Selective Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitor Research Articles

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of [14C]anagliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in humans

1. The disposition of anagliptin, an orally active, highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, was investigated after a single oral dose of 100 mg/1.92 MBq [14C]anagliptin to six healthy men. Almost all the dose (98.2%) was recovered within 168 h: 73.2% in urine and 25.0% in faeces.2. Anagliptin was rapidly absorbed, with peak plasma concentrations of unchanged drug attained at a mean time of 1.8-h postdose. Mean fraction of the dose absorbed was >73%. Unchanged drug and a carboxylate metabolite (M1) were the major components in plasma, accounting for 66.0 and 23.4% of total plasma radioactivity area under the curve, respectively.3. Anagliptin was incompletely metabolized, with about 50% dose eliminated as unchanged drug (46.6% in urine and 4.1% in faeces). Metabolism to M1 accounted for 29.2% of the dose. No other metabolite accounted for >1% dose in excreta or yielded measurable systemic exposure. Terminal half-life of anagliptin and M1 was 4.37 and 9.88 h, respectively. Renal clearance of unbound anagliptin and unbound M1 far exceeded glomerular filtration rate, indicating active renal elimination: that might reflect the fact that anagliptin may be a substrate of OAT1, OAT3, MDR1 and MRP2, and M1 a substrate of OAT3, BCRP, MRP2 and MRP4.

Sitagliptin: Anti-platelet effect in diabetes and healthy volunteers

Sitagliptin, a selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor drug is used to treat type-2 diabetes (T2DM). We investigated the anti-platelet activity of sitagliptin in patients with T2DM and in in vitro samples obtained from healthy humans. Patients with T2DM (27 male + 23 female) were selected and followed up before (control) and after treatment with sitagliptin for up to 3 months. Platelets were isolated from the blood of sitagliptin treated patients and controls. Patients with T2DM treated with sitagliptin for 1and 3 months, showed 10 ± 2% and 30 ± 5% inhibition of platelet aggregation, respectively. For the in vitro study, platelets from 10 normal humans (n = 10) were isolated. Platelet aggregation, intracellular free calcium and tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple proteins were measured by aggregometer, spectrofluorometer and western blotting, respectively. Platelets pre-treated with 5 and 10 µg/ml of sitagliptin, showed 25 ± 4% and 40 ± 6% inhibition of thrombin-induced platelet aggregation, respectively. Sitagliptin decreased intracellular free calcium (2.5-fold) and tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple proteins in thrombin-induced platelet activation. Sitagliptin inhibited platelet aggregation in T2DM as well as in healthy humans. Sitagliptin has significant concentration-dependent anti-platelet activity. This activity was due to its inhibitory effect on intracellular free calcium and tyrosine phosphorylation.

Linagliptin

Linagliptin (Trajenta®, Tradjenta™, Trazenta™, Trayenta™) is an oral, highly selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 and is the first agent of its class to be eliminated predominantly via a nonrenal route. Linagliptin is indicated for once-daily use for the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and a twice-daily fixed-dose combination of linagliptin/metformin (Jentadueto®) is also available. In this article, the pharmacological, clinical efficacy and tolerability data relevant to the use of linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes are reviewed. The efficacy of oral linagliptin in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes has been investigated in several double-blind, multicentre trials. Following 12-24 weeks of treatment, improvements in glycaemic control parameters, including glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c); primary endpoint in all trials), were seen with linagliptin relative to placebo when used as monotherapy, initial combination therapy (with metformin or pioglitazone) or add-on therapy to other oral antihyperglycaemia agents (metformin and/or a sulfonylurea) or basal insulin (with or without metformin and/or pioglitazone). In terms of lowering HbA(1c), linagliptin was more effective than voglibose in a 26-week monotherapy trial and noninferior to glimepiride when used as add-on therapy to metformin in a 104-week study. Additional trials and subgroup analyses of pooled data suggest that linagliptin improves glycaemic control regardless of factors such as age, duration of type 2 diabetes, ethnicity and renal function, and as linagliptin is eliminated primarily via a nonrenal route, it can be used without dosage adjustment in patients with renal impairment of any degree. Oral linagliptin was generally well tolerated and was associated with a low likelihood of hypoglycaemia (except when used in combination with a sulfonylurea) and had little effect on bodyweight. Further long-term and comparative efficacy and tolerability data are required to help position linagliptin more definitively with respect to other antihyperglycaemia agents. However, clinical data currently available indicate that linagliptin is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment option for use in patients with type 2 diabetes, including those with renal impairment for whom other antihyperglycaemia agents require dosage adjustment or are not suitable.

