functions, and (5) body perception. All self-reported outcomes related to signs and symptoms of BCRL and problems in functioning were significantly different between the control group and the other two groups with and without measurable self-reported BCRL (p < 0.001-0.003). Except for "skin texture" (p = 0.01), "hand swelling" (p=0.301) and 'difficulty writing' (p=0.676), no differences were found between groups. For pain-related outcomes, sensory function, and body perception, significant differences were only found for the mechanical detection threshold (p < 0.01) and self-reported disturbances in body perception (p < 0.001) between the self-reported BCRL groups and control group. Diverse signs and symptoms related to BCRL, sensory function, and perception were different among women with self-reported BCRL compared to controls. No differences between women with and without measurable self-reported BCRL were found. The presence of self-reported BCRL, with or without measurable swelling, is a first indication for the need of further diagnostic evaluation.

Functional decline among older cancer survivors in the Baltimore longitudinal study of aging.

Evidence has begun to emerge indicating that cancer survivors experience accelerated aging. This study examines this phenomenon by evaluating trajectories of functional decline in older adults with a history of a cancer diagnosis relative to those without a history of cancer. Community dwelling healthy volunteers in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging were evaluated in the Clinical Research Unit of the National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program. Between 2006 and 2019, 1728 men and women (aged 22-100) underwent clinical evaluation of functional status; 359 reported having a history of cancer. Longitudinal associations between self-reported cancer history and measures of functional decline were examined using generalized estimating equations. Additionally, time-to-event and Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine trajectories of decline. Where appropriate, age-stratified associations were examined, and models were adjusted for sex, body mass index, race, smoking status, education, and number of comorbid conditions. Among all participants, a history of cancer was associated with 1.42 (95% CI 1.11-1.81) greater odds of weak grip strength. Among older participants (>65 years of age), those with a history of cancer had 1.61 (95% CI 1.28, 2.02) greater odds of slow gait speed and a 0.11 unit (95% CI 0.19-0.03) lower physical performance score than those with no cancer history. Time-to-event analysis showed that older individuals with a history of cancer experienced steeper decline in grip strength and gait speed than older adults with no history of cancer (p < 0.01). Cancer survivors, especially older individuals, demonstrate greater odds of and accelerated functional decline, suggesting that cancer and/or its treatment may alter aging trajectories. Observational and intervention studies are needed for prevention, mitigation, and/or reversal of aging-related effects of cancer and its treatment.

Lower Utilization of Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Vegetarians, Adventist Health Study-2.

This study aims to examine lifestyle predictors of the utilization of colorectal cancer screening. Using modified Poisson regression, we studied self-reported colorectal cancer screening utilization (colonoscopy or fecal occult blood test) with various dietary and lifestyle characteristics among 33,922 subjects aged 51 + years in the Adventist Health Study-2, a large population-based prospective cohort study. According to the multivariable-adjusted models, vegetarians were less likely to report screening: vegans, prevalence ratio (PR) = 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.83); lacto-ovo-vegetarians (0.95 [0.93-0.97]); and semi-vegetarians (0.97 [0.94-0.99]) compared to non-vegetarians. Blacks were more likely than non-Blacks to be screened (1.04 [1.02-1.06]) and males were less likely (0.93 [0.92-0.95]) to utilize the screening tests. Older subjects were more likely to be screened, and unmarried and divorced/widowed subjects were less likely to screen. Education, personal income, and BMI were positively associated with screening, with p-value for trend < 0.001 for all three variables. A family history of colorectal cancer was associated with higher screening prevalence (1.15 [1.12-1.17]). Our stratified analyses on race and gender with dietary patterns showed non-Hispanic White vegans (PR = 0.77 [0.74-0.81]) and male vegans (PR = 0.76 [0.72-0.81]) were least likely compliant with colorectal cancer screening (p = 0.009 and p = 0.04, respectively). Vegans may believe that their personal risk for colorectal cancer is low due to their healthy lifestyle, resulting in lack of compliance to colorectal cancer screening. It remains to be seen whether vegans in AHS-2 also experience higher incidence of colorectal cancer or are diagnosed at a later stage.

Health-related and cancer risk concerns among siblings of childhood cancer survivors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS).

