Second-round Survey Research Articles

International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) consensus on miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Over the past three decades, there has been increasing interest in miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) techniques featuring smaller tracts as they offer potential solutions to mitigate complications associated with standard PCNL (sPCNL). However, despite this growing acceptance and recognition of its benefits, unresolved controversies and acknowledged limitations continue to impede widespread adoption due to a lack of consensus on optimal perioperative management strategies and procedural tips and tricks. In response to these challenges, an international panel comprising experts from the International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) took on the task of compiling an expert consensus document on mPCNL procedures aimed at providing urologists with a comprehensive clinical framework for practice. This endeavor involved conducting a systematic literature review to identify research gaps (RGs), which formed the foundation for developing a structured questionnaire survey. Subsequently, a two-round modified Delphi survey was implemented, culminating in a group meeting to generate final evidence-based comments. All 64 experts completed the second-round survey, resulting in a response rate of 100.0%. Fifty-eight key questions were raised focusing on mPCNLs within 4 main domains, including general information (13 questions), preoperative work-up (13 questions), procedural tips and tricks (19 questions), and postoperative evaluation and follow-up (13 questions). Additionally, 9 questions evaluated the experts’ experience with PCNLs. Consensus was reached on 30 questions after the second-round survey, while professional statements for the remaining 28 key questions were provided after discussion in an online panel meeting. mPCNL, characterized by a tract smaller than 18 Fr and an innovative lithotripsy technique, has firmly established itself as a viable and effective approach for managing upper urinary tract stones in both adults and pediatrics. It offers several advantages over sPCNL including reduced bleeding, fewer requirements for nephrostomy tubes, decreased pain, and shorter hospital stays. The series of detailed techniques presented here serve as a comprehensive guide for urologists, aiming to improve their procedural understanding and optimize patient outcomes.

Management of human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors-related acneiform rash: A position paper based on the first Europe/USA Delphi consensus process.

There is a need for unified guidance in the management of acneiform rash induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi) among dermatologists. To establish unified international guidelines for the management of acneiform rash caused by EGFR inhibitors, based on an experts' Delphi consensus. The initiative was led by five members of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force 'Dermatology for Cancer Patients' who developed a questionnaire that was circulated to a group of 32 supportive oncodermatology experts in Europe, Canada, Argentina, the US States and Asia. The questionnaire consisted of 84 statements in total, regarding diagnosis and treatment of EGFRi-induced acneiform rash. Experts responded to an anonymous 5-point Likert scale survey. The coordinators collected the first-round responses that were checked for consensus (≥75% agreement in positive [agree or strongly agree] or in negative [disagree or strongly disagree] vote). The statements that did not reach strong consensus in the first round were revised, according to experts' feedback, for a second-round survey. Strong consensus was reached in 75/84 (89.3%) of the statements, whilst moderate consensus was achieved in 6/84 elements. Key points include consideration of low-dose isotretinoin for refractory grade II/III acneiform rash, use of topical steroid-sparing agents like topical pimecrolimus in the maintenance phase and use of doxycycline in either 100 or 200 mg per day as prophylactic treatment. Interestingly, experts did not recommend topical antibiotics, neither for prevention, nor for treatment. Consensus failure in 3/84 objects is mostly related to the lack of robust data on these topics. This consensus offers crucial insights often overlooked by radiotherapists, general practitioners, dermatologists and oncologists, and it is expected to improve the management of oncologic patients treated with EGFRi in different settings and continents.

The Integration of Traditional Chinese Culture into the English Grammar Course in Regular Higher Education: A Practical Case Study

In the interconnected global society today, the significance of integrating traditional Chinese culture into English grammar education cannot be overstated, but it is often ignored in the practical teaching and theoretical research. Hence, this study aims to explore this integration in regular higher education to promote ideological and political education and their intercultural competence. Research questions include how traditional Chinese culture is practically integrated into the English grammar course in regular higher education and whether this integration is effectively achieved as well as what suggestions can be proposed for the future English grammar course and research. Considering this, a practical case study in the context of Xianda College of Economics and Humanities, Shanghai International Studies University in China is employed to address these questions. Twenty-nine first-year English majors, both females and males, voluntarily participate as research subjects. The specific research methods mainly involve a two-round questionnaire survey and a one-round interview. One of the conclusion is that traditional Chinese culture can be practically integrated into the English grammar course in regular education by the the strategy of “4-R”, namely “Revise Teaching Goals and Objectives, Refine Teaching Content, Revitalize Teaching Methods and Reform Teaching Evaluation”. This study focuses on adopting Chinese ancient poetry, Chinese opera, Chinese architecture, and Chinese festival customs as the main materials for traditional Chinese culture related to grammar points in this course. Moreover, based on the participants’ feedback from the second-round questionnaire survey and one-round interview, it is effectively carried out and attains the quality goals in the overall teaching syllabus to a large extent. Another conclusion is that some suggestions from students and the teacher are provided for the future English grammar course and relevant research.