Linagliptin Improves Insulin Sensitivity and Hepatic Steatosis in Diet-Induced Obesity

Linagliptin (tradjenta™) is a selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor. DPP-4 inhibition attenuates insulin resistance and improves peripheral glucose utilization in humans. However, the effects of chronic DPP-4 inhibition on insulin sensitivity are not known. The effects of long-term treatment (3–4 weeks) with 3 mg/kg/day or 30 mg/kg/day linagliptin on insulin sensitivity and liver fat content were determined in diet-induced obese C57BL/6 mice. Chow-fed animals served as controls. DPP-4 activity was significantly inhibited (67–89%) by linagliptin (P<0.001). Following an oral glucose tolerance test, blood glucose concentrations (measured as area under the curve) were significantly suppressed after treatment with 3 mg/kg/day (–16.5% to –20.3%; P<0.01) or 30 mg/kg/day (–14.5% to –26.4%; P<0.05) linagliptin (both P<0.01). Liver fat content was significantly reduced by linagliptin in a dose-dependent manner (both doses P<0.001). Diet-induced obese mice treated for 4 weeks with 3 mg/kg/day or 30 mg/kg/day linagliptin had significantly improved glycated hemoglobin compared with vehicle (both P<0.001). Significant dose-dependent improvements in glucose disposal rates were observed during the steady state of the euglycemic–hyperinsulinemic clamp: 27.3 mg/kg/minute and 32.2 mg/kg/minute in the 3 mg/kg/day and 30 mg/kg/day linagliptin groups, respectively; compared with 20.9 mg/kg/minute with vehicle (P<0.001). Hepatic glucose production was significantly suppressed during the clamp: 4.7 mg/kg/minute and 2.1 mg/kg/minute in the 3 mg/kg/day and 30 mg/kg/day linagliptin groups, respectively; compared with 12.5 mg/kg/minute with vehicle (P<0.001). In addition, 30 mg/kg/day linagliptin treatment resulted in a significantly reduced number of macrophages infiltrating adipose tissue (P<0.05). Linagliptin treatment also decreased liver expression of PTP1B, SOCS3, SREBP1c, SCD-1 and FAS (P<0.05). Other tissues like muscle, heart and kidney were not significantly affected by the insulin sensitizing effect of linagliptin. Long-term linagliptin treatment reduced liver fat content in animals with diet-induced hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance, and may account for improved insulin sensitivity.

Pharmacokinetics of linagliptin in subjects with hepatic impairment

• Linagliptin is an oral, highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor that was approved in the United States, Europe and elsewhere in 2011 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. • The elimination of linagliptin is primarily non-renal. Therefore, a potential effect of hepatic impairment on the elimination of linagliptin may have important implications for dosing recommendations. • This study shows that mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment did not result in an increase in linagliptin exposure after single and multiple dosing as compared with normal hepatic function. • No linagliptin dose adjustment is required in patients with any degree of hepatic impairment. To investigate whether hepatic impairment affects linagliptin pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability. This open label, parallel group, single centre study enrolled patients with mild (n= 8), moderate (n= 9) or severe (n= 8) hepatic impairment and healthy subjects (n= 8). Groups were matched with regard to age, weight and gender. Primary endpoints were linagliptin exposure following 5 mg linagliptin once daily for 7 days in patients with mild and moderate hepatic impairment vs. healthy subjects or after a single 5 mg dose for patients with severe hepatic impairment vs. healthy subjects. In mild hepatic impairment, steady-state linagliptin exposure was slightly lower than in healthy subjects [AUC(τ,ss) geometric mean ratio (GMR) 75.5%, 90% confidence interval (CI) 61.6%, 92.5%, and C(max,ss) GMR 64.4%, 90% CI 43.2%, 96.0%]. Exposure also tended to be lower in moderate hepatic impairment (AUC(τ,ss) GMR 85.5%, 90% CI 70.2%, 104.2% and C(max,ss) GMR 92.3%, 90% CI 62.8%, 135.6%). After a single dose, AUC(0,24 h) in patients with severe hepatic impairment was similar to that in healthy subjects (GMR 100.4%, 90% CI 75.0%, 134.3%) and C(max) was lower (GMR 77.0%, 90% CI 44.9%, 132.3%). Accumulation based on AUC or C(max) and renal excretion of unchanged linagliptin (≤ 7%) were comparable across groups. Median plasma DPP-4 inhibition was similar in healthy subjects (91%), and patients with mild (90%) and moderate (89%) hepatic impairment at steady-state trough concentrations, and in patients with severe hepatic impairment 24 h after a single dose (84%). Linagliptin was well tolerated. Mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment did not result in an increase in linagliptin exposure after single and multiple dosing compared with normal hepatic function. Dose adjustment with linagliptin is not required in patients with hepatic impairment.