To characterize the prevalence and predictors of concerns regarding future health and cancer risk among siblings of childhood cancer survivors. This study reports longitudinal data (baseline and follow-up) from 3969 adult siblings (median age = 29 [range 18-56] years) of long-term survivors of childhood cancer (median time since diagnosis 19.6 [9.6-33.8] years). Self-reported future health and cancer risk concerns (concerned vs not concerned) were assessed. Demographics and health data reported by both the siblings and their matched cancer survivors were examined as risk factors for health concerns using multivariable logistic regression. Percentage of siblings reporting future health and cancer risk concerns, respectively, decreased across decade of survivors' diagnosis: 1970s (73.3%; 63.9%), 1980s (67.2%; 62.6%), and 1990s (45.7%; 52.3%). Risk factors associated with future health concerns included sibling chronic health conditions (grade 2 Odds Ratio [OR]=1.57, 95% CI: 1.12-2.20; grades 3-4 OR=1.86, 95% CI: 1.18-2.94; compared to less than grade 2). Risk factors associated with future cancer concerns included sibling chronic health conditions (grade 2 OR=1.43, 95% CI: 1.05-1.94; grades 3-4 OR=1.64, 95% CI: 1.09-2.47; compared to less than grade 2). Sibling concerns regarding future health and cancer have diminished in recent decades. There are subgroups of siblings that are at-risk for future health and cancer risk concerns. Routine screening of concerns in at-risk siblings of survivors of childhood cancer may benefit the siblings of cancer survivors. These individuals may benefit from early interventions during diagnosis and treatment of their siblings.

Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer, and Financial Toxicity Among Adults in the United States

BackgroundFinancial toxicity (FT) is a well-established side-effect of the high costs associated with cancer care. In recent years, studies have suggested that a significant proportion of those with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) experience FT and its consequences. ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare FT for individuals with neither ASCVD nor cancer, ASCVD only, cancer only, and both ASCVD and cancer. MethodsFrom the National Health Interview Survey, we identified adults with self-reported ASCVD and/or cancer between 2013 and 2018, stratifying results by nonelderly (age <65 years) and elderly (age ≥65 years). We defined FT if any of the following were present: any difficulty paying medical bills, high financial distress, cost-related medication nonadherence, food insecurity, and/or foregone/delayed care due to cost. ResultsThe prevalence of FT was higher among those with ASCVD when compared with cancer (54% vs. 41%; p < 0.001). When studying the individual components of FT, in adjusted analyses, those with ASCVD had higher odds of any difficulty paying medical bills (odds ratio [OR]: 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09 to 1.36), inability to pay bills (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.50), cost-related medication nonadherence (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.51), food insecurity (OR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.64), and foregone/delayed care due to cost (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.36). The presence of ≥3 of these factors was significantly higher among those with ASCVD and those with both ASCVD and cancer when compared with those with cancer (23% vs. 30% vs. 13%, respectively; p < 0.001). These results remained similar in the elderly population. ConclusionsOur study highlights that FT is greater among patients with ASCVD compared with those with cancer, with the highest burden among those with both conditions.

Associations Between Serum Lycopene and Cancer-Related Fatigue: Findings From the US 2005–2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)

Abstract Objectives Cancer-related fatigue is characterized by an overwhelming sense of tiredness that cannot be relieved by sleep or rest; it often persists for years into survivorship. Maintaining appropriate nutritional status is critical during cancer treatment, though few studies have assessed relationships between diet quality and cancer-related fatigue. Herein, we aimed to investigate the association between serum lycopene, a proxy for diet quality, and fatigue in a large representative sample of the US population. Methods Data were obtained from the 2005–2006 NHANES dataset. Serum total lycopene was quantified from fasting blood samples and used as a continuous variable. Patient-reported fatigue was assessed from a question on the validated Patient Health Questionnaire-9: “Over the last 2 weeks, how often have you been bothered by… feeling tired or having little energy?”; fatigue was categorized as no fatigue (0), low fatigue (1), or moderate-severe fatigue (2–3). Multinomial regression models were applied to assess the association between serum lycopene and fatigue while controlling for age, race/ethnicity, and body mass index. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for having low or moderate-severe vs. no fatigue for a 10-μg/dL increase in serum lycopene for all participants and those with a previous cancer diagnosis. Results Participants (n = 4091) were 48.3 ± 18.7 years old, 52% female, and 51.7% non-Hispanic White; 329 had a prior cancer diagnosis. A self-reported cancer diagnosis was associated with a 31.8% greater odds of having moderate-severe vs. no fatigue (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.12–1.55) and a 6.8% greater odds of having low fatigue (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.93–1.22). A 10-μg/dl increase in serum lycopene concentrations was associated with a 5.3% lower odds of moderate-severe vs. no fatigue (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.90–0.99) and a similar odds of low fatigue (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.97–1.04). These associations were similar for patients who had had a cancer diagnosis. Conclusions Higher levels of serum lycopene were associated with lower odds of moderate-severe. Dietary interventions should be further explored for their associations with cancer-related fatigue among patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Funding Sources National Cancer Institute.

