Self-reported Patient Adherence Research Articles

The impact of symptom clusters on endocrine therapy adherence in patients with breast cancer

BackgroundWhen taken as prescribed, endocrine therapy is effective in reducing risk of recurrence and mortality in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. However, treatment side effects can act as a barrier to medication adherence. Existing research has not identified any specific side effects as consistent predictors of nonadherence. Our aim was to explore the influence of symptom clusters on self-reported adherence in patients with breast cancer. MethodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted, including patients with breast cancer currently or previously prescribed endocrine therapy (N = 1051). This included measures of self-reported endocrine therapy adherence and common symptoms among this population (insomnia, depression, anxiety, fatigue, musculoskeletal, and vasomotor symptoms). ResultsUnintentional nonadherence was higher than intentional nonadherence (50.8 % vs 31.01 %). The most troublesome symptom was insomnia (73.83 % displayed probable insomnia disorder). K-means cluster analysis identified 2 symptom clusters: overall High symptoms, and overall Low symptoms. Participants in the Low symptoms cluster were significantly more likely to be classed as adherent based on unintentional and intentional items. ConclusionsNonadherence was high in the current sample, and significantly more likely in participants reporting overall severe symptoms. Clinicians should be aware of the scale of common side effects and facilitate open conversation about potential barriers to adherence. Follow-up care should include assessment of common symptoms and signpost patients to appropriate support or treatment when required. Future research should explore potential for a central symptom to act as a target for intervention, to relieve overall side effect burden and facilitate better medication adherence.

The relationship between knowledge, health literacy, and adherence among patients taking oral anticoagulants for stroke thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation.

Patients' knowledge regarding their oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF), their level of medication adherence, and health literacy are known to affect treatment outcomes. However, contemporary data regarding the relationships between these variables are lacking. To investigate the relationships between anticoagulant knowledge, health literacy, and self-reported adherence in patients taking warfarin and the directly acting oral anticoagulants. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 48 patients with AF identified from general practices. The Anticoagulation Knowledge Tool (AKT) was used to assess anticoagulation knowledge; the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (s-TOFHLA) for health literacy; and the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) for medication adherence. Participants had mean scores of 61.6±15.8, 7.2±1.1, and 24.7±9.5 for the AKT, MMAS-8 and s-TOFHLA, respectively. Significant correlations were observed between anticoagulation knowledge and health literacy with medication adherence (0.37, P<.01 and .30, P<.05, respectively). Participants with inadequate health literacy had a significantly lower mean knowledge score than those with adequate health literacy (55.8±15.9 vs 66.1±14.4, P<.05). Participants who self-reported adherence to their OAC had significantly higher knowledge scores than those who did not (67.5±13.3 vs 56.1±16.2, P<.05). Significant correlations between health literacy, OAC knowledge, and adherence were observed, and these relationships should to be considered by health professionals responsible for monitoring patients who are prescribed anticoagulants. We also observed serious gaps in OAC knowledge. Interventions designed to optimize the outcomes of anticoagulant treatment need to address these factors.

A Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Staphylococcus aureus Screening, Decolonization and Patient Adherence to Pre-Operative Decolonization Procedures

