Selective His Bundle Pacing Research Articles

Electrical parameters for physiological His–Purkinje pacing vary by implant location in an ex vivo canine model

Permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP) is an attractive, perhaps more physiological, alternative to traditional right ventricular pacing. The purpose of this study was to utilize direct visualization to more comprehensively understand the anatomy central to HBP, correlating electrical lead performance to implant locations along the His-bundle (HB) pathway. Canine hearts (n = 5) were isolated and reanimated using Visible Heart methodologies. Medtronic 3830 SelectSecure leads were fixated where His potentials were present. The location of each implant was mapped/binned into 4 regions approximately analogous to the proximal, penetrating, and distal HB. Locational differences in HBP capture and resultant QRS morphology were assessed. Average HBP capture thresholds did not significantly vary with respect to implant location (1.0-ms pulse width; P = .48). The resulting QRS morphologies from HB-paced beats varied in relation to implant location. As leads were placed further distally along the HB, the ratio of paced to native QRS complex duration increased (ΔQRSpaced/ΔQRSnative ratios-region 2: 0.84 ± 0.16; region 3: 1.04 ± 0.42; region 4: 1.74 ± 0.86). We demonstrated correlation between the anatomic locations of HBP lead placement and resultant QRS morphologies in a reanimated canine heart model. Proximal placement along the HB pathway resulted in more favorable QRS morphologies, suggesting improved selective HBP capture, with no significant increase in HBP capture thresholds. Pacing the HB in more proximal pathway locations improved the selectivity of HBP and may confer electrical and anatomic benefits relative to distal HBP.

Selective His-Bundle Pacing May Preserve Intrinsic Repolarization as Well as Depolarization

A 79-year-old man with chronic atrial fibrillation underwent single-chamber His-bundle pacemaker implantation. The post-implant electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrated selective His-bundle capture, with a narrow paced QRS and repolarization pattern similar to that of the baseline ECG. Furthermore, repolarization changes prototypic of ventricular pacing did not occur with selective His-bundle capture. While His-bundle pacing, with or without selective His-bundle capture, can preserve physiologic patterns of depolarization, only His-bundle selective pacing can preserve intrinsic ST- and T-wave patterns. Thus, the maintenance of physiologic repolarization may have various advantages, including accurate interpretation of ECG changes that are not generally interpretable in the setting of ventricular pacing.

Commentary: Selective His-Bundle Pacing May Preserve Intrinsic Repolarization as Well as Depolarization.

Commentary: Selective His-Bundle Pacing May Preserve Intrinsic Repolarization as Well as Depolarization.

Permanent His-bundle pacing in patients with prosthetic cardiac valves

Conduction disease is not uncommon after prosthetic valve (PV) surgery. The feasibility of His-bundle pacing (HBP) in this patient population is not well studied. The purpose of this study was to report our experience with permanent HBP in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation after PV surgery. Permanent HBP was attempted in patients with AV conduction disease after PV surgery referred for pacemaker implantation. Conduction disease was characterized as AV nodal vs infranodal. Feasibility, relationship of HBP lead to PVs, and HBP characteristics were recorded. Thirty patients (47% men, age 74 ± 12 years, left ventricular ejection fraction 49% ± 11%) with AV conduction disease (100% patients; 14 with infranodal block; right bundle branch block 9, left bundle branch block 5, intraventricular conduction delay 1) underwent HBP. PVs included aortic valve replacement (AVR) in 8 patients (infranodal block 6 patients), tricuspid valve (TV) ring with mitral valve replacement or repair (MVR) in 10 patients (AV nodal block 9 patients), transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in 4 patients (infranodal block 4 patients), and MVR alone in 6 patients. HBP was successful in 28 patients (93%) (selective HBP 50%). His bundle (HB) recruitment was unsuccessful in 2 patients with TAVR. AVR/TAVR and TV ring served as anatomic landmarks for localizing the HB. Successful sites of HBP were posterior and inferior to AVR/TAVR and distal and septal to the TV ring. Baseline QRSd improved from 124 ± 32 ms to 118 ± 20 ms (P = .39). HBP threshold at implant was 1.45 ± 1 V at 1 ms. Permanent HBP was feasible in 93% of patients with PVs. Patients with AVR/TAVR predominantly developed infranodal block compared to AV nodal block in patients with TV ring/MVR. Location of PV might serve as a landmark for identifying the site of the HB.

Validation of Criteria for Selective His Bundle and Para‐Hisian Permanent Pacing

His Bundle (HB) pacing is a valid alternative to right ventricular pacing for patients with preserved His-ventricle conduction who are candidates for permanent stimulation. Permanent pacing in the HB area enables Selective HB pacing (SHBP) or para-Hisian pacing (PHP) to be achieved. The aim of our study was to draw up a set of easy criteria to differentiate and validate the two kinds of stimulations according to the pacing output and the ECG/EKG signals. From February to July 2005, 17 patients eligible for a pacemaker (PM) procedure underwent implantation with the Medtronic SelectSecure lead (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) screwed into the HB area.SHBP was defined when the intrinsic QRS was equal, in both duration and morphology, to the paced QRS, the His-Ventricular (H-V) interval was equal to Pace-Ventricular interval (Vp-V) and, at low output, only the HB was captured, while increasing the output resulted in both the HB and right ventricular (RV) being captured (widening of QRS at high output). Conversely, PHP was defined when the intrinsic QRS differed from the paced one, either in morphology or in duration and, at high output, both the RV and HB were captured (non-SHBP), while decreasing the output resulted in losing HB capture (widening of QRS at low output). According to these criteria, SHBP was achieved in 11 patients, while in the remaining 6, PHP was obtained. No adverse events were reported. The above criteria enabled SHBP and PHP to be validated easily and clearly. A longer follow-up will be needed in order to ascertain whether the clinical outcome of these two approaches differs.

P2-29: A methodological approach to validate selective his bundle and para-Hisian permanent pacing

His Bundle (HB) pacing is a valid alternative to right ventricular pacing for patients with a preserved His-ventricle conduction candidate to permanent stimulation. By permanently pacing in the His Bundle area it is possible to obtain Selective HB pacing (SHBP) or para-Hisian pacing. The aim of our work is to propose an easy set of criteria to differentiate and validate the two kind of stimulation according to the pacing output and the ECG/EKG signals.