Secondary Amputation Rate Research Articles

Tratamiento quirúrgico de los tumores malignos y localmente agresivos del tercio proximal del peroné. Resultados oncológicos y evaluación funcional

IntroductionProximal fibula malignant and locally aggressive benign bone tumors are uncommon and usually treat by surgery. Bloc resection of the knee can compromise knee stability due to of the resection of the posterolateral ligament complex. Material and methodsWe analyzed 28 consecutive patients treated for a proximal fibula bone tumor between 1980 and 2006 (osteosarcoma: 9, giant cell tumor: 9, Ewing sarcoma: 8 and chondrosarcoma: 2). Sixty-one percent were male and the median age was 21 years (range: 8-60). The mean follow-up was 86 months. The posterolateral complex was reinserted at tibial metaphyseal level. Patients were evaluated functionally using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scale (MSTS). ResultsOverall survival rate was 89%, local recurrence rate was 11%, and secondary amputation rate was 6% at 7 years of median follow-up. The average MSTS score was 93%. Five patients had neurological complications. No patient experienced subjective instability or vascular insufficiency. ConclusionsBloc resection of the proximal fibula for the treatment of aggressive or malignant primary bone tumors allowed us to obtain local tumor control, and overall survival rate for sarcomas of 89% at 7 years. The posterolateral ligament complex tibial reinsertion provided functional knee stability without major functional consequences in the medium term.

Management of Vascular Trauma: A Single Center Experience

Introduction: This was a retrospective study of the experience with extremity vascular trauma at a tertiary level referral center in North India. The objective of this study was to analyze the cause of injury, surgical approach, outcome, and complications in patients with vascular trauma operated from 2003 to 2013. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of records of patients who were operated for peripheral vascular injuries in the last 10 years (November 2003 to November 2013) was done. Diagnosis was made by physical examination and hand Doppler alone or in combination with computed tomography angiography. There were 3948 patients; primary vascular repair was carried out where possible; if not possible an interposition vein graft was placed. Patients with isolated venous trauma or unsalvageable lower extremity injury requiring primary amputation were excluded from the study. Results: Of 3948 patients, 3347 were male (84.78%), and 601 were females (15.22%); their ages range was 5-80 years. Mean duration of the presentation was 11 h after the injury. Road traffic accidents were the most common cause of injury: 67% in those with penetrating trauma and 58% in those with blunt trauma. The incidence of concomitant orthopedic injuries was very high in our patients (73.6%). The most common injured artery was the brachial artery (36.4%), followed by the popliteal (30.4%) and femoral artery (21.7%). Primary repair was performed in 58.3%, interposition vein grafts in 41.4%. Majority of patients had a good outcome-78% had functional, viable limbs. About 13% had a nonfunctional, but viable limb; the secondary amputation rate was 9%.Conclusion: Early diagnosis and treatment of vascular injuries is crucial for saving the patient's limb and life. Our study is the largest study from a single center in India/South West Asia: Increased awareness is required to ensure that patients identified to have a vascular injury are transferred to a specialist vascular surgery center at the earliest. Vascular injuries require immediate localization and surgical intervention. Prompt and decisive management maximizes patient survival and limb salvage- and as we demonstrate, this is possible even in patients with delayed presentation or when early ischemic changes are present. Protocols must be established in the management of associated injuries to avoid delay.