BackgroundColonization with Staphylococcus aureus (SA) increases the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and de-colonization reduces this risk depending on level of patient adherence. Our VA facility’s participation in a multi-site study to identify the best strategies for implementing peri-operative SA de-colonization provided an opportunity to examine the reliability of existing internal processes. The objectives of this single-site study were to asses self-reported patient adherence, and barriers to recommended de-colonization procedures, as well as to examine if current patient educational materials were sufficient.MethodsA survey measuring self-reported adherence and barriers to recommended de-colonization procedures was administered by telephone. A process map of the patient education process was employed to identify key frontline staff who were asked to review existing patient education materials and procedures. A new patient education tool was then developed with their input and input from an expert in patient education.Results34 patients responded to the telephone interview. Self-reported de-colonization adherence was 100%. 32% of patients reported high levels of social/economic deprivation and only 32% reported using medication reminders, suggesting some risk of non-adherence. Process mapping revealed that patient education was delivered through a combination of face-to-face training and printed materials. Review of the printed materials identified a number of opportunities for improvement. The newly developed patient education tool was rewritten at a 7th grade reading level and revised to include: (1) more concrete information on the benefits of SA de-colonization; (2) visual aides to enhance performance of different de-colonization tasks; and (3) a tracking log to facilitate adherence to each of the recommended de-colonization tasks.ConclusionWe identified many opportunities to improve the education of patients undergoing SA de-colonization prior to high-risk surgery at our VA. Further work will need to be done to determine whether these changes positively impacted patient adherence to recommended de-colonization procedures and whether this translates into improved patient outcomes.Disclosures M. Schweizer, B Braun: Speaker at a course, Travel reimbursement to teach course

Nevirapine Concentrations in Saliva Measured by Thin Layer Chromatography and Self-Reported Adherence in Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Tanzania

Thin layer chromatography (TLC) can be used to perform therapeutic drug monitoring in resource-limited settings, where more expensive analytical methods, such as high-performance liquid chromatography or liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, are not feasible. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare saliva concentrations of nevirapine (NVP) with self-reported adherence in patients on NVP-containing antiretroviral treatment at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania. HIV-infected patients using a combination of zidovudine + lamivudine + NVP, or stavudine + lamivudine + NVP, for more than 4 weeks were included. Saliva samples were collected using dental cotton rolls impregnated with citric acid (20 mg). Saliva NVP concentrations were analyzed using TLC. Adherence to ARV medication was assessed by self-reporting using the Morisky scale. Of the 91 study participants, 79 (86.8%) had therapeutic saliva NVP concentrations (ie, >1.75 mg/L) and 12 (13.2%) had subtherapeutic concentrations. Self-reported adherence among the study participants was high in 62 participants (68.1%), moderate in 24 (26.4%), and low in 5 (5.5%). Fifty-seven (91.9%) of the study participants with high self-reported adherence had therapeutic saliva NVP concentrations. Of the 5 participants with low self-reported adherence, 3 had therapeutic NVP concentrations. A high proportion of patients had therapeutic NVP saliva concentrations as measured by TLC, which showed a good agreement with self-reported adherence.

Patient adherence with postoperative restrictions after rotator cuff repair

This study aimed to measure self-reported patient adherence to postoperative restrictions after rotator cuff repair, to evaluate correlations between adherence and functional outcome, and to identify possible indicators of poor adherence. We believed that poor adherence would correlate with poor functional outcome. Fifty consecutive patients undergoing repair for rotator cuff tears were included and instructed to wear an abduction brace for 6weeks after surgery. Functional evaluations, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, University of California-Los Angeles shoulder score, and Simple Shoulder Test, were made preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients commented on their adherence with a medical adherence measurement questionnaire. Average adherence was 88% (range, 59.2-100). There were no significant correlations between adherence and improvement in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California-Los Angeles, or Simple Shoulder Test scores after rotator cuff repair (P=.06245, .5891, and .7688). Of the patient demographics analyzed, only smoking status had a positive effect on adherence (P=.00432; coefficient, 9.867). All other demographics, including hand dominance, mechanism of injury, repair complexity, comorbidities, living status, employment status, and age, had no significant effect on self-measured adherence to postoperative restrictions (P=.7876, .5889, .6444, .4190, .0609, .4171, .5402). Patients' self-reported adherence did not correlate with shoulder outcome as measured on any of 3 functional outcome scores.

