SecY Complex Research Articles

Increasing Chloride Conductance Through the SecY Complex By Mutagenesis or Trivalent Cations

The SecY complex or channel is responsible for translocation of proteins across the bacterial inner membrane. The complex maintains a seal for small molecules by means of a plug domain and a hydrophobic pore, consisting of six isoleucine residues arranged in a ring. When these pore residues are mutated into asparagine, a specific conductance for small monovalent anions, like chloride, is observed. Here, we show that an enhanced chloride conductance is also observed when bulky phenylalanine residues are introduced into the pore ring. The increased conductance is accompanied by an increase in protein translocation. Chloride conductance was also observed upon addition of trivalent aluminum cations, which are suspected of binding to negatively charged residues near the lateral gate of SecY.

Mapping polypeptide interactions of the SecA ATPase during translocation

Many bacterial proteins, including most secretory proteins, are translocated across the plasma membrane by the interplay of the cytoplasmic SecA ATPase and a protein-conducting channel formed by the SecY complex. SecA catalyzes the sequential movement of polypeptide segments through the SecY channel. How SecA interacts with a broad range of polypeptide segments is unclear, but structural data raise the possibility that translocation substrates bind into a "clamp" of SecA. Here, we have used disulfide bridge cross-linking to test this hypothesis. To analyze polypeptide interactions of SecA during translocation, two cysteines were introduced into a translocation intermediate: one that cross-links to the SecY channel and the other one for cross-linking to a cysteine placed at various positions in SecA. Our results show that a translocating polypeptide is indeed captured inside SecA's clamp and moves in an extended conformation through the clamp into the SecY channel. These results define the polypeptide path during SecA-mediated protein translocation and suggest a mechanism by which ATP hydrolysis by SecA is used to move a polypeptide chain through the SecY channel.

Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome

During protein synthesis, it is often necessary for the ribosome to form a complex with a membrane-bound channel, the SecY/Sec61 complex, in order to translocate nascent proteins across a cellular membrane. Structural data on the ribosome-channel complex are currently limited to low-resolution cryo-electron microscopy maps, including one showing a bacterial ribosome bound to a monomeric SecY complex. Using that map along with available atomic-level models of the ribosome and SecY, we have determined, through molecular dynamics flexible fitting (MDFF), an atomic-resolution model of the ribosome-channel complex. We characterized computationally the sites of ribosome-SecY interaction within the complex and determined the effect of ribosome binding on the SecY channel. We also constructed a model of a ribosome in complex with a SecY dimer by adding a second copy of SecY to the MDFF-derived model. The study involved 2.7-million-atom simulations over altogether nearly 50 ns.

The SecY complex forms a channel capable of ionic discrimination

Protein translocation across the bacterial membrane occurs at the SecY complex or channel. The resting SecY channel is impermeable to small molecules owing to a plug domain that creates a seal. Here, we report that a channel loosely sealed, or with a plug locked open, does not, however, lead to general membrane permeability. Instead, strong selectivity towards small monovalent anions, especially chloride, is observed. Mutations in the pore ring-structure increase both the translocation activity of the channel and its ionic conductance, however the selectivity is maintained. The same ionic specificity also occurs at the onset of protein translocation and across the archaeal SecY complex. Thus, the ion-conducting characteristic of the channel seems to be conserved as a normal consequence of protein translocation. We propose that the pore ring-structure forms a selectivity filter, allowing cells to tolerate channels with imperfect plugs.

