Seeking Fertility Preservation Research Articles

United Kingdom data collection of semen quality in transgender adolescent females seeking fertility preservation

ObjectiveIncreasing numbers of adolescents with gender dysphoria start gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists to halt puberty, minimising psychological distress. The uncertainty of long-term effects of this medication, and the subsequent likelihood of accessing gender affirming hormone treatment, highlights the importance of fertility preservation prior to starting hormone treatment. We investigated the take up, hormonal profile and sperm quality in adolescents undergoing fertility preservation via cryopreservation by masturbation or surgical sperm retrieval, prior to starting hormonal therapy. DesignData was prospectively maintained from a tertiary UK-based hospital. 122 people under 19 years, mean age 15.2 +/- 1.7 years, referred by gender clinics and GPs, were included in this cohort study. SubjectsParticipants were counselled for fertility preservation, and serum testosterone, follicle stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone levels were recorded prior to providing semen samples. InterventionMasturbation semen samples were classified as normal (>15mil/ml), oligozoospermia (1mil-15mil/ml), cryptozoospermia (<1mil/ml) or azoospermia. If the sample was insufficient or the person was unwilling to masturbate, surgical sperm retrieval was offered in a stepwise manner using electroejaculation, TESE +/- mTESE. Main Outcome measurementsQuality of semen produced by participants, via masturbation or surgical sperm retrieval, was analysed to determine if it was good enough to cryopreserve for future fertility use. Results23/122 (19%) participants declined sample storage.In the masturbation group (average age 16.3), 78 people produced 106 samples. 86/106 were stored - 43.7% were normospermic, 35.9% oligozoospermic, 8.7% cryptozoospermic, 11.7% azoospermic. Overall, semen parameters varied but were generally abnormal, illustrated by only 43.7% of the masturbation samples produced being normospermic.For surgical sperm retrieval subjects (average age 15.2), electroejaculation was successful in 4/21 people, while the rest proceeded with TESE/mTESE. Encouragingly, 16/21 subjects had an average of 5 vials stored, and all participants had a testosterone level >8nmol/l. Semen parameters in this sub-cohort were poor but possibly adequate for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. ConclusionsIn this large database of transgender girls referred for fertility preservation in the UK, fertility preservation is possible, even with those unwilling to masturbate. Long-term data is required to check the health of these gametes, observing live birth rates using these preserved gametes.

O-062 New strategies in ovarian stimulation

Abstract Controlled Ovarian stimulation (COH) has an objective to induce multiple ovulations in order to yield a multiple oocyte harvest and offer multiple embryos available for transfer thereby increasing the efficacy of ART. The theory of a multicyclic development of follicles during the menstrual cycle has prompted new approaches to ovarian stimulation. Research has suggested that recruitable antral follicles are continuously present in the ovaries during the menstrual cycle, and ultrasonographic studies have demonstrated that multiple cohorts or ‘waves’ of 2–5 mm follicles are recruited continuously during a menstrual cycle. Because of the asynchrony between endometrial receptivity and embryo development with a ‘non-conventional start’ stimulation, all the embryos are generally cryopreserved and transferred subsequently. This deferred transfer policy is currently possible given the advances in vitrification techniques, with success rates comparable to those following transfer with ‘fresh’ embryos. New stimulation approaches, together with advanced cryopreservation techniques, allow for a total ‘disarticulation’ between the time of the menstrual cycle, ovarian stimulation start and embryo transfer. This new approach to ovarian stimulation is particularly useful for women seeking fertility preservation, especially where a shortened time to starting cancer treatment is desirable. Also, poor responders could benefit from the new stimulation protocols by continuing ovarian stimulation after the first oocyte retrieval, thereby obtaining more oocytes or embryos compared with the conventional approach. In the quest to reduce the incidence of OHSS and make the clinic OHSS free various antagonist protocols are now routinely used. These and other new protocols discussed will include Late initiation of stimulation, long acting antagonist. Individualised (iCOS) to include mild stimulation, random start, Dual stimulation and double trigger are done to improve efficacy and success rates in certain group of patients. New drugs like Long acting FSH and oral antagonist with their results will be presented. Pre-Treatment medications like Estrogens, Progestogens, Combined CoC, antagonist will also be discussed.

