When appropriately used, the multiconfigurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) approximation is useful in discerning correct electronic structure results. However, with the increasing size of chemical systems of interest, MCSCF rapidly becomes unfeasible due to the requirement of larger active spaces, which lead to computationally unmanageable numbers of configurations. This situation is especially true for complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF). In particular, reducing this computational expense by using restricted active spaces in solving for gradients and nonadiabatic couplings (NACs) during dynamics runs would save computer time. However, the validity of such restricted spaces is not well-known even for recovering the majority of the nondynamical correlation and inevitably varies between chemical systems across a range of nuclear geometries. As such, we use the recently implemented coupled perturbed–occupation restricted multiple active space (CP-ORMAS) equations (West et al., unpublished) to verify the accuracy of this approximation for gradients and NACs vectors around two specific conical intersection geometries for the silaethylene and butadiene systems. Overall, no excitations between appropriate subspaces show qualitatively reasonable results while single excitations significantly improve ORMAS results relative to the CASSCF level in these particular systems. However, single excitation schemes do not always lead to the correct orbital subspaces, and as a result, seemingly smooth potential energy surfaces (PES) do not always result in smooth analytical gradients and NACs. In addition, while some of the single excitation ORMAS and CASSCF schemes have improper orbitals rotate into the active space, the schemes without excitations (even with more subspaces) do not exhibit this behavior.