Mechanisms of protein translocation across membranes

Many proteins in bacteria are transported during their biosynthesis across or are integrated into the plasma membrane, a process that is similar to protein translocation across endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane in eukaryotes. Transport occurs through a protein‐conducting channel that is formed from a conserved heterotrimeric membrane protein complex (SecY or Sec61 complex). The channel associates with different partners in different translocation pathways. In bacteria, the SecY channel can associate with the translating ribosome (co‐translational translocation) or with the cytoplasmic ATPase SecA (post‐translational translocation).The crystal structure of an archaeal SecY complex shows the architecture of the closed channel. The structure suggests that a single SecY copy forms the translocation pore, a prediction that was confirmed for SecA‐mediated translocation by disulfide bridge crosslinking experiments. However, translocation appears to be mediated by oligomers of the SecY complex; nucleotide‐binding fold 1 (NBF1) of SecA interacts with a non‐translocating SecY copy, while other domains of SecA "push" the polypeptide chain through a neighboring SecY copy.A recently determined crystal structure shows one copy of SecA in its transitions state of ATP hydrolysis bound to one copy of SecY complex. The latter corresponds to the translocating SecY copy. Both SecA and SecY undergo major conformational changes upon interaction. The structure suggests mechanisms for how SecA moves polypeptides through the SecY channel. In addition, the data reveal that SecA binding opens the lateral gate of SecY for signal sequence intercalation, and induces plug movement. These results indicate that the channel is opened for translocation in two distinct steps, induced by SecA and signal sequence binding.

Structure, Binding, and Activity of Syd, a SecY-interacting Protein

The Syd protein has been implicated in the Sec-dependent transport of polypeptides across the bacterial inner membrane. Using Nanodiscs, we here provide direct evidence that Syd binds the SecY complex, and we demonstrate that interaction involves the two electropositive and cytosolic loops of the SecY subunit. We solve the crystal structure of Syd and together with cysteine cross-link analysis, we show that a conserved concave and electronegative groove constitutes the SecY-binding site. At the membrane, Syd decreases the activity of the translocon containing loosely associated SecY-SecE subunits, whereas in detergent solution Syd disrupts the SecYEG heterotrimeric associations. These results support the role of Syd in proofreading the SecY complex biogenesis and point to the electrostatic nature of the Sec channel interaction with its cytosolic partners.

The Roles of Pore Ring and Plug in the SecY Protein-conducting Channel

The protein-conducting channel, or translocon, is an evolutionarily conserved complex that allows nascent proteins to cross a cellular membrane or integrate into it. The crystal structure of an archaeal translocon, the SecY complex, revealed that two elements contribute to sealing the channel: a small “plug” domain blocking the periplasmic region of the channel, and a pore ring composed of six hydrophobic residues acting as a constriction point at the channel's center. To determine the independent functions of these two elements, we have performed molecular dynamics simulations of the native channel as well as of two recently structurally resolved mutants in which portions of their plugs were deleted. We find that in the mutants, the instability in the plug region leads to a concomitant increase in flexibility of the pore ring. The instability is quantified by the rate of water permeation in each system as well as by the force required for oligopeptide translocation. Through a novel simulation in which the interactions between the plug and water were independently controlled, we find that the role of the plug in stabilizing the pore ring is significantly more important than its role as a purely steric barrier.

Role of Protein Translocation Pathways across the Endoplasmic Reticulum in Trypanosoma brucei

The translocation of secretory and membrane proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane is mediated by co-translational (via the signal recognition particle (SRP)) and post-translational mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the relative contributions of these two pathways in trypanosomes. A homologue of SEC71, which functions in the post-translocation chaperone pathway in yeast, was identified and silenced by RNA interference. This factor is essential for parasite viability. In SEC71-silenced cells, signal peptide (SP)-containing proteins traversed the ER, but several were mislocalized, whereas polytopic membrane protein biogenesis was unaffected. Surprisingly trypanosomes can interchangeably utilize two of the pathways to translocate SP-containing proteins except for glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins, whose level was reduced in SEC71-silenced cells but not in cells depleted for SRP68, an SRP-binding protein. Entry of SP-containing proteins to the ER was significantly blocked only in cells co-silenced for the two translocation pathways (SEC71 and SRP68). SEC63, a factor essential for both translocation pathways in yeast, was identified and silenced by RNA interference. SEC63 silencing affected entry to the ER of both SP-containing proteins and polytopic membrane proteins, suggesting that, as in yeast, this factor is essential for both translocation pathways in vivo. This study suggests that, unlike bacteria or other eukaryotes, trypanosomes are generally promiscuous in their choice of mechanism for translocating SP-containing proteins to the ER, although the SRP-independent pathway is favored for glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins, which are the most abundant surface proteins in these parasites.

