Secondary Prevention Research Articles

Gestational diabetes mellitus, body mass index, and cardiometabolic multimorbidity: a prospective cohort study

PurposeGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) could increase the risks of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease. However, evidence on its association with cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) was limited. This study aimed to evaluate the association between GDM and the prevalence, incidence, patterns, and progression of CMM; and the role of body mass index (BMI) in such association. MethodsThis study included 203,372 women who have given birth in UK Biobank. The diagnoses of GDM and cardiometabolic diseases (including stroke, coronary heart disease [CHD], and T2DM) were reported by participants or obtained through linkage to inpatient hospital data until 31st December 2020. BMI was assessed at the baseline assessment. CMM was defined as having two or more of included cardiometabolic diseases. Logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association between GDM and CMM, and the modifications on both additive and multiplicative scales were assessed to evaluate the effect of BMI on such association. ResultsA total of 1,217 women had a history of GDM, 2,351 participants had CMM at the end of follow-up and 1,601 was newly diagnosed during follow-up. GDM was associated with higher prevalence (odds ratio [OR]=4.64, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=3.54-6.08) and incidence (hazard ratio [HR]=3.62, 95% CI=2.62-5.00) of CMM. In particular, GDM was associated with higher odds of T2DM, coexisting T2DM and vascular disease, and T2DM followed by vascular disease. Formal testing for effect modification suggested multiplicative modification by BMI for the association between GDM and incident CMM. ConclusionsGDM was associated with CMM in women’s late life, with multiplicative modification effects of BMI. Our results suggest that maternal and lifestyle interventions (e.g., weight management) are warranted for the primary and secondary prevention of CMM, particularly in women with a history of GDM.

Decreased mortality in patients with fragility fracture of a fracture liaison service coordinated by Chile's first nurse practitioner.

Fragility fractures have significant sequelae, including pain, loss of mobility, and increased risk of mortality. Fracture liaison services (FLS) represent a coordinated, interdisciplinary approach to secondary prevention and reduce mortality. To investigate the effectiveness and patient outcomes regarding readmission and mortality of a newly developed, nurse practitioner (NP) coordinated FLS in Chile. Retrospective longitudinal analysis of 214 patients who agreed to participate in a FLS was conducted. Variables studied include patient age, gender, anatomical fracture site, dual x-ray absorptiometry scans, medication, readmission information, and mortality. Demographics and clinical data were collected and analyzed with bivariate and multivariate statistics. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were performed to compare survival curves between those who did and did not participate in the FLS. The study sample was predominantly female (85%) with a mean age of 76 (SD: 12; range 41-101) years. The most frequently noted fracture sites were hip (n = 167), wrist (n = 132), and spine (n = 72). At one-year follow-up, the FLS group had a significantly lower mortality (5%, 10 patients) than those who did not participate in the program (12% [N = 50], p = .005). The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients who participated in the FLS had significantly better survival rates than those who did not participate. Significantly improved survival rates were observed in FLS patients. Chile's first FLS demonstrated improved patient outcomes, specifically a reduced mortality in patients who were enrolled in the FLS. The NP role was fundamental in the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with osteoporosis.

LGBT Myanmar Migrants in Thailand: Unveiling Diverse Forms of Abuse, Healthy and Unhealthy Coping Strategies

ABSTRACT This study investigates the challenges faced by LGBT Myanmar migrants in Thailand, including discrimination and abuse due to their gender identity or sexual orientation, and their coping strategies. Through qualitative interviews with 20 self-identified LGBT Myanmar migrants aged over 18 years who experienced discrimination or abuse in Thailand, the findings underscore the presence of a segment within the Myanmar LGBT migrant community in Thailand subject to discrimination and violence across diverse settings, including workplaces, public areas, and even within their homes. Additionally, the research identified healthy coping strategies like self-soothing thoughts, relaxation activities, and seeking support, contrasted with unhealthy coping strategies such as negative self-talk, rumination, and suppressing one’s identity, leading to harmful behaviors and even suicidality. The experiences of severe discrimination and violence among LGBT migrants help this study advocate for policy interventions, such as extending the coverage of the Gender Equality Act to encompass LGBT migrants and implementing mental health support services as a form of secondary prevention. Given the significant contribution of LGBT migrants to various sectors of Thailand’s workforce, these measures are essential. However, the existing legislation concerning gender equality in Thailand inadequately addresses the specific concerns of this demographic group.

Adding traditional and emerging biomarkers for risk assessment in secondary prevention: A prospective cohort study of 20,656 patients with cardiovascular disease.