Vildagliptin selectively ameliorates GLP-1, GLUT4, SREBP-1c mRNA levels and stimulates β-Cell proliferation resulting in improved glucose homeostasis in rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes

ObjectiveInhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4), a key regulator of the actions of incretin hormones, exert antihyperglycemic effects in type 2 diabetic patients. A major unanswered question concerns the potential ability of DPP-4 inhibition to have beneficial disease-modifying effects, specifically to attenuate loss of pancreatic β-cell mass and function due to oxidative stress induced inflammation. Here, we investigated the effects of a potent and selective DPP-4 inhibitor vildagliptin on glycemic control, pancreatic β-cell mass and function, genes and proteins expressions, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and nitric oxide in an n2-STZ diabetic model of rat with defects in insulin sensitivity and secretion. MethodTo induce NIDDM, STZ (sigma chemicals, USA) (90 mg/kg) was administered i.p. to a group of 2 days old pups. Another group of pups received only saline. The pups were weaned for 21 days, and 6 weeks after the injection of STZ, the animals were checked for fasting glucose level (FPG) ≥160 mg/dl were considered as diabetic. ResultsSignificant and dose-dependent correction of postprandial and fasting hyperglycemia was observed in diabetic rats following 8 weeks of chronic therapy. Treatment with vildagliptin showed increase in the number of insulin-positive β-cells in islets and improved the expressions of genes and proteins are responsible for insulin secretions. In addition, treatment of rats with vildagliptin significantly increased insulin content; and decreased the nitric oxide and TNF-alpha concentration. ConclusionThese findings suggest that DPP-4 inhibitors may offer long-lasting efficacy in the treatment of diabetes mellitus by modifying the courses of the disease.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Vildagliptin

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Vildagliptin

Alogliptin benzoate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Introduction: Alogliptin is a highly selective inhibitor of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4). It is one of several agents of this class now available for treatment of type 2 diabetes.Areas covered: This review is based upon a PubMed search and personal experience with alogliptin. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alogliptin are reviewed. The glucose-lowering effect of this agent is discussed as monotherapy and in combination with metformin, sulfonylurea, piogilitazone and insulin. The potential adverse effects of alogliptin are summarized. Alogliptin is compared with the other available DPP-4 inhibitors.Expert opinion: Alogliptin is an additional choice in the group of DPP-4 inhibitors. As a group, these agents have a relatively modest glucose-lowering effect, inferior to that of metformin, sulfonylureas, and insulin. They do not have the benefit of weight loss offered by the glucagon-like polypeptide (GLP)-1 agonists. The primary use of DPP-4 inhibitors is in combination with other hypoglycemic agents, mainly metformin. Their principal advantage is a low incidence of hypoglycemia, making these agents desirable in patients such as the elderly and those with cardiac disease. A greater use of alogliptin and other DPP-4 inhibitors will occur if long-term studies show reduced cardiac events or long-term retention of insulin secretory capacity. The Examine Trial, a large study of alogliptin in coronary disease patients, is now underway and could provide important supportive data.

Sitagliptin ve Akut Pankreatit: Olgular ve Literatürün Gözden Geçirilmesi

Acute pancreatitis is the rapid onset inflammation of the pancreas. Medications are rare but important and rising cause of acute pancreatitis and account for approximately 2% of all cases. Sitagliptin is a potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor for the treat - ment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and acts by increasing active incretin hormone con - centrations. Adverse effects including constipation, nausea, nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection and dizziness were reported. We reported a case with acute pancreatitis that seems to be induced by sitagliptin.

Saxagliptin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: assessing cardiovascular data.

