Selective CRF1 Receptor Antagonist Research Articles

P.6.d.002 Expression of NMDA receptor subunits in human peripheral blood lymphocytes in opioid addiction

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is the major neuromodulator of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, regulating the behavioural, endocrine, autonomic and immune responses to stress. Together with the recently discovered members of the CRF peptide family, urocortin 1, urocortin 2 and urocortin 3, it also has neurotransmitter actions.Previous publication has demonstrated that stress induces CRF release in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and the release of both CRF and GABA in the amygdala. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to determine the effects of the members of the CRF peptide family on GABA release from the amygdala by using an in vitro superfusion system. In order to study the participation of different CRF receptors (CRF1 and CRF2) in this process, rat amygdalar slices were pretreated with selective CRF1 and CRF2 antagonists.CRF and urocortin 1 significantly increased the release of [3H]GABA from the slices following electrical stimulation, whereas urocortin 2 and urocortin 3 were ineffective. The actions of CRF and urocortin 1 were blocked by the selective CRF1 receptor antagonist antalarmin, but were not inhibited by the selective CRF2 receptor antagonist astressin 2B, both administered in equimolar doses. Our results demonstrate that the release of GABA from the amygdala is mediated by CRF and urocortin 1 through the activation of CRF1 receptors.

P.6.d.003 Blockade of amygdalar CRF and dopamine receptors diminishes the reinforcing effects of opiates and opioids

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is the major neuromodulator of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, regulating the behavioural, endocrine, autonomic and immune responses to stress. Together with the recently discovered members of the CRF peptide family, urocortin 1, urocortin 2 and urocortin 3, it also has neurotransmitter actions.Previous publication has demonstrated that stress induces CRF release in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and the release of both CRF and GABA in the amygdala. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to determine the effects of the members of the CRF peptide family on GABA release from the amygdala by using an in vitro superfusion system. In order to study the participation of different CRF receptors (CRF1 and CRF2) in this process, rat amygdalar slices were pretreated with selective CRF1 and CRF2 antagonists.CRF and urocortin 1 significantly increased the release of [3H]GABA from the slices following electrical stimulation, whereas urocortin 2 and urocortin 3 were ineffective. The actions of CRF and urocortin 1 were blocked by the selective CRF1 receptor antagonist antalarmin, but were not inhibited by the selective CRF2 receptor antagonist astressin 2B, both administered in equimolar doses. Our results demonstrate that the release of GABA from the amygdala is mediated by CRF and urocortin 1 through the activation of CRF1 receptors.

Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator and placebo-controlled trial of a corticotropin-releasing factor receptor-1 antagonist in generalized anxiety disorder

Antagonism of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors has been hypothesized as a potential target for the development of novel anxiolytics. This study was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of pexacerfont, a selective CRF-1 receptor antagonist, in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active comparator trial. Two hundred and sixty patients were randomly assigned to pexacerfont 100 mg/day (after a 1 week loading dose of 300 mg/day), placebo or escitalopram 20 mg/day in a 2:2:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline to end point (week 8) in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale total score. Pexacerfont 100 mg/day did not separate from placebo on the primary outcome measure. The half-powered active comparator arm, escitalopram 20 mg/day, demonstrated efficacy with significant separation from placebo at weeks 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8 (P<.02). Response rates for pexacerfont, placebo, and escitalopram were 42, 42, and 53%, respectively. Genetic and psychometric rating scale data was obtained in 175 randomized subjects. There was a significant association between a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the gene encoding plexin A2 (PLXNA2-2016) with the HAM-A psychic subscale score for the entire cohort at baseline (FDR-adjusted P=.015). Pexacerfont did not demonstrate efficacy compared to placebo for the treatment of GAD. Whether these findings are generalizable to this class of agents remains to be determined. Our preliminary genetic finding of an association between a SNP for the gene encoding plexin A2 and an anxiety phenotype in this study merits further exploration. The trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00481325) before enrollment.