P-369 DuoStim could be a proper option for women seeking fertility preservation for non-medical reasons

Abstract Study question Is Duostim a suitable option for women who wish to preserve fertility for social reasons? Summary answer Providing the option of DuoStim is an efficient way to expand the cohort of vitrified oocytes in women seeking fertility preservation for non-medical reasons. What is known already A growing number of reproductive-age women are choosing to postpone motherhood, giving rise to the concept of reproductive autonomy. Numerous strategies aim to refine ovarian stimulation protocols. DuoStim, entailing dual ovarian stimulations and retrievals within one menstrual cycle, proves advantageous for those with diminished ovarian reserve or facing cancer. To our knowledge, this is the first study offering DuoStim for social preservation. Study design, size, duration Retrospective controlled case-control study conducted with paired follicular phase stimulation (FPS) and luteal phase stimulation (LPS) derived cohorts of oocytes collected in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim). The study included 160 patients aged 36.85 ± 3.3 years old, who underwent DuoStim for social egg freezing from October 2018 to September 2023. The primary outcome was the number of MII oocytes retrieved per cycle and secondary outcomes included stimulation duration and gonadotropin dose. Participants/materials, setting, methods FPS and LPS were performed using the same daily dose of recombinant gonadotropins in an antagonist protocol. Oocyte retrieval was performed 36 hours after triggering with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triptorelin acetate (0,2 mg) after the FPS. Luteal phase stimulation protocol began on the 5th day after ovarian puncture using dual trigger, followed by a second oocyte retrieval. Mature oocytes were vitrified 2 hours later following the Kitazato® protocol. Main results and the role of chance Stimulation duration and gonadotropin dose were lower during Follicular Phase Stimulation (FPS) vs. Luteal Phase Stimulation (LPS) (10.8 ± 1.5 days vs. 13.0 ± 2.3, P &amp;lt; 0.05 and 2,487.9 ± 580.8 vs. 3,264.0 ± 942.7, P &amp;lt; 0.05). The number of retrieved oocytes was comparable between the two groups (4.78 ± 3.0 vs. 5.32 ± 3.7; P = 0.15). The mean number of MII oocytes acquired in the LPS group exceeded that in the FPS group (4.16 ± 3.0 vs. 3.58 ± 2.3; P = 0.054), indicating a tendency towards more MII oocytes in the LPS group without achieving statistical significance. A total of 110 patients (69.29%) obtained the same or a greater number of MII during the LPS compared to the FPS. Limitations, reasons for caution Although DuoStim is acknowledged as an option to obtain a greater number of eggs in certain situations, the evidence supporting its utility in social fertility preservation is still limited. It is crucial to recognize the inherent biases in observational retrospective studies. Wider implications of the findings DuoStim could be an advantage for women who live abroad or those who dispose of short periods of time for oocyte vitrification, also potentially reducing the drop-out rate. Trial registration number not applicable

Prediction of complete regression in fertility-sparing patients with endometrial cancer and apical hyperplasia: the GLOBAL model in a large Chinese cohort

BackgroundFertility preservation treatment is increasingly essential for patients with apical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and early endometrial cancer (EEC) worldwide. Complete regression (CR) is the main endpoint of this treatment. Accurately predicting CR and implementing appropriate interventions during treatment are crucial for these patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study involving 193 patients diagnosed with atypical AEH or EEC, enrolled from January 2012 to March 2022 at our center. We evaluated 24 clinical parameters as candidate predictors and employed LASSO regression to develop a prediction model for CR. Subsequently, a nomogram was constructed to predict CR after the treatment. We evaluated the performance of the nomogram using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) to assess its predictive accuracy. Additionally, we employed cumulative curves to determine the CR rate among patients.ResultsOut of the 193 patients, 173 achieved CR after undergoing fertility preservation treatment. We categorized features with similar properties and provided a list of formulas based on their coefficients. The final model, named GLOBAL (including basic information, characteristics, blood pressure, glucose metabolism, lipid metabolism, immunohistochemistry, histological type, and medication), comprised eight variables identified using LASSO regression. A nomogram incorporating these eight risk factors was developed to predict CR. The GLOBAL model exhibited an AUC of 0.907 (95% CI 0.828–0.969). Calibration plots demonstrated a favorable agreement between the predicted probability by the GLOBAL model and actual observations in the cohort. The cumulative curve analysis revealed varying cumulative CR rates among patients in the eight subgroups. Categorized analysis demonstrated significant diversity in the effects of the GLOBAL model on CR among patients with different total points (p < 0.05).ConclusionWe have developed and validated a model that significantly enhances the predictive accuracy of CR in AEH and EEC patients seeking fertility preservation treatment.

An update on the current indications for in vitro maturation.