Clinician-Prioritized Measures to Use in a Remote Concussion Assessment: Delphi Study.

There is little guidance available, and no uniform assessment battery is used in either in-person or remote evaluations of people who are experiencing persistent physical symptoms post concussion. Selecting the most appropriate measures for both in-person and remote physical assessments is challenging because of the lack of expert consensus and guidance. This study used expert consensus processes to identify clinical measures currently used to assess 5 physical domains affected by concussion (neurological examination, cervical spine, vestibular, oculomotor, or effort) and determine the feasibility of applying the identified measures virtually. The Delphi approach was used. In the first round, experienced clinicians were surveyed regarding using measures in concussion assessment. In the second round, clinicians reviewed information regarding the psychometric properties of all measures identified in the first round by at least 15% (9/58) of participants. In the second round, experts rank-ordered the measures from most relevant to least relevant based on their clinical experience and documented psychometric properties. A working group of 4 expert clinicians then determined the feasibility of virtually administering the final set of measures. In total, 59 clinicians completed survey round 1 listing all measures they used to assess the physical domains affected by a concussion. The frequency counts of the 146 different measures identified were determined. Further, 33 clinicians completed the second-round survey and rank-ordered 22 measures that met the 15% cutoff criterion retained from round 1. Measures ranked first were coordination, range of motion, vestibular ocular motor screening, and smooth pursuits. These measures were feasible to administer virtually by the working group members; however, modifications for remote administration were recommended, such as adjusting the measurement method. Clinicians ranked assessment of coordination (finger-to-nose test and rapid alternating movement test), cervical spine range of motion, vestibular ocular motor screening, and smooth pursuits as the most relevant measures under their respective domains. Based on expert opinion, these clinical measures are considered feasible to administer for concussion physical examinations in the remote context, with modifications; however, the psychometric properties have yet to be explored. RR2-10.2196/40446.

Establishment of the benchmarking tool for evaluating the operation of biorepositories for pathogenic resource using a modified Delphi method

In recent years, as the infectious diseases caused by pathogens such as novel coronavirus and mpox (formerly called monkeypox) spread globally, the significance of identification, preservation, and sharing of pathogenic resources become prominent. Along with the rapid development of biorepositories, it is imperative to evaluate their operation in a scientific manner. By using the literature review and modified Delphi method, this study develops a benchmarking tool for the comprehensive evaluation of the operation of biorepositories for pathogenic resources. The effective response rates of both rounds of expert surveys were 100 %. The authority coefficients (Cr) were 0.82 and 0.85, respectively, manifesting the reliability of consultation results. In the second-round survey, the Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (Kendall’s W) of all indicators ranged from 0.09 to 0.31 (P < 0.001), the comprehensive score ranged from 4.02 to 4.94, the standard deviation ranged from 0.21 to 0.77, and the coefficient of variation (CV) ranged from 0.04 to 0.22, indicating that the expert opinions reached consensus. The final benchmarking tool was composed of 4 primary indicators, 12 secondary indicators, and 65 tertiary indicators. The weights of the four primary indicators allocated through the rank-sum ratio method, namely organizational structure, management requirements, biobanking capacity, and sharing capacity, were 30.50 %, 30.08 %, 25.45 %, and 13.97 %, respectively. The benchmarking tool established in this study provides references for the comprehensive evaluation of the operation and puts forward advice for the sustainable development of biorepositories for pathogenic resources.

Inpatient Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Delphi Consensus Study.

