So Pearson. The strange series of hypodochmiacs here and atO.T.1207 ff. (cf.E.Or.982–4), with brevis in longo without pause atAj.421 andO.T.1208 (possibly also 1217), seems metrically self-contained, despite their syntactical interdependence (esp.Aj.421–2οὐκέτ' ἄνδρα μὴ | τόνδ' ἴδητ', so that the word-overlap ofοἷονinto iambics in Pearson's text is unlikely.ἑξερῶ μέγαshould therefore be writtenplena scriptura. Thenοἷον οὔτιν' ἁ Τροί|α στρατοῦ…is possible, but the ithyphallic with word-overlap, sometimes found in the syncopated iambics of Aeschylus, is foreign to Sophocles. Divideἐξερῶ μέγα, | οἷον οὔτινα | Τροία…Thenϕίλοι τοῖσδ' ὁμοῦ = οἷον οὔτινα, i.e.δ= hyp., which is not certainly found, and the antistrophe has two syllables extra.