Continuous unobtrusive assessment of meaningful change in older adults with cancer: The Pacific Aging &amp; Cancer Study Collaborative—PACS collaborative.

1569 Background: Knowledge of changes in health that precede a cancer diagnosis is challenging because of a lack of longitudinal, objective measurement techniques. Current approaches rely on periodic assessment via self-report which may miss when and how health changes, particularly when changes may appear subtly over time. Remote-monitoring technologies provide a mechanism to continuously, passively, and unobtrusively monitor changes in health so that trajectories of change in relation to a life event (i.e., cancer diagnosis, treatment) can be detected and described. We examined the changes in digital indicators of health and life events 1 year before and after a self-reported cancer diagnosis in community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older. Methods: This is a secondary, retrospective data analysis of older adults who self-reported a new cancer diagnosis in the Oregon Center for Aging &amp; Technology (ORCATECH) cohort. Ten older adults (age = 71.8±4.9 years, 30% women) were included with various cancer types (esophageal, prostate, uterine, pancreatic, b-cell follicular lymphoma, multiple myeloma, basal cell melanoma, basal and/or squamous cell carcinoma). Daily physical activity was measured using step counts derived from an actigraph watch. Weekly health and life events (pain severity, loneliness, hospitalization/emergency room (ER) visits, days away from home overnight) were self-reported from weekly online surveys. Results: A total of 3,624 days of actigraphy data (210 ± 88 days pre-cancer; 153 ± 81 days post-cancer) and 750 weeks of self-reported online survey data (36 ± 12 weeks pre-cancer; 39 ± 14 weeks post-cancer) were collected. Longitudinal linear mixed-effects models revealed that the trajectory of step counts was different pre- and post-cancer (β = -1.52, p &lt;.001), with a gradual decrease in step counts before a cancer diagnosis. The trajectory of pain severity was different pre- and post-cancer (β = 0.01, p &lt;.001), with a gradual increase in pain severity before a cancer diagnosis. There was a gradual increase in the occurrence of hospitalization/ER visits (OR = 1.07, p = 0.02) and days away from home overnight (OR = 1.04, p = 0.01) before a cancer diagnosis. Feelings of loneliness increased over time, regardless of pre- or post-cancer (OR = 1.04, p &lt;.001). Conclusions: Changes in health and life events 1-year before a cancer diagnosis in older adults with varying cancer types and severity were unobtrusively observed. This study suggests that a remote-monitoring technology platform deployed in homes can detect meaningful intra-individual changes before and after a cancer diagnosis. Future studies can employ this technology as a pathway for improving the timeliness of detection and more effective therapeutic follow-up for older adults.

Social inequalities in participation in cancer screening: does the mode of data collection matter? The CONSTANCES cohort.

Self-reported data are prone to item non-response and misreporting. We investigated to what extent the use of self-reported data for participation in breast (BCS) and cervical cancer screening (CCS) impacted socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation. We used data from a large population-based survey including information on cancer screening from self-reported questionnaire and administrative records (n = 14122 for BCS, n = 27120 CCS). For educational level, occupation class and household income per capita, we assessed the accuracy of self-reporting using sensitivity, specificity and both positive and negative predictive value. In addition, we estimated to what extent the use of self-reported data modified the magnitude of socioeconomic differences in BCS and CCS participation with age-adjusted non-screening rate difference, odds ratios and relative indices of inequality. Although women with a high socioeconomic position were more prone to report a date for BCS and CCS in questionnaires, they were also more prone to over-declare their participation in CCS if they had not undergone a screening test within the recommended time frame. The use of self-reported cancer screening data, when compared with administrative records, did not impact the magnitude of social differences in BCS participation but led to an overestimation of the social differences in CCS participation. This was due to misreporting rather than to item non-response. Women's socioeconomic position is associated with missingness and the accuracy of self-reported BCS and CCS participation. Social inequalities in cancer screening participation based on self-reports are likely to be overestimated for CCS.