Inpatient hospitalization of individuals with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) has increased. Inpatient services may not be familiar enough with this disease to understand how to manage severe HS and/or HS flares. It would be beneficial to the inpatient medical community to establish consensus recommendations on holistic inpatient care of patients with HS. A survey study was developed and distributed by Wake Forest University School of Medicine (Winston-Salem, North Carolina). A total of 26 dermatologists participated in the Delphi process, and the process was conducted in 2 rounds. Participants voted on proposal statements using a 9-point scale (1=very inappropriate; 9=very appropriate). Statements were developed using current published guidelines for management of HS and supportive care guidelines for other severe inpatient dermatologic diseases. A total of 50 statements were reviewed and voted on between the 2 rounds. Consensus was determined using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Twenty-six dermatologists completed the first-round survey, and 24 completed the second-round survey. The 40 consensus recommendations generated through these surveys can serve as a resource for providers caring for inpatients with HS.

Abstract P401: Association of Healthy Lifestyle Score With Metabolic Syndrome in Hong Kong Chinese Women: An Age-Matched Nested Case-Control Study

Introduction: Limited studies explored the combined effect of lifestyles on metabolic syndrome (MetS), especially in Hong Kong Chinese people. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that a combination of seven lifestyles, expressed as a healthy lifestyle score (HLS), was inversely associated with MetS. Methods: A nested case-control study was conducted in a cohort named Migraine Exposures and Cardiovascular Health in Hong Kong Chinese Women (MECH-HK). We recruited 4,221 women aged ≥30 years at baseline (2019-2021) and followed up with 3,435 subjects at the second-round survey until September 2023. The MetS was diagnosed based on the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) (2005 version). Women who developed MetS between baseline and second-round survey and had no hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipemia, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cancers at baseline were selected as cases. Age-matched controls were selected using a 1:1 ratio. Seven lifestyles were included in the HLS, each was assigned 0 or 1 point. The 1-point criteria were: smoking (never smoker), physical activity (vigorous physical activity ≥75 min/week), sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ≤5), stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10 ≤13), fatigue (≤ the median of a 10-point Likert scale), diet (≥ the median of a healthy diet score), and alcohol (&lt;20g/day). The overall score ranged from 0 to 7, where a higher score indicated better health. Leave-one-out test was performed by excluding the seven items from the HLS one at a time. A weighted HLS was generated based on the coefficient of each component in multivariable analysis. Results: A total of 123 MetS patients (aged 56.6±7.5 years) and 123 controls (aged 56.9±7.8 years) were included. The number of MetS cases and total subjects for the lowest (0-2 points), middle (3-4 points), and highest (5-7 points) HLS groups were 40/64 (62.5%), 51/107 (47.7%), and 32/75 (42.7%), respectively. Compared to the lowest HLS group, the ORs (95% CIs) for the highest HLS group in univariable and multivariable analysis were 0.45 (0.23, 0.88) (P=0.021) and 0.46 (0.23, 0.94) (P=0.032), respectively. Among the seven components, smoking was the strongest contributor, followed by physical activity and diet. The results were consistent in the leave-one-out test and weighted HLS. Conclusions: Higher HLS was associated with lower MetS risk in Hong Kong Chinese women. The combined healthy lifestyles could benefit the prevention of MetS.

Development of the assessment standards of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Geriatric Core Set through a modified Delphi method

BackgroundThere is currently a lack of functional assessment tools based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) theoretical framework that are specific for older adults.ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to develop Chinese assessment standards of the ICF Geriatric Core Set for functional evaluation of older adults.MethodsA two-stage study process was conducted to develop the assessment standards of the ICF Geriatric Core Set: establishment of candidate assessment standards, and a modified Delphi consensus process including a pilot survey and two-round formal expert survey. Thirty participants in the field of ICF and geriatric rehabilitation were recruited. The suitability of the assessment standards in the questionnaires was rated using a Likert 5-level scoring method. The arithmetic mean, the full mark ratio and the coefficient of variation (CV) were used as screening indicators for the assessment standards, and modification was made for several standards, in line with the Delphi results and the expert panel discussion.ResultsThirty-three candidate assessment standards belonging to 17 categories were generated. A total of 26 and 24 experts in the field of ICF and geriatric rehabilitation participated in the two-round survey, respectively. Five standards belonging to four categories entered into the second-round survey directly, five standards belonged to five categories entered with minor modification, and nine standards belonging to seven categories were redesigned based on the literature and discussion of the expert panel. In the second-round survey,15 assessment standards belonging to 15 categories met the screening requirements and four assessment standards belonged to the two remaining categories that needed a criterion and which the expert panel discussed for the final decision.ConclusionsUsing the modified Delphi method, the assessment standards of the ICF Geriatric Core Set have been developed.Future work should focus on the reliability and validity of the the assessment standards and their application to the health management of older adults.