Power spectrum analysis of ultrasonic vocalization elicited by maternal separation in rat pups

The present study investigated how frequency distribution of maternal separation-induced ultrasonic vocalization was altered by environmental stimuli and pharmacological agents. Sprague–Dawley rat pups at 10 days were used to measure numbers and frequencies of the ultrasonic vocalizations under various ambient temperatures and with pharmacological manipulations of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and GABAergic systems. The ultrasonic vocalization consisted of two distinct peaks in the frequency range of 30 kHz to 50 kHz. The area under the curve (AUC) in the high-frequency range and the number of the ultrasonic vocalizations increased when ambient temperature was lowered. Systemic administration of a selective CRF1 receptor antagonist, NBI27914, and a typical anxiolytic, diazepam, decreased the AUC in the high-frequency range and the number of the ultrasonic vocalizations in a dose-dependent manner at an ambient temperature of 24 °C. The AUC in the low-frequency range did not change with an alteration in ambient temperature or treatment with NBI27914 and diazepam except a high dose (1 mg/kg) of diazepam. These results demonstrated that emotional levels of isolated pups reflected not only the number but also the frequency distribution of maternal separation-induced ultrasonic vocalizations. High-frequency components, but not low-frequency components, of the ultrasonic vocalization were sensitive to changes in negative affective state of isolated pups.

Do corticotropin releasing factor-1 receptors influence colonic transit and bowel function in women with irritable bowel syndrome?

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF), a mediator of stress response, alters gastrointestinal (GI) functions. Stress-related changes in colonic motility are blocked by selective CRF(1) receptor antagonists. Our aim was to assess whether modulation of central and peripheral CRF(1) receptors affects colonic transit and bowel function in female patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (D-IBS). This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-wk study evaluated the effects of oral pexacerfont (BMS-562086), a selective CRF(1) receptor antagonist, 25 and 100 mg qd, on GI and colonic transit of solids [by validated scintigraphy with primary end point colonic geometric center (GC) at 24 h] and bowel function (by validated daily diaries) in 39 women with D-IBS. The 100-mg dose was comparable to a dose that inhibited colonic motility in stressed rats. Treatment effects were compared by analysis of covariance with baseline colonic transit as covariate. The study had 80% power (alpha = 0.05) to detect clinically meaningful (26%) differences in colonic transit. Thirty-nine of 55 patients fulfilled eligibility criteria (9 screen failures, 5 baseline GC24 outside prespecified range). At baseline, three treatment groups had comparable age, body mass index, and GC 24 h. Significant effects of pexacerfont relative to placebo were not detected on colonic GC24 (P = 0.53), gastric emptying, orocecal transit, ascending colon emptying half-time, and stool frequency, consistency, and ease of passage. No safety issues were identified. We conclude that in women with D-IBS, pexacerfont, 25 or 100 mg qd, does not significantly alter colonic or other regional transit or bowel function. The role of central and peripheral CRF(1) receptors in bowel function in D-IBS requires further study.

Corticotropin-releasing factor modulates maternal separation-induced ultrasonic vocalization in rat pups via activation of CRF1 receptor

An infant animal isolated from its mother emits vocalizations spanning from the audible to the ultrasonic. These vocalizations are believed to represent distress signals from the pup. However, the neurobiological basis for vocalizations elicited by isolation has not been well characterized under different environmental conditions. The present study was designed to clarify the role of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) system in vocalizations elicited by isolating a rat pup at ambient temperatures of 37 °C (temperature of the nest in which the mother and littermates are present) and 24 °C (room temperature). Sprague–Dawley rat pups at 7 days old were isolated from their dam, then the number of vocalizations was measured for 5 min. The number of vocalizations increased when ambient temperature was changed from 37 °C to 24 °C. Systemic administration of CRF (3 or 10 mg/kg) increased the number of vocalizations at 37 °C in a dose-dependent manner. CRF-induced increases in the number of vocalizations at 3 mg/kg were completely blocked by a selective CRF1 receptor antagonist, NBI27914 (3 mg/kg), but not by a selective CRF2 receptor antagonist, K41498 (3 mg/kg). NBI27914 (30 mg/kg), but not K41498 (3 mg/kg), suppressed the increased number of vocalizations at 24 °C. These results demonstrate involvement of the CRF–CRF1 receptor regulatory system on the modulation of ultrasonic vocalizations by rat pups separated from their dam.

