212 China Review International: Vol. i, No. i, Spring 1994 successfully combined the concerns of the new labor history, which emphasizes popular culture and shop-floor conditions, with a more conventional focus on strikes and other forms oflabor collective action. Her documentary basis is solid and rich with library sources reinforced by archival items and oral interviews. Her comparative perspectives are pertinent and effective. Altogether, this book is a very significant contribution to comparative labor history and also to the social history ofthe modern Chinese revolution. This award-deserving first volume may only be a prelude to a magnum opus second volume, which should create a whole new dimension in our understanding of state-society interaction in revolutionary China, transcending the stereotyped 1949 demarcation. We all eagerly await Professor Perry's continuation ofher splendid Shanghai labor stories. Ming K. Chan Swarthmore College and University of Hong Kong Douglas R. Reynolds. China, 1898-1912: The Xinzheng Revolution and Japan Harvard East Asian Monographs, No. 60. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1993. xxi, 308 pp. $32.00. copyright1994 by University of Hawai'i Press During the summer of 1993, 1 was asked by Professor Shimada Kenji to present a report to his kenkyükai on Liang Qichao studies in the West. The study group had just begun translating the 1,200-plus-page Liang Qichao nianpu changbian, edited by Ding Wenjiang and Zhao Fangtian (Shanghai: Renmin Chubanshe, 1983). During the questions and answers, one member of the group who had spent a year as a Harvard-Yenching Fellow in the United States asked what I thought ofDouglas Reynolds' new book. Since no one else in the group knew of the book, I summarized its contents and stressed his major themes. I then mentioned its title and subtitle. "You mean Xinzheng Reforms, not Revolution," said the number two in command, Professor Hazama Naoki ofthe Jinbun Kagaku Kenkyujo at Kyoto University. No, I assured him; Reynolds clearly meant "Xinzheng Revolution," and I (incidentally) found the idea quite intriguing. "No, that's impossible," said Hazama, or words to that effect. This book is aimed at shaking up all of our (Chinese, Japanese, and Western) thinking about its subject matter. Reynolds claims that the "reforms" instituted in the last decade or so of the Qing dynasty—often almost smirkingly referred to as the Empress Dowager's Reforms—constituted nothing less than a revolution (the Chinese correlate of the Meiji Restoration) in numerous spheres of Chinese life, and that the inspiration and "active partner" (p. 5) in every one of these Reviews 213 spheres was Japan. The argument itselfis stunningly simple; its elucidation may take considerably more time to reach wide acceptance, but it deserves our concerted attention. Reynolds argues with a remarkably affecting naïveté, an almost boyish excitement at having discovered the historian's equivalent of a great hidden treasure trove of chocolate candy. The weight of twentieth-century historiography has militated against seeing China and Japan as friends. That, however, Reynolds correctly points to as a consequence ofour reading the history ofJapanese imperialism in China back into the decade under study. In a mere three years following the first Sino-Japanese War, Chinese and Japanese (for equally self-serving but nonetheless sincere reasons) launched a wide-ranging series of educational initiatives. Thousands of Chinese students came to study in Japanese institutions ofhigher learning, and hundreds ofJapanese teachers came to instruct many thousands more Chinese on the mainland. Some of this part ofthe story has been told in English, most recently in Paula Harrell's fine study, Sowing the Seeds ofChange: Chinese Students, Japanese Teachers, 1895-1905 (Stanford, 1992). Reynolds begins with the educational exchanges and then proceeds to examine their impact on many areas oflife in China. He looks at the Japanese coinage ofkanji neologisms that were imported back into Chinese, another subject frequently discussed (even by those who know no Japanese) in the literature but here dealt with in a full way that brings out the extraordinary impact that this newlanguage has had in China. He then moves to Chinese educational reforms, military modernization, police and penal institutions, legal, judicial, and constitutional innovations—all intricately tied up with Japanese...
Read full abstract