Translation and psychometric properties of the Mandarin Chinese version of the COVID-19 Impact Scale in college students.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant long psychological impacts that require a novel measurement tool to capture the changes in such impacts. To this end, the COVID-19 Impact Scale (CIS) was developed as an instrument to evaluate psychological responses associated with the pandemic, and has shown evidence of a one-factor structure. The CIS was initially created using an Korea University students sample, and has since been translated and validated in Turkish. A total of 504 College students, aged 17-25, took part in the study from two universities in Jinan, located in Shandong Province, Eastern China, via an online survey platform. They were administered the Chinese versions of the following self-report instruments: Mandarin Chinese CIS, Fear of COVID-19 Scale, Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 and Satisfaction With Life Scale. Moreover, a sample of 86 participants who provided their contact information and agreed to participate in the second-round survey were asked to reassess using the Mandarin Chinese CIS after a period of 3 weeks following the initial testing. Results showed that Mandarin Chinese CIS had good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Additionally, the Mandarin Chinese CIS presented good criterion validity and estimates of convergent validity and incremental validity. In confirmatory factor analysis, the one-factor model showed an acceptable fit after incorporating correlations between error terms. Our findings suggest that the Mandarin Chinese CIS is a reliable and valid self-report tool that demonstrates robust psychometric properties and acceptable construct validity when used with a Chinese university students.

Development of an Orthopedic Surgery Anatomy Curricular Model for Fourth Year Medical Students Using a Modified Delphi Method

The purpose of this study was to develop anatomy-focused learning outcomes that can be used to design a fourth-year elective for students matriculating into orthopedic surgery residencies. A series of proposed learning outcomes (N=72) was developed using the ACGME Orthopedic Milestones 2.0 as a framework. In 2021, these were converted into a survey asking participants to rate the importance of each outcome on a 5-point Likert scale. The modified Delphi Method was used to refine the list of outcomes until group consensus was achieved. The consensus was defined using a conservative 3-tier approach. Eighteen academic centers with an associated orthopedic surgery residency. Twenty-six orthopedic surgeons (ranging from 1 to 42 years in practice). Of the 72 learning outcomes from the first-round survey, 25 met consensus criteria. Of the 62 learning outcomes from the second-round survey, 45 met consensus criteria. All learning outcomes that met consensus criteria after the second-round survey were stratified into low-yield (n = 8), intermediate-yield (n = 34), and high-yield (n = 28) categories. Using a modified Delphi Method, this study elicited feedback from experts in the field of orthopedic surgery to develop a framework for a fourth-year elective focused on anatomical concepts important for students applying to residencies in orthopedic surgery. The product of this process affords a great deal of flexibility when utilizing the results of this study in institution-specific curricular development.

Maternal healthcare utilization in rural Bangladesh: A comparative analysis between high and low disaster-prone areas.

This study examined the disparity in antenatal care (ANC) visits and institutional delivery between high-disaster-prone (HDP) and low-disaster-prone (LDP) areas, defined based on multi-hazards, in Bangladesh and assessed the influencing factors using Andersen's behavioral model. In this study, cross-sectional data of 345 mothers, who had live birth the year preceding the survey, were used from the second-round multipurpose survey of a longitudinal research project conducted in May-June 2011. Hierarchical multinomial logistic and binary logistic models were respectively used to assess the determinants of ANC contacts and choice of childbirth place. We found very low utilization of 4+ ANC visits in both HDP (20%) and LDP (15%) areas. The difference is also not significant. The strong influencing factors of receiving 4+ ANC were mother's education, household size, income, and proximity to health facility. The level of institutional delivery was also low (21%), and no significant difference between HDP (15.2%) and LDP (25.7%) was found. However, in the case of institutional delivery, significant (p-value ≤ .01) difference was found in C-section between HDP (42%) and LDP (79%). A significant (p-value ≤ .05) difference was also found in the attendance of graduate doctors/gynecologists between HDP (58%) and LDP (88%). Mothers of HDP areas were 52 percent less likely to choose institutional delivery compared to those of LDP areas. Moreover, there was 30 percent less likelihood of choosing institutional delivery with an increase in distance to the nearest health facility. Specific demand-side (e.g., awareness raising, expanding maternal voucher scheme, covering more mothers under maternal allowance, and facilitating more income-generating activities especially off-farm ones) and supply-side interventions (e.g., providing training to local traditional birth attendants, and deployment of boat-based medical teams in coastal and char areas) need to be undertaken to increase institutional delivery, especially in HDP areas. However, the ultimate solution depends on adopting long-term measures to prepare facilities ready by filling the vacant posts and reducing absenteeism. Public-private partnerships modality can also be introduced especially in the HDP areas. Policy attention is needed to introduce such interventions.