Structure of a complex of the ATPase SecA and the protein-translocation channel

Most proteins are secreted from bacteria by the interaction of the cytoplasmic SecA ATPase with a membrane channel, formed by the heterotrimeric SecY complex. Here we report the crystal structure of SecA bound to the SecY complex, with a maximum resolution of 4.5 ångström (A), obtained for components from Thermotoga maritima. One copy of SecA in an intermediate state of ATP hydrolysis is bound to one molecule of the SecY complex. Both partners undergo important conformational changes on interaction. The polypeptide-cross-linking domain of SecA makes a large conformational change that could capture the translocation substrate in a 'clamp'. Polypeptide movement through the SecY channel could be achieved by the motion of a 'two-helix finger' of SecA inside the cytoplasmic funnel of SecY, and by the coordinated tightening and widening of SecA's clamp above the SecY pore. SecA binding generates a 'window' at the lateral gate of the SecY channel and it displaces the plug domain, preparing the channel for signal sequence binding and channel opening.

A role for the two-helix finger of the SecA ATPase in protein translocation.

An important step in the biosynthesis of many proteins is their partial or complete translocation across the plasma membrane in prokaryotes or the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in eukaryotes 1. In bacteria, secretory proteins are generally translocated after completion of their synthesis by the interplay of the cytoplasmic ATPase SecA and a protein-conducting channel formed by the SecY complex 2. How SecA moves substrates through the SecY channel is unclear. However, a recent structure of a SecA-SecY complex raises the possibility that the polypeptide chain is moved by a two-helix finger domain of SecA that is inserted into the cytoplasmic opening of the SecY channel 3. Here, we have used disulfide-bridge crosslinking to show that the loop at the tip of the two-helix finger interacts with a polypeptide chain right at the entrance into the SecY pore. Mutagenesis demonstrates that a tyrosine in the loop is particularly important for translocation, but can be replaced by some other bulky, hydrophobic residues. We propose that the two-helix finger of SecA moves a polypeptide chain into the SecY channel with the tyrosine providing the major contact with the substrate, a mechanism analogous to that suggested for hexameric, protein-translocating ATPases.

Protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

A decisive step in the biosynthesis of many eukaryotic proteins is their partial or complete translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. A similar process occurs in prokaryotes, except that proteins are transported across or are integrated into the plasma membrane. In both cases, translocation occurs through a protein-conducting channel that is formed from a conserved, heterotrimeric membrane protein complex, the Sec61 or SecY complex. Structural and biochemical data suggest mechanisms that enable the channel to function with different partners, to open across the membrane and to release laterally hydrophobic segments of membrane proteins into lipid.

Analysis of Polypeptide Movement in the SecY Channel during SecA-mediated Protein Translocation

In bacteria most secretory proteins are transported across the plasma membrane by the interplay of the ATPase SecA with the translocation channel formed by the SecY complex; SecA uses cycles of ATP hydrolysis to “push” consecutive segments of a polypeptide substrate through the channel. Here we have addressed the mechanism of this process by following the fate of stalled translocation intermediates. These were generated by using a polypeptide substrate containing a bulky disulfide-bonded loop, thus preventing the final residues from passing through the channel. Protease protection experiments showed that the intermediates were stable in the presence of ATP and could complete translocation once the block was removed. The translocation intermediate was also stable when SecA associated with ATPγS, a poorly hydrolyzable ATP analog, or ADP plus AlF4, which mimics the transition state during ATP hydrolysis. In contrast, when SecA was in its ADP-bound state, the translocating polypeptide moved back into the cytosol, as indicated by the disappearance of the protected fragment. Backsliding was not significantly altered by deletion of the plug domain, a short helix in the center of the SecY channel, but it was slowed down when changes were introduced into the pore ring, the constriction of the hourglass-shaped channel. In all cases, backsliding was significantly slower than forward translocation. Together, these data suggest that SecA binds the polypeptide chain in its ATP state and releases it in the ADP state. The channel itself does not bind the polypeptide chain but provides “friction” that minimizes backsliding when ADP-bound SecA resets to “grab” the next segment of the substrate.

