Sedentary Behavior In Older Adults Research Articles

Sedentary behavior is associated with disability and multimorbidity in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey

Objective: We described sedentary behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazilian older adults and explored whether highly sedentary behavior was associated with multimorbidity, physical activity levels, adoption of physical distancing, perceived social isolation, disability, and depressive symptoms. Methods: We surveyed 184 older adults and gathered information on sedentary behavior, multimorbidity, physical activity, adoption of social distancing, perceived social isolation, disability, and depressive symptoms. Then, we investigated the association between highly sedentary behavior and these factors. Results: 26% of participants reported high levels of sedentary behavior, spending 5 hours per day in sitting (median). Highly sedentary behavior during COVID-19 pandemic was associated with multimorbidity (OR: 2.78, 95% CI 1.12-6.89) and disability (OR: 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.16). Conclusion: The prevalence of highly sedentary behavior in older adults during the pandemic was 26%. High sedentary behavior was associated with disability and multimorbidity in them. These findings can be used to guide the academia, the public sector, and health professionals to develop integrated initiatives to monitor and to decrease sedentary behavior especially in older adults with disability and multimorbidity during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Daily and hourly patterns of physical activity and sedentary behavior of older adults: Atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study

This cross-sectional study of older adults ≥ 65 years describes daily and hourly patterns of accelerometer-derived steps, sedentary, and physical activity behaviors and examines differences by day of the week and sociodemographic and health-related factors to identify time-use patterns. Data were from 459 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participants (60% female; mean ± SD age = 78.3 ± 4.6 years; 20% Black) who wore a hip accelerometer ≥ 4 of 7 days, for ≥ 10 h/day in 2016. We used linear mixed models to examine daily patterns of steps, sedentary, low light, high light, and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA). Differences by sex, median age (</≥ 78 years), body mass index, self-rated health, depressive symptoms, and performance in a two-minute walk test were explored. Men (vs women), and those with overweight and obesity (vs normal weight), had significantly higher sedentary minutes and lower minutes of low light per day. For each additional meter walked during the two-minute walk test, sedentary behavior was lower while high light, MVPA, and daily steps were higher. No significant differences in time-use behaviors were found by self-reported race, age, education, self-rated health, or depressive symptoms. Participants were least active (22.5 min MVPA, 95% CI: 11.5, 33.5) and most sedentary (453.9 min, 95% CI: 417.7, 490.2) on Sunday. Most activity was accrued in the morning (before 12 PM) while the evening hours (3–11 PM) were spent ≥ 50% sedentary. Movement patterns suggest opportunities for promotion of activity and reduction in sedentary time on Sundays, in the evening hours, and for those with overweight or obesity.

Cost-effectiveness of a programme to address sedentary behaviour in older adults: results from the SITLESS RCT.

BackgroundThis study details the within-trial economic evaluation and long-term economic model of SITLESS, a multi-country, three-armed randomized controlled trial comparing a combined intervention of exercise referral schemes (ERS) enhanced by self-management strategies (SMS) against ERS alone and usual care (UC).MethodsA cost-utility analysis, conducted from the base-case perspective of the National Health Service and personal and social services, estimated the incremental cost per incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and years in full capability (YFC). A secondary analysis combined the costs with a broad set of outcomes within a cost-consequence framework, from a societal perspective. A Markov-type decision-analytic model was developed to project short-term changes in physical activity to long-term outcomes and costs, over a 5- and 15-year time horizon.ResultsThe results of the within-trial analysis show that SMS+ERS is highly likely to be cost-effective compared to ERS alone (ICER €4270/QALY), but not compared to UC. Participants allocated to the SMS+ERS group also showed an improvement in YFC compared to ERS alone and UC. The long-term analysis revealed that SMS+ERS is likely to be a cost-effective option compared to ERS and UC over a 5-year, but not with a 15-year horizon, being then dominated by ERS alone.ConclusionThis research provides new evidence that SMS is a cost-effective add-on to ERS strategies. This economic evaluation informs the case for further, cost-effective, refinement of lifestyle change programmes targeted to older adults, with the aim of ultimately reducing the impact of non-communicable diseases in this population.

Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults.