In vitro maturation has become a significant component of modern assisted reproductive techniques. Published data have been supported for the safety and effectiveness of in vitro maturation treatment. In recent years, potential indications for in vitro maturation (IVM) have been a topic of interest and investigation. Significant improvements in technique enhancement and data publication for evaluating the efficacy of IVM have been achieved. Recent studies have shown that IVM could offer several advantages over in vitro fertilization. Currently, there are growing indications for IVM beyond the commonly mentioned indication of infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Additionally, some potential candidates might have significant advantages for IVM, such as women diagnosed with gonadotropin resistance ovary syndrome or those seeking fertility preservation. With a better understanding of IVM, from basic science to clinical practice, it can be applied safely, effectively, and affordably to a broader range of patients, making it a more accessible and patient-friendly option. Despite the possibly acknowledged limitations, the potential of in vitro maturation cannot be denied. As this technique becomes increasingly accessible to patients and more continuous efforts are dedicated to advancing this technique, the impact of in vitro maturation is expected.

Outcomes of fertility preservation treatments in patients with endometrial cancer with different molecular classifications based on an NGS panel.

The molecular classification of endometrial cancer has previously been shown to be associated with clinical outcomes. However, there are insufficient data to support the routine use of molecular classification for the treatment of patients seeking fertility preservation. Here, we retrospectively investigated 90 patients received fertility-sparing treatment. We used a next generation sequencing (NGS) panel to classify these patients into four subtypes. All patients received hormonal therapy combined with hysteroscopy. Therapeutic effects were evaluated by hysteroscopy every three months during the treatment. Patients with POLE mutations had the highest disease progression rate (50.0%, P=0.013), while the microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) group had the highest recurrence rate (50.0%, P=0.042). PIK3CA mutation (hazard ratio (HR): 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.99; P=0.046), overweight (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.32-0.96; P=0.033) and obesity (HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.20-0.95; P=0.036) were associated with a significantly lower cumulative complete response (CR) rate. The combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRH-a) and letrozole (HR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.81-6.52; P< 0.001) was associated with a significantly higher cumulative CR rate. KRAS mutation was significantly associated with disease progression (P=0.002). In wild-type TP53 patients, PTEN and PIK3CA mutations significantly prolonged the duration of treatment to achieve CR (log rank P=0.034; P=0.018). The implementation of molecular classification for EC patients undergoing fertility-sparing treatment is promising and can facilitate the selection of appropriate medical regimes to achieve better outcomes in patients with EC who require fertility preservation treatment.

Fertility Preservation in Endometriosis: Does Patient Symptomatology Affect the Extent of the Ovarian Response?

This study is to identify factors and patient symptomatology affecting ovarian response in women with endometriosis who seek fertility preservation. An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2017 to May 2020 at a tertiary university-affiliated medical center. We included patients who were treated in the endometriosis clinic and underwent fertility preservation. Patients completed an online questionnaire that was cross-referenced with electronic charts. An analysis related to patient data and fertility preservation cycles and a mediation analysis were performed. The mean patient age at time of fertility preservation was 35.2 (± 4.9) years. The mean accumulated number of oocytes vitrified per patient was 16.7 (± 12.1) oocytes. The correlation coefficient assessed between the number of oocytes vitrified per cycle and AMH was significantly positive at +0.472, p = 0.006. The examined reported symptoms were lethargy, chronic pelvic pain, dyschezia, dyspareunia, bowel-associated symptoms, and urinary tract symptoms. The number of oocytes vitrified correlated with the number of reported symptoms and clinical characteristics at - 0.497, p = 0.0001, and - 0.442, p = 0.0001, respectively. In a mediation analysis, the potential causality of surgical intervention in the relationship between the number of symptoms and ovarian response was - 0.300 (95% CI [0.15, 1.905], p = 0.05), and the calculated proportion of mediation was estimated to be 17%. We observed a significant negative association between the number of clinical symptoms and the quantity of vitrified oocytes. This relationship was only partly associated with prior surgical intervention. AMH was found to have the highest correlation with treatment success in patients with endometriosis undergoing fertility preservation.