This study aims to explore whether conventional and emerging biomarkers could improve risk discrimination and calibration in secondary prevention of recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), based on a model using predictors from SMART2. In a cohort of 20,658 UK Biobank participants with medical history of ASCVD, we analysed any improvement in C indices and net reclassification index (NRI) for future ASCVD events, following addition of LP-a, ApoB, cystatin C, HbA1c, GGT, AST, ALT, and ALP, to a model with predictors used in SMART2 for the outcome of recurrent major cardiovascular event. We also examined any improvement in C indices and NRIs replacing creatinine based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with cystatin C based estimates. Calibration plots between different models were also compared. Compared with the baseline model (C index=0.663), modest increment in C indices were observed when adding HbA1c (ΔC=0.0064, p<0.001), cystatin C (ΔC=0.0037, p<0.001), GGT (ΔC=0.0023, p<0.001), AST (ΔC= 0.0007, p<0.005) or ALP (ΔC=0.0010, p<0.001) or replacing eGFRCr with eGFRCysC (ΔC=0.0036, p<0.001) or eGFRCr-CysC (ΔC=0.00336, p<0.001). Similarly, the strongest improvements in NRI were observed with the addition of HbA1c (NRI=0.014), or cystatin C (NRI= 0.006) or replacing eGFRCr with eGFRCr-CysC (NRI=0.001) or eGFRCysC (NRI=0.002). There was no evidence that adding biomarkers modify calibration. Adding several biomarkers, most notably cystatin C and HbA1c, but not LP-a, in a model using SMART2 predictors modestly improved discrimination.

Development, Content Validity and Usability of a Self-Assessment Instrument for the Lifestyle of Breast Cancer Survivors in Brazil.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women globally, and it negatively impacts diet and quality of life, increasing the risk of recurrence. Adhering to World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) lifestyle guidelines, such as healthy eating habits and nutritional status, can help in primary and secondary cancer prevention. However, no questionnaire was found for self-assessment of these guidelines for the Brazilian population. The aim of this study is to carry out content validity, pilot, and usability testing of the self-administered digital instrument "PrevCancer" assessing adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations in Brazilian female breast cancer survivors. We conducted a psychometric study that involved the development of an instrument based on WCRF/AICR recommendations. Assessment of content validity involved the Content Validity Index (CVI) based on expert assessments (n = 7). The pilot study involved the System Usability Scale (SUS) after applying the developed instrument (n = 65) and anthropometric assessment for convergent validity by female participants (n = 55). The final usability test consisted of evaluating the satisfaction with the instrument of women with breast cancer (n = 14). The "PrevCancer" instrument demonstrated good content (CVI = 1.0) as well as good usability and acceptability in the pilot study (mean SUS score = 88.1). The convergent validity stage demonstrated positive associations between the PrevCancer parameters and anthropometric parameters (p < 0.001). In the final usability study (mean SUS score = 90.3), participants' receptivity to the instrument was excellent. The PrevCancer instrument had valid content and great usability by the target population, proving to be a useful tool for future cancer research.

Local Supports to Break the Cycle: A Description of Intersectional Interventions to Address Adverse Childhood Experiences and Drug Overdose.

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), substance use disorders (SUDs), and overdose are interconnected issues impacting individuals and communities at multiple levels of the social ecology and across generations. Few studies describe approaches that intentionally and simultaneously address these issues. This paper examines activities of 15 sites across the country that were designed to simultaneously prevent ACEs, SUD, and overdose. This paper describes the work at the intersection as well as gaps and opportunities. Describing ways to implement intersectional programming may assist other organizations in taking similar steps in their communities. From December 2020 through July 15, 2023, funded sites received technical assistance from the National Association of County and City Health Officials and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for 18months to support the implementation, adaptation, and/or expansion of evidence-based programs to address ACEs, SUD, and overdose. Activities were coded to identify intersectional interventions that addressed ACEs, SUD, and overdose. Most of the ACEs prevention strategies and overdose prevention priority areas/guiding principles from which communities could choose were represented. Most activities were implemented with caregivers and families and addressed ACEs through interventions to lessen harm or to promote social norms. Primary prevention and coordination of resources were the most used overdose prevention priority area/guiding principle. It is possible to address the intersection of ACEs, SUD, and overdose on a local level. Opportunities to further address the intersection include incorporating more secondary and tertiary prevention strategies, expanding economic supports, and increasing the work focused on equity.

Physical activity and influencing factors in people post stroke or transient ischemic attack across diverse regions in Sweden.

Physical activity (PA) and sedentary behavior are key targets for secondary stroke prevention, yet their characteristics and contributing factors are not well understood. This study aims to explore PA and sedentary behavior in individuals' post-stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and identify factors linked to low PA (≤5,000 steps/day) and prolonged sedentary time (≥8 h/day). A cross-sectional study comparing sensor-derived (activPAL) PA and sedentary time among community-dwelling individuals post stroke or TIA residing in diverse geographical regions of Sweden. Multiple logistic regression models were performed to determine potential factors associated with low PA and prolonged sedentary time. The study included 101 participants post-stroke (n = 68) and TIA (n = 33), with a mean age of 70.5 years (65% female), mostly with no or mild disability (91%), living in metropolitan (69%) and rural (31%) areas of Sweden. Most participants (72%) had ≥ 8 h of sedentary time per day and 38% performed ≤5,000 steps per day. Using a walking aid (OR = 11.43, p = 0.002) was independently associated with low PA, whereas contextual factors; living alone (OR = 3.49, p = 0.029) and living in metropolitan areas (OR = 2.79, p = 0.036), were associated with prolonged sedentary time. In this study encompassing people post stroke or TIA from diverse geographical regions across Sweden, PA was associated with mobility status whereas sedentary behavior was associated with contextual factors. The results also showed a large variation in PA highlighting the need for tailored strategies to promote PA post stroke or TIA.