Improving the economic and humanistic outcomes for diabetic patients: making a case for employer-sponsored medication therapy management

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to determine the cost savings of a pharmacist-led, employer-sponsored medication therapy management (MTM) program for diabetic patients and to assess for any changes in patient satisfaction and self-reported medication adherence for enrollees.MethodsParticipants in this study were enrollees of an employer-sponsored MTM program. They were included if their primary medical insurance and prescription coverage was from the City of Toledo, they had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, and whether or not they had been on medication or had been given a new prescription for diabetes treatment. The data were analyzed on a prospective, pre-post longitudinal basis, and tracked for one year following enrollment. Outcomes included economic costs, patient satisfaction, and self-reported patient adherence. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the population, calculate the number of visits, and determine the mean costs for each visit. Friedman’s test was used to determine changes in outcomes due to the nonparametric nature of the data.ResultsThe mean number of visits to a physician’s office decreased from 10.22 to 7.07. The mean cost of these visits for patients increased from $47.70 to $66.41, but use of the emergency room and inpatient visits decreased by at least 50%. Employer spending on emergency room visits decreased by $24,214.17 and inpatient visit costs decreased by $166,610.84. Office visit spending increased by $11,776.41. A total cost savings of $179,047.80 was realized by the employer at the end of the program. Significant improvements in patient satisfaction and adherence were observed.ConclusionPharmacist interventions provided through the employer-sponsored MTM program led to substantial cost savings to the employer with improved patient satisfaction and adherence on the part of employees at the conclusion of the program.

Self-reported adherence in patients with epilepsy who missed their medications and reasons for nonadherence in China

ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were: (1) to evaluate self-reported adherence in adult patients with epilepsy in China who had missed taking their antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) at least once and (2) to determine why patients were not adherent to their medication to employ interventions targeted at barriers to adherence. MethodsA questionnaire was used to collect the patients' demographic data, disease information, and reasons for why the patients did not take their AEDs. Adherence was also included as measured using a four-item Morisky questionnaire (Morisky-4 questionnaire). ResultsOf the 131 patients, 4.6%, 70.2%, and 25.2% showed high, medium, and low adherence, respectively. The reasons for nonadherence included forgetfulness (54.2%), being seizure-free for a period (48.9%), and fear of adverse drug effects (27.5%). ConclusionsMedium adherence was the predominant nonadherence pattern, and forgetfulness, being seizure-free for a period, and fear of adverse effects were the primary reasons for nonadherence to AEDs. To overcome barriers to nonadherence, it is essential to use tools that are sensitive to reasons for nonadherence.

Factors affecting adherence to treatment of psoriasis: comparing biologic therapy to other modalities

Objectives: This study evaluated self-reported patient adherence to different types of treatment in psoriasis and factors that affect adherence. Patients and methods: Patients attending a Dermatology Department for treatments of psoriasis completed a questionnaire about adherence to each of their therapies, Self-assessed Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (SAPASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Results: Hundred and six patients participated, 98 on topical treatments, 43 on oral systemic therapies, 39 on phototherapy and 29 were on biologic therapies. The overall rate of self-reported treatment adherence was 85.8%. There was a significant relationship between the types of treatment (topical, oral systemic, phototherapy and biologic therapy) and the number of combinations of treatments and adherence. Adherence ranked significantly better on biologic therapies 100%, followed by oral therapy 96%, phototherapy 93% and then topical therapy 75%. Being too busy, being fed up and cigarette smoking were associated with reduced adherence. About 56.8% of patients reported that messiness of treatment prevented them from adhering. Patients with mild psoriasis and those with DLQI of 5 or less adhered less to topical therapy. Conclusions: There is a significant relationship between the types of treatment (topical, oral systemic, phototherapy and biologic therapy) and the number of combinations of treatments and adherence.

Patient-reported barriers to glaucoma medication access, use, and adherence in southern India

The objectives of the study were to (a) describe the different types of problems that patients in southern India reported having when taking their glaucoma medications and (b) examine the relationship between patient reported-problems in taking their glaucoma medications and the self-reported patient adherence. A survey was conducted by clinical staff on 243 glaucoma patients who were on at least one glaucoma medication in an eye clinic in southern India. We found that 42% of patients reported one or more problems in using their glaucoma medications. Approximately 6% of patients reported being less than 100% adherent in the past week. Unmarried patients and patients who reported difficulty squeezing the bottle and difficulty opening the bottle were significantly more likely to report nonadherence.

