Seizure-free Days Research Articles

One-year seizure freedom and quality of life in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy receiving adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation in Japan.

Amount of seizure-free days is a critical determinant of quality of life (QoL) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). The fractions of patients experiencing prolonged periods of seizure freedom with adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) have yet to be assessed on a large scale. Retrospective analysis of patients in the Japanese VNS prospective observational registry who experienced at least 1 year of seizure freedom from all seizures, focal seizures, or tonic-clonic seizures (TCS), as well as patient-reported change in QoL in these groups. The study included 362 patients with DRE, 147 were female (40.6%), and the median age at VNS implant was 23.0 years (range: 1.0-73.0). A total of 225 patients reported focal seizures and 184 patients reported TCS. After 36 months of adjunctive VNS, the cumulative proportion of patients experiencing at least 1 year of complete seizure freedom was 11% (38/356) with an average duration of seizure freedom of 19.4 months. In patients with focal seizures, 25% (n = 57/225) experienced at least 1 year of freedom from focal seizures with an average duration of 24.8 months. Higher cumulative rates of freedom from TCS were observed: 55% (n = 101/184) experienced at least 1 year without TCS with an average duration of TCS-free periods of 28.9 months. 82.1% of patients with 12-month complete seizure freedom reported markedly improved or improved QoL compared with 51.9% of patients who were not seizure-free. QoL changes in patients with 12-month seizure freedom from TCS and focal seizures were similar: 61.8% and 63% of respective patients reported either markedly improved or improved QoL at 36 months. Complete seizure freedom is rare in patients treated with VNS; however, this analysis found approximately half of patients who experienced TCS prior to VNS experienced prolonged periods of freedom from TCS with adjunctive VNS. We studied patients in Japan with epilepsy that is difficult to treat. To understand if adding vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) helps such patients, we looked at which patients stopped having all seizures or stopped having a specific seizure type (such as tonic-clonic seizures or focal seizures), and how long these periods lasted. With VNS treatment, about 2 out of 4 patients with tonic-clonic seizures and 1 out of 4 patients with focal seizures had more time without these seizure types. Without seizures, patients felt better about their daily lives. Even patients who still had seizures felt better about their daily lives after 3 years of VNS treatment. The clinical trial registry number is UMIN000014728.

Cost Effectiveness of Adding Fenfluramine to Standard of Care for Patients with Dravet Syndrome in Sweden.

This study evaluated, in a Swedish setting, the cost effectiveness of fenfluramine (FFA) as an add-on to standard of care (SoC) for reducing seizure frequency in Dravet syndrome, a severe developmental epileptic encephalopathy. Cost effectiveness of FFA+SoC compared with SoC only was evaluated using a patient-level simulation model with a lifetime horizon. Patient characteristics and treatment effects, including convulsive seizures, seizure-free days and mortality, were derived from FFA clinical trials. Resource use and costs included cost of drug acquisition, routine care and monitoring, as well as ongoing and emergency resources. Quality of life (QoL) estimates for patients and their caregivers were derived from clinical trial data. Robustness was evaluated by one-way sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses. Lifetime cost of FFA+SoC was ~3 million SEK per patient compared with ~1.5 million SEK for SoC only. FFA+SoC generated 15% more QALYs than SoC only (21.2 vs 18.5 over a lifetime), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ~540,000SEK. Moreover, FFA+SoC had a higher probability of being cost effective than SoC only from a willingness-to-pay threshold of 710,000SEK. Results remained generally consistent across scenario analyses, with only few exceptions (exclusions of carer utility or FFA effect on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy). Due to better seizure control, FFA is a clinically meaningful add-on therapy and was estimated to be a cost-effective addition to current SoC for patients with this rare disease in Sweden at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 1,000,000 SEK.

Placebo response in patients with Dravet syndrome: Post-hoc analysis of two clinical trials