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at high risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease; however, conclusive evidence that glycemic control leads to improved cardiovascular outcomes is lacking. Saxagliptin is a potent, selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor approved as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with T2DM. Saxagliptin was evaluated in a series of phase III trials as monotherapy; add-on therapy to metformin, a sulfonylurea, or a thiazolidinedione; and as initial therapy in combination with metformin. Saxagliptin consistently improved glycemic control (as reflected by significant decreases in glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, and postprandial glucose compared with controls) and was generally well tolerated. In these analyses, saxagliptin had clinically neutral effects on body weight, blood pressure, lipid levels, and other markers of CV risk compared with controls. A retrospective meta-analysis of 8 phase II and phase III trials found no evidence that saxagliptin increases CV risk in patients with T2DM (Cox proportional hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.80 for major adverse cardiovascular events retrospectively adjudicated). Instead, it raised the hypothesis that saxagliptin may reduce the risk of major adverse CV events. A long-term CV outcome trial, Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-THrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53 (SAVOR-TIMI 53) is currently ongoing to determine whether saxagliptin reduces CV risk in T2DM.

Inhibition of anaphylaxis like reaction and mast cell activation by Sitagliptin

Mast cells stimulation activates degranulation process resulting in releasing of mediators, such as histamine. In this study, the effect of aqueous extract of sitagliptin, a selective dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitor, on the mast cell-mediated allergic response was studied with the possible mechanisms of action, focusing on the histamine release and pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion in mast cells. Sitagliptin produced dose dependent inhibition in compound 48/80-induced systemic reactions. In addition, sitagliptin attenuated IgE-mediated skin allergic reaction. Sitagliptin dose-dependently reduced compound 48/80- and IgE-induced histamine release from mast cells. Sitagliptin decreased the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor-α, in mast cells. So, the finding of this study provides evidence that sitagliptin inhibits mast cell derived allergic reactions, and involvement of pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion in such effects.

Effect of sitagliptin therapy on postprandial lipoprotein levels in patients with type 2 diabetes

Recent studies indicate that type 2 diabetes is associated with an increased secretion of both hepatic and intestinal lipoproteins, leading to the accumulation of atherogenic triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins. Sitagliptin is a selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 that has been shown to reduce fasting and postprandial glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes presumably through incretin hormone-mediated improvements in islet function. The objective of the present study is to examine the effects of treatment with sitagliptin on postprandial lipid and incretin hormone levels as well as glucose homeostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Thirty-six subjects with type 2 diabetes (30 men/6 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 58.1 ± 6.4 years and a body mass index of 30.7 ± 4.9 kg/m(2) ) were recruited in this double-blind cross-over study using sitagliptin 100 mg/day or placebo for a 6-week period each, with a 4-week washout period between the two phases. At the end of each phase of treatment, patients underwent an oral lipid tolerance test providing 35 g of fat per m(2) of body surface area and blood samples were taken over an 8-h period. Sitagliptin therapy significantly decreased the postprandial area under the curves (AUCs) for plasma apolipoprotein (apo)B (-5.1%, p = 0.002), apoB-48 (-7.8%, p = 0.03), TG (-9.4%, p = 0.006), very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-cholesterol (-9.3%, p = 0.001), free fatty acids (FFAs) (-7.6%, p = 0.005) and glucose (-9.7%, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the postprandial AUCs for plasma intact glucagon-like peptide-1 (+67.8%, p < 0.0001) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (+67.3%, p < 0.0001) were significantly increased following treatment with sitagliptin, whereas the AUC for plasma glucagon was reduced by -9.7% (p = 0.001) with no significant changes in the AUCs for plasma insulin and C-peptide. Sitagliptin therapy also improved homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index for insulin resistance (-14.6%, p = 0.01) and β-cell function (+32.3%, p = 0.007). Treatment with sitagliptin for 6 weeks reduced postprandial plasma levels of TG-rich lipoproteins of both intestinal and hepatic origin, most likely by increasing incretin hormone levels, reducing circulating plasma FFA concentrations and improving insulin sensitivity and β-cell function.