Differential Mechanisms of CRF1 and CRF2 Receptor Functions in the Amygdala in Pain-Related Synaptic Facilitation and Behavior

A major site of extrahypothalamic expression of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and its G-protein-coupled CRF1 and CRF2 receptors is the amygdala, a key player in emotions and affective disorders. Pain-related plasticity in the laterocapsular division of the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeLC) generates emotional-affective responses and anxiety-like behavior. CRF1 receptor antagonists have anxiolytic effects. Although both CRF1 and CRF2 receptors couple positively to adenylyl cyclase, they can have opposite effects, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. This study addressed CRF1 and CRF2 receptor functions and mechanisms in the amygdala in a model of arthritic pain. Using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of CeLC neurons, we found that a selective CRF1 receptor antagonist (NBI27914 [5-chloro-4-(N-(cyclopropyl)methyl-N-propylamino)-2-methyl-6-(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl)]) amino-pyridine inhibited synaptic facilitation in brain slices from arthritic rats through a postsynaptic mechanism. Inhibition of the NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic component was occluded by a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor, consistent with our previous demonstration of PKA-dependent increased NMDA receptor function in arthritis pain-related plasticity. NBI27914 also decreased neuronal excitability through inhibition of highly tetraethylammonium (TEA)-sensitive ion channels that contribute to action potential repolarization and firing rate. In contrast, a CRF2 receptor antagonist (astressin-2B [cyclo(31-34) [d-Phe11,His12,C alphaMeLeu13,39, Nle17, Glu31, Lys34] Ac-Sauvagine(8-40)]) facilitated synaptic transmission through presynaptic inhibition of GABAergic transmission (disinhibition). NBI27914 inhibited arthritis pain-related behaviors (audible and ultrasonic vocalizations and hindlimb withdrawal reflexes). Astressin-2B had no significant behavioral effect. The data suggest that endogenous CRF1 receptor activation in the amygdala contributes to pain-related synaptic facilitation, increased excitability, and pain behavior through a postsynaptic mechanism involving activation of PKA and highly TEA-sensitive K(+)-currents. Presynaptic CRF2 receptor-mediated inhibition does not reach behavioral significance.

Pro- and Anti-Nociceptive Effects of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF) in Central Amygdala Neurons Are Mediated Through Different Receptors

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is not only a stress hormone but also acts as a neuromodulator outside the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis, playing an important role in anxiety, depression, and pain modulation. The underlying mechanisms remain to be determined. A major site of extra-hypothalamic expression of CRF and its receptors is the amygdala, a key player in affect-related disorders such as anxiety. The latero-capsular division of the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeLC) is also important for pain modulation and pain affect. This study analyzed the effects of CRF on nociceptive processing in CeLC neurons and the contribution of CRF1 and CRF2 receptors and protein kinases A and C. Extracellular single-unit recordings were made from CeLC neurons in anesthetized adult rats. All neurons responded more strongly to noxious than innocuous mechanical stimulation of the knee. Evoked responses and background activity were measured before and during administration of CRF into the CeLC by microdialysis. CRF was administered alone or together with receptor antagonists or protein kinase inhibitors. CRF (0.01-1 microM; concentrations in microdialysis probe; 15 min) facilitated the evoked responses more strongly than background activity; a higher concentration (10 microM) had inhibitory effects. Facilitation by CRF (0.1 microM) was reversed by a selective CRF1 receptor antagonist (NBI27914, 10 microM) but not a CRF2 receptor antagonist (astressin-2B, 100 microM) and by a protein kinase A (PKA) inhibitor (KT5720, 100 microM) but not a protein kinase C inhibitor (GF109203X, 100 microM). Inhibitory effects of CRF (10 microM) were reversed by astressin-2B. These data suggest that CRF has dual effects on amygdala neurons: CRF1 receptor-mediated PKA-dependent facilitation and CRF2 receptor-mediated inhibition.