Management of war-related vascular injuries: experience from the second gulf war

AimTo study the biomechanism, pattern of injury, management, and outcome of major vascular injuries treated at Mubarak Al-Kabeer Teaching Hospital, Kuwait during the Second Gulf War.MethodsThis is a descriptive retrospective study. War-related injured patients who had major vascular injuries and were treated at Mubarak Al-Kabeer Teaching Hospital from August 1990 to September 1991 were studied. Studied variables included age, gender, anatomical site of vascular injury, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, type of vascular repair, and clinical outcome.Results36 patients having a mean (SD) age of 29.8 (10.2) years were studied. 32 (89%) were males and 21 (58%) were civilians. Majority of injuries were caused by bullets (47.2%) and blast injuries (47.2%). Eight patients (22%) presented with shock.There were 31 arterial injuries, common and superficial femoral artery injuries were most common (10/31). Arterial repair included interposition saphenous vein graft in seven patients, thrombectomy with end-to-end / lateral repair in twelve patients, vein patch in two patients, and arterial ligation in four patients. Six patients had arterial ligation as part of primary amputation. 3/21 (14.3%) patients had secondary amputation after attempted arterial vascular repair of an extremity. There were a total of 17 venous injuries, 13 managed by lateral suture repair and 4 by ligation. The median (range) hospital stay was 8 (1–76) days. 5 patients died (14%).ConclusionsMajor vascular injuries occurred in 10% of hospitalized war-related injured patients. Our secondary amputation rate of extremities was 14%. The presence of a vascular surgeon within a military surgical team is highly recommended. Basic principles and techniques of vascular repair remain an essential part of training general surgeons because it may be needed in unexpected wars.

Management of Upper Extremity Vascular Injury: Outcome Related to the Mangled Extremity Severity Score

The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) is an objective criterion for amputation prediction after lower extremity injury as well as for amputation prediction after upper extremity injury. A MESS of >or=7 has been utilized as a cutoff point for amputation prediction. In this study, we examined the result of upper extremity vascular injurty (UEVI) management in terms of the amputation rate as related to the MESS. During January 2002 to July 2007, we reviewed patients with UEVIs at our institution. Data collections included demographic data, mechanism of injuries, injury severity score (ISS), ischemic time, MESS, pathology of UEVI, operative management, and amputation rate. Decisions to amputate the injured limbs at our institution were made individually by clinically assessing limb viability (i.e., color and capillary refill of skin; color, consistency, and contractility of muscles) regardless of the MESS. The outcome was analyzed in terms of the amputation rate related to the MESS. There were 52 patients with UEVIs in this study: 25 (48%) suffered blunt injuries and 27 (52%) suffered penetrating injuries. The age ranged from 15 to 59 years (mean 28.7 years). The mean ischemia time was 10.07 h. The mean ISS was 17.52. There were 12 patients (23%) with subclavian artery injuries, 3 patients (5.76%) with axillary artery injuries, 18 patients (34.61%) with brachial artery injuries, and 19 patients (36.54%) with radial artery and/or ulnar artery injuries. Primary repairs were performed in 45 patients (86.54%), with ligations in 3 patients (5.77%). An endovascular stent-graft was used in one patient (1.92%). Primary amputations were performed in three patients (5.77%). Secondary amputations (amputation after primary operation) were done in 4 of 49 patients (secondary amputation rate 8.16%). All amputation patients suffered blunt injuries and had a MESS of >or=7 (range 7-11). The overall amputation rate in this study was 13.46% (7/52 patients). Multivariate analysis revealed that the only factor significantly associated with amputation was the MESS. There were no amputations in 33 patients who had a MESS of <7. We could avoid amputation in 12 of 19 patients who had a MESS>or=7. There were no mortalities among 52 UEVI patients. MESS, an outcome score used to grade the severity of extremity injuries, correlates well with the risk of amputation. Nevertheless, a MESS of >or=7 does not always mandate amputation. On the other hand, the MESS is a better predictor for patients who do not require amputation when the score is <7. The decisions to amputate in patients should be made individually based on clinical signs and an intraoperative finding of irreversible limb ischemia.