Effects of chronic administration of alogliptin on the development of diabetes and β-cell function in high fat diet/streptozotocin diabetic mice

Alogliptin is a potent and highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor. The aim of this study was to determine its effects on glucose control and pancreas islet function and to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms after chronic administration, in a non-genetic mouse model of type 2 diabetes. Alogliptin (5, 15 and 45 mg/kg) was orally administered to high fat diet/streptozotocin (HFD/STZ) diabetic mice daily for 10 weeks. Postprandial and 6-h fasting blood glucose levels, blood A1C level, oral glucose tolerance and pancreas insulin content were measured during or after the treatment period. Alogliptin plasma concentration was determined by an LC/MS/MS method. Islet morphology and architectural changes were evaluated with immunohistochemical analysis. Islet endocrine secretion ability was assessed by measuring insulin release from isolated islets which were challenged with 16 mM glucose and 30 mM potassium chloride, respectively. Gene expression profiles of the pancreas were analysed using the mouse diabetes RT(2) Profiler PCR array which contains 84 genes related to the onset, development and progression of diabetes. Alogliptin showed dose-dependent reduction of postprandial and fasting blood glucose levels and blood A1C levels. Glucose clearance ability and pancreas insulin content were both increased. Alogliptin significantly restored the β-cell mass and islet morphology, thus preserving islet function of insulin secretion. Expression of 10 genes including Ins1 was significantly changed in the pancreas of diabetic mice. Chronic alogliptin treatment completely or partially reversed the abnormalities in gene expression. Chronic treatment of alogliptin improved glucose control and facilitated restoration of islet architecture and function in HFD/STZ diabetic mice. The gene expression profiles suggest that the underlying molecular mechanisms of β-cell protection by alogliptin may involve alleviating endoplasmic reticulum burden and mitochondria oxidative stress, increasing β-cell differentiation and proliferation, enhancing islet architecture remodelling and preserving islet function.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction after multiple oral doses of linagliptin and digoxin in healthy volunteers

The aim of this study was to investigate whether multiple doses of the oral and highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin affect the steady-state pharmacokinetics of the P-glycoprotein substrate digoxin. This single-center, open-label, two-period cross-over study involved healthy subjects (n=20), randomized to treatment sequence AB or BA, where A comprised 0.25mg digoxin qd for 5days, then 0.25mg digoxin qd plus 5mg linagliptin qd for 6days, and B comprised 0.25mg digoxin qd for 11days. A treatment-free period (≥35days for AB and 14days for BA) separated each treatment in both sequences. There were no clinically significant changes in steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of digoxin when it was co-administered with linagliptin. The ratio of the adjusted-by-treatment geometric mean ratios and associated 90% confidence intervals for the AUC(τ,ss), C (max,ss) and renal clearance (CL( R,0-24,ss)) of digoxin were all within the bioequivalence range 80-125%, which is important as digoxin has a narrow therapeutic range. There was a low incidence of adverse events, which were randomly distributed between treatment groups. In conclusion, linagliptin did not alter the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in this study, indicating that linagliptin does not inhibit P-glycoprotein or other transporters relevant for digoxin pharmacokinetics. These results suggest that linagliptin and digoxin can be co-administered without dose adjustment. Administration of digoxin alone and with linagliptin was well tolerated.

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters and dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibition following single doses of sitagliptin in healthy, young Japanese males

Sitagliptin is a selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) used to treat type 2 diabetes. The present aim was to evaluate pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and safety characteristics of sitagliptin following single doses in healthy, young Japanese males. In this alternating two-panel, randomized, controlled double-blind study, six healthy Japanese male subjects (aged 20-46 years) in each panel received single oral doses of 5-400mg sitagliptin and two received placebo. Plasma and urine drug concentrations were measured from 0-48h post dose and plasma DPP-4 inhibition from 0-24h post dose. The results were compared with historical data from young, healthy non-Japanese males. Plasma concentrations of sitagliptin increased approximately in proportion to dose; maximum concentrations occurred 2-6h post-dose. The mean apparent terminal half-life for plasma sitagliptin was 9-14h, with the half-life slightly decreasing as the dose increased. The mean dose fraction excreted unchanged in the urine was 0.73-1.00. Ingestion of a traditional Japanese breakfast prior to dosing had only a minor effect on PK parameters. After correction for dilution and competition effects during assay, doses of sitagliptin ≥50mg resulted in weighted average DPP-4 inhibition from 0-24h post-dose >94% (without correction, >78%). No clinically meaningful differences in PK and DPP-4 inhibition parameters were found between Japanese and non-Japanese subjects. Sitagliptin was generally well tolerated and there were no serious adverse experiences or episodes of hypoglycaemia. The PK and PD findings from this study are consistent with once daily dosing of sitagliptin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Effect of linagliptin monotherapy on glycaemic control and markers of β-cell function in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