Metabolic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Correlates Weakly with Patient Adherence to Oral Hypoglycaemic Treatment

Patient adherence to treatment is viewed as essential to good metabolic control in diabetes. Our primary objective was to determine if self-reported patient adherence correlated strongly with metabolic control. Our secondary objective was to determine the natural grouping of factors which influence adherence. Data were collected using a questionnaire set with 5-point Likert scales. Primary analysis was done using Spearman's correlation coefficient between self-reported composite adherence scores and HbA1c. Secondary analysis was done using exploratory factor analysis. The primary analysis suggests that patient adherence to the treatment regime is weakly correlated to metabolic control. Calculated Spearman's rho was 0.197, with a two-tailed P value of 0.027. The secondary analysis demonstrates the natural clustering of factors that influence patient adherence to treatment. A 6-factor solution was found to account for most of the variance in the data. We also found that feelings of frustration, anxiety, and depression were associated with a lack of knowledge about diabetes treatment. In addition, belief in traditional medicine correlated strongly with ethnicity. A good treatment regime for type 2 diabetes mellitus influences metabolic outcome far more than patient adherence.

Treatment adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus

This study assessed self-reported adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) from underserved healthcare settings. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 102 ethnically diverse patients--70 with RA and 32 with SLE--attending rheumatology clinics at publicly funded hospitals in Houston, Texas; 43% were Hispanic, 32% African-American, and 25% White. Treatment adherence was evaluated using the compliance questionnaire rheumatology (CQR; 0, low adherence and 100, high adherence) and the questionnaire of the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (AACTG). The patients were also asked how often they forgot to take their prescribed medications or discontinued them on their own. Mean patient age was 48.5 years; 75% were female, 32% were African-American, 43% Hispanic, and 25% White. Only one third reported never forgetting to take their medications; 40% reported having stopped their medications on their own because of side effects, and 20% because of lack of efficacy. Mean CQR score was 69.1 +/- 10.5, suggesting moderate adherence overall. Differences were also observed across ethnic groups: 23% of ethnic minority patients had problems taking their medications at specified times compared to 11% of Whites (p = 0.03). Lower education and side effects were associated with lower adherence. No differences were observed between RA and SLE patients. Many patients with RA and SLE report problems with treatment adherence. These appear to be more prevalent in African Americans and Hispanics than Whites; the impact of decreased adherence on outcomes could be significant and should be considered when treating patients with RA and SLE.

Adesão ao tratamento em pacientes com fibrose cística

To evaluate the self-reported degree of adherence to treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), investigating associations with characteristics of the disease and with the degree of adherence perceived by health professionals. This was a prospective, cross-sectional study involving patients with CF monitored at a Program for Adults with CF. The degree of adherence was evaluated using a questionnaire. Patients were divided into two groups: greater degree of adherence and moderate/poor degree of adherence. Clinical data, Shwachman-Kulczycki clinical score, Brasfield radiographic score and spirometry data were obtained for all patients. Out of 38 patients studied, 31 (81.6%) were classified as presenting a greater degree of adherence and 7 (18.4%) as presenting a moderate/poor degree of adherence. The self-reported patient adherence score correlated with the clinical score (r = -0.36, p = 0.028). The self-reported patient adherence score (median = 0.79) was higher than that perceived by health professionals (median = 0.71, p = 0.003). A greater degree of adherence was self-reported for respiratory therapy (by 84.2%), exercise (by 21.1%), prescribed diet (by 65.8%), pancreatic enzymes (by 96.3%), vitamins (by 79.4%), inhaled antibiotic therapy (by 76.7%) and inhaled DNase (by 79.4%). Self-reported adherence of patients attending a Program for Adults with CF was good. The self-reported patient adherence score correlated inversely with the clinical score. Self-reported patient adherence was greater than the adherence perceived by health professionals.