Ribosome Binding of a Single Copy of the SecY Complex: Implications for Protein Translocation

The SecY complex associates with the ribosome to form a protein translocation channel in the bacterial plasma membrane. We have used cryo-electron microscopy and quantitative mass spectrometry to show that a nontranslating E. coli ribosome binds to a single SecY complex. The crystal structure of an archaeal SecY complex was then docked into the electron density maps. In the resulting model, two cytoplasmic loops of SecY extend into the exit tunnel near proteins L23, L29, and L24. The loop between transmembrane helices 8 and 9 interacts with helices H59 and H50 in the large subunit RNA, while the 6/7 loop interacts with H7. We also show that point mutations of basic residues within either loop abolish ribosome binding. We suggest that SecY binds to this primary site on the ribosome and subsequently captures and translocates the nascent chain.

Protein translocation across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial plasma membranes

A decisive step in the biosynthesis of many proteins is their partial or complete translocation across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum membrane or the prokaryotic plasma membrane. Most of these proteins are translocated through a protein-conducting channel that is formed by a conserved, heterotrimeric membrane-protein complex, the Sec61 or SecY complex. Depending on channel binding partners, polypeptides are moved by different mechanisms: the polypeptide chain is transferred directly into the channel by the translating ribosome, a ratcheting mechanism is used by the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone BiP, and a pushing mechanism is used by the bacterial ATPase SecA. Structural, genetic and biochemical data show how the channel opens across the membrane, releases hydrophobic segments of membrane proteins laterally into lipid, and maintains the membrane barrier for small molecules.

Mutations in the Sec61p Channel Affecting Signal Sequence Recognition and Membrane Protein Topology

The orientation of most single-spanning membrane proteins obeys the "positive-inside rule", i.e. the flanking region of the transmembrane segment that is more positively charged remains in the cytosol. These membrane proteins are integrated by the Sec61/SecY translocon, but how their orientation is achieved is unknown. We have screened for mutations in yeast Sec61p that alter the orientation of single-spanning membrane proteins. We identified a class of mutants that are less efficient in retaining the positively charged flanking region in the cytosol. Surprisingly, these mutations are located at many different sites in the Sec61/SecY molecule, and they do not only involve charged amino acid residues. All these mutants have a prl phenotype that so far have only been seen in bacteria; they allow proteins with defective signal sequences to be translocated, likely because the Sec61p channel opens more easily. A similar correlation between topology defects and prl phenotype was also seen with previously identified yeast Sec61 mutants. Our results suggest a model in which the regulated opening of the translocon is required for the faithful orientation of membrane proteins.

Determining the Conductance of the SecY Protein Translocation Channel for Small Molecules

The channel formed by the SecY complex must maintain the membrane barrier for ions and other small molecules during the translocation of membrane or secretory proteins. We have tested the permeability of the channel by using planar bilayers containing reconstituted purified E. coli SecY complex. Wild-type SecY complex did not show any conductance for ions or water. Deletion of the "plug," a short helix normally located in the center of the SecY complex, or modification of a cysteine introduced into the plug resulted in transient channel openings; a similar effect was seen with a mutation in the pore ring, a constriction in the center of the channel. Permanent channel opening occurred when the plug was moved out of the way by disulfide-bridge formation. These data show that the resting channel on its own forms a barrier for small molecules, with both the pore ring and the plug required for the seal; channel opening requires movement of the plug.