To assess the safety and efficacy of the potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin 5 mg when given for 24 weeks to patients with type 2 diabetes who were either treatment-naive or who had received one oral antidiabetes drug (OAD). This multicentre, randomized, parallel group, phase III study compared linagliptin treatment (5 mg once daily, n = 336) with placebo (n = 167) for 24 weeks in type 2 diabetes patients. Before randomization, patients pretreated with one OAD underwent a washout period of 6 weeks, which included a placebo run-in period during the last 2 weeks. Patients previously untreated with an OAD underwent a 2-week placebo run-in period. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment. Linagliptin treatment resulted in a placebo-corrected change in HbA1c from baseline of -0.69% (p < 0.0001) at 24 weeks. In patients with baseline HbA1c ≥ 9.0%, the adjusted reduction in HbA1c was 1.01% (p < 0.0001). Patients treated with linagliptin were more likely to achieve a reduction in HbA1c of ≥0.5% at 24 weeks than those in the placebo arm (47.1 and 19.0%, respectively; odds ratio, OR = 4.2, p < 0.0001). Fasting plasma glucose improved by -1.3 mmol/l (p < 0.0001) with linagliptin vs. placebo, and linagliptin produced an adjusted mean reduction from baseline after 24 weeks in 2-h postprandial glucose of -3.2 mmol/l (p < 0.0001). Statistically significant and relevant treatment differences were observed for proinsulin/insulin ratio (p = 0.025), Homeostasis Model Assessment-%B (p = 0.049) and disposition index (p = 0.0005). There was no excess of hypoglycaemic episodes with linagliptin vs. placebo and no patient required third-party intervention. Mild or moderate renal impairment did not influence the trough plasma levels of linagliptin. Monotherapy with linagliptin produced a significant, clinically meaningful and sustained improvement in glycaemic control, accompanied by enhanced parameters of β-cell function. The safety profile of linagliptin was comparable with that of placebo.

Response: Predictive Clinical Parameters for the Therapeutic Efficacy of Sitagliptin in Korean Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (Diabetes Metab J 2011;35:159-65)

We appreciate the comments on our study Predictive clinical parameters for the therapeutic efficacy of sitagliptin in Korean type 2 diabetes mellitus, which was published in Diabetes & Metabolism Journal 2011;35:159-65. Sitagliptin is an oral hypoglycemic agent with characteristics that may make it particularly useful for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [1]. The drug is a selective inhibitor of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) [2], which inactivates the incretins glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. By inhibiting the activity of DPP-4, sitagliptin stabilizes the active forms of these incretins, thereby supporting glucose homeostasis through mechanisms that are not in themselves likely to trigger hypoglycemia [3]. Previous randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials have shown that sitagliptin is an effective glucose lowering agent in patients with T2DM when used as monotherapy and when given in combination with other drugs such as metformin, sulfonylurea and thiazolidinediones [4-7]. In a meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials, patients were more likely to reach the HbA1c goal of <7% when treated with sitagliptin compared with placebo (POR, 3.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.47 to 3.72); sitagliptin was also associated with greater decline in HbA1c from baseline compared with placebo (WMD, -0.78%; 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.63) [8]. That study reported that sitagliptin treatment lead to improvements in glycemic control in patients with T2DM, including reductions in HbA1c 0.7 to 1.2%, and 17 to 63% of patients achieved HbA1c <7% at the end of the treatment. In our study, treatment with 100 mg sitagliptin with metformin or sulfonylurea for 24 weeks led to additional reductions of mean HbA1c to 1.23±1.15%. The likelihood of patients to reach the HbA1c goal of <7% with sitagliptin treatment was 47% at the end of 24 weeks. This glycemic lowering effect is greater than that observed in previous studies [9,10]. In addition, the HbA1c lowering effect of sitagliptin was more pronounced in non-obese patients and in patients with decreased insulin secretion compared with the non-responder group. This potent effects of sitagliptin are expected in Korean diabetic patients who have quantitative pancreatic deficiencies. Asian T2DM patients have relatively lower level of pancreatic secretory dysfunction than patients of European descent. Most studies of sitagliptin have demonstrated significant improvements in β-cell function [11,12]. Therefore, sitagliptin appears to be effective for the treatment of T2DM, and may become a first-line treatment in the future. As Dr. Oh noted, our study has some limitations. It is retrospective, and did not control for other factors such as exercise and diet. Despite these limitations, the results of our study indicate that sitagliptin treatment greatly reduces glucose level in younger, non-obese Korean T2DM patients. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to determine the specific effects of sitagliptin.