Whether the COVID-19 pandemic has long-lasting effects on physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior in the vulnerable older adult population is uncertain. A total of 387 older adults (75 ± 6 years) completed a retrospective questionnaire on time spent sitting, walking, and performing aerobic and muscle-strengthening PA before, during the first three months, and one year into the COVID-19 pandemic. Whether the participants met the aerobic and muscle-strengthening PA guidelines was then determined. Of the 387 older adults, 376 (97%) were vaccinated. The participants completed 361 ± 426, 293 ± 400, and 454 ± 501 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous aerobic PA before, during the first three months, and one year into the pandemic, respectively. During the same time periods, the participants performed muscle-strengthening PA 87 ± 157, 68 ± 163, and 90 ± 176 min/week, walked 2.4 ± 1.7, 2.3 ± 1.7, and 2.6 ± 1.9 h/day, and sat 6.2 ± 2.9, 7.4 ± 3.1, and 6.1 ± 2.9 h/day, respectively. Aerobic PA, muscle-strengthening PA, and walking time decreased, whereas sitting time increased, during the first three months of the pandemic (p < 0.05), and then returned to pre-pandemic levels after one year (p < 0.05). The percentage of participants meeting both aerobic and muscle-strengthening PA guidelines decreased during the first three months of the pandemic (48.9% to 33.5%, p < 0.001), but returned to pre-pandemic levels one year later (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic significantly decreased PA and increased sitting time in older adults; however, both PA and sitting time returned to pre-pandemic levels after one year.

How are combinations of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep related to cognitive function in older adults? A systematic review.

The relationships between cognitive function and each of physical activity, sleep and sedentary behaviour in older adults are well documented. However, these three "time use" behaviours are co-dependent parts of the 24-hour day (spending time in one leaves less time for the others), and their best balance for cognitive function in older adults is still largely unknown. This systematic review summarises the existing evidence on the associations between combinations of two or more time-use behaviours and cognitive function in older adults. Embase, Pubmed, PsycInfo, Medline and Emcare databases were searched in March 2020 and updated in May 2021, returning a total of 25,289 papers for screening. A total of 23 studies were included in the synthesis, spanning >23,000 participants (mean age 71years). Findings support previous evidence that spending more time in physical activity and limiting sedentary behaviour is broadly associated with better cognitive outcomes in older adults. Higher proportions of moderate-vigorous physical activity in the day were most frequently associated with better cognitive function. Some evidence suggests that certain types of sedentary behaviour may be positively associated with cognitive function, such as reading or computer use. Sleep duration appears to share an inverted U-shaped relationship with cognition, as too much or too little sleep is negatively associated with cognitive function. This review highlights considerable heterogeneity in methodological and statistical approaches, and encourages a more standardised, transparent approach to capturing important daily behaviours in older adults. Investigating all three time-use behaviours together against cognitive function using suitable statistical methodology is strongly recommended to further our understanding of optimal 24-hour time use for brain function in aging.

Associations of perceived role of exercise in cancer prevention with physical activity and sedentary behavior in older adults

This study examined whether the perceived importance of exercise in cancer prevention was related to physical activity and sedentary behavior in older adults, who are the most vulnerable to cancer and the least active among all age groups. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 1,308 respondents (≥ 50 years) from the cycle 2 of the 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). 70.23% of older adults acknowledged the protective role of exercise in cancer prevention. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the perceived role of exercise in cancer prevention was significantly and positively associated with physical activity (Odds Ratio = 1.58, p = .013), while multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the perceived role of exercise in cancer prevention was significantly and negatively associated with sedentary behavior (p < .001) in older adults. Findings from this study can guide efforts to develop interventions that could promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior in older adults.

Impact of Social Isolation on Physical Activity and Factors Associated With Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The objective was to analyze the impact of social isolation on moderate physical activity and factors associated with sedentary behavior of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was a cross-sectional study involving 111 older adults (aged 71.0 ± 6.87years). The data were collected at two time points: in November 2019 and in June 2020. There was a decline in moderate physical activity when the minutes/week were compared before and during social isolation (p < .001). Sedentary behavior was associated with the condition of living alone. Older adults who lived alone were 3.29 times more likely to spend 4hr or more in sedentary behavior than those who lived with a partner (95% confidence interval [1.01, 10.74]). Government agencies must establish PA-related health promotion strategies, especially in developing and low-income countries. Therefore, home exercises need to be encouraged to prevent the consequences of this pandemic period.