Protein Translocation Is Mediated by Oligomers of the SecY Complex with One SecY Copy Forming the Channel

Many proteins are translocated across the bacterial plasma membrane by the interplay of the cytoplasmic ATPase SecA with a protein-conducting channel, formed from the evolutionarily conserved heterotrimeric SecY complex. Here, we have used purified E. coli components to address the mechanism of translocation. Disulfide bridge crosslinking demonstrates that SecA transfers both the signal sequence and the mature region of a secreted substrate into a single SecY molecule. However, protein translocation involves oligomers of the SecY complex, because a SecY molecule defective in translocation can be rescued by linking it covalently with a wild-type SecY copy. SecA interacts through one of its domains with a nontranslocating SecY copy and moves the polypeptide chain through a neighboring SecY copy. Oligomeric channels with only one active pore likely mediate protein translocation in all organisms.

Deregulation of the SecYEG Translocation Channel upon Removal of the Plug Domain

Previous studies have shown that the SecY plug is displaced from the center of the SecYEG channel during polypeptide translocation. The structural and functional consequences of the deletion of the plug are now examined. Both in vivo and in vitro observations indicate that the plug domain is not essential to the function of the translocon. In fact, deletion of the plug confers to the cell and to the membranes a Prl-like phenotype: reduced proton-motive force dependence of translocation, increased membrane insertion of SecA, diminished requirement for functional leader peptide, and weakened SecYEG subunit association. Although the plug domain does not seem essential, locking the plug in the center of the channel inactivates the translocon. Thus, the SecY plug is important to regulate the activity of the channel and to confer specificity to the translocation reaction. We propose that the plug contributes to the gating mechanism of the channel by maintaining the structure of the SecYEG complex in a compact closed state.

Structure and function of a protein‐conducting channel

A conserved heterotrimeric membrane protein complex (Sec61/ SecYcomplex) forms a protein-conducting channel, allowing polypeptides to be transferred across or integrated into membranes. The channel associates with different partners in different translocation pathways: the ribosome in cotranslational translocation, the Sec62/63p complex and BiP in posttranslational translocation in eukaryotes, and SecA in posttranslational translocation in bacteria. The crystal structure of the SecY complex from Methanococcus jannaschii at 3.2 Å resolution suggests mechanisms for how the membrane barrier can be maintained during translocation, how the signal sequence is recognized, and how TMs of nascent membrane proteins exit into lipid. Experimental data support some of the major predictions derived from the structure.

The structure of the bacterial protein translocation complex SecYEG

Proteins destined for secretion, membrane insertion or organellar import contain signal sequences that direct them to the membrane. Once there, transport machines receive and translocate them appropriately across or into the membrane. The related SecY and Sec61 protein translocation complexes are ubiquitous components of machines that are essential for protein transport. They co-operate with various partners such that the substrate polypeptide is pulled or pushed through the membrane by post- or co-translational mechanisms. In bacteria and archaea, the SecY complex (SecYEG/SecYEbeta) is a heterotrimer, which associates with ribosomes so that the polypeptide is threaded through the channel during its synthesis. Bacteria possess an additional pathway, whereby the newly synthesized substrate protein is maintained in an unfolded conformation and is engaged by the ATPase SecA and delivered to the translocon. Recent medium- (cryo-electron microscopy) and high-resolution (X-ray) structures of the Sec complex have dramatically increased our understanding about how proteins pass through membranes, but have posed a number of new questions. The Sec complex is active as an oligomer, but the structure indicates that the protein-conducting channel is formed by a monomer of SecYEG. Structures of the membrane-bound dimer of Escherichia coli SecYEG and the detergent-solubilized monomer of Methanococcus jannaschii SecYEbeta will be described and discussed in the context of the mechanism that underlies protein secretion and membrane insertion.