Patient and clinician perspectives on implant dentistry decision aid content: Results from an enhanced Delphi study.

To investigate patient and clinician perspectives on what is considered important to include in a decision aid for replacement of a missing tooth with an implant. An online modified Delphi method with pair comparisons technique was used to survey participants (66 patients, 48 prosthodontists, 46 periodontists, and 31 oral surgeons) in Ontario, Canada from November 2020 to April 2021 regarding the importance of information provided during an implant consultation. Round one included 19 items derived from the literature and informed consent protocols. The decision to retain an item was based on group consensus, defined as at least 75% of participants identifying the item as "important" or "highly important." After analysis of round one results, a second-round survey was sent to all participants to rank the relative importance of the consensus items. Statistical testing was completed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test and post hoc Mann-Whitney U tests with a significance level set at p≤0.05. The first and second surveys had response rates of 77.0% and 45.6%, respectively. In round one, all items except purpose of steps reached group consensus. In round two, the highest group ranked items were patient responsibilities for treatment success and follow-ups after treatment. The lowest group ranked items were cost factors and restorative steps. Significant differences between the stakeholder groups were found on several items, including diagnosis (p≤0.00), non-implant options (p≤0.00), and cost (p≤0.01). In general, patients' opinions were significantly different than clinicians' opinions on the relative importance of items. Clinicians and patients feel that multiple items are important to include in a decision aid for implant therapy; however, differences exist between patients and clinicians on the relative importance of items.

Management of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer in Catalonia: an expert Delphi consensus.

To reach a consensus on recommendations for the management of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer by a group of Radiation Oncologists in Catalonia dedicated to prostate cancer. A modified Delphi approach was employed to reach consensus on controversial topics in Radiation Oncology on high-risk non-metastatic (eight questions) and post-operative (eight questions) prostate cancer. An agreement of at least 75% was considered as consensus. The survey was electronically sent 6weeks before an expert meeting where topics were reviewed and discussed. A second-round survey for the controversial questions only was sent and answered by participants after the meeting. After the first round of the survey, 19 experienced Radiation Oncologists attended the meeting and 74% fulfilled the second-round online questionnaire. An agreement of 9 of the 16 questions was accounted for the first round. After the meeting, an additional agreement was reached in 3 questions leading to a final consensus on 12 of the 16 questions. There are still controversial topics like the use of PET for staging of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer and the optimal dose to the prostate bed in the salvage setting. This consensus contributes to establish recommendations and a framework to help in prostate cancer radiation therapy and pharmacological management in daily clinical practice of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Identifying Components of Autism Friendly Health Care: An Exploratory Study Using a Modified Delphi Method.

Autistic individuals report lower health care satisfaction. However, there is currently no set of "best practice" standards about caring for autistic individuals. In this exploratory study, we aim to identify features of Autism Friendly practice according to a sample consisting of mainly professionals whose interests include autism using a modified 3-round Delphi-a method that identifies a consensus view across subject participants. Statements about components of an Autism Friendly health care practice were compiled in consultation with the steering committee of an Autism Friendly Initiative at a single, urban academic safety-net hospital. Participants were recruited through our national network of professionals and patients/families mailing list. Examples of invited professionals included researchers, health care workers, and educators. In the first 2 rounds, we distributed electronic surveys to participants, who scored statements from 1 to 9 regarding importance. In round 2, statements that were scored low by all stakeholder groups were eliminated. Seventy-eight participants responded to the first-round survey, and 51 participants responded to the second-round survey. In the third round, 38 participants ranked 16 statements from most to least important. Statements are summarized and presented in the Results section. Topics that emerged from highly ranked statements include environmental/operational modifications (e.g., longer appointment times) and staff training to support autistic patients. Highly ranked statements represented previously reported barriers, including the need for staff training and inclusive engagement with the autistic community. The findings can help inform health care organizations to determine priorities when building an Autism Friendly health care practice.