Reducing sedentary behaviour and cognitive function in older people with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results of a randomized feasibility study

BackgroundSedentary behaviour is associated with poorer cognitive function amongst older adults and may pose a risk to cognitive decline. We tested the feasibility and acceptability of a remotely delivered coaching intervention designed to reduce sedentary behaviour in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MethodsThis was a 13-week unblinded, single-centered randomized feasibility study. People with MCI were recruited and randomized to receive five sessions of WALC-R intervention or information on physical activity. ActivPAL-measured sedentary behaviour, self-reported sedentary levels, pre-morbid intelligence, and verbal fluency were measured at baseline and week 13. ResultsWe recruited 25 people of whom 23 were followed up. 82% of outcome data including valid accelerometer data were collected. Self-reported sedentary levels reduced by 65(36.6) min at follow-up, while device measured sedentary increased by 10.5(17) min. When interviewed, participants found the intervention acceptable. ConclusionThe intervention was feasible and acceptable to participants. A full-scale trial is needed to examine the effectiveness of the intervention on cognitive function in community dwelling older population at risk of cognitive decline.

Intervening on physical activity and sedentary behavior in older adults.

Participating in sufficient levels of physical activity is important for sustaining health and quality of life across the age span. The United States Physical Activity Guidelines recommend individuals of all ages "move more, more often" by frequently engaging in aerobic activity while avoiding prolonged bouts of sitting. This is indicative of a slow shift in focus in the study of active aging that has occurred in the last two decades. Historically, researchers interested in the influence of physical activity on older adults' health and quality of life focused on discrete sustained bouts of intense activity (i.e., structured exercise). More recently the widespread usage of accelerometers contributed to a large body of evidence demonstrating that long periods spent sedentary were associated with a host of negative health outcomes ranging from poorer cardiometabolic health to poorer physical functioning and elevated risk of death. These findings often persisted when controlling for time spent in higher-intensity physical activity, spurring separate fields of intervention research concerned with promoting exercise or reducing sedentary time. Novel data emerging in recent years on the importance of an individual's overall activity profile (i.e., amount and patterning of light and moderate-to-vigorous activity) has driven yet another shift in focus toward interventions focused explicitly on movement profiles. In this narrative review, we discuss the evolution of thought regarding older adults' physical activity behaviors. We highlight successes and challenges in first promoting structured and prolonged exercise, later in targeting sedentary behavior, and most recently in attempting to intervene on activity profiles. We end our review by highlighting current gaps in research and important future directions.

Active Life for Brain Health: A Narrative Review of the Mechanism Underlying the Protective Effects of Physical Activity on the Brain.

A growing body of evidence clearly indicates the beneficial effects of physical activity (PA) on cognition. The importance of PA is now being reevaluated due to the increase in sedentary behavior in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although many studies in humans have revealed that PA helps to preserve brain health, the underlying mechanisms have not yet been fully elucidated. In this review, which mainly focuses on studies in humans, we comprehensively summarize the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of PA or exercise on brain health, particularly cognition. The most intensively studied mechanisms of the beneficial effects of PA involve an increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and preservation of brain volume, especially that of the hippocampus. Nonetheless, the mutual associations between these two factors remain unclear. For example, although BDNF presumably affects brain volume by inhibiting neuronal death and/or increasing neurogenesis, human data on this issue are scarce. It also remains to be determined whether PA modulates amyloid and tau metabolism. However, recent advances in blood-based biomarkers are expected to help elucidate the beneficial effects of PA on the brain. Clinical data suggest that PA functionally modulates cognition independently of neurodegeneration, and the mechanisms involved include modulation of functional connectivity, neuronal compensation, neuronal resource allocation, and neuronal efficiency. However, these mechanisms are as yet not fully understood. A clear understanding of the mechanisms involved could help motivate inactive persons to change their behavior. More accumulation of evidence in this field is awaited.

Changes in Physical and Cognitive Function Predict Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment.