Lethal Prostate Cancer in Mexico: Data from the Can.Prost Mexican Registry and a Project for Early Detection.

Epidemiological data are crucial for adopting primary and secondary prevention strategies and to develop screening protocols against prostate cancer (PCa). Despite the comprehensive characterization of PCa across White and Black men, there is a lack of data from the Mexican population. This manuscript presents data from the Can.Prost registry that captures PCa trends over the past two decades in Mexico City; furthermore, we aimed to compare clinical differences and oncological outcomes before and after the promotion of early detection actions through a campaign against PCa that occurred in 2014. A retrospective observational study on newly diagnosed Mexican PCa patients was carried out at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan) in Mexico City. During 2014 and 2015, a project for the early diagnosis of PCa ("OPUS program") was launched in the aforementioned tertiary hospital. Starting at the age of 45 years, all men were invited for a PSA measurement and a specialist urologist consultation. All individuals with clinical or biochemical suspicion of PCa (PSA > 4 ng/mL), in the context of age and prostate volume, underwent ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy. Then, patients with pathologically confirmed prostate cancer were stratified according to the year of diagnosis: Group A accounted for those diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 and Group B for those patients diagnosed in the timeframe of 2015-2021. Comparisons of PCa characteristics, treatment modalities and oncologic outcomes between Group A and B were performed. Overall, we collected data from 2759 PCa patients from 2000 to 2021. The median PSA at baseline was 32 ng/mL, and 25% had a family history of PCa. Overall, 25.8% were asymptomatic and 46% had a non-metastatic presentation. After the OPUS campaign, PSA at diagnosis was significantly lower across all age groups. The incidence of PCa diagnosis in asymptomatic men was higher (31.4% vs. 19.9%) and a higher proportion of men were diagnosed with organ-confined, palpable disease (46% vs. 28%) (p < 0.001). The rate of patients eligible for active/radical treatment was higher after the OPUS campaign (patients who received surgery increased from 12.78% to 32.41%; patients who underwent radiation increased from 28.38% to 49.61%). The proportion of patients diagnosed with non-clinically significant disease was negligible and remained stable across time. PCa in Mexican patients displays aggressive features at diagnosis, whereas the rate of non-significant disease is negligible. The introduction of early detection strategies may lead to lower symptomatic and metastatic PCa and higher opportunities for radical treatment. This emphasizes the need for public awareness and for adjustment of screening strategies to the peculiarities of the Mexican population.

The Post-Stroke Checklist: longitudinal use in routine clinical practice during first year after stroke

BackgroundFew studies describe the use of the Post-Stroke Checklist (PSC) as a tool for longitudinal stroke follow-up in clinical practice. We mapped the prevalence of stroke-related health problems and targeted interventions at 3 and 12 months post-stroke by using the PSC.MethodsPatients with acute stroke discharged home in 2018–2019 at Skåne University Hospital, Sweden, were invited to participate in a comprehensive nurse-led follow-up based on a 14-item PSC 3 and 12 months post-stroke. We measured time consumption, screened for stroke-related health problems, compared the findings, and recorded targeted healthcare interventions. Problems at 12 months were grouped into new, persistent, or none compared to the 3-month evaluation.ResultsOf 200 consecutively included patients, 146 (77%) completed both the 3- and 12-month follow-ups. At 12-month follow-up, 36% of patients reported no stroke-related health problems, 24% reported persistent problems, and 40% reported new problems since the 3-month evaluation. New problems at 12 months were most common within the domains: secondary prevention (23%) and life after stroke (10%). Stroke recurrence rate was 7.5%, 43% had high blood pressure, and few smokers had quit smoking. At 12 months, 53% received at least one new healthcare intervention, compared to 84% at 3 months.ConclusionsStroke-related health problems decreased beyond 3 months but were still present in two-thirds of patients at 1 year. This emphasizes the relevance of continuous structured follow-up using the PCS. However, the follow-up alone was insufficient to adequately achieve treatment targets for secondary prevention, which require intensified focus.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04295226, (04/03/2020)