ObjectiveDravet syndrome is a rare, early childhood-onset epileptic and developmental encephalopathy. Responses to placebo in clinical trials for epilepsy therapies range widely, but factors influencing placebo response remain poorly understood. This study explored placebo response and its effects on safety, efficacy, and quality of life outcomes in patients with Dravet syndrome. MethodsWe performed exploratory post-hoc analyses of pooled data from placebo-treated patients from the GWPCARE 1B and GWPCARE 2 randomized controlled phase III trials, comparing cannabidiol and matched placebo in 2–18 year old Dravet syndrome patients. All patients had ≥4 convulsive seizures during a baseline period of 4 weeks. Results124 Dravet syndrome-treated patients were included in the analysis (2–5 years: n = 35; 6–12 years: n = 52; 13–18 years: n = 37). Convulsive seizures were experienced by all placebo group patients at all timepoints, with decreased median convulsive seizure frequency during the treatment period versus baseline; the number of convulsive seizure-free days was similar to baseline. Convulsive seizure frequency had a nominally significant positive correlation with age and a nominally significant negative correlation with body mass index. Most placebo-treated patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event; however, most resolved quickly, and serious adverse events were infrequent. Placebo treatment had very little effect on reported Caregiver Global Impression of Change outcomes versus baseline. InterpretationPlacebo had little impact on convulsive seizure-free days and Caregiver Global Impression of Change versus baseline, suggesting that these metrics may help differentiate placebo and active treatment effects in future studies. However, future research should further assess placebo responses to confirm these results.

A Cost-Utility Analysis of Add-On Cannabidiol Versus Usual Care Alone for the Treatment of Seizures Associated with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex in England and Wales.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of plant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (Epidyolex® in the UK; 100mg/mL oral solution) as an add-on treatment to usual care for the management of treatment-refractory seizures associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) in patients aged ≥2 years. A cohort-based model was developed using a National Health Service perspective and lifetime horizon. Health states were based on weekly seizure frequency and seizure-free days, utilizing patient-level data from the GWPCARE6 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02544763). Two independent regression models were applied to individual patient-level data to predict seizure-free days and seizure frequency. Healthcare resource utilization data were sourced from a Delphi panel, and patient and caregiver health-related quality of life values were elicited using vignettes valued by the general public. Outcomes relating to TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorders were modeled with costs and quality-adjusted life-years sourced from published literature. In the base case, compared with usual care alone, 12mg/kg/day cannabidiol was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £23,797. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence disease severity modifier reduced the ICER to £19,831. Probabilities of cost effectiveness at willingness-to-pay thresholds of £20,000 and £30,000 were 30% and 52%, respectively, for the base case and 39% and 66%, respectively, for the disease severity modifier. Results were robust to sensitivity and scenario analyses. At 12mg/kg/day and an ICER threshold of £20,000-£30,000, we provide evidence for the cost effectiveness of add-on cannabidiol treatment for patients with TSC-associated seizures aged ≥2 years who are refractory to current treatment.

The impact of omega-3 on recurrent seizures in epileptic patients: A case study with evidence-based approaches

Background: Epileptogenesis is also associated with increased production of excessive pro-inflammatory cytokines” which shows connection between pro-inflammatory cytokines as triggering factor with omega-3 which has anti-inflammatory effect. Omega-3, known for its neuroprotective and anticonvulsant properties, exhibits promising effects on epileptic seizure attacks.
 Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of omega-3 supplementation on the incidence of seizures in epilepsy patients.
 Methods: This study used a literature search using advanced queries in the databases PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and Cochrane Library, and combined MeSH terms with Title/Abstract. The collected literature is discarded if there are duplicates, then literature is filtered that meets the eligibility criteria. We used the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine as a means of critical appraisal and determining the level of evidence of the selected literature.
 Results: Four chosen literatures were critically assessed. Two articles indicating no significant difference between omega-3 and placebo and two articles showed had a significantly higher number of seizure-free days than placebo. The first article, involving 78 adults, reported a 50% reduction in seizure risk with a frequency RR of 0.57, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.75 (IS = 0%) indicating no significant difference between omega-3 and placebo groups after 12 weeks of treatment. The second study, comprising mostly non-significant findings, demonstrated no significant correlation between omega-3 and epilepsy attacks in epilepsy patients. The third literature revealed seizure occurrences per month in the EPA group (9.7±1.2), DHA group (11.7±1.5), and placebo group (16.6±1.5). Incidence rate ratio (IRR) adjusted for seizure type in EPA and DHA groups compared to the placebo group were 0.61 (CI = 0.42–0.88, p = 0.008, a 42% reduction) and 0.67 (CI = 0.46–1.0, p = 0.04, a 39% reduction), respectively. Both treatment groups had a significantly higher number of seizure-free days compared to the placebo group (p < 0.05). The fourth study reported intervention group frequency (4.72 ± 1.6, p= 0.014) and placebo frequency (11.64 ± 1.63, p=0.014) with intervention group seizure duration (6.64 ± 1.39, p=0.009) compared to placebo group (14.36 ± 2.18, p=0.009).
 Conclusion: Omega-3 supplementation may be considered for management in patients with recurrent epileptic seizures, although its effect on reducing seizure frequency remains inconsistent.