The current longitudinal study examined the influence of cognitive and lower extremity function on sedentary behavior continuously over 6 months in community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Multilevel models examined Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) change scores and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) on percent time in sedentary behavior among 17 older adults with MCI (50 to 74 observations for analysis). Sedentary behavior was measured daily and averaged monthly using wrist-worn actigraphy. Each 1-unit decrease in MoCA score was associated with an increase of 2 percentage points in sedentary behavior (p ≤ 0.01). In addition, each 1-unit decrease in chair stand score (lower extremity strength) was associated with an increase of 5 percentage points in sedentary behavior (p ≤ 0.01). Older adults experiencing cognitive decline and concurrent changes in lower extremity strength had the sharpest increase in sedentary behavior. Findings suggest lower body strengthening interventions may reduce sedentary behavior time and subsequently preserve physical functioning in this vulnerable population. [Research in Gerontological Nursing, 14(6), 285-291.].

Factors associated with objectively-derived physical activity and sedentary behavior in older adults

Abstract Background Identification of factors associated with older adults' physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior (SB) is essential to inform effective targeted prevention strategies to prevent the impact of lack of PA and high sedentary time on health in older adults. While most previous studies examined factors associated activity levels separately, this study investigated factors associated with the activity distribution using the continuum of acceleration, avoiding loss of information that could arise from categorization of activity levels. Methods This study included 3896 participants (25.3% women, mean [range] age: 69.4 [60-83] years) from the Whitehall II accelerometer sub-study. The association of socio-demographic, lifestyle and cardiometabolic factors with the whole activity intensity distribution and time in SB, light PA and moderate-to-vigorous PA was examined using functional data analysis and linear regressions, respectively. The consistency of the associated factors over time was examined using factors assessed at the time of the activity measure, and 9 and 18 years prior this measure. Results Cross-sectional analyses showed participants who were older, current smokers, obese, with chronic conditions, and those reporting poor SF36 physical component score spent more time in the lowest acceleration intensities at the expense of less time in higher intensities. Occupational position in men and SF36-mental component score in women were additionally associated with activity distribution. In both men and women, the pattern of factors associated with PA and SB were generally similar in prospective and cross-sectional analyses. Conclusions This study confirms socio-demographic disparities in PA and SB and identify several modifiable factors which are eligible to health promotion interventions. Factors associated with activity intensity distribution at older age were consistent in the 20 years before physical activity measure. Key messages Factors associated with activity intensity distribution at older age slightly differ between men and women. Factors associated with activity intensity distribution at older age were consistent whether they were assessed in mid-life or at older age suggesting promotion of PA shall start as early as possible.

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the physical and psychoaffective health of older adults in a physical exercise program.

COVID-19 lockdowns restricted physical activity levels for individuals in many countries. In particular, older adults experienced limited access to their usual activities, including physical exercise programs. How such restrictions and interruptions in physical exercise programs might impact the physical and mental health of older adults has not yet been studied. We sought to analyse changes in the physical and mental health of older adults enrolled in a group-based multicomponent physical exercise (MPE) program that was interrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We followed 17 participants of this program from October 2018 to October 2020, including the interruption of the program during the pandemic. The MPE program included strength, balance, and stretching exercises. We compared anthropometric and cardiovascular parameters, physical fitness, frailty, quality of life, and psychoaffective status of participants before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most parameters followed the same pattern, improving after 8 months of the first MPE season (Oct. 2018–Jun. 2019), worsening after 4 months of summer rest, improving from October 2019 to January 2020 in the second MPE season (Oct. 2019–Jan. 2020), and severely worsening after 7 months of program interruption. We show that an MPE program has clear benefits to the physical and psychoaffective health of older adults, and interruption of these programs could adversely impact participants. These results highlight the need to maintain physical exercise programs or facilitate engagement in physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in older adults, particularly in situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

Association of Daily Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour with Protein Intake Patterns in Older Adults: A Multi-Study Analysis across Five Countries.