Timing of testosterone discontinuation and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in transgender patients: a cohort study

To determine if there is an association between the timing of testosterone discontinuation and assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes. Retrospectivse cohort study. Single academic center. We included consecutive transgender patients seeking fertility preservation between October 2019 and April 2021. Patients who identified as transgender on androgens for >1 month on presentation were included. None. A linear regression model was used to evaluate the effect of testosterone discontinuation duration on the number of mature oocytes retrieved. Eighteen patients (mean age 27.7 [SD 5.2] years, mean body mass index 27.3 [SD 4.6] kg/m2, mean antimüllerian hormone 27.2 [SD 11.8], median antral follicle count 20 [interquartile range (IQR) 14-32]) were included in the analysis. No patient underwent transition-related surgery (eg, oophorectomy, hysterectomy). None of the patients were previously pregnant. Mean time o,n testosterone was 44 (SD 29.6) months. The median time off testosterone until the start of ovarian stimulation was 7.7 weeks (IQR 4.3-20.7). All patients underwent oocyte cryopreservation except one who had embryo cryopreservation. The median total number of oocytes was 11 (IQR 7-14). The median number of mature oocytes was 7.5 (IQR 5-12) oocytes. The univariate regression model evaluating the duration of time off testosterone before ART demonstrated no significant association with the outcome of mature oocytes (regression coefficient, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, -0.13 to 0.50). In a retrospective analysis of transgender patients recently on testosterone undergoing ART, no association was detected between the timing of testosterone cessation and the number of mature oocytes.

IVF characteristics and the molecular luteal features of random start IVF cycles are not different from conventional cycles in cancer patients.

Are the IVF parameters and the steroidogenic luteal characteristics of random-start IVF cycles different from conventional cycles in cancer patients? No; controlled ovarian stimulation cycles randomly started at late follicular phase (LFP) and luteal phase (LP) are totally comparable to those conventional IVF cycles started at early follicular phase (EFP) in terms of the expression of the enzymes involved in cholesterol utilization and steroid hormone biosynthesis pathways, gonadotropin receptor expression and, estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4) production in addition to the similarities in ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation, oocyte yield, fertilization rate and embryo development competency in cancer patients. Random start ovarian stimulation protocols are commonly employed for oocyte and embryo freezing for fertility preservation in cancer patients with time constraints who do not have sufficient time to undergo ovarian stimulation initiated conventionally at EFP of the next cycle. No data is available regarding the molecular steroidogenic features of these cycles analyzed together with the clinical IVF characteristics in cancer patients. We aimed to address this question in this study to help understand how similar the random start cycles are to the conventional start ones. A clinical translational research study conducted in 62 cancer patients undergoing IVF for fertility preservation between the years 2017 and 2022. Sixty-two patients who were diagnosed with different types of cancer and underwent ovarian stimulation for oocyte (n = 41) and embryo (n = 21) cryopreservation using GnRH antagonist protocol and human menopausal gonadotropins before receiving cancer treatment/surgery were enrolled in the study. For patients with breast cancer and endometrial cancer the aromatase inhibitor letrozole was used with gonadotropin stimulation. Ovarian stimulation was initiated conventionally at EFP in 22 patients and served as control while it was started at LFP in 20, and mid-LP in the other 20 patients. The luteinized granulosa cells (GCs) were recovered from follicular aspirates during oocyte retrieval procedure and used for the experiments separately for each individual patient. The expression of the enzymes involved in sex steroid biosynthesis (StAR, 3β-HSD, Aromatase) and cholesterol synthesis (3-hydroxy 3-methylglutaryl Co-A reductase (HMG-Co-A reductase)), utilization (hormone sensitive lipase (HSL)), and storage (Acetyl-Coenzyme A acetyltransferase 1 (ACAT-1)), and gonadotropin receptor expression status were analyzed using immunoblotting and RT-PCR methods. Laser confocal immunofluorescence imaging was applied to analyze and compare the expression patterns of the steroidogenic enzymes and their relation with mitochondria. In vitro E2 and P4 production by the cells were compared among the groups. Baseline demographic and IVF characteristics of the patients undergoing the conventional start and random start IVF cycles were similar. Duration of gonadotropin stimulation was significantly longer in LFP and LP start cycles in comparison to the conventional ones. Ovarian response to gonadotropin stimulation, mature and total oocyte yield, fertilization and Day 5 blastulation rates of the embryos were comparable between the conventional versus random start cycles. When the luteal GCs of these random start cycles were analyzed we could not find any gross differences between these cycles in terms of the viability index and gross light microscopic morphologic features. More detailed analysis of the molecular luteal characteristics of the cells using RT-PCR, immunoblotting methods revealed that the expression profiles of the gonadotropin receptors, and the enzymes involved in sex steroid biosynthesis and cholesterol synthesis/utilization, and the steroidogenic activity of the luteal GCs of the random start cycles are almost identical to those of the conventional start cycles. Confocal image analysis demonstrated similar patterns in the signal expression profiles of the steroidogenic enzymes and their co-localization within mitochondria. N/A. Caution should be exercised when interpreting our data and counseling cancer patients seeking fertility preservation because it is still unclear if previous exposure to cancer drugs, different ovarian pathologies or infertility etiologies, previous ovarian surgery and/or any other underlying diseases that are concomitantly present with cancer may cause a difference between conventional and random start stimulation protocols in terms of IVF parameters, luteal function and reproductive outcome. Relatively low number of patients in each stimulation protocol and pooling of luteal GCs for each patient rather than individual analysis of each follicle and oocyte are additional limitations of our study. Our findings provide reassurance that random start protocol offers cancer patients an equally good prospect of fertility preservation as conventional IVF. Funded by the School of Medicine, the Graduate School of Health Sciences of Koc University and Koç University Research Center for Translational Medicine (KUTTAM), equally funded by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Development Research Infrastructure Support Program. All authors declare no conflict of interest. N/A.

