JILL SAVAGE SCHARFF AND DAVID E. SCHARFF (EDS.): Tuning the Therapeutic Instrument: Affective Learning of Psychotherapy. Jason Aronson, Northvale, NJ, 2000, 438 pp., $60.00, ISBN: 0-765-702452. The authors engage us in an interesting foray that moves psychoanalytic theory further into the field of object relationships. In fact, their conceptual scheme goes beyond the dyad to discussions of family dynamics and the explorations of small and large groups as organizers of psychic development. This book is divided into four sections. The first concentrates on psychic development as occurs in individual and group interactions. The developmental process is also infused with the mathematical principles of chaos theory and fractal geometry, although the latter is considered primarily in phenomenological terms rather than as a unique type of geometry. The second section consists of interesting discussions of the psychodynamics of psychotherapy and supervision in small and large groups, as well as therapists in the student role. The latter is an enhancing experience for the therapist and the group. The remaining sections include extensive discussions of many different groups, pursuing the individual, group, and institutional elements of the learning matrix. This book covers many aspects of psychic development, the learning process, and the treatment relationship. Inasmuch as it spreads itself to include very difficult and complicated theoretical systems, such as chaos theory, it is remarkably lucid. This is further noteworthy because various chapters are written by different people, so I conclude that the Scharffs have carefully reviewed and edited the manuscripts presented to them. The central theme of the Scharffs' system concerning therapeutic strategy and learning is what they call affective learning. It is sufficiently important to them to include it in the subtitle. It is also part of their educational endeavor, a two-year program in which the therapist focuses on using the self, a key ingredient of successful treatment, as it is developed into a sensitive instrument for therapy. In spite of the constant references to affective learning, I am not quite certain as to what special significance they attribute to that term. They emphasize that affects are motivating and integrative factors for self-object differentiation, obviously a developmental achievement. Unconscious self-object relations are the organizers for external object relations. Freud made the same point when he wrote that the ego is a precipitate of past object relations. The Scharffs state that communication is largely unconscious. This applies mainly to learning experiences that relate to developmental progression. As with many psychic processes it is unwise to generalize. There are many types of learning that involve different levels of the psychic apparatus and much is acquired by ego and secondary-process activity, although in creative interactions the role of the unconscious is vital. …
Read full abstract