The CRF‐1 Receptor Antagonist, CP‐154,526, Attenuates Stress‐Induced Increases in Ethanol Consumption by BALB/cJ Mice

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) signaling modulates neurobiological responses to stress and ethanol, and may modulate observed increases in ethanol consumption following exposure to stressful events. The current experiment was conducted to further characterize the role of CRF1 receptor (CRF1R) signaling in stress-induced increases in ethanol consumption in BALB/cJ and C57BL/6N mice. Male BALB/cJ and C57BL/6N mice were given continuous access to 8% (v/v) ethanol and water for the duration of the experiment. When a baseline of ethanol consumption was established, animals were exposed to 5 minutes of forced swim stress on each of 5 consecutive days. Thirty minutes before each forced swim session, animals were given an intraperitoneal injection of a 10 mg/kg dose of CP-154,526, a selective CRF1R antagonist, or an equal volume of vehicle. The effect of forced swim stress exposure on consumption of a 1% (w/v) sucrose solution was also investigated in an ethanol-naïve group of BALB/cJ mice. Exposure to forced swim stress significantly increased ethanol consumption by the BALB/cJ, but not of the C57BL/6N, mice. Stress-induced increases in ethanol consumption were delayed and became evident approximately 3 weeks after the first stressor. Additionally, forced swim stress did not cause increases of food or water intake and did not promote delayed increases of sucrose consumption. Importantly, BALB/cJ mice pretreated with the CRF1R antagonist showed blunted stress-induced increases in ethanol intake, and the CRF1R antagonist did not influence the ethanol drinking of non-stressed mice. The present results provide evidence that CRF1R signaling modulates the delayed increase of ethanol consumption stemming from repeated exposure to a stressful event in BALB/cJ mice.

Stimulation of lateral septum CRF2 receptors promotes anorexia and stress-like behaviors: functional homology to CRF1 receptors in basolateral amygdala.

The corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) system is the primary central mediator of stress-like states, coordinating behavioral, endocrine, and autonomic responses to stress. Although induction of anorexia is a well documented effect of CRF receptor agonist administration, the central sites and behavioral processes underlying this phenomenon are poorly understood. The present studies addressed this question by examining the neuroanatomical, behavioral, and pharmacological mechanisms mediating decreases in feeding produced by the CRF1/CRF2 receptor agonist urocortin. Separate groups of food-restricted male Sprague Dawley rats were given infusions of urocortin (0, 50, 125, 250 ng/0.5 microl) into the lateral septum (LS) and immediately afterward were rated on a wide array of behaviors (locomotion, rearing, grooming, stereotypies) including a microstructural analysis of ingestive behavior. Intra-LS urocortin infusion dose-dependently reduced feeding and drinking while concomitantly increasing grooming, stereotypies, and ethological plus traditional measures of anxiety-like responses in the elevated plus-maze. Urocortin infusion into neighboring sites (lateral ventricle, medial caudate) had no effects. Coinfusion into the LS of the mixed CRF1/CRF2 receptor antagonist D-Phe-CRF(12-41) (0, 100, 1000 ng/0.5 microl) or the novel selective CRF2 receptor antagonist Astressin2B (0, 500, 1000 ng/0.5 microl) blocked urocortin-induced effects, but the CRF1-selective antagonist NBI27914 (0, 500, 1000 ng/0.5 microl) had no effect, although it completely reversed the behavioral sequelae of CRF when infused into the basolateral amygdala. These results indicate that one of the modes through which the CRF system promotes anorexia is the recruitment of stress-like states after stimulation of CRF2 receptors within the LS.

The effects of CRF and the urocortins on [ 3H]GABA release from the rat amygdala—An in vitro superfusion study

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is the major neuromodulator of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, regulating the behavioural, endocrine, autonomic and immune responses to stress. Together with the recently discovered members of the CRF peptide family, urocortin 1, urocortin 2 and urocortin 3, it also has neurotransmitter actions. Previous publication has demonstrated that stress induces CRF release in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and the release of both CRF and GABA in the amygdala. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to determine the effects of the members of the CRF peptide family on GABA release from the amygdala by using an in vitro superfusion system. In order to study the participation of different CRF receptors (CRF1 and CRF2) in this process, rat amygdalar slices were pretreated with selective CRF1 and CRF2 antagonists. CRF and urocortin 1 significantly increased the release of [ 3H]GABA from the slices following electrical stimulation, whereas urocortin 2 and urocortin 3 were ineffective. The actions of CRF and urocortin 1 were blocked by the selective CRF1 receptor antagonist antalarmin, but were not inhibited by the selective CRF2 receptor antagonist astressin 2B, both administered in equimolar doses. Our results demonstrate that the release of GABA from the amygdala is mediated by CRF and urocortin 1 through the activation of CRF1 receptors.