245 A PILOT STUDY EVALUATING USE AND ACCEPTABILITY OF A NATIONAL AUDIT TOOL AND MANUAL FOR PSYCHOTROPIC MEDICATIONS IN RESIDENTIAL CARE

Abstract Background Psychotropic medications are frequently prescribed for long-term care residents, even though the risks frequently outweigh the benefits. A draft tool was developed for self-audit of the appropriateness of psychotropic medications prescribed for non-cognitive symptoms for people with dementia in Residential-Care Facilities (RCF). Prior to national use, the audit tool, audit manual and training required piloting. Methods The case notes of ten residents with dementia were selected at random within a single RCF. A set of notes were audited by professional staff after online (pre-recorded) audit training, with subsequent feedback by the auditors on the process via focus groups/individual interviews. A second set of notes were then audited, with feedback via a brief survey. Results All auditors (7 nurses, 4 doctors, and 4 therapists) gave feedback via a focus group(n=4) or 1:1 interviews; 7 also completed the second-round survey. The pre-audit online training was welcomed but some auditors required additional support during the audit, especially if inexperienced or if there was a gap between training and audit performance. Improvement suggestions for the audit manual included shortening it; adding a glossary of terms, and additional information for decisions on the appropriateness of “as needed” (PRN) medications. Auditors reported difficulties with reading handwriting, locating information in the chart, and determining if a medication was newly or previously prescribed on occasion (due to inconsistencies with prescribing documentation). Conclusion Overall, the feedback was positive; all reported that the audit was relevant to their practice, and the manual and online training were useful. Future audits could be facilitated by electronic prescriptions, protected time to complete audits, and site audit leads (senior nursing or medical staff who are familiar with the residents, the audit topic, and with performing the audit). Inexperienced auditors should have, in addition to a training session, a supported auditing session.

O25 - Contemporary Maternity Research Priorities for the Nation’s Biggest Health Service: Results of a Delphi Study

Western Australian Country Health Service (WACHS) is one of the world’s largest health service by area. The diversity of resourcing, population density and remote locations results in distinctive challenges and opportunities in the provision of maternity care. The aim of this Delphi study was to establish a collaborative, interdisciplinary evidence-based consensus regarding maternity research priorities across the service. A three-round Delphi survey method was used. Maternity professionals employed by WACHS (including midwives, obstetricians, GP obstetricians, Aboriginal maternity workers, remote area nurses and midwifery managers / leaders) were invited to participate. The first round collected demographic data and had free text fields, encouraging participants to create a list of ideas, problems and opportunities that could be addressed through research. Responses from the first questionnaire were grouped and summarised. A total of 52 key concepts were identified which were classified across five domains: Clinical Care; Aboriginal Health; Workforce and Education, Logistics and Health Systems; and, Health Equity. The second-round survey sought ranking of the importance and perceived priority of each research topic proposed. The top 15 ranked research topics from round two were then circulated to all WACHS maternity professionals in a round three survey and a final priority ranking to guide the focus of future research activities at WACHS was obtained. The final results will be available in May 2022 and will report the first-ever systematic and scientific consensus of maternity research priorities identified by the maternity professionals working in the unique settings presented in rural and remote Western Australia. The Delphi will offer an evidence-informed list of research priorities as identified by WACHS maternity professionals. It is anticipated that the study will enhance engagement, collaboration and enthusiasm within the interdisciplinary maternity team to undertake research locally, potentially, with multi-site collaborations within WA or nationally.

Are Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeons or Classical Open Spine Surgeons More Consistent with Their Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity?

Spine surgeons have a heuristic sense of how to surgically restore alignment and address adult spinal deformity (ASD) symptoms, but consensus on the extent of treatment remains unclear. We sought to determine the variability of surgical approaches in treating ASD. Sixteen spine surgeons were surveyed on treatment approaches in 10 select ASD cases. We repeated the survey with the same surgeons 4 weeks later, with cases ordered differently. We examined the variability in length of construct, use of interbody spacers, osteotomies, and pelvic fixation frequency. Treatment approaches for each case varied by surgeon, with some surgeons opting for long fusion constructs in cases for which others offered no surgery. There was no consensus among surgeons on the number of levels fused, interbody spacer use, or anterior/posterior osteotomies. Intersurgeon and intrasurgeon variability was 48% (kappa= 0.31) and 59% (kappa= 0.44) for surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus 37% (kappa= 0.21) and 47% (kappa= 0.30) for those performing open surgery. In the second-round survey, 8 of 15 (53%) surgeons substantially changed the construct length, number of interbody spacers, and osteotomies in at least half the cases they previously reviewed. Surgeons performing MIS versus open surgery were less likely to extend constructs to the pelvis (42.5% vs. 67.5%; P= 0.02), but construct length was not correlated with whether a surgeon performed MIS or open surgery. Spinal deformity surgeons lack consensus on the optimal surgical approach for treating ASD. Classifying surgeons as performing MIS or open surgery does not mitigate this variability.