Self-Reported Adherence in Patients with Asthma

Not all patients with asthma adhere to their prescribed drug regimens. The Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization, organized as predisposing, enabling, and need variables, may be useful in identifying variables related to adherent medication-taking behavior. To examine the relationship between predisposing, enabling, and need variables and self-reported adherence with asthma controller drugs. A secondary analysis was conducted from a cross-sectional study using survey and claims data obtained from adults with asthma enrolled in a managed care organization. Independent variables included predisposing (age, gender, race, years with asthma, number of comorbidities, health beliefs), enabling (income, number of metered-dose inhaler [MDI] instructors, inhaler technique, perceived physician access), and need (patient-perceived severity, symptom-derived severity, health-related quality of life). Adherence was measured using a 4 item questionnaire scored as the mean of the responses, with 5 denoting highest adherence. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify variables with statistically significant relationships to self-reported adherence. Stepwise backward elimination was used, with the final model consisting of variables considered significant at p less than 0.05. The 573 respondents (1270 packets sent; 45% response rate) were primarily white (89.5%) and female (71.0%), with an average age of 40.5 +/- 12.4 years (mean +/- SD) and average asthma duration of 18.3 +/- 14.2 years. The mean adherence scale score was 3.7 +/- 1.1, with 84.6% indicating some level of nonadherence (score <5). The final model had an adjusted R(2) of 0.26 and included 6 independent variables. Better adherence was associated with stronger beliefs in the benefits of treatment and trigger avoidance, greater perceived asthma severity, longer asthma duration, more MDI instructors, and higher scores on the Short-Form 36 mental component summary. Complex beliefs, perceptions, and experiences constitute the variables associated with adherent medication-taking behavior. Future longitudinal studies should include these variables to determine the predictive strength of the model.

Adherence to medication after liver transplantation in Scotland: A pilot study

This study assessed adherence to medication after liver transplantation and consisted of 2 components: a retrospective audit involving the examination of the Scottish national database, and a preliminary study assessing psychological factors implicated in poor adherence. In order to first establish an idea of the extent of poor adherence within the Scottish liver transplant population, a retrospective audit was carried out on all patients (N = 435) who received transplants before November 2003. Adherence was assessed by attendance at follow-up clinic appointments, blood immunosuppressant levels, and episodes of cellular rejection. It was found that attendance and immunosuppressant levels were often suboptimal and that nonadherence may have contributed to retransplantation and death. Cellular (acute) rejection after 6 months was associated with higher mortality. Explanations as to why liver transplant patients may not take their medication as recommended were then explored in detailed psychological assessments of 33 liver transplant recipients. The results indicated that low self-reported patient adherence was related to greater concerns regarding the potential adverse effects of medication, and a stronger belief that medicines in general are harmful. In addition, the greater the effect the transplantation had on patients' lives and the more it affected them emotionally, the less adherent the patients were likely to be. The results highlight potential areas that, if confirmed in a larger study, might be targeted in a psychological intervention to improve patient adherence and thereby transplantation outcomes.

Adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy in HIV+ Ugandan patients purchasing therapy

Our objective was to determine the level of adherence and reasons for non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among HIV-positive (HIV+) people on ART in a resource-limited setting. Patients receiving ART were recruited into the cross-sectional study from three treatment centres in Kampala, Uganda. The number of missed doses over the last three days was assessed by structured patient interviews and dichotomized at +/-95% adherence. Reasons for non-adherence were assessed with both structured patient interviews and unstructured qualitative interviews. Independent predictors of non-adherence were assessed with multivariate logistic regression. In all, 304 HIV-infected persons on ART were enrolled into the study. Factors associated with non-adherence were marital status (odds ratio (OR) = 2.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.32-6.50) and low monthly income <50 US$ [OR = 2.77, 95% CI 1.64-4.67]. We concluded that levels of self-reported adherence in patients receiving ART in Kampala are comparable to levels in resource-rich settings with inability to purchase and secure a stable supply as a major barrier to adherence.