Caregiver-reported outcomes with real-world use of cannabidiol in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome from the BECOME survey

PurposePlant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (CBD) reduced the frequency of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) and improved the overall condition of patients in placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trials. Anecdotal reports also suggest a positive effect on nonseizure outcomes. In this study, we aimed to identify, through a caregiver survey which nonseizure outcomes were most likely to change in these patients. MethodsThe BEhavior, COgnition, and More with Epidiolex® (BECOME) was a 20-minute, cross-sectional, online survey that was developed with extensive input from caregivers, healthcare professionals, and epilepsy researchers, and was based on questions from validated measures and previously published caregiver reports. US-based caregivers (from Jazz Pharmaceuticals patient/caregiver database) of people with LGS or DS who were treated with CBD (Epidiolex®, 100 mg/mL oral solution) for ≥3 months were asked to compare the past month to the period before CBD initiation and rate their impression of changes using symmetrical Likert scales. ResultsA total of 498 caregivers (97% parents) of patients with LGS (80%) or DS (20%) completed the survey. Mean (range) age of patients was 16 (1−73) years, and 52% were male. Patients were taking a median CBD dose of 14 mg/kg/d and median 4 concomitant antiseizure medications. A large proportion of respondents reported improvements in ≥1 survey question for all nonseizure-related domains: alertness, cognition, and executive function (85%); emotional functioning (82%); language and communication (79% in nonverbal patients and 74% in verbal); activities of daily living (51%); sleep (51%); and physical functioning (46%). Respondents reported improvements in seizure-related domains, including overall seizure frequency (85%), overall seizure severity (76%), seizure-free days per week for ≥1 seizure type (67%), and seizure freedom during the past month (16%). The majority of respondents who reported reduction in seizure frequency also reported improvements in nonseizure outcomes domains (51–80%). However, improvements in nonseizure outcomes (18–56%) were also reported in patients who either had no change or worsening of seizure frequency. ConclusionsThis survey characterized and quantified caregiver impression of changes in the seizure and nonseizure outcomes in patients taking add-on CBD treatment. Overall, 93% of caregivers reported planning to continue CBD treatment, primarily because of reduced seizure burden but also because of improvements in nonseizure-related outcomes. Despite the limitations that are associated with a retrospective survey-based study design, these results support further evaluation of the effect of CBD treatment on nonseizure outcomes among patients with LGS or DS.

Adjunctive perampanel for myoclonic and absence seizures: A post hoc pooled analysis of seizure-free days in studies 332, 311, and 232

Adjunctive perampanel for myoclonic and absence seizures: A post hoc pooled analysis of seizure-free days in studies 332, 311, and 232

Determining the Relationship Between Seizure-Free Days and Other Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients with Dravet Syndrome and Their Carers from FFA Registration Studies.

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare, lifelong epileptic encephalopathy characterised by frequent and severe seizures associated with premature mortality. Typically diagnosed in infancy, patients also experience progressive behavioural, motor-function and cognitive decline. Twenty percent of patients do not reach adulthood. Quality of life (QoL) is impaired for both patients and their carers. Reducing convulsive seizure frequency, increasing convulsive seizure-free days (SFDs) and improving patient/carer QoL are primary treatment goals in DS. This study explored the relationship between SFDs and patients' and carers' QoL to inform a cost-utility analysis of fenfluramine (FFA). In FFA registration studies, patients (or their carer proxies) completed the Paediatric QoL inventory (PedsQL). These data were mapped to EuroQol-5 Dimensions Youth version (EQ-5D-Y) to provide patient utilities. Carer utilities were collected using EQ-5D-5L and mapped to EQ-5D-3L to align patient and carer QoL on the same scale. Linear mixed-effects and panel regression models were tested and Hausman tests identified the most appropriate approach for each group. On this basis, a linear mixed-effects regression model was used to examine the relationships between patient EQ-5D-Y and clinically relevant variables (age, frequency of SFDs per 28days, motor impairments and treatment dose). A linear panel regression model examined the relationship between SFDs and carer QoL. After adjustment for age and underlying comorbidities, the patient regression model showed that SFDs per 28days was a significant predictor of QoL. Each additional patient-SFD increased utility by 0.005 (p < 0.001). The carer linear panel model also showed that increasing SFDs per 28days was a significant predictor of improved QoL. Each additional SFD increased carer utility by 0.014 (p < 0.001). This regression framework highlights that SFDs are significantly correlated with both patients' and carers' QoL. Treatment with effective antiseizure medications that increase SFDs directly improves QoL for patients and their carers.