An Adaptation of the RAND/UCLA Modified Delphi Panel Method in the Time of COVID-19.

The RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel method is a formal group consensus process that systematically and quantitatively combines expert opinion and evidence by asking panelists to rate, discuss, then re-rate items. The method has been used to develop medical society guidelines, other clinical practice guidelines, disease classification systems, research agendas, and quality improvement interventions. Traditionally, a group of experts meet in person to discuss results of a first-round survey. After the meeting, experts complete a second-round survey used to develop areas of consensus. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this aspect of the method was not possible. As such, we have adapted the method to conduct virtual RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panels. In this study, we present a targeted literature review to describe and summarize the existing evidence on the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi panel method and outline our adaptation for conducting these panels virtually. Transitioning from in-person to virtual meetings was not without challenges, but there have also been unexpected advantages. The method we describe here can be a cost-effective and efficient alternative for researchers and clinicians.

Assessment of structured data elements for social risk factors.

Computable social risk factor phenotypes derived from routinely collected structured electronic health record (EHR) or health information exchange (HIE) data may represent a feasible and robust approach to measuring social factors. This study convened an expert panel to identify and assess the quality of individual EHR and HIE structured data elements that could be used as components in future computable social risk factor phenotypes. Technical expert panel. A 2-round Delphi technique included 17experts with an in-depth knowledge of available EHR and/or HIE data. The first-round identification sessions followed a nominal group approach to generate candidate data elements that may relate to socioeconomics, cultural context, social relationships, and community context. In the second-round survey, panelists rated each data element according to overall data quality and likelihood of systematic differences in quality across populations (ie, bias). Panelists identified a total of 89 structured data elements. About half of the data elements (n = 45) were related to socioeconomic characteristics. The panelists identified a diverse set of data elements. Elements used in reimbursement-related processes were generally rated as higher quality. Panelists noted that several data elements may be subject to implicit bias or reflect biased systems of care, which may limit their utility in measuring social factors. Routinely collected structured data within EHR and HIE systems may reflect patient social risk factors. Identifying and assessing available data elements serves as a foundational step toward developing future computable social factor phenotypes.

Psychometric properties of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale in Chinese typical, subthreshold, and clinically depressed adolescents.

The Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale measures state anhedonia in multiple domains, such as hobbies, food and drink, social activities, and sensory experience, and it has good reliability and validity in adult samples. However, no study has examined the psychometrical properties of this scale in adolescents. The present study examined its reliability and validity in adolescents with and without depression. In Study 1, 988 high-school students completed the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale; 915 completed the second-round survey 3months later. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to determine the factor structure. Additionally, internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and concurrent, convergent, and divergent validity were assessed in typical adolescents. In Study 2, the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale was administrated to 108 patients with major depressive disorder, 108 adolescents with subthreshold depression, and 108 healthy controls. Factor structure and convergent validity were assessed in the clinical and subclinical groups. Finally, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to examine the effect of depression severity on the scale scores. The results of Study 1 indicated that a four-factor model (i.e., hobbies, food and drink, social activities, and sensory experience) best fit the data. Meanwhile, the scale also yielded good concurrent, convergent, and divergent validity, as well as high internal consistency and test-retest reliability, in typical adolescents. In Study 2, goodness-of-fit statistics also suggested a good fit for the four-factor model in the two depressed groups. The one-way ANOVA revealed significant group differences in the total and factor scores, whereby the major depressive disorder group had lower scores than the subthreshold depression group, whose scores were lower than the healthy controls, indicating excellent eligibility of the scale in depressed adolescents. The Chinese version of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale is a reliable and valid instrument to comprehensively measure state anhedonia in Chinese typical and depressed adolescents.