Secondary Palate Repair Research Articles

Buccinator myomucosal flap in cleft palate repair: Revisited

Objective: To present various ways of transfer and result of buccinator myomucosal flap (BMMF) in primary and secondary repair of palatal cleft and palate fistula. Design: This study has been designed on the basis of a clinical experience and literature search. Route of single or two BMMF(s) transfer was either lateral or posterior to the greater palatine neurovascular bundle. The flap has been used to repair defect in nasal layer, oral layer, or in combined nasal as well as oral layer of the palate. Materials and Methods: More than 160 palatoplasties have undergone palate repair with the use of BMMFs between 1999 and 2011. The analysis includes 98 palate repair. Unilateral flap was used most commonly in primary repair of nasal side of wide unilateral cleft palate (CP); whereas, two flaps were used mostly in primary repair of wide bilateral CP and in secondary palate repair for large fistula. Results: The fistula rate; in primary palatoplasty patients was 4.8% and in secondary palatoplasty patients, it was 8.3%. Good speech has been achieved in primary palatoplasty patients. After secondary palatoplasty also patients had good speech following therapy. Conclusion: The presented technique has been effective in anatomical and functional repair of wide palatal defects primary as well as secondary. The literature has been reviewed along with.

Reconstruction of the palatal aponeurosis with autogenous fascia lata in secondary radical intravelar veloplasty: a new method

Velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft patients with muscular insufficiency detected by nasendoscopy is commonly treated by secondary radical intravelar veloplasty, in which the palatal muscles are reoriented and positioned backwards. The dead space between the retro-displaced musculature and the posterior borders of the palatal bone remains problematic. Postoperatively, the surgically achieved lengthening of the soft palate often diminishes due to scar tissue formation in the dead space, leading to reattachment of the reoriented muscles to the palatal bone and to decreased mobility of the soft palate. To avoid this, the dead space should be restored by a structure imitating the function of the missing palatal aponeurosis. The entire dead space was covered using a double layer of autogenous fascia lata harvested from the lateral thigh, which should allow sufficient and permanent sliding of the retro-positioned musculature. A clinical case of a 9-year-old boy who underwent the operation is reported. Postoperatively, marked functional improvements were observable in speech assessment, nasendoscopy and nasometry. The case reported here suggests that the restoration of the dead space may be beneficial for effective secondary palatal repair. Fascia lata seems to be a suitable graft for this purpose.

Experience with the Furlow Double- Reversing Z-Plasty for Cleft Palate Repair

One-hundred and six cases of soft palate closure using the Furlow double-reversing Z-plasty technique have been reported. Most of these patients have been done in the past 2 years. There seem to be a number of worthwhile advantages to this procedure, with few disadvantages or complications. The operation is adaptable for use in early soft palate closure (3 to 6 months) as well as late closure (12 to 14 months), in submucosal clefts, as well as in secondary palatal repair where lengthening and repositioning of the levator muscle is desired. With this type of palatoplasty, the need for raising or shifting large mucoperiosteal flaps from the hard palate has been completely avoided. The operation can be combined with a primary posterior pharyngeal flap if desired, although this is not advised if early palatal closure (3 to 6 months) is used because of a high incidence of sleep apnea. Preliminary speech results are very encouraging.

Secondary palatal repair by the island flap technique. A follow-up study.

The island flap technique was applied to the secondary repair of 57 cleft patients with persisting open nasality and no velopharyngeal closure. A follow-up investigation showed that closure was achieved in about 50%, and the degree of nasality in spontaneous speech diminished in about 70% of the patients. The general quality of speech was postoperatively good in about 50%, but on the other hand fully normal only occasionally. The island flap secondary repair should probably be reserved for selected patients having a tight, short but mobile velum and relatively slight nasality. Failures of this method can still be improved by a traditional upwards based pharyngeal flap.