FERTILITY PRESERVATION IN ENDOMETRIOSIS: DOES PATIENT SYMPTOMATOLOGY AFFECTS THE EXTENT OF THE OVARIAN RESPONSE

This study was aimed to assess whether the extent of the disease and the individual symptomatology of patients with endometriosis seeking fertility preservation correlates with their ovarian response to cycle stimulation.

National Ovarian and Testicular Tissue Transport and Cryopreservation Service (NOTTCS)

Background: Recognised female fertility preservation strategies include oocyte and embryo cryopreservation. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation is no longer experimental, and the only option for children and pre-pubertal girls. Although testicular cryopreservation remains experimental for boys, it has the potential to evolve and provide a realistic opportunity for fertility in the future. The RWH/MIVF fertility preservation service has been preserving ovarian tissue since 1995. This service has been available to children, adolescent young adults (AYA) and adults about to receive gonadotoxic treatment for malignant and non-malignant conditions. In 2013, this service was extended to freezing testicular tissue for pre-pubertal and peri-pubertal males. Until 2019 these fertility preservation options have only been available to those undergoing procedures at Melbourne metropolitan hospitals. Young cancer patients seeking fertility preservation in regional or interstate areas, did not have this opportunity due to lack of access and resources. One approach to increasing patient access to Gonadal Tissue Cryopreservation (GTC), was to establish a national tissue retrieval and transport service. Aim: This paper describes the uptake of a GTC transport program at RWH, allowing rural and interstate oncology referral for transport, processing and storage of gonadal tissue in an acknowledged centre of excellence. Method: An information/education/instruction resource package was developed for fertility units Australia-wide, supported by a centralised GTC program coordinator. Referrals are fast tracked to eliminate any delay in treatment. Gonadal tissue is harvested at the referring hospital and transported to RWH for cryopreservation and storage, following methods established in other countries with a centralised service 1 – 3 . Results: To date, 40 ovarian and testicular tissue has been transported from all Australian states, and Northern Territory to RWH, including semen transported from a regional hospital where no fertility service was available. This service was made possible, and free of charge to those patients 13–30 yo with a cancer diagnosis, through a generous donation by Sony Foundation. Conclusion: Provision of a comprehensive fertility preservation service, including GTC, for young people, was not widely available until 2019. Gonadal tissue transport facilitates engagement and upskilling in oncofertility with extensive support from a centre of excellence, allowing expansion of patient and provider access to best-practice fertility preservation options, regardless of their geographic location and socio-economic status.

P-459 Timing of testosterone discontinuation and assisted reproductive technology in transgender patients