PHARMACOLOGICAL STRATEGIES TO PREVENT CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS

INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) remain the leading cause of global mortality, and high-risk patients, such as those with a history of myocardial infarction, diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, or severe dyslipidemia, are especially vulnerable to adverse cardiovascular events. Pharmacological strategies aimed at preventing these events in high-risk patients are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with CVDs. These strategies include the use of antiplatelet agents, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and beta-blockers, which have shown efficacy in the secondary prevention of events such as myocardial infarction and stroke. OBJECTIVES: Given the importance of this topic, this study aims to explore the most effective pharmacological strategies to prevent cardiovascular events in patients considered at high risk. The study aims to elucidate the main drugs used, their mechanisms of action, as well as the relevance of their clinical application for the reduction of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events in these patients. METHODOLOGY: The study was developed based on an integrative literature review, based on searches in the Virtual Health Library (VHL), PubMed and SciELO databases. The search terms used included: “Cardiovascular prevention”, “High-risk patients”, and “Pharmacological strategies”. Articles published in the last five years were selected to ensure the relevance and timeliness of the information. RESULTS: Pharmacological strategies to prevent cardiovascular events in high-risk patients include the use of antiplatelet agents such as aspirin, which reduces platelet aggregation and prevents arterial thrombosis. Statins, which reduce LDL cholesterol levels, have been shown to significantly reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. In addition, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers have shown benefits in patients with heart failure and hypertension, reducing cardiovascular mortality. Individualizing treatment, considering the comorbidities and characteristics of each patient, is essential to optimize clinical results. CONCLUSION: Pharmacological strategies play a crucial role in the prevention of cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The combination of medications such as antiplatelet agents, statins, ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers, when applied individually and according to clinical guidelines, can significantly reduce the incidence of serious cardiovascular events. Awareness of the importance of the correct use of these therapies and adherence to treatment are essential to improve the quality of life and increase the longevity of patients.

Risk for appropriate ICD intervention and complications in patients implanted after an out-hospital cardiac arrest compared to patients implanted for primary and other secondary prevention indication

Abstract Background Few data are available about patients implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). In particular, it is unclear if these patients have a higher risk of appropriate device therapy than patients implanted for primary and other secondary prevention. Purpose To assess if appropriate device interventions (ATP/shocks) are higher in patients implanted after OHCA compared to patients implanted for primary and secondary prevention other than OHCA. To verify also if mortality, implantation-related complications (pneumothorax, hemothorax, hematoma, cardiac tamponade), device-related complications (lead displacement and fracture, infections) and inappropriate shocks/ATP are higher in OHCA patients compared to other patients. Methods This is a retrospective multicenter international study. All the patients implanted with an ICD between January 2015 and December 2016 in the participating centers were included. Follow-up was considered concluded in case of death or at the last follow-up available until December 2023. Patients were divided according to ICD implantation indication (secondary prevention after OHCA, other secondary prevention, primary prevention). Results 1386 patients (79% males; median age 67, IQR 59-74) from 15 centers were included with a median follow-up of 83 months: 111 patients in OHCA group, 134 in other secondary prevention group and 1141 in primary prevention group. Considering the first appropriate intervention, a significant difference among the three groups was observed (Fig.1A) and, at post-hoc comparison, the OHCA group was at higher risk than primary prevention (HR 1.51, 95%CI 1.06-2.17, p=0.02), but was at similar risk than other secondary prevention (HR 0.79, 95%CI 0.51-1.23, p=0.3). This was confirmed also after correction for age, gender, history of atrial fibrillation, aetiology and multi-comorbidity (Fig.2A). However, considering the number of appropriate interventions during follow-up, the risk of OHCA group was lower than other secondary prevention (IRR 0.28, 95%CI 0.11-0.68, p&amp;lt;0.01) and similar to primary prevention (IRR 0.97, 95%CI 0.47-1.96, p=0.93), also after correction for the other predictors (Fig.2B). The three groups showed no differences in survival (Fig.1B), implantation-related complication, device-related complications (Fig.1C) and inappropriate shocks/ATP. Conclusion Patients implanted with an ICD after an OHCA have a risk similar to those implanted for other secondary prevention, when considering the first appropriate intervention, but a risk similar to those implanted for primary prevention when considering the number of appropriate interventions during follow-up. Our study confirms that OHCA patients represents a peculiar population with the same chance of survival and rate of complications compared to primary and other secondary prevention patients suggesting the need of more studies to improve their long-term treatment.Figure 1 (Panel A, B and C)Figure 2 (Panel A and B)

Income level is associated with differences in primary and secondary stroke prevention in China

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to assess differences in the effects of income level on the primary and secondary prevention of stroke in the Chinese population.Material and methodsThis was a population-based study using data from a China Kadoorie Biobank survey that began in 2004 in 10 geographical regions. Community residents (n = 512,715) aged 30–79 years were recruited. Stroke was determined by the self-reporting of a doctor’s diagnosis, and participants with a high risk of stroke were identified using the model developed in the Prediction for ASCVD Risk in China study.ResultsThe final numbers of people included in this study were 8,884 with stroke and 218,972 with a high risk of stroke. The participants’ income level was positively associated with high levels of physical activity and the consumption of a healthy diet, but negatively associated with the control of alcohol consumption (all p &lt; 0.05). In addition, positive associations were observed between the control of smoking and the use of antiplatelet and antihypertensive medication for primary prevention (all p &lt; 0.05), but there was a negative association with the control of blood pressure (p &lt; 0.001).ConclusionsLow-income individuals were less likely to control smoking and their diet and use preventive medications, while high-income individuals were less likely to control their alcohol consumption and blood pressure. Moreover, medication use was low for both primary and secondary prevention in high-income individuals.

