Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions significantly impact the environment and human health, but many people are unaware of how their daily choices affect climate change. Carbon calculators estimate emissions in sectors like construction, digital health, transportation, and food production. However, they are still developing and face challenges that require attention from both industry and academia. Researchers highlight the absence of a unified framework for assessing these tools, leading to simplistic binary evaluations, which result in inaccuracies in household tool evaluations. In the current study, an assessment framework has been created by integrating existing binary frameworks and incorporating the MCDA method for weighted multi-criteria evaluation, offering a quantitative scoring system for qualitative criteria. This dual-criteria framework addresses both practical and academic aspects of the evaluated tools. The framework was used to evaluate 15 tools chosen for their prominence in search engine results and their impact on scientific publications. Findings revealed that tools such as Svalna, WWF calculator, and Carbon Savvy produce comparable results, while others, like the UN CF calculator, show deviations up to 136 tons. The study highlights challenges related to feasibility, availability of resources, and user engagement, noting that the criterion for accessibility for special groups received a score of zero across all CF tools. The work is expected to yield enhanced understanding that will aid in the selection of appropriate CF tools, foster sustainable practices, and offer developers direction to ensure their designs conform to established standards.