Differential Effects of CRF1 and CRF2 Receptor Antagonists on Pain-Related Sensitization of Neurons in the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala

As a hormone in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) mediates stress responses. CRF can also act as a neuromodulator of synaptic transmission outside the HPA axis. A major site of extrahypothalamic expression of CRF and its G-protein-coupled receptors is the amygdala, a key player in affect-related disorders such as anxiety. The laterocapsular division of the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeLC) is important for the modulation of pain affect. This study determined the effects of CRF1 and CRF2 receptor antagonists in CeLC neurons in an arthritis pain model. Extracellular single-unit recordings were made from CeLC neurons in anesthetized adult rats. All neurons responded more strongly to noxious than to innocuous mechanical stimulation (compression) of peripheral tissues, including the knee. Evoked responses and background activity were measured before and during the development of a kaolin/carrageenan-induced knee joint arthritis. Drugs were administered into the CeLC by microdialysis before and/or after arthritis induction. All CeLC neurons showed increased responses to mechanical stimuli ("sensitization") 5-6 h postinduction of arthritis. A selective CRF1 receptor antagonist (NBI27914; 1-100 microM, concentration in microdialysis probe; 15 min) inhibited evoked responses and background activity in arthritis (n = 9) but had no effect under normal conditions before arthritis (n = 9). In contrast, a selective CRF2 receptor antagonist (Astressin-2B; 1-100 microM, 15 min) had no effect in arthritis (n = 7) but increased the neurons' responses under normal conditions (n = 8). These data suggest that CRF1 receptors in the amygdala contribute to pain-related sensitization, whereas the normally inhibitory function of CRF2 receptors is lost in the arthritis pain model.

Pain-Related Anxiety-Like Behavior Requires CRF1 Receptors in the Amygdala

Corticotropin-releasing factor receptor CRF1 has been implicated in the neurobiological mechanisms of anxiety and depression. The amygdala plays an important role in affective states and disorders such as anxiety and depression. The amygdala is also emerging as a neural substrate of pain affect. However, the involvement of the amygdala in the interaction of pain and anxiety remains to be determined. This study tested the hypothesis that CRF1 receptors in the amygdala are critically involved in pain-related anxiety. Anxiety-like behavior was determined in adult male rats using the elevated plus maze (EPM) test. The open-arm preference (ratio of open arm entries to the total number of entries) was measured. Nocifensive behavior was assessed by measuring hindlimb withdrawal thresholds for noxious mechanical stimulation of the knee. Measurements were made in normal rats and in rats with arthritis induced in one knee by intraarticular injections of kaolin/carrageenan. A selective CRF1 receptor antagonist (NBI27914) or vehicle was administered systemically (i.p.) or into the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA, by microdialysis). The arthritis group showed a decreased preference for the open arms in the EPM and decreased hindlimb withdrawal thresholds. Systemic or intraamygdalar (into the CeA) administration of NBI27914, but not vehicle, inhibited anxiety-like behavior and nocifensive pain responses, nearly reversing the arthritis pain-related changes. This study shows for the first time that CRF1 receptors in the amygdala contribute critically to pain-related anxiety-like behavior and nocifensive responses in a model of arthritic pain. The results are a direct demonstration that the clinically well-documented relationship between pain and anxiety involves the amygdala.

CRF-induced calcium signaling in guinea pig small intestine myenteric neurons involves CRF-1 receptors and activation of voltage-sensitive calcium channels