Efficacy of combination therapy with statin and ezetimibe versus high dose statin monotherapy in secondary prevention in high-risk patients

Abstract Background Secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome focuses on lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol below 55 mg/dL. In all statin-naïve patients at high risk (LDL-cholesterol target &amp;lt;55 mg/dL), initiation of high-intensity statin monotherapy is recommended by ESC guidelines. Nonetheless, at one month, a significant proportion of patients do not reach their LDL-cholesterol target. Purpose The aim of this study was to compare lipid-lowering therapy with statin monotherapy versus statin with ezetimibe in secondary prevention in patients at high risk. Methods The current prospective study included 264 consecutive patients admitted with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. None of the patients had taken lipid-lowering drugs in the previous 12 months. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: Group 1 - rosuvastatin 40 mg (n= 144) and Group 2 - rosuvastatin 40 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg (n= 120). All patients' lipid profiles were assessed upon admission and after one month of lipid-lowering treatment. Results At baseline, no patient had LDL cholesterol level lower than 55 mg/dL. There was no significant difference in lipid profile at baseline between the two groups (all p &amp;gt; 0.05). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of baseline LDL-cholesterol deviation from the target (103.4% versus 99.70%; p= 0.66). As expected, the combination therapy reduced LDL-cholesterol at one month significantly higher compared to high-dose statin monotherapy (-59.65% versus -37.54%; p&amp;lt; 0.0001). After one month of treatment, only 47.92% of patients in Group 1 reached the LDL-cholesterol target (&amp;lt;55 mg/dL) compared to 90.00% of the patients in Group 2 (p&amp;lt;0.0001; R.R.= 0.53). Conclusion(s) Our findings show that statin and ezetimibe combination therapy is more effective in reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels and reaching targets compared to statin monotherapy alone. In statin-naïve patients at high risk, early initiation of the statin and ezetimibe combination instead of statin monotherapy should be taken into account in secondary prevention, for an earlier reach of the LDL-cholesterol target and to reduce the overall cardiovascular risk.

Sex differences in secondary prevention and outcomes post-myocardial infarction in Scotland

Abstract Background Sex differences in outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI) are of increasing interest. Differential receipt of evidence-based treatments may contribute to such disparities. Purpose In this study, we investigate sex differences in the burden of risk factors, in-hospital and long-term treatment and outcomes in contemporary practice in Scotland, by analysing a nationwide sample of consecutive MI admissions. Methods All MI admissions centrally recorded between 2010-2016 by Public Health Scotland were included and followed up until the end of 2021. Poisson regressions analysed in-hospital outcomes (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), mortality and post-discharge secondary prevention medication). Models were adjusted for age, co-morbidities and ST-elevation on the electrocardiogram. Royston-Parmar models analysed long-term outcomes (all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)) and were sequentially adjusted for confounders (age, comorbidities, secondary prevention medications). A 2:1 age and sex-matched general population were included as controls. Results Of a total 47,063 MI patients, 15,776 (33.5%) were women. They were matched with 81,641 controls free of major cardiovascular disease. Median (interquartile range) age was 64 (56-72) years for men and 69 (60-75) years for women. Obesity, hypertension and renal disease were the risk factors more prevalent amongst women, while men had higher rates of previous MI, peripheral vascular disease and atrial fibrillation. Compared to men, women were less likely to undergo PCI (risk ratio (95% confidence interval) – 0.87 (0.86-0.89)) or receive secondary prevention (0.94 (0.93-0.95)), but had similar in-hospital mortality (1.06 (0.99-1.13)), after multi-variable adjustment. Over a median follow-up of 8.4 (6.8-10.2) years, women had higher raw rates of adverse outcomes. However, after full confounder adjustment, this translated into lower risk for women of all cause-mortality 0.92 (0.89-0.95), cardiovascular mortality 0.82 (0.78-0.87) and MACE 0.92 (0.88-0.95) (Figure 1). The female survival advantage was attenuated post-MI in comparison to controls free of significant cardiovascular disease (Figure 2). Conclusions Women and men have different MI risk factor profiles. Women had overall worse crude outcome rates after MI, driven by age and comorbidities. This may have been driven further by undertreatment after MI, including PCI and secondary prevention. Urgent identification of drivers for such disparities in care is warranted in order to improve outcomes and ensure health equity.

