Abstract
DS is a rare, genetic epileptic encephalopathy presenting in early childhood, characterised by frequent, severe and pharmaco-resistant seizures; associated with developmental and cognitive impairment, premature death and poor patient and carer quality of life (QoL). As DS is highly heterogeneous, a novel patient-level simulation model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fenfluramine - a newly licensed ‘add-on therapy’ for the treatment of DS, in the UK setting. Patient-level data from the placebo arm of fenfluramine registration studies were used to model the number of convulsive seizures and convulsive seizure-free days per 28-day cycle in a DS population generalisable to the UK. Utility values were mapped from patient and carer QoL data from the trials. Carer utility values were included in line with the NICE reference case. Natural and DS-specific mortality rates were derived from literature and UK healthcare resource use data from a DS-specific pathway study. The primary base case analysis compared standard of care (SoC) with either add-on fenfluramine or NICE-recommended cannabidiol (with clobazam), over a lifetime horizon. A robust indirect treatment comparison provided relative treatment effects for SoC, fenfluramine and cannabidiol. The estimated ICER of fenfluramine at the proposed NHS price compared with cannabidiol (list price) is £31,773/QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated the base case analysis results are robust to parameter uncertainty. Scenario analyses indicate the most influential assumptions are the inclusion of utility values for carers, and doses assumed for cannabidiol. At plausible maximum doses of cannabidiol, fenfluramine dominates cannabidiol. In fully incremental analyses, fenfluramine had a lower ICER vs SoC than did cannabidiol, i.e. fenfluramine extendedly dominated cannabidiol. This novel patient-level simulation model, which appropriately characterises the population heterogeneity in DS, demonstrates fenfluramine provides a clinically and cost-effective alternative to existing ‘add-on therapy’ options for this rare, life-threatening syndrome.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Value in Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.