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is a 41-amino acid peptide with distinct effects on gastrointestinal motility involving both CRF-1 and CRF-2 receptor-mediated mechanisms that are generally claimed to be centrally mediated. Evidence for a direct peripheral effect is rather limited. Electrophysiological studies showed a cAMP-dependent prolonged depolarization of guinea pig myenteric neurons on application of CRF. The current study aimed to test the direct effect of CRF on myenteric neurons and to identify the receptor subtype and the possible mechanisms involved. Longitudinal muscle myenteric plexus preparations and myenteric neuron cultures of guinea pig small intestine were incubated with the calcium indicator Fluo-4. Confocal Ca(2+) imaging was used to visualize activation of neurons on application of CRF. All in situ experiments were performed in the presence of nicardipine 10(-6) M to reduce tissue movement. Images were analyzed using Scion image and a specifically developed macro to correct for residual minimal movements. A 75 mM K(+)-Krebs solution identified 1,076 neurons in 46 myenteric ganglia (16 animals). Administration of CRF 10(-6) M and CRF 10(-7) M during 30 s induced a Ca(2+) response in 22.4% of the myenteric neurons (n = 303). Responses were completely abolished in the presence of the nonselective CRF antagonist astressin (n = 55). The selective CRF-1 receptor antagonist CP 154,526 (n = 187) reduced the response significantly to 2.1%. Stresscopin, a CRF-2 receptor agonist, could not activate neurons at 10(-7) M, and its effect at 10(-6) M (15.3%, n = 59) was completely blocked by CP 154,526. TTX 10(-6) M (n = 70) could not block the CRF-induced Ca(2+) transients but reduced the amplitude of the signals significantly. Removal of extracellular Ca(2+) blocked all responses to CRF (n = 47). L-type channels did not contribute to the CRF-induced Ca(2+) transients. Blocking N- or P/Q-type Ca(2+) channels did not reduce the responses significantly. Combined L- and R-type Ca(2+) channel blocking (SNX-482 10(-8) M, n = 64) abolished nearly all responses in situ. Combined L-, N-, and P/Q-type channel blocking also significantly reduced the response to 8.6%. Immunohistochemical staining for CRF-1 receptors clearly labeled individual cell bodies in the ganglia, whereas the CRF-2 receptor staining was barely above background. CRF induces Ca(2+) transients in myenteric neurons via a CRF-1 receptor-dependent mechanism. These Ca(2+) transients highly depend on somatic calcium influx through voltage-operated Ca(2+) channels, in particular R-type channels. Action potential firing through voltage-sensitive sodium channels increases the amplitude of the Ca(2+) signals. Besides centrally mediated effects, CRF is likely to modulate gastrointestinal motility on the myenteric neuronal level.

Corticotropin‐releasing factor 1 receptor‐mediated mechanisms inhibit colonic hypersensitivity in rats

The potential relationship between stress and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptomatology suggests a possible role for stress-mediating hormones, such as corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), in the altered perception of stimuli in IBS patients. In previous studies, Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats with genetic indices of high anxiety demonstrated colonic hypersensitivity coupled with a high basal level of CRF within the central nervous system. In the current study we tested the hypothesis that a selective, non-peptide CRF1 receptor antagonist, antalarmin, would inhibit hypersensitivity in the WKY rat colon. Colonic sensitivity was determined by monitoring a visceromotor behavioural response during innocuous levels of colorectal distention (30 mmHg). In high anxiety WKY rats we found that antalarmin (20 mg kg-1, i.p.) significantly decreased the visceromotor response induced by colorectal distention. In a second study central administration (i.c.v.) of CRF was used to induce colonic hypersensitivity in lower anxiety Fischer 344 (F-344) rats, and in this model, antalarmin significantly inhibited the CRF-induced colonic hypersensitivity. In summary, a selective CRF1 receptor antagonist, antalarmin, inhibits colonic hypersensitivity apparent in WKY rats or in F-344 rats given a central administration of CRF. Our findings suggest that CRF1 receptor antagonism may represent a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of IBS.

Expression of type 1 corticotropin‐releasing factor receptor in the guinea pig enteric nervous system