The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor vildagliptin improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis

The potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor vildagliptin improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes through incretin hormone-mediated increases in both α- and β-cell responsiveness to glucose. We conducted a prospective, open-label, parallel group, controlled study of 51 patients with type 2 diabetic patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) during the 24-week study period. Patients were assigned to two groups: the vildagliptin group (n = 30) and the control group (n = 21). Vildagliptin was administered at 50 mg/day for the first 8 weeks. Then doses were titrated by dose-doubling to a maximum of 100 mg/day if hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or glycated albumin (GA) target levels had not been reached. No vildagliptin was administered to the controls. The average final dose of vildagliptin was 80 ± 5 mg daily. After 24 weeks, vildagliptin had decreased average HbA1c levels from 6.7 % baseline to 6.1 %, average GA levels from 24.5 % baseline to 20.5 % and average postprandial plasma glucose levels from 186 mg/dL baseline to 140 mg/dL (all p < 0.0001). In the control group, we observed no such changes. Vildagliptin efficacy did not differ according to age or body mass index, but the GA reduction was significantly greater in the anti-diabetic agents-naïve group. Furthermore, in patients with higher baseline GA levels, a higher vildagliptin dosage was required to produce a noticeable effect. No serious adverse effects such as hypoglycemia or liver impairment were observed in any patient. Vildagliptin was effective as a treatment for diabetic patients undergoing HD.

Safety and efficacy of linagliptin as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor linagliptin administered as add-on therapy to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycaemic control. This 24-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study was carried out in 82 centres in 10 countries. Patients with HbA1c levels of 7.0-10.0% on metformin and a maximum of one additional antidiabetes medication, which was discontinued at screening, continued on metformin ≥1500 mg/day for 6 weeks, including a placebo run-in period of 2 weeks, before being randomized to linagliptin 5 mg once daily (n = 524) or placebo (n = 177) add-on. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in HbA1c after 24 weeks of treatment, evaluated with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Mean baseline HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were 8.1% and 9.4 mmol/l, respectively. Linagliptin showed significant reductions vs. placebo in adjusted mean changes from baseline of HbA1c (-0.49 vs. 0.15%), FPG (-0.59 vs. 0.58 mmol/l) and 2hPPG (-2.7 vs. 1.0 mmol/l); all p < 0.0001. Hypoglycaemia was rare, occurring in three patients (0.6%) treated with linagliptin and five patients (2.8%) in the placebo group. Body weight did not change significantly from baseline in both groups (-0.5 kg placebo, -0.4 kg linagliptin). The addition of linagliptin 5 mg once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in glycaemic control without weight gain or increased risk of hypoglycaemia.

Alogliptin: a Novel Molecule for Improving Glycemic Control in Type II Diabetes Mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus causes significant morbidity and mortality on account of its progressive nature and results in considerable burden on healthcare resources. It is characterized by high circulating levels of glucose resulting from insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion. Current treatment strategies have only limited long-term efficacy and tolerability given the progressive nature of the disease leading to inadequate glycemic control and are also associated with undesirable side effects such as weight gain, hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal distress. In the light of these existing limitations, exploring new treatment targets and new therapies have become the need of the hour at present. The incretin pathway, in particular, glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1), plays an important pathological role in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and treatments targeting the incretin system have recently generated surmount interest. These can mainly be categorized into two broad classes; GLP-1 agonists/analogs (exenatide, liraglutide), and dipeptidyl peptidase- 4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, vildagliptin). The gliptins act by prolonging the action of incretins, the gut hormones which can boost insulin levels. Alogliptin is a potent, highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor now undergoing clinical testing to support a new drug application for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The results of Phase II and Phase III human studies, upon evaluation for clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability in patients with type 2 diabetes, have demonstrated that Alogliptin is effective and well tolerated as a treatment for type 2 diabetes, either as monotherapy or in combination with metformin, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas and insulin, with an excellent safety profile.