Family planning in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants

BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers have a high lifetime risk of developing breast and ovarian malignancies. Given the risks and significant ramifications of undergoing risk-reducing surgeries, many pathogenic variant carriers unaffected by cancer (previvors) struggle with family planning and reproductive decision making. The objective of this study was to determine the attitudes and practices of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers with respect to family planning decision making. A cross-sectional survey was conducted of BRCA1 and BRCA2 previvors at four Northeastern medical centers. The survey was administered electronically via email using REDCap. The survey included demographic information as well as questions about genetic testing, prophylactic surgeries, family planning, and partnering. Data were analyzed with Fisher's exact tests and t tests. The survey was completed by 139 of 422 BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant carriers (response rate 33%). Thirteen were excluded from analysis due to self-reported cancer history. Of the remaining 126, 21 (16.7%) were male and 105 (83.3%) were female. Female participants <35years old at the time of genetic testing were significantly more likely than those 35 or greater to report feeling urgency to have a family after finding out about their BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variant (p<0.0001). Younger women also reported their genetic status had a stronger impact on their romantic relationships (p=0.029). Men were significantly more likely to report that they felt no urgency to have a family compared to women (p<0.0001). Our study reflects the complex decision making for previvors and the intricacies of family planning in this population. Providers can use this knowledge as a guide to counsel patients about reproductive options.

Influenza Vaccination Rates Among Patients With a History of Cancer: Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey.

BackgroundAnnual influenza vaccination is recommended for all patients with cancer, but vaccine uptake data by cancer type and time since diagnosis are limited. We sought to estimate vaccination rates across different cancer types in the United States and determine whether rates vary over time since diagnosis.MethodsVaccination rates in individuals with solid tumor and hematological malignancies were estimated using data from 59 917 individuals obtained by the 2016 and 2017 National Health Interview Survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.ResultsAn average of 64% of the 5053 individuals with self-reported cancer received the influenza vaccine. Vaccination rates in men and women with solid tumors (66.6% and 60.3%, respectively) and hematological malignancies (58.1% and 59.2%, respectively) were significantly higher compared to those without cancer (38.9% and 46.8%, respectively). Lower rates were seen in uninsured patients, those younger than 45 years of age, and in African Americans with hematological malignancies but not with solid tumors. Vaccine uptake was similar regardless of time since cancer diagnosis.ConclusionsInfluenza vaccination rates are higher in men and women with cancer but remain suboptimal, highlighting the need for additional measures to improve vaccine compliance and prevent complications from influenza across all cancer types.

Disparities in Meeting USPSTF Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines Among Women in the United States.

IntroductionMany sociodemographic factors affect women’s ability to meet cancer screening guidelines. Our objective was to examine which sociodemographic characteristics were associated with women meeting US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.MethodsWe used 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data to examine the association between sociodemographic variables, such as race/ethnicity, rurality, education, and insurance status, and self-reported cancer screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer. We used multivariable log-binomial regression models to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios and 95% CIs.ResultsOverall, the proportion of women meeting USPSTF guidelines for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening was more than 70%. The prevalence of meeting screening guidelines was 6% to 10% greater among non-Hispanic Black women than among non-Hispanic White women across all 3 types of cancer screening. Women who lacked health insurance had a 26% to 39% lower screening prevalence across screening types than women with health insurance. Compared with women with $50,000 or more in annual household income, women with less than $50,000 in annual household income had a 3% to 8% lower screening prevalence across all 3 screening types. For colorectal cancer, the prevalence of screening was 7% less among women who lived in rural counties than among women in metropolitan counties.ConclusionMany women still do not meet current USPSTF guidelines for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Screening disparities are persistent among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, especially women with low incomes and without health insurance. To increase the prevalence of cancer screening and reduce disparities, interventions must focus on reducing economic barriers and improving access to care.