Comprehensive risk factor management through a dedicated secondary prevention clinic: experience from hamilton, Ontario

Abstract Introduction and Background Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) remain a major source of morbidity and mortality. Modifiable ASCVD risk factors can be effectively treated, however, there is a lack of systematic implementation of secondary prevention therapies in ASCVD patients. We established a comprehensive secondary prevention program for patients with ASCVD to provide care for all modifiable risk factors in an integrated manner. Methods Patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD) and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) who had one or more uncontrolled risk factors, were referred to the center(s). Patients were assessed between November 2022 and October 2023. Uncontrolled risk factors were defined as dyslipidemia (LDL &amp;gt; 70 mg/dL [1.8 mmol/L]), hypertension (defined as BP &amp;gt;130/80 mmHg), diabetes (HbA1c &amp;gt;6.5%), chronic kidney disease (eGFR &amp;lt;60 ml/min/1.73m2) obesity (BMI &amp;gt;30 kg/m2) and current tobacco use. Data was collected at the initial visit and subsequent follow-up visits. Results A total of 274 patients were seen, with 85% were referred for CAD. Median age was 62 years,72% were men. The most common uncontrolled modifiable risk factor was hypertension (62% of patients), followed by dyslipidemia (60%) and obesity (50%). 39% of patients had diabetes, with 57% on a SGLT2i, 16% on a GLP-1 agonist and with 23% with HbA1c &amp;gt;8%. Blood pressure was above 140/90 mm Hg in 41% of patients, 20% were current smokers and 75% of patients had two or more uncontrolled risk factors. At the first visit, 56% of patients had a pharmacological intervention. The most common was for management of dyslipidemia, followed by diabetes and then hypertension. 17.8%(n=49) patients had a change in statin,13.8% (n= 38) patients were started on Ezetmibe, 9.1%(n=25) on Icosapent Ethyl, and 16.4% (n= 45) on a PCSK9i inhibitor (monoclonal antibody or Inclisiran). Among patients with diabetes, 5.1%(n=14) patients were started on a GLP-1 agonist and 2.5%(n=7) were started on a SGLT2i. 2.9%(n=8) patients were started on Varenicline and 2.9%(n=8) were started on NRT. Mean LDL (with LDL &amp;gt;1.8 at baseline) at visit 1 was at 3.03 ± 1.1 (n=157) mmol/dl, which reduced to 2.05 ± 0.9 (n=77) mmol/dl by 2nd visit and to 1.90 ± 1.3 (n=32) mmol/dl by visit 3. Average SBP (SBP &amp;gt;130 at baseline) at visit 1 was 143.3 ± 13.4 (n=114) mm Hg, this was subsequently reduced to 126.4 ± 14.0 (n=58) mm Hg at visit 2 and further reduced to 123.2 ± 14.7 (n=31) mm Hg by visit 3. Discussion and Impact: In our tertiary Cardiac Care center there are a significant number of patients with established ASCVD that remain on inadequate treatment for secondary prevention. Addressing these risk factors in a timely and integrated fashion in one clinic improves the implementation of guideline directed therapies for management of secondary risk factors in ASCVD and is expected to result in improved outcomes.

Prognostic values of lipoprotein(a) levels for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome among patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract Background Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is known to be a residual risk factor for acute coronary syndrome(ACS). However, in the current era where primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and lipid-lowering therapies have advanced, the role of Lp(a) levels in secondary prevention among ACS patients remains unclear. Purpose The purpose of this study is to determine whether Lp(a) levels play a role in secondary prevention by studying patients with ACS who underwent primary PCI and survived discharge. Methods Consecutive ACS patients who were admitted to our institution between December 2016 and March 2021, requiring primary PCI and were discharged alive were enrolled for the current study (n = 471). Of these patients, those with the following circumstances were excluded: (1) multidisciplinary treatment such as mechanical ventilation management and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (n = 74), (2) incomplete clinical data (n = 34), (3) ACS classified as other than type 1 in the universal definition (n = 6), and (4) unknown prognosis at 6 months after discharge (n = 8). A total of 349 consecutive patients were included in the current study. They were divided into two groups according to Lp(a) levels: Lower Lp(a) group (Lp(a) &amp;lt; 30 mg/dL, n = 277) and Higher Lp(a) group (Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL, n = 72). The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), composite of all cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and congestive heart failure requiring admission. Event-free survival curves were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to detect statistically significant differences. In addition, influence of Lp(a) levels on MACE was examined using three cox regression analyses. Model 1 was adjusted for age, gender and body mass index, model 2 was adjusted for hypertension, diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD), model 3 was adjusted for old myocardial infarction (OMI), smoking and multivessel disease, respectively. Results The mean age was 67.0 ± 12.8 years, and 70.5% were male. The median serum Lp(a) levels of the entire population was 14 mg/dL (interquartile range, 7 to 26). There were no significant differences about baseline patient’s characteristics, laboratory findings, and medications at discharge including statin treatment. The MACE was observed in 15.5% of the Lower Lp(a) group and 20.8% of the Higher Lp(a) group (p=0.29). No difference was observed about MACE between the two groups (log-rank p=0.45). After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors, Lp(a) levels were not associated with MACEs in all three models. However, in model 2 and model 3, CKD and OMI were associated with MACEs (hazard ratio 4.29, 95% confidence interval 2.17 to 8.46, p &amp;lt; 0.001, hazard ratio 3.02, 95% confidence interval 1.39 to 6.51, p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusions In the current era, Lp(a) levels are not associated with secondary prevention among ACS patients who underwent primary PCI.