Seizure-free days as a novel outcome in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Post hoc analysis of patients receiving cannabidiol in two randomized controlled trials.

In this post hoc analysis, we aimed to assess seizure-free days as a potential new outcome measure to use in randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). In two phase 3 RCTs (GWPCARE3, GWPCARE4), eligible patients were randomized to receive plant-derived highly purified cannabidiol (CBD; Epidiolex® in the USA; 100 mg/mL oral solution) at 10 mg/kg/day (CBD10; GWPCARE3 only), at 20 mg/kg/day (CBD20), or matched placebo. The treatment period comprised a 2-week dose titration and a 12-week maintenance period. This post hoc analysis evaluated the least-squares (LS) mean changes from baseline and difference versus placebo in the number of drop or total seizure-free days per 28 days during the treatment period or maintenance period alone. LS mean changes were estimated using an analysis of covariance model, with categorical age and baseline number of drop or total seizure-free days as covariates, and treatment group as a fixed factor. A total of 396 patients were included in this post hoc analysis. During the 14-week treatment period, LS mean changes from baseline in number of drop seizure-free days per 28 days for patients receiving placebo (n = 161), CBD10 (n = 73), and CBD20 (n = 162) were 2.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.75-3.88), 5.64 (95% CI = 4.08-7.20), and 6.45 (95% CI = 5.39-7.52), respectively. The LS mean differences in number of drop seizure-free days versus placebo were 2.83 (95% CI = .98-4.68) for CBD10 and 3.64 (95% CI = 2.18-5.10) for CBD20. For total seizure-free days, LS mean differences versus placebo were 2.63 (95% CI = .92-4.34) for CBD10 and 3.50 (95% CI = 2.16-4.85) for CBD20. The improvements from baseline in seizure-free days during the maintenance period alone were similar to the entire treatment period. Drop and total seizure-free days represent potential new and clinically meaningful endpoints for future RCTs in patients with LGS.

Sleep and seizure risk in epilepsy: bed and wake times are more important than sleep duration.

Sleep duration, sleep deprivation and the sleep-wake cycle are thought to play an important role in the generation of epileptic activity and may also influence seizure risk. Hence, people diagnosed with epilepsy are commonly asked to maintain consistent sleep routines. However, emerging evidence paints a more nuanced picture of the relationship between seizures and sleep, with bidirectional effects between changes in sleep and seizure risk in addition to modulation by sleep stages and transitions between stages. We conducted a longitudinal study investigating sleep parameters and self-reported seizure occurrence in an ambulatory at-home setting using mobile and wearable monitoring. Sixty subjects wore a Fitbit smartwatch for at least 28 days while reporting their seizure activity in a mobile app. Multiple sleep features were investigated, including duration, oversleep and undersleep, and sleep onset and offset times. Sleep features in participants with epilepsy were compared to a large (n = 37 921) representative population of Fitbit users, each with 28 days of data. For participants with at least 10 seizure days (n = 34), sleep features were analysed for significant changes prior to seizure days. A total of 4956 reported seizures (mean = 83, standard deviation = 130) and 30 485 recorded sleep nights (mean = 508, standard deviation = 445) were included in the study. There was a trend for participants with epilepsy to sleep longer than the general population, although this difference was not significant. Just 5 of 34 participants showed a significant difference in sleep duration the night before seizure days compared to seizure-free days. However, 14 of 34 subjects showed significant differences between their sleep onset (bed) and/or offset (wake) times before seizure occurrence. In contrast to previous studies, the current study found undersleeping was associated with a marginal 2% decrease in seizure risk in the following 48 h (P < 0.01). Nocturnal seizures were associated with both significantly longer sleep durations and increased risk of a seizure occurring in the following 48 h. Overall, the presented results demonstrated that day-to-day changes in sleep duration had a minimal effect on reported seizures, while patient-specific changes in bed and wake times were more important for identifying seizure risk the following day. Nocturnal seizures were the only factor that significantly increased the risk of seizures in the following 48 h on a group level. Wearables can be used to identify these sleep-seizure relationships and guide clinical recommendations or improve seizure forecasting algorithms.