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), immunohistochemistry, electrophysiological recording, and intraneuronal injection of the neuronal tracer biocytin were integrated in a study of the functional expression of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors in the guinea pig enteric nervous system. RT-PCR revealed expression of CRF1 receptor mRNA, but not CRF2, in both myenteric and submucosal plexuses. Immunoreactivity for the CRF1 receptor was distributed widely in the myenteric plexus of the stomach and small and large intestine and in the submucosal plexus of the small and large intestine. CRF1 receptor immunoreactivity was coexpressed with calbindin, choline acetyltransferase, and substance P in the myenteric plexus. In the submucosal plexus, CRF1 receptor immunoreactivity was found in neurons that expressed calbindin, substance P, choline acetyltransferase, or neuropeptide Y. Application of CRF evoked slowly activating depolarizing responses associated with elevated excitability in both myenteric and submucosal neurons. Histological analysis of biocytin-filled neurons revealed that both uniaxonal neurons with S-type electrophysiological behavior and neurons with AH-type electrophysiological behavior and Dogiel II morphology responded to CRF. The CRF-evoked depolarizing responses were suppressed by the CRF1/CRF2 receptor antagonist astressin and the selective CRF1 receptor antagonist NBI27914 and were unaffected by the selective CRF2 receptor antagonist antisauvagine-30. The findings support the hypothesis that the CRF1 receptor mediates the excitatory actions of CRF on neurons in the enteric nervous system. Actions on enteric neurons might underlie the neural mechanisms by which stress-related release of CRF in the periphery alters intestinal propulsive motor function, mucosal secretion, and barrier functions.

Extrahypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone mediates (−)-nicotine-induced elevation of plasma corticosterone in rats

(−)-Nicotine activates the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis via an activation of the brainstem catecholaminergic neurons in rats. The present study was undertaken to clarify the mechanisms involved in the (−)-nicotine-induced activation of brainstem catecholaminergic neurons in anesthetized rats. Physostigmine (a cholinesterase inhibitor) (0.31 and 0.77 μmol/animal, i.p.) dose-dependently elevated plasma corticosterone in the presence of scopolamine (a muscarinic receptor antagonist) (2.3 μmol/animal, i.p.). (−)-Nicotine (250 and 500 nmol/animal, i.c.v.) dose-dependently elevated plasma corticosterone with concomitant noradrenaline release in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. The (−)-nicotine (500 nmol/animal, i.c.v.)-induced elevation of corticosterone was abolished by phentolamine (an α-adrenoceptor antagonist) (0.66 μmol/animal, i.c.v.), and attenuated by (±)-sotalol (a β-adrenoceptor antagonist) (0.97 μmol/animal, i.c.v.). The (−)-nicotine-induced increases of plasma corticosterone and hypothalamic noradrenaline release were abolished either by hexamethonium (a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist) (1.8 μmol/animal, i.c.v.), CP-154,526 (butyl-ethyl-[2,5-dimethyl-7-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-yl]amine) (a selective CRF-1 receptor antagonist) (1.3 μmol/animal, i.c.v.) or indomethacin (a cyclooxygenase inhibitor) (1.2 μmol/animal, i.c.v.). These results suggest that (−)-nicotine elevates plasma corticosterone by CRF-1 receptor- and prostaglandin-mediated noradrenaline release in the paraventricular nucleus in rats.

Effects of SR48968, a selective non-peptide NK2 receptor antagonist on emotional processes in rodents.

It has been suggested that tachykinin NK(2) receptor antagonists may have therapeutic utility in anxiety and/or depressive disorders. The present study investigated the modulatory action of the NK(2) receptor antagonist SR48968 on emotional processes in rodents. The tests used include classical models of anxiety (punished lever pressing and punished drinking conflict tests, elevated plus-maze in rats), a model based on defensive behaviors of mice confronted with a natural threat (a rat), and two tests based on exposure of rats or mice to a natural predator (a cat) followed by subsequent exposure to a cat odor cue. The prototypical anxiolytic diazepam was used throughout as a positive control, the antidepressant imipramine was tested in the mouse defense test battery and in both models of predatory exposure, and the selective CRF1 receptor antagonist antalarmin was used in the cat-exposure test in rats. Unlike diazepam, SR48968 failed to increase rates of responding suppressed by punishment in both conflict procedures. By contrast, in the elevated plus-maze test, the NK(2) receptor antagonist (3 mg/kg, IP) elicited positive effects on traditional and ethologically derived measures of anxiety. In the mouse defense test battery, SR48968 (0.03-1 mg/kg, IP) decreased flight reactions, risk assessment behavior, defensive biting and escape attempts. While the magnitude of the effects on flight, risk assessment and escape attempts of the NK(2) receptor antagonist was less than that of diazepam, SR48968 appeared to be as effective as the BZ on defensive biting. In rats previously exposed to a cat, SR48968 (3 mg/kg, IP), antalarmin (1 mg/kg, IP), imipramine (30 mg/kg, IP), but not diazepam, reduced subsequent high levels of avoidance responses when subjects are exposed to a cat odor-saturated cue 1 h later. Similar effects of SR48968 (0.1-0.3 mg/kg, IP) were observed in mice following repeated administration (twice a day/5 days/IP). Importantly, the positive effects of the NK(2) receptor antagonist were evident at doses that did not impair general activity, unlike imipramine which displayed mainly sedative action. Moreover, the (R)-enantiomer of SR48968, SR48965, which was tested in the elevated plus-maze, the mouse defense test battery and the cat exposure tests, was much less active than its racemate, indicating a stereoselective action of SR48968. These data show that while SR48968 has limited or no efficacy in models or behavioral measures mainly sensitive to BZs, it shows good activity in reducing anxiety-like behaviors following traumatic stress or upon forced and unavoidable contact with a threatening stimulus. This suggests that NK(2) receptor antagonists may have a potential in the treatment of some forms of anxiety disorders.