Abstract Study question What is the relationship between the duration of testosterone cessation and assisted reproductive technology outcomes in transgender patients? Summary answer There is no association between the timing of testosterone cessation &amp;number of mature oocytes and the number of total oocytes in transgender patients undergoing ART What is known already Many transgender patients do not undergo fertility treatment, citing the delay or discontinuation of testosterone as the main reason. There has been an increase in the number of referrals to specialist clinics for hormone replacement for gender affirmation. There are variable reported durations in the literature on when to discontinue testosterone before starting the fertility preservation cycle. Presently, no guidelines specify the duration or necessity of testosterone discontinuation. Study design, size, duration This study is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive transgender patients seeking fertility preservation at single academic fertility clinic between October 2019 to June 2021. Patients that identify as transgender that started taking androgens for at least one month were included in the study. Transgender patients that did not start hormone replacement therapy were not included. Participants/materials, setting, methods Primary analyses evaluated whether an association between testosterone discontinuation duration &amp; number of mature oocytes and total #of oocytes, adjusted for AMH &amp; AFC. Secondary analyses included unadjusted analyses to evaluate whether an association between patient age, AMH, AFC, duration on HRT prior to ART, and duration off HRT prior to ART. The primary analysis was a multiple linear regression. Simple regression model was used for secondary analyses. Main results and the role of chance Nineteen patients (mean age 27.9 years [range 19-37], mean BMI 27.1 [20-34], mean AMH 24.8 [6.5-49], mean AFC 23.6 [11-50]) were included in the analysis. No patient underwent gender-affirming (eg: oophorectomy, hysterectomy) surgery. None of the patients were previously pregnant. Mean time on testosterone was 44.4 [1-96] months. Mean time off testosterone was 3.5 [0.6-13] months. All patients underwent egg freezing, except one who had embryo cryopreservation. Simple linear regression showed that maternal age (p = 0.044), AMH (0.028), and AFC (p = 0.0008) were associated with the number of mature oocytes. Duration of time on testosterone (p = 0.319) and duration off testosterone prior to ART (p = 0.628) were not associated with the number of mature oocytes. For the outcome of total oocytes, age (p = 0.047), AMH (p = 0.042), and AFC (p &amp;lt; 0.00001) were significant; duration of time on testosterone (p = 0.414) and duration off testosterone prior to ART (p = 0.471) were not significant. Multiple regression models evaluating duration of time off testosterone prior to ART, adjusted for AFC and AMH, demonstrated no significant association with the outcome of mature oocytes (p = 0.712) and total oocytes (p = 0.564). Limitations, reasons for caution Thistudy is limited by including only 19 patients. The lack of effect of testosterone discontinuation duration and number of mature oocytes and total oocytes may be due to a lack of power. In addition, our study is single-centre, and may only include a small sample of transgender patients. Wider implications of the findings The majority of publications have documented successful ART outcomes in patients who have stopped testosterone for 3-6 months. Our study is critical as it is the first to evaluate whether an association exists between the timing of testosterone duration and ART outcomes. Trial registration number not applicable

Fertility Preservation: How to Preserve Ovarian Function in Children, Adolescents and Adults

Chemotherapy, pelvic radiotherapy and ovarian surgery have known gonadotoxic effects that can lead to endocrine dysfunction, cessation of ovarian endocrine activity and early depletion of the ovarian reserve, causing a risk for future fertility problems, even in children. Important determinants of this risk are the patient’s age and ovarian reserve, type of treatment and dose. When the risk of premature ovarian insufficiency is high, fertility preservation strategies must be offered to the patient. Furthermore, fertility preservation may sometimes be needed in conditions other than cancer, such as in non-malignant diseases or in patients seeking fertility preservation for personal reasons. Oocyte and/or embryo vitrification and ovarian tissue cryopreservation are the two methods currently endorsed by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, yielding encouraging results in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates. The choice of one technique above the other depends mostly on the age and pubertal status of the patient, and personal and medical circumstances. This review focuses on the available fertility preservation techniques, their appropriateness according to patient age and their efficacy in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates.

P–308 Fertility preservation in endometriosis: Appraising the factors affecting the ovarian response

Abstract Study question To estimate the factors affecting the ovarian response in women with endometriosis who seek fertility preservation. Summary answer AMH was the most important predictor of ovarian response. What is known already Endometriosis is a chronic disease characterised by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterine mucosa. This condition affects up to 10% of reproductive-aged women and up to 50% of women with infertility. Infertility in patients affected with endometriosis has been thought to stem mainly from the inherent effect of implants on the ovarian reserve or by the distortion of the female upper reproductive tract organs in the late stages of the disease. Women diagnosed with endometriosis should be counselled about family planning however, the data available to guide these patients regarding fertility preservation or oocyte freezing is scarce. Study design, size, duration A Retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2017 to May 2020 at a university-affiliated medical center. Patients who had been treated in the endometriosis clinic and underwent controlled ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation, filled an online questionnaire crossed reference with electronic chart analysis related to patient data and fertility preservation cycles. Participants/materials, setting, methods Eighty-one patients were included and categorized into two groups according to the number of oocytes retrieved: 0–5 (Group A, n = 26) low ovarian response and 6 or more oocytes (Group B, n = 55). Main results and the role of chance The severity and duration of the disease so as the symptoms indicative of deep infiltrating endometriosis, were not associated with reduced numbers of vitrified oocytes. The presence of deep infiltrating implants was not associated with numbers of vitrified oocytes (44.4% vs 70.6%, p = 0.08). More Patients who underwent surgical interventions, had significantly lower ovarian responses compared to women who had no intervention (95.2% vs 61.5%, respectively, p = 0.005). A multivariate logistic regression adjusted for the number of oocyte vitrified revealed that anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level below 0.8 ng/ml was the only factor significantly associated with low ovarian response, with an adjusted odds ratio of 13.40 (2.02–157.27, p = 0.015). Limitations, reasons for caution: The size of our cohort is relatively small for the number of covariates, reducing the impact of our results when put on an international scope and the lack of information regarding the return rate of patients who had their oocytes vitrified in the attempt of achieving a pregnancy. Wider implications of the findings: We believe that since the practice of FP for endometriosis is relatively new and there is a substantial lack of data, this cohort represents an important contribution to existing literature by extracting data from medical files and cross-referencing them with existing data for fertility specialists, patient encounters, and hospital registries. Trial registration number Not applicable