Prehospital Tourniquet Use in Operation Iraqi Freedom: Effect on Hemorrhage Control and Outcomes

Up to 9% of casualties killed in action during the Vietnam War died from exsanguination from extremity injuries. Retrospective reviews of prehospital tourniquet use in World War II and by the Israeli Defense Forces revealed improvements in extremity hemorrhage control and very few adverse limb outcomes when tourniquet times are less than 6 hours. We hypothesized that prehospital tourniquet use decreased hemorrhage from extremity injuries and saved lives, and was not associated with a substantial increase in adverse limb outcomes. This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of the 31st combat support hospital for 1 year during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Inclusion criteria were any patient with a traumatic amputation, major extremity vascular injury, or documented prehospital tourniquet. Among 3,444 total admissions, 165 patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-seven patients had prehospital tourniquets (TK); 98 patients had severe extremity injuries but no prehospital tourniquet (No TK). Extremity Acute Injury Scores were the same (3.5 TK vs. 3.4 No TK) in both groups. Differences (p < 0.05) were noted in the numbers of patients with arm injuries (16.2% TK vs. 30.6% No TK), injuries requiring vascular reconstruction (29.9% TK vs. 52.5% No TK), traumatic amputations (41.8% TK vs. 26.3% No TK), and in those patients with adequate bleeding control on arrival (83% TK vs. 60% No TK). Secondary amputation rates (4 (6.0%) TK vs. 9 (9.1%) No TK); and mortality (3 (4.4%) TK vs. 4 (4.1%) No TK) did not differ. Tourniquet use was not deemed responsible for subsequent amputation in severely mangled extremities. Analysis revealed that four of seven deaths were potentially preventable with functional prehospital tourniquet placement. Prehospital tourniquet use was associated with improved hemorrhage control, particularly in the worse injured (Injury Severity Score >15) subset of patients. Fifty-seven percent of the deaths might have been prevented by earlier tourniquet use. There were no early adverse outcomes related to tourniquet use.

Ischemies aigue on traumatiques des membres

Twenty four patients (18 males, 6 females, Mean age 50 years) with acute non traumatic limb ischemia were operated on in our institution. The ischemia has been observed after 24 hours in 15 patients (62,5 % versus 7 patients (37,5 %) within 24 hours. The arterial femoral was often (54,1 %) the site of occlusion. Embolism (29,2 %) and thrombosis (54,2 % were the cause of acute limb ischemia. All patients were treated by embolectomy or thrombectomy. The overall mortality was 29,2 % with a limb salvage rate of 45,8 % and secondary amputation rate of 29,2 %. According to our experience, the diagnosis of acute non traumatic limb ischemia is not instituted early and the rate of hospital mortality and morbidity remain high.

Popliteal artery injury: Royal Perth experience and literature review

Popliteal artery injury is uncommon but poses a significant challenge in Australian trauma care. Blunt trauma and knee dislocations appear to be associated with higher amputation rates. The aim of the present study was to review the authors' experience with this condition and discuss the best approach to investigation and management. The medical records of all patients with popliteal artery injury (n = 19) who were entered prospectively onto the Royal Perth Hospital Trauma Registry from 1995 to 2003 were reviewed. Their demographic data, investigations, primary operative procedures, fasciotomy, primary and secondary amputation rates and mortality were determined. There were 17 male and two female patients with a median age of 34 years (range 17-62 years). Most patients (84%) were under 40 years in age. Blunt trauma was the commonest cause of popliteal artery injury (68.4%), and 84.6% of the patients had associated skeletal injury. The amputation rate in the present study was 26.3% (5/19). There were no intraoperative or in-hospital deaths. Three of 13 patients (23%) with blunt trauma underwent amputation, compared to two of six (33.3%) with penetrating injury. Two of three amputee patients in the blunt trauma group had dislocated knees. Despite technical improvements in management of popliteal artery injury, a high amputation rate is still seen, especially in patients with one or more of the following factors: extensive soft-issue injury, associated skeletal trauma, knee dislocation, and prolonged ischaemia time. Measures to reduce the amputation rate, ranging from more prompt diagnosis to modified surgical treatment techniques, are discussed.

War injuries of major extremity arteries.