"The medicine is not something that interests me at all." Beliefs, health-related behaviors, and medication adherence in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease

Abstract Background Despite evidence-based guidelines recommending secondary prevention with antithrombotics and lipid-lowering therapies, adherence to optimal pharmacological therapies remains suboptimal in patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD), potentially contributing to excess morbidity and mortality. However, the behavioral factors and health beliefs underlying this behavior are still poorly understood. Purpose To explore the health-related behaviors and beliefs of patients with symptomatic PAD regarding secondary preventive therapy. Methods Using a qualitative design, we conducted individual semi-structured interviews with patients diagnosed with symptomatic PAD. Participants were recruited from four departments of vascular surgery in Denmark from December 2022 to January 2024. Data analysis was performed using framework analysis based on the six domains of the Health Belief Models1 (HBM) as analytical framework: perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits, barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy. The HBM is widely used for conceptualizing individual’s attitudes and beliefs to explain and predict health behaviours. Results Sixteen patients participated in the study: seven adherent and nine non-adherent patients. Based on the HBM components, the following findings emerged (Figure 1). Patients expressed low perceived awareness of the severity of PAD and its potential consequences, not recognizing PAD as a systemic condition associated with broader cardiovascular risk. The perception of PAD centered around the experience of excruciating leg pain and its impact on everyday life. This focus on symptoms affected the perceived benefits of secondary preventive therapies. Patients lacked knowledge about the importance and goal of treatment and did not link the secondary preventive therapy to PAD, often associating it only with other cardiovascular diseases. Barriers included inadequate understanding of the chronic progressive nature of PAD and its severity, experience and fear of side-effects, prescription confusion, pill burden, financial constraints, and allergies. Fear of recurring pain, complications, and early death served as strong internal adherence triggers. Paradoxically, despite expressing fear, some patients were only adherent to antithrombotic therapy, not assigning the same importance to statins. Other cues to action included practical arrangements as well as establishing a trusting patient-provider relationship and receiving comprehensive and logical explanations. Conclusions This study provided new perspectives on the multifaceted challenges hindering adherence to secondary preventive therapy among patients with symptomatic PAD. Notably, the insufficient knowledge regarding the chronic progressive nature of PAD and its cardiovascular implications, underscores the need for enhanced patient education and tailored interventions to ensure optimal secondary preventive therapy.Figure 1

The association of inflammation, triglycerides and lipoprotein(a) with cardiovascular events in the UK Biobank

Abstract Background Recent trial data has suggested that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) is, at least, as strong a predictor of future cardiovascular events as LDL cholesterol in patients on lipid-lowering therapy1,2. There are limited data however on how hsCRP and other additional risk factors perform in patients at different levels of CVD risk. Purpose To evaluate the relationship of hsCRP, triglyceride and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels with cardiovascular events in guideline-defined, clinically distinct cohorts. Such a study will improve the understanding of CVD risk prediction and provide essential information on the role of these pathways in CVD. Methods Data from the UK Biobank were used. In accordance with the 2021 ESC CVD prevention guidelines, four risk groups were derived based on clinical data and 10-year CVD risk, calculated from the recently derived SCORE2 model (Figure 1)3. Those not falling into one of the four cohorts were excluded as further risk stratification in these individuals would not influence management. For increasing quartiles (Q) of each biomarker, hazard ratios (HR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values were calculated relative to the lowest Q, using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol and total cholesterol. Interactions between sex and biomarker were explored. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischaemic stroke. Secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint. Results A total of 229,339 participants were included across the four risk groups, with a total of 24,133 primary endpoint events over the mean follow-up period of 14 years. In all four groups there was a robust linear relationship of hsCRP with MACE (p&amp;lt;0.001 [Figure2]) – strongest in the secondary prevention population (Q4 v Q1 HR=1.79 [95%CI:1.60, 2.02]). Of the secondary endpoints, hsCRP was most strongly associated with cardiovascular death (Q4 v Q1 secondary prevention cohort HR=1.97 [1.68, 2.30]). Lp(a) was associated with MACE in the primary prevention cohorts only (Q4 vs Q1 high-risk cohort HR=1.35 [1.27, 1.44]), driven by its strong association with myocardial infarction (Q4 vs Q1 HR 1.61 [1.48, 1.75]) but not other secondary endpoints. After adjustment, triglyceride levels were not associated with MACE in the four cohorts. There was no evidence of sex interactions in any analysis (p&amp;gt;0.05). Conclusions After adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors, hsCRP is a more robust predictor of cardiovascular events than Lp(a) or triglycerides in both primary and secondary prevention settings. Consideration should be given to evaluating whether hsCRP, Lp(a) and other ‘non-traditional’ risk factors can improve CVD risk reclassification and/or be used to guide allocation to targeted anti-atherosclerotic therapies.Figure 1:Participant FlowFigure 2:Main effects