Fertility preservation in men and women: Where are we in 2021? Are we rising to the challenge?

Demand for fertility preservation in women for oncologic, nononcologic, and personal reasons has increased dramatically. Meeting that demand is a major challenge, and we are rising to the challenge. Mature oocyte cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation and ovarian tissue cryopreservation are both methods endorsed by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (formerly The American Fertility Society), and numerous papers confirmed their efficacy. In girls and women with leukemia or cancers who are at a high risk of ovarian metastasis and who may not be eligible for ovarian tissue transplantation, restoration of fertility can only be achieved by invitro methods. Male fertility preservation has also become a pressing issue and is extensively reviewed in the present journal issue.

Assessing online price transparency of sperm cryopreservation across the United States.

Although the lack of information on the costs and pricing of healthcare services prevails throughout the medical industry, empiric observations have demonstrated that pricing information is even more obscured in the sperm cryopreservation market. Thus, the objectives of our study are to assess and compare online price transparency and the price of sperm cryopreservation across various healthcare settings in the United States. This study examined online pricing published by facilities that have an active registration to store spermatozoa with the Food and Drug Administration. Less than one-fifth of registered facilities display any pricing information online. Price transparency also varies among census regions and facility types. Nationally, the median initial bank fee and annual price of storage are $350 and $385 respectively. Although there were no differences in the initial fee by facility type and census region, the annual price of storing spermatozoa is highest in the Northeast, which could be attributed to laboratory techniques, demographic patterns or insurance coverage. Guidelines from professional societies or different legislation and regulatory requirements across different US states can increase price transparency, which can promote consumer decision-making and decrease the barrier for men seeking fertility preservation.

Current Approaches to Fertility Preservation.

The 5 principal reasons a patient may consider fertility preservation are: treatment for cancer that may affect fertility, treatment for nonmalignant medical conditions that may affect fertility, planned indications, planned gender-affirming hormone therapy or surgery, or in the setting of genetic conditions that may increase the risks of premature ovarian insufficiency or early menopause. This paper will focus on describing who may consider preserving their fertility, how to provide the best clinical evaluation of those seeking fertility preservation, and current and future fertility preservation techniques. Last, we will highlight a need to continue to expand access to fertility preservation technologies.

Combining fertility preservation procedures to spread the eggs across different baskets: a feasibility study.