During the period 1991-1994, 99 patients (all males, median age 35 years) with combat-related injuries of major limb arteries were managed. Mechanism: mine fragments (40%), high-velocity projectiles (35%), and shotgun pellets (25%). Patients were admitted 1 hour to 16 hours (median 8 hours) after injury; 39% were in severe hemorrhagic shock. Arterial injury was diagnosed by clinical findings. Preoperative angiography was usually not necessary. Of 99 injured patients, 50 (51%) showed signs of distal ischemia and required arterial reconstruction. No primary amputation was performed. Reconstruction was always necessary in cases of injury of axillary or popliteal arteries, but not of superficial femoral or brachial arteries. Ligation of injured single forearm or crural arteries was well tolerated. End-to-end anastomosis by reconstruction was possible only in 38% of cases. In 56% of patients, autologous venous bypass was performed. Uncontrolled wound infection developed in 22% of cases, leading to a secondary hemorrhage compelling arterial ligature (8%), and thrombosis (6%). The secondary amputation rate after arterial reconstruction was 10%. Injury of major vessels was associated with limb bone fractures, nerve damage, or major vein injuries in 68% of cases, frequently on the forearm, the popliteal region, and the crural region. When limb ischemia was present, vascular reconstruction had priority over orthopedic immobilization. Arterial injury was almost always associated with the venous damage in the forearm, the popliteal region, and the crural region. Injured veins of the upper limb were ligated; venous repair was more often indicated in lower limb injury (52%). The method of choice was lateral suture/patch. Gunshot damage to peripheral nerves was rarely treated with primary repair.

The use of MR images to evaluate the risks associated with proximal locking of intramedullary tibial nails

Vascular complications associated with locked intramedullary tibial nailing are infrequent but always serious, with a secondary amputation rate of 30%. These complications, based on an MR study of the anatomic relationships between the interlocking screws and the neurovascular or articular structures at the proximal end of the tibia, have been analysed. Two types of nails were used: one with anterior-posterior locking and a specially designed prototype with oblique locking. In particular this study emphasised the anatomic risk of injury to the popliteal structures when using anterior-posterior locking, as well as to the anterior tibial vessels and proximal tibiofibular joint when using oblique locking. As no locking method appears to be better than any other, the best is that associated with the lowest morbidity. Consequently, the use of frontal instead of anterior-posterior locking is recommended; the use of oblique locking, which this study has shown carries a much higher risk of complications, is strongly advised against.

The functional outcome of lower-extremity fractures with vascular injury.

Salvage of lower-extremity Gustilo type IIIC fractures is difficult, time-consuming for the patients and physicians, and not universally successful because of poor functional outcomes. Even if successful with limb salvage, the functional result may be unsatisfactory because of mutilating injuries to muscle and nerve, bone loss, and the presence of chronic infection. From July 1991 until July 1994, revascularizations of open IIIC fractures were attempted for wounds with Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) < or = 10. The functional results were evaluated at 2 years after injury. Thirty-six lower-extremity revascularizations were performed on 34 patients, including 1 patient with bilateral distal tibial IIIC fractures and a child with IIIC femoral fracture accompanied by ipsilateral distal tibial amputation. Excluded were patients with below-ankle IIIC fractures as well as patients who underwent immediate amputation at admission. After the revascularization, seven patients with IIIC fractures (7 of 36, 19.4%) underwent secondary amputation within 1 week. At the 2-year follow-up, the overall secondary amputation rate was 25% (9 of 36) and the salvage rate was 75% (27 of 36). Those were no deaths. Of the 29 salvaged limbs among these 27 patients, 23 limbs (23 of 29, 79.3%) required secondary coverage procedures that included 12 free flap transfers (12 of 29, 41.4%). Every patient needed subsequent reconstructive surgery to achieve an acceptable functional result. In this series, MESS was able to predict the secondary amputation rate and the functional result. Sixteen of the 17 limb-salvaged patients with MESS < or = 7 were able to achieve minimal functional requirements, whereas 3 of the 10 patients with MESS = 8 to 10 failed to achieve minimal functional requirements at the 2-year follow-up. Using statistical analysis, we found that the salvaged limbs with MESS < or = 9 exhibited a significant difference in achieving adequate function compared with limbs with MESS > 9. Using our protocol for treatment for IIIC fractures, the threshold for immediate amputation can be raised from MESS = 7 to MESS = 9. Our conclusions are (1) more severely injured limbs have poor functional results, (2) every patient needs subsequent reconstructive surgery, and (3) the MESS may be helpful in decision-making.