Autoradiographic and in situ hybridization localization of corticotropin‐releasing factor 1 and 2 receptors in nonhuman primate brain

Two different corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors, CRF1 and CRF2, have been identified in rat and human brain. Although the two receptor subtypes show a markedly different distribution in the rat brain, their distribution in the primate brain has not been described previously. In this study, the neuroanatomic distribution of CRF1 and CRF2 receptor binding sites in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) was assessed by using iodine 125 ([125I)-Tyr0]-sauvagine with or without the selective CRF1 receptor antagonist CP-154,526–1. Radiolabeled human cRNA probes were used to map the distribution of the two receptor mRNAs with in situ hybridization. Both CRF1 and CRF2 receptors were found in the pituitary and throughout the neocortex (especially, in prefrontal, cingulate, striate, and insular cortices), amygdala, and hippocampal formation of the monkey brain. This is in contrast to the distribution of these receptors reported in the rat brain, in which generally only the CRF1 receptor is found in the pituitary and neocortex. These results suggest that, in primates, both CRF1 and CRF2 receptors may be involved in mediating the effects of CRF on cognition, behavior, and pituitary-adrenal function. The presence of CRF1 (but not CRF2) receptors within the locus coeruleus, cerebellar cortex, nucleus of the solitary tract, thalamus, and striatum and of CRF2 (but not CRF1) receptors in the choroid plexus, certain hypothalamic nuclei, the nucleus prepositus, and the nucleus of the stria terminalis suggests that each receptor subtype also may have distinct functional roles within the primate central nervous system. J. Comp. Neurol. 408:365–377, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Autoradiographic and in situ hybridization localization of corticotropin-releasing factor 1 and 2 receptors in nonhuman primate brain

Two different corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors, CRF1 and CRF2, have been identified in rat and human brain. Although the two receptor subtypes show a markedly different distribution in the rat brain, their distribution in the primate brain has not been described previously. In this study, the neuroanatomic distribution of CRF1 and CRF2 receptor binding sites in rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) was assessed by using iodine 125 ([125I)-Tyr0]-sauvagine with or without the selective CRF1 receptor antagonist CP-154,526-1. Radiolabeled human cRNA probes were used to map the distribution of the two receptor mRNAs with in situ hybridization. Both CRF1 and CRF2 receptors were found in the pituitary and throughout the neocortex (especially, in prefrontal, cingulate, striate, and insular cortices), amygdala, and hippocampal formation of the monkey brain. This is in contrast to the distribution of these receptors reported in the rat brain, in which generally only the CRF1 receptor is found in the pituitary and neocortex. These results suggest that, in primates, both CRF1 and CRF2 receptors may be involved in mediating the effects of CRF on cognition, behavior, and pituitary-adrenal function. The presence of CRF1 (but not CRF2) receptors within the locus coeruleus, cerebellar cortex, nucleus of the solitary tract, thalamus, and striatum and of CRF2 (but not CRF1) receptors in the choroid plexus, certain hypothalamic nuclei, the nucleus prepositus, and the nucleus of the stria terminalis suggests that each receptor subtype also may have distinct functional roles within the primate central nervous system.