Physical activity and protein intake are associated with ageing-related outcomes, including loss of muscle strength and functional decline, so may contribute to strategies to improve healthy ageing. We investigated the cross-sectional associations between physical activity or sedentary behaviour and protein intake patterns in community-dwelling older adults across five countries. Self-reported physical activity and dietary intake data were obtained from two cohort studies (Newcastle 85+ Study, UK; LiLACS, New Zealand Māori and Non-Māori) and three national food consumption surveys (DNFCS, The Netherlands; FINDIET, Finland; INRAN-SCAI, Italy). Associations between physical activity and total protein intake, number of eating occasions providing protein, number of meals with specified protein thresholds, and protein intake distribution over the day (calculated as a coefficient of variance) were assessed by regression and repeated measures ANOVA models adjusting for covariates. Greater physical activity was associated with higher total protein intake and more eating occasions containing protein, although associations were mostly explained by higher energy intake. Comparable associations were observed for sedentary behaviour in older adults in Italy. Evidence for older people with higher physical activity or less sedentary behaviour achieving more meals with specified protein levels was mixed across the five countries. A skewed protein distribution was observed, with most protein consumed at midday and evening meals without significant differences between physical activity or sedentary behaviour levels. Findings from this multi-study analysis indicate there is little evidence that total protein and protein intake patterns, irrespective of energy intake, differ by physical activity or sedentary behaviour levels in older adults.

Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults With Preclinical Cognitive Impairment With and Without Chronic Kidney Disease.

Older adults with preclinical cognitive impairment can have chronic conditions and lifestyle factors that influence health. Sedentary behavior is common in older adults with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of the current study was to determine the differences in sedentary behavior for older adults with preclinical cognitive impairment with and without CKD. Our study evaluated 48 older adults with preclinical cognitive impairment with and without CKD who underwent assessment of sedentary behavior via accelerometry. We found that older adults with preclinical cognitive impairment with and without CKD were sedentary, but there were no significant differences between groups. Fragmentation index was different (p < 0.05), with a lower fragmentation index found in those with CKD. Sedentary behavior should be assessed and evaluated as a potential target for interventions to improve health in these at-risk older adults; however, further investigation is needed. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 47(6), 35-42.].

The Daily Activity Study of Health (DASH): A pilot randomized controlled trial to enhance physical activity in sedentary older adults

Sedentary behavior increases the risk for multiple chronic diseases, early mortality, and accelerated cognitive decline in older adults. Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior among older adults are needed to improve health outcomes and reduce the burden on healthcare systems. We designed a randomized controlled trial that uses a self-affirmation manipulation and gain-framed health messaging to effectively reduce sedentary behavior in older adults. This message-based intervention lasts 6 weeks, recruiting 80 healthy but sedentary older adults from the community, between the ages of 60 and 95 years. Participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1) an intervention group, which receives self-affirmation followed by gain-framed health messages daily or 2) a control group, which receives daily loss-framed health messages only. Objective physical activity engagement is measured by accelerometers. Accelerometers are deployed a week before, during, and the last week of intervention to examine potential changes in sedentary time and physical activity engagement. Participants undertake structural and functional (resting and task-based) MRI scans, neuropsychological tests, computerized behavioral measures, and neurobehavioral inventories at baseline and after the intervention. A 3-month follow-up assesses the long-term maintenance of any engendered behaviors from the intervention period. This study will assess the effectiveness of a novel behavioral intervention at reducing sedentarism in older adults and examine the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying any such changes.

Agreement of sedentary behaviour metrics derived from hip-worn and thigh-worn accelerometers among older adults: with implications for studying physical and cognitive health.

Little is known about how sedentary behaviour (SB) metrics derived from hip-worn and thigh-worn accelerometers agree for older adults. Thigh-worn activPAL micro monitors were concurrently worn with hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers (with SB measured using the 100 count-per-minute (cpm) cut-point; ActiGraph100cpm) by 953 older adults (age 77±6.6, 54% women) for 4-to-7 days. Device agreement for sedentary time and 5 SB pattern metrics was assessed using mean error and correlations. Logistic regression tested associations with 4 health outcomes using standardized (i.e., z-scores) and unstandardized SB metrics. Mean errors (activPAL-ActiGraph100cpm) and 95% limits of agreement were: sedentary time -54.7(-223.4,113.9) min/d; time in 30+ minute bouts 77.6(-74.8,230.1) min/d; mean bout duration 5.9(0.5,11.4) min; usual bout duration 15.2(0.4,30) min; breaks in sedentary time -35.4(-63.1,-7.6) breaks/d; and alpha -0.5(-0.6,-0.4). Respective Pearson correlations were: 0.66, 0.78, 0.73, 0.79, 0.51, 0.40. Concordance correlations were: 0.57, 0.67, 0.40, 0.50, 0.14, 0.02. The statistical significance and direction of associations was identical for ActiGraph100cpm and activPAL metrics in 46 of 48 tests, though significant differences in the magnitude of odds ratios were observed among 9 of 24 tests for unstandardized and 2 of 24 for standardized SB metrics. Caution is needed when interpreting SB metrics and associations with health from ActiGraph100cpm due to the tendency for it to overestimate breaks in sedentary time relative to activPAL. However, high correlations between activPAL and ActiGraph100cpm measures and similar standardized associations with health outcomes suggest that studies using ActiGraph100cpm are useful, though not ideal, for studying SB in older adults.

The Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Community-Based Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Older Adults

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and feasibility of translating a 4-week "Stand Up and Move More" (SUMM) intervention by state aging units to older adults (N = 56, M age = 74 years). A randomized controlled trial assessed sedentary behavior, physical function, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) before and after the intervention. Participants included healthy community-dwelling, sedentary (sit > 6 hr/day) and aged ≥ 55 years adults. For the primary outcome, the SUMM group (n = 31) significantly (p < .05) reduced total sedentary time post-intervention by 68 min/day on average (Cohen's d = -0.56) compared with no change in the wait-list control group (n = 25, Cohen's d = 0.12). HRQoL and function also improved (p < .05) in the SUMM group post-intervention. Workshop facilitators indicated the intervention was easy to implement, and participants expressed high satisfaction. The SUMM intervention reduced sedentary time, improved physical function and HRQoL, and was feasible to implement in community settings.

Core Domains for Research on Hospital Inactivity in Acutely Ill Older Adults: A Delphi Consensus Study

ObjectiveTo identify core domains for research studies of physical activity and sedentary behavior during hospitalization for older adults with an acute medical illness. DesignA 4-Round Delphi consensus process. Round 1 invited responses to open-ended questions to generate items for the core domains research. In rounds 2-4, participants were invited to use a Likert scale (1-9) to rate the importance of each core domain for research studies of physical activity and/or sedentary behavior in hospitalized older adults with an acute medical illness. SettingOnline surveys. ParticipantsA total of 49 participants were invited to each round (international researchers, clinicians, policy makers and patients). Response rates across rounds 1-4 were 94%, 88%, 83% and 81%, respectively. InterventionsNone. Main Outcome MeasuresConsensus was defined a priori as ≥70% of respondents rating an item as “critical” (score≥7) and ≤15% of respondents rating an item as “not important” (score≤3). ResultsIn round 2, a total of 9 of 25 core domains reached consensus agreement (physical functioning, general, role functioning, emotional functioning, global quality of life, hospital, psychiatric, cognitive functioning, carer burden). In round 3, an additional 8 reached consensus (adverse events, perceived health status, musculoskeletal, social functioning, vascular, cardiac, mortality, economic). Round 4 participants provided further review and a final rating of all 17 core domains that met consensus in previous rounds. Four core domains were rated as “critically important” to evaluate: physical functioning, social functioning, emotional functioning, and hospital outcomes. ConclusionsThis preliminary work provides international and expert consensus-based core domains for development toward a core-outcome set for research, with the ultimate goal of fostering consistency in outcomes and reporting to accelerate research on effective strategies to address physical activity and/or sedentary behavior in older adults while hospitalized.

Psychological Factors Predicting Sedentary Behavior of Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil.

This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the psychological factors that might predict the sedentary behavior of 654 older adults from the South Region of Brazil. The participants were evaluated by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire; Mini-Mental State Exam; Geriatric Anxiety Scale; and the scales Geriatric Depression, Purpose in Life, Perceived Stress, Rosenberg Self-Esteem, and Satisfaction with Life. Data analysis was conducted through Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis (p < .05). No significant (p > .05) correlation was found between the sedentary behavior variables with self-esteem. Multiple regression analysis revealed that psychological variables explained 6% of the variance of sitting time during the week (R2 = .06; F = 11.546; p < .01). Depression showed a positive prediction (β = -0.10; p = .040), while life satisfaction (β = -0.16; p = .001) and purpose in life (β = -0.10; p = .026) showed negative prediction. Psychological variables predicted only 3% of the variance of sitting time during the weekend (R2 = .03; F = 5.629; p < .01), showing that life satisfaction had significant (p = .007) and negative (β = -0.13) association. Life satisfaction and purpose in life can be considered protector factors to sedentary behavior, while depression is a potentiating factor.