The efficacy and safety of ganaxolone for the treatment of refractory epilepsy: A meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials.

Epilepsy is one of the most common and refractory neurological disorders globally. Ganaxolone, a neuroactive steroid that enhances GABAergic inhibition, has been tested in many trials for the resolution of refractory epilepsy. Based on these, our study implemented a meta-analysis to evaluate the general benefit of ganaxolone for refractory epilepsy. EMBASE, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to June 20, 2022. The risk ratio (RR) and standard mean difference (SMD) were analyzed using dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively with a random effect model. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was also performed to judge the reliability of results. We totally collected 659 patients from four RCTs to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ganaxolone. As results showed, ≥50% reduction in mean seizure frequency has improved significantly compared with placebo (RR=1.60, 95%CI: 1.02-2.49, p=0.04, I2 = 30%), which is supported by TSA. However, the percentage of seizure-free days shows no statistical significance (p=0.36). For safety outcomes, adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events, and AE leading to study drug discontinuation all revealed no obvious difference between ganaxolone and placebo (p > 0.05). Based on our research, we have observed that ganaxolone is safe and has potential efficacy in the treatment of refractory epilepsy, waiting for further studies.

Fenfluramine for Treating Dravet Syndrome: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.

Fenfluramine, tradename Fintepla®, was appraised within the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) single technology appraisal (STA) process as Technology Appraisal 808. Within the STA process, the company (Zogenix International) provided NICE with a written submission and a mathematical health economic model, summarising the company's estimates of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of fenfluramine for patients with Dravet syndrome (DS). This company submission (CS) was reviewed by an evidence review group (ERG) independent of NICE. The ERG, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews in collaboration with Maastricht University Medical Centre, produced an ERG report. This paper presents a summary of the ERG report and the development of the NICE guidance. The CS included a systematic review of the evidence for fenfluramine. From this review the company identified and presented evidence from two randomised trials (Study 1 and Study 1504), an open-label extension study (Study 1503) and 'real world evidence' from a prospective and retrospective study. Both randomised trials were conducted in patients up to 18 years of age with DS, whose seizures were incompletely controlled with previous anti-epileptic drugs. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare fenfluramine with cannabidiol plus clobazam. There was no evidence of a difference between any doses of fenfluramine and cannabidiol in the mean convulsive seizure frequency (CSF) rate during treatment. However, fenfluramine increased the number of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in CSF frequency from baseline compared to cannabidiol. The company used an individual-patient state-transition model (R version 3.5.2) to model cost-effectiveness of fenfluramine. The CSF and convulsive seizure-free days were estimated using patient-level data from the placebo arm of the fenfluramine registration studies. Subsequently, a treatment effect of either fenfluramine or cannabidiol was applied. Utility values for the economic model were obtained by mapping Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory data from the registration studies to EuroQol-5D-3L Youth (EQ-5D-Y-3L). The company included caregiver utilities in their base-case, as the severe needs of patients with DS have a major impact on parents and caregivers. There were several key issues. First, the company included caregiver utilities in the model in a way that when patients in the economic model died, the corresponding caregiver utility was also set to zero. Second, the model was built in R statistical software, resulting in transparency issues. Third, the company assumed the same percentage reduction for convulsive seizure days as was estimated for CSF. Fourth, during the final appraisal committee meeting, influential changes were made to the model that were not in line with the ERG's preferences (but were accepted by the appraisal committee). The company's revised and final incremental cost effectiveness ratio(ICER) in line with committee preferences resulted in fenfluramine dominating cannabidiol. Fenfluramine was recommended as an add-on to other antiepileptic medicines for treating seizures associated with DS in people aged 2 years and older in the National Health Service(NHS).