Cost-Efficacy Issues in the Treatment of Peripheral Vascular Disease: Primary Amputation or Revascularization for Limb-threatening Ischemia

Controlling rising health care costs represents a major challenge to our society. Due to the aging of the population and the increasing number of patients with vascular disease, vascular specialists will be under mounting pressure by the managed care industry to provide the most cost-effective care for these patients. One particular controversy is whether to attempt revascularization in the patient with limb-threatening ischemia or to proceed directly with primary amputation. Although it has been assumed that the operative risk for revascularization procedures is high in elderly patients with a severely ischemic limb, mortality rates in the sickest patients are actually higher for amputation. It is also incorrect to assume that the duration of hospitalization is shorter for patients undergoing amputation than for patients undergoing revascularization. For both types of procedures, it is complications that prolong the length of hospital stay, and the rate of secondary amputation following a revascularization attempt is low (8.5%), compared with the rate of operative revision in patients following primary below-knee amputation (23%). The costs for revascularization and primary amputation are similar when the costs of a prosthesis and rehabilitative therapy are included in the calculations for amputation. The rationale for primary amputation assumes that patients will ambulate successfully with a prosthesis; however, many do not, and thus costs for institutionalization must be included in the equation. Long-term costs following revascularization were $28,374 in patients with a viable limb, compared with $56,809 in those undergoing secondary revascularization. The key to minimizing health care costs in this population is careful patient selection for initial revascularization, with aggressive long-term surveillance to ensure graft patency and limb viability.

Limb salvage and patency after aortic reconstruction in younger patients

Purpose: The purpose of this report was to compare patient characteristics, treatment, and outcome in younger and older patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. Methods: The medical records of 56 patients ≤50 years of age (Group ≤50) were retrospectively reviewed and compared to the records of 128 patients ≥60 years of age (Group ≥60). All patients were examined and treated between April 1987 and April 1994. Postoperatively, they were enrolled in a vascular laboratory surveillance program to serially monitor the status of the vascular reconstruction. Follow-up averaged more than 3 years in both groups and was available on greater than 90% of patients. Results: Patients in Group ≤50 had a higher incidence of smoking (68% versus 51%) and a lower incidence of hypertension (29% versus 50%) than patients in group ≥60 (smoking P = 0.03, hypertension P = 0.007). No other significant differences were noted among cardiovascular risk factors. Preoperative indications for surgery were similar among patients in both groups. An aortoiliac endarterectomy was more commonly used to revascularize the lower extremities in younger patients than in their older counterparts (23% versus 7%, P = 0.002). Graft revisions were more frequently necessary after aortic reconstruction in Group ≤50 than in Group ≥60 (29% versus 8%, P = 0.0003); however patency rates computed by life table analysis were not significantly different. The primary patencies for Group ≤50 and Group ≥60 at 5 years were 64% and 67%, respectively; their secondary patency rates at 5 years were 84% and 89%, respectively. No significant difference was found in major limb amputation (8% in Group ≤50 versus 5% in Group ≥60, P = 0.46). We conclude that aortoiliac reconstruction for occlusive disease can be performed with similar secondary patency and amputation rates in young and old patients. However, close postoperative surveillance and frequent surgical revision are necessary to maintain patency and minimize amputation.