What is the reproductive potential following combinations of ovarian stimulation, IVM and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) in female patients seeking fertility preservation (FP)? In selected patients, combining different FP procedures is a feasible approach and reproductive outcomes after FP in patients who return to attempt pregnancy are promising. FP is increasingly performed in fertility clinics but an algorithm to select the most suitable FP procedure according to patient characteristics and available timeframe is currently lacking. Vitrification of mature oocytes (OV) and OTC are most commonly performed, although in some clinical scenarios a combination of procedures including IVM, to spread the sources of gametes, may be considered in order to enhance reproductive options for the future. Retrospective, observational study in a university-based, tertiary fertility centre involving all female patients who underwent urgent medical FP between January 2012 and December 2018. Descriptive analysis of various FP procedures, either stand-alone or combined, was performed, and reproductive outcomes of patients who attempted pregnancy in the follow-up period were recorded. In total, 207 patients underwent medical FP. Patient-tailored strategies and procedures were selected after multidisciplinary discussion. When deemed feasible, FP procedures were combined to cryopreserve different types of reproductive tissue for future use. The main primary outcome measure was the number of mature oocytes. Live birth rates were evaluated in patients who returned for reproductive treatment. Among patients seeking FP, 95/207 (46%) had breast cancer, 43/207 (21%) had haematological malignancies and 31/207 (15%) had a gynaecological tumour. Mean ± SD age was 27.0 ± 8.3 years. Eighty-five (41.1%) patients underwent controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), resulting in 10.8 ± 7.1 metaphase II (MII) oocytes for vitrification. Eleven (5.3%) patients had multiple COS cycles. Transvaginal oocyte retrieval for IVM was performed in 17 (8.2%) patients, yielding 9.2 ± 10.1 MII oocytes. Thirty-four (16.4%) patients underwent OTC combined with IVM of oocytes retrieved from ovarian tissue 'ex vivo' (OTO-IVM), yielding 4.0 ± 4.3 MII oocytes in addition to ovarian fragments. Seventeen (8.2%) patients had OTC combined with OTO-IVM and transvaginal retrieval of oocytes for IVM from the contralateral ovary, resulting in 13.5 ± 9.7 MII oocytes. In 13 (6.3%) patients, OTC with OTO-IVM was followed by controlled stimulation of the contralateral ovary, yielding 11.3 ± 6.6 MII oocytes in total. During the timeframe of the study, 31/207 (15%) patients have returned to the fertility clinic with a desire for pregnancy. Of those, 12 (38.7%) patients had preserved ovarian function and underwent ART treatment with fresh oocytes, resulting in nine (75%) livebirth. The remaining 19 (61.3%) patients requested warming of their cryopreserved material because of ovarian insufficiency. Of those, eight (42.1%) patients had a livebirth, of whom three after OTO-IVM. To date, 5/207 patients (2.4%) achieved an ongoing pregnancy or livebirth after spontaneous conception. Our FP programme is based on a patient-tailored approach rather than based on an efficiency-driven algorithm. The data presented are descriptive, which precludes firm conclusions. Combining different FP procedures is likely to enhance the reproductive fitness of patients undergoing gonadotoxic treatment but further follow-up studies are needed to confirm this. No external funding was used for this study and the authors have no competing interests. N/A.

Fertility Preservation for the Transgender Individual

This review aims to update readers on recent evidence in order to counsel and guide clinical management of individuals with gender dysphoria seeking fertility preservation (FP). Relevant topics include a discussion of the consistent desire for children in transgender people despite a low utilization rate of FP services, animal models, and human histology depicting the effect of gender-affirming treatment (GAT) on the gonads, varied time for resumption of menses, and start of ovarian stimulation upon discontinuing testosterone (T) in transmen, feasible clinical and experimental options for FP in transgender males and females, worsening dysphoria, and recommended methods to mitigate symptoms, and lastly a short discussion of changes in legislation providing increased insurance coverage of medically indicated FP for transpatients. FP is an important option for transgender patients who desire to retain the ability to become genetic parents. While controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte or embryo cryopreservation is the standard-of-care for transmen, unique considerations must be made in this population. Recent literature has highlighted the ability of transmen to have viable oocytes and pregnancies despite a history of T use, suggesting that the window of genetic parentage does not close with the start of GAT. FP for transwomen requires ejaculation or extraction with sperm cryopreservation; options for prepubertal transwomen are only in nascent phases. Research is rapidly evolving though many questions remain unanswered. The harmonization of advances in assisted reproduction with legislation advocating for transgender rights will continue to reach new peaks in the coming years.

Male fertility preservation in oncology: patients’ profile and clinical guidance importance

AIMS: To evaluate the profile of men with cancer who performed semen cryopreservation prior/during treatment and address the importance of this method for reproductive health.METHODS: This was a transversal and retrospective study which used a database from a Reproductive Medicine Center located in Brazil. A total of 150 male patients who performed semen cryopreservation due to cancer diagnosis, from January 2014 to December 2017, were included.RESULTS: The profile of men seeking fertility preservation prior/during treatment for cancer was young adults, single, childless, with higher education. Oncologists were the ones who reported more patients for semen cryopreservation followed by urologists and hematologists. With regards to tumor diagnosis frequency, testicular was the most diagnosed, followed by Hodgkin’s/non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, leukemia, prostate and rectal tumor, along with retroperitoneal tumor.CONCLUSION: Data brought the reflection on the cultural and financial barriers involved for the accomplishment of cryopreservation. Health professionals attending cancer patients should consider the importance of educational and incentive activities to prevent male fertility. Future research on the subject should carried out.