Patient and Caregiver Health State Utilities in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome and Dravet Syndrome

PurposeLennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) are rare, treatment-resistant forms of epilepsy characterized by childhood onset of seizures. Cost-effectiveness analysis for new antiseizure medications typically requires health state utilities (HSUs) that reflect the patient and caregiver burden of the relevant conditions. This study aimed to estimate HSUs for LGS and DS. Focus was placed on valuing the impact of seizure frequency and seizure-free days on health-related quality of life (HRQL) for patients and caregivers. MethodsHealth state vignettes that described the experience of living with and caring for a child with LGS or DS were developed based on a targeted literature review and feedback from interviews with LGS and DS clinical experts and DS caregivers. Vignettes varied by the number of seizures and seizure-free days per month. Twenty-four vignettes were developed that described patient HRQL (6 per condition) and caregiver HRQL (6 per condition) for LGS or DS. Vignettes were evaluated via interviews from the general population in the United Kingdom and Sweden using a visual analog scale and time trade-off (TTO) method. Participants were recruited by interviewers based in different regions of the United Kingdom and Sweden using convenience sampling. FindingsTwo hundred interviews were conducted by video call from March to April 2020. One hundred participants evaluated each of the 6 patient and 6 caregiver vignettes for LGS; a different 100 participants evaluated each of the DS vignettes. The estimated utility values vary consistently according to seizure frequency and number of seizure-free days. Patient TTO utility values range from −0.186 (highest seizure frequency and fewest seizure-free days) to 0.754 (seizure-free state) for LGS and from 0.171 to 0.778 for DS. The caregiver TTO utility values range from 0.032 to 0.810 and 0.510 to 0.881 for LGS and DS, respectively. Fewer seizures and additional seizure-free days are associated with better patient and caregiver HRQL. ImplicationsThis study estimated utility values for patients with LGS or DS and their caregivers using visual analog scale and TTO valuation among a general public sample. These utility values can be used in cost-effectiveness assessments of new antiseizure medications. The findings indicate the importance of seizure-free days as well as seizure frequency in patient and caregiver HRQL, which may inform the design of future clinical trials.

Fenfluramine significantly reduces day-to-day seizure burden by increasing number of seizure-free days and time between seizures in patients with Dravet syndrome: A time-to-event analysis.

ObjectiveThe number, unpredictability, and severity of seizures experienced by patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) negatively impact quality of life (QOL) for patients, caregivers, and families. Metrics are needed to assess whether patients with residual seizures have moved meaningfully toward seizure freedom after treatment with new antiseizure medications.MethodsWe evaluated the time required postrandomization for each patient to experience the same number of seizures experienced during baseline (i.e., time‐to‐nth seizure), using a post hoc time‐to‐event (TTE) analysis of data from two Phase 3 placebo‐controlled trials of adjunctive fenfluramine for DS (Study 1, N = 119; Study 2, N = 87). Patients aged 2–19 years were randomized to placebo or adjunctive fenfluramine (Study 1: .7 mg/kg/day or .2 mg/kg/day; Study 2: .4 mg/kg/day with stiripentol). Data were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier TTE curves and waterfall plots.ResultsThe proportion of patients who never reached baseline seizure frequency was greater with fenfluramine than with placebo (Study 1: fenfluramine .7 mg/kg/day, 60%; fenfluramine .2 mg/kg/day, 31%; placebo, 13%; Study 2: fenfluramine .4 mg/kg/day, 58%; placebo, 2%). Median time‐to‐nth seizure was longer after fenfluramine than after placebo (Study 1: fenfluramine .7 mg/kg/day, 13 weeks; .2 mg/kg/day, 10 weeks; placebo, 7 weeks; Study 2: fenfluramine .4 mg/kg/day, 13 weeks; placebo, 5 weeks; p < .001). Longest duration of convulsive seizure‐free days was increased in active groups versus the placebo group (Study 1: fenfluramine .7 and .2 mg/kg/day, 25.0 and 15.0 days; placebo, 9.5 days [p = .0001; p = .0352]; Study 2: fenfluramine .4 mg/kg/day, 22.0 days; placebo, 13.0 days [p = .004]). The most common adverse events included decreased appetite, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infection, diarrhea, and fatigue.SignificanceThese data demonstrate that fenfluramine can significantly reduce day‐to‐day seizure burden in patients with DS, providing prolonged periods of convulsive seizure‐free days, which may help reduce the physical and emotional disease toll while improving health‐related QOL for patients and caregivers.