Sex-differences in prescription patterns of secondary prevention pharmacotherapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a 20-year perspective

Abstract Background Recent studies have demonstrated sex-related differences in secondary prevention pharmacotherapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), although guidelines recommend the same preventive approach in both women and men. Purpose This study extends earlier work by examining temporal trends of prescribing practices of secondary prevention medications using contemporary data from a long-term period in Switzerland, with particular regard to sex inequalities. Methods For the purpose of this retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in the Acute Myocardial Infarction in Switzerland (AMIS) Plus registry, optimal medical therapy (OMT) was defined as the combination of all five guideline-recommended medications in AMI at discharge: aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, lipid-lowering drugs, beta blockers, and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results A total of 34'612 patients (men n=25’913, 75%) hospitalised with AMI between 2003 and 2022 were included in the analysis. The mean age was 66±13 years and women were on average 7 years older than men. Despite having more comorbidities, women benefited less frequently from OMT than men (51% vs. 60%) across all age groups (all p&amp;lt;0.001), with the greatest gap occurring in patients &amp;lt;50 years of age. Within the 20-year study period, significant increases over time were observed in the singular prescription of all OMT components, except for beta blockers (p=0.2). This translated into a marked increase in OMT prescription irrespective of age and sex (from 36% to 60%), mainly due to greater prescription of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, from 71% to 91%) and lipid-lowering drugs (LLD, from 69% to 93%). The sex-related gap in OMT disfavoring women showed a uctuating trend over the years (getting reduced from 14% in 2003 to 0.7% in 2016 to widen again to 12% in 2022) whereas there was a continuous narrowing over time regarding the combination of DAPT plus LLD, from 18% to 10% at the beginning and the end of the observation, respectively (Figure 1). In multivariable analysis, age (OR 0.99, 95%CI 0.98-0.99, p&amp;lt;0.001) and female sex (OR 0.90, 95%CI 0.85-0.95, p&amp;lt;0.001) were independent predictors of deficient OMT prescription, while the performance of percutaneous coronary intervention was identified as the strongest positive predictor favoring it (OR 4.85, 95%CI 4.49-5.24, p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion Although there has been a gradual increase in the prescription of OMT over time among both women and men, concerning sex disparities disfavoring women, and particularly young women, remained. Targeted programs to reduce sex-related differences in secondary prevention care are warranted.

Association of metabolic phenotypes with cardiovascular events in primary and secondary prevention

Abstract Background Metabolic disorders are established risk factors for the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Although obesity is strongly related with the metabolic health status, its role as a cardiovascular risk modifier in the absence of metabolic disorders remains controversial. Recent implementation of nutrient-stimulated hormone-based therapies (NUSH) including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in the treatment of obesity even in metabolically healthy individuals requires further understanding to ensure optimal patient management. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the association of metabolic phenotypes with cardiovascular events in primary and secondary prevention of CAD. Methods We included patients over 18 years electively evaluated for CAD by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) between 2010 and 2021 in our tertiary referral centre in one of Europe’s largest university hospitals. Metabolic disorder was considered as the presence of diabetes, irrespective of additional risk factors, or hypertension and hyperlipidaemia, and obesity as a BMI of ≥30 kg/m², distinguishing four metabolic phenotypes: metabolically healthy/unhealthy nonobese/obese (MHN, MHO, MUN, MUO). The primary study endpoint MACE was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure. Results The total study population included 12 760 patients (68 [58-76] years; 57.3% male), of whom 56.5% presented metabolically healthy (43.3% MHN; 13.1% MHO) and 43.5% unhealthy (28.3% MUN; 15.2% MUO). During a median follow up time of 3.91 (1.75-7.09) years, 2 592 (20.3%) MACE and 3 351 (26.3%) all-cause deaths occurred. Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) showed different risk patterns for distinct metabolic phenotypes (Table 1). While we observed higher event rates in metabolically unhealthy compared to healthy individuals, obesity alone was not associated with increased events (Figure 1). However, metabolically healthy individuals experienced lower event rates with increasing BMI. Among patients without or with nonobstructive CAD, metabolic disease was strongly associated with increased subsequent coronary revascularization regardless of BMI. These patterns were similar across all endpoints irrespective of presence of obstructive or nonobstructive CAD. Conclusions Whereas metabolic disorders are strongly associated with adverse clinical events, obesity alone does not reflect the cardiovascular risk profile in patients with or without obstructive CAD. Thus, focusing on obesity alone for primary or secondary prevention appears unjustified. Particularly after the recent implementation of GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity, precise and individual risk stratification is essential to allow for an optimal personalized patient management.Figure 1Table 1