Long-term treatment with everolimus in TSC-associated therapy-resistant epilepsies

PurposeTo investigate the efficacy and tolerability of long-term treatment with Everolimus (EVO) in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and therapy-resistant epilepsy in a compassionate use trial. MethodsAfter a 3-month baseline, patients were treated with EVO. Treatment was divided into treatment phases each lasting at least 9 months. Patients started with one of three target serum levels. In case of insufficient seizure control, subsequent treatment phases with other target serum levels followed. The accompanying antiseizure medication (ASM) remained stable during the baseline phase and for at least the initial three treatment phases. We evaluated changes in seizure frequency and seizure-free days compared to baseline for each patient (Cox-Stuart-test). ResultsFifteen patients were followed up for up to 10 years (minimum 0.6 years, median 5.8 years). Twelve patients (80%) experienced a significant reduction in seizure frequency or an increase in seizure-free days: Six (40%) patients became seizure-free and four patients (26.7%) remained seizure free for > 7 years, of which three required no additional ASM. All participants reported at least one adverse effect, the vast majority (92.5%) of which were mild or moderate. ConclusionLong-term treatment with EVO was highly efficacious, safe and well tolerated. While EVO can be a therapeutic option for therapy-resistant epilepsy in TSC, it can take a long time for seizure relief to manifest.

The impact of seizure frequency on quality of life in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome or Dravet syndrome

ObjectivesLennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) are rare treatment-resistant epileptic encephalopathies with limited data describing the relationship between seizures and quality of life (QoL). The objective of this cross-sectional pilot study was to assess the impact on QoL of seizures and seizure-free days for the generation of utility values. MethodsSurveys were conducted in the UK and France, whereby patients and/or caregivers of patients with LGS, DS, or other epilepsies were asked to score health state vignettes for a hypothetical patient with LGS or DS. Respondents evaluated QoL for health states based on the number of seizures and seizure-free days per month, using a visual analog scale (VAS). Visual analog scale scores were converted to the 0–1 scale as a proxy estimate for utility values. Surveys were pilot tested and respondents were recruited from October 2018 to August 2019. ResultsPatient respondents were mainly treatment-responsive (n = 43/55) whereas caregiver respondents mainly cared for patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy (n = 38/43). Most respondents and patients were aged ≥18 years. Results from LGS and DS surveys in the UK (n = 58) and France (n = 40) suggested that health states with fewer seizures and more seizure-free days had higher QoL scores for hypothetical patients. For DS, QoL scores for patient health states ranged from 0.20 (32 convulsive seizures and 4 seizure-free days/month, UK) to 0.92 (seizure-free, France). For LGS, scores ranged from 0.14 (130 drop seizures and 1 seizure-free day/month, France) to 0.83 (seizure-free, UK). In all surveys, seizure-free days had a greater impact on QoL than seizure frequency (P < 0.001). ConclusionsFewer seizures and additional seizure-free days improved QoL in patients with LGS or DS; seizure-free days had the greatest impact on QoL.

PND33 A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Fenfluramine for the Treatment of Seizures for Patients with Dravet Syndrome (DS) in the UK Setting

DS is a rare, genetic epileptic encephalopathy presenting in early childhood, characterised by frequent, severe and pharmaco-resistant seizures; associated with developmental and cognitive impairment, premature death and poor patient and carer quality of life (QoL). As DS is highly heterogeneous, a novel patient-level simulation model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fenfluramine - a newly licensed ‘add-on therapy’ for the treatment of DS, in the UK setting. Patient-level data from the placebo arm of fenfluramine registration studies were used to model the number of convulsive seizures and convulsive seizure-free days per 28-day cycle in a DS population generalisable to the UK. Utility values were mapped from patient and carer QoL data from the trials. Carer utility values were included in line with the NICE reference case. Natural and DS-specific mortality rates were derived from literature and UK healthcare resource use data from a DS-specific pathway study. The primary base case analysis compared standard of care (SoC) with either add-on fenfluramine or NICE-recommended cannabidiol (with clobazam), over a lifetime horizon. A robust indirect treatment comparison provided relative treatment effects for SoC, fenfluramine and cannabidiol. The estimated ICER of fenfluramine at the proposed NHS price compared with cannabidiol (list price) is £31,773/QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated the base case analysis results are robust to parameter uncertainty. Scenario analyses indicate the most influential assumptions are the inclusion of utility values for carers, and doses assumed for cannabidiol. At plausible maximum doses of cannabidiol, fenfluramine dominates cannabidiol. In fully incremental analyses, fenfluramine had a lower ICER vs SoC than did cannabidiol, i.e. fenfluramine extendedly dominated cannabidiol. This novel patient-level simulation model, which appropriately characterises the population heterogeneity in DS, demonstrates fenfluramine provides a clinically and cost-effective alternative to existing ‘add-on therapy’ options for this rare, life-threatening syndrome.

Use of an electronic seizure diary in a randomized, controlled trial of natalizumab in adult participants with drug-resistant focal epilepsy

ObjectiveTo analyze electronic diary (e-diary) use in a phase 2, randomized, controlled clinical trial (OPUS; NCT03283371) of natalizumab in adult participants with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. MethodsWe developed an e-diary, which incorporated an episodic seizure diary and a daily diary reminder, for use as the primary source to record participants’ daily seizure activity in the OPUS phase 2 clinical trial. Participants and/or their designated caregivers made e-diary entries by selecting seizure descriptions generated in the participants’ and/or caregivers’ own words at the time of screening. Seizures and seizure-free days were reported for the current day and for up to 5 and 4 retrospective days, respectively. A record of seizure symptoms entered within the prior 5-day period was displayed on accessing the diary. Changes were not permitted in the e-diary once a seizure record was saved unless a data change request was made. A paper backup diary was available. ResultsE-diary entries (N = 15,176) from the 6-week baseline period and subsequent 24-week placebo-controlled period were analyzed for 66 adults who were randomized and dosed in the OPUS trial. The overall e-diary compliance, defined as the total number of days with any entry out of the total number of days in the baseline and placebo-controlled periods for all participants combined, was 83.6%. Caregivers made 190 (1.3%) e-diary entries. Day-of-event e-diary entries totaled 11,248 (74.1%). At least one paper backup diary was used by 36 (54.5%) participants. SignificanceOur data highlight that good e-diary compliance can be achieved across participants in randomized clinical trials in adult focal epilepsy. In addition to identifying and addressing any barriers that may prevent a minority of participants from achieving good e-diary compliance, consideration of e-diary elements, such as recall period and reporting of seizure-free days, will facilitate the most accurate data capture in epilepsy clinical trials.

Clinical results and prospects for the use of phenosanic acid in patients with focal epilepsy

To study the efficacy and safety of using a new original synthetic antioxidant - phenosanic acid as an adjunct therapy in patients with focal epilepsy. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy and safety of phenosanic acid as an adjunct therapy to basic antiepileptic drugs in 120 patients with focal epilepsy. Primary purpose: to study the dynamic of seizure frequency. Secondary purposes: to study the dynamic of seizure-free days, the dynamics of bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, the results of questionnaires and scales (General Dynamics Assessment, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31-P), European Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Frontal Asstssment Battery (FAB), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)). Phenosanic acid (Dibufelon) showed statistically significant benefit over placebo in the primary indicator of efficacy (reduction in the frequency of epileptic seizures by at least 50%) and in the secondary indicators. The drug was safe and well tolerated by the patients. The addition of phenosanic acid (Dibufelon) to base antiepileptic drugs seems to be perspective because of its positive effect on reducing the number of epileptic seizures, as well as on comorbid disorders in the emotional and cognitive spheres.

Cannabidiol in conjunction with clobazam: analysis of four randomized controlled trials.

ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety profile of add‐on cannabidiol (CBD) in patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS) on clobazam and in the overall population of four randomized, controlled phase 3 trials.MethodsPatients received plant‐derived, highly purified CBD medicine (Epidiolex® in the USA; Epidyolex® in Europe; 100 mg/ml oral solution) at a dose of 10 or 20 mg/kg/day, or placebo for 14 weeks. A subgroup analysis of patients on clobazam and meta‐analysis by syndrome were conducted. The primary endpoint was percentage reduction in primary seizure type during the treatment period.Results396 patients with LGS (49% on clobazam) and 318 patients with DS (64% on clobazam) were included. CBD treatment resulted in a reduction in primary seizure frequency vs placebo in the overall population (treatment ratio [95% confidence interval]: LGS, 0.70 [0.62‐0.80]; DS, 0.71 [0.60‐0.83]) and in patients receiving clobazam (LGS, 0.56 [0.47‐0.67]; DS, 0.63 [0.52‐0.77]). The antiseizure efficacy of CBD was also demonstrated across other endpoints vs placebo (≥50% responder rate, total seizure frequency, number of seizure‐free days, and Subject/Caregiver Global Impression of Change scores) in the overall populations and in patients receiving clobazam. There were higher incidences of somnolence and sedation in patients on CBD and clobazam. Most incidences of elevated transaminases occurred in patients on concomitant valproate and, to a lesser extent, clobazam.ConclusionsAdd‐on CBD was effective in reducing seizures in the overall populations and in conjunction with clobazam. Somnolence and sedation occurred more frequently in patients on CBD and clobazam.