Recent advancements in empirical observations of human psychological responses have revealed that the governing rules of human behavioral aspects can not only be predicted with adequate deterministic precision but also forged into mathematical formulations. These modeling studies enable crisis managers with reliable simulation tools to gain insights into critical facets of crowd disasters and enhance their decision-making abilities to facilitate safe egress in emergency situations. The macroscopic scale of representation in this context is often invoked to comprehend large-scale collective pattern formation in vast built environments, owing to its computational viability. The associated governing equations are typically constructed in a system of hyperbolic conservation law form, and conducting simulations in real-life complex geometric configurations can pose computational challenges. This article puts forward a high-resolution, shock-capturing meshfree particle method in an Eulerian framework for the numerical approximation of several widely adopted macroscopic pedestrian flow models. It serves as a superior alternative to traditional mesh-based methods, eliminating the need for specific mesh structures and connectivity between them. A classical Generalized Finite Difference Method (GFDM) in conjunction with several consistency conditions on spatial derivative coefficients is adopted to obtain a non-oscillatory and fairly conservative Godunov-type discretization of the governing system. The intercell flux is evaluated using a suitable Riemann solver, and a slope-limited reconstruction procedure of the corresponding Riemann states, adapted to arbitrary point distribution, is employed for improved accuracy. Moreover, the preferred direction of human motion is determined from a local density-dependent eikonal-type equation, which is solved using a generalized version of the Fast Marching Method. A thorough numerical investigation of three well-known second-order macroscopic models, namely Payne-Whitham (PW), Aw-Rascle (AR), and Aw-Rascle-Zhang (ARZ) is carried out through two hypothetical scenarios of crowd evacuation, not only to demonstrate the accuracy and applicability of the proposed approach but also to deepen understanding of their distinctive characteristics. A comparison of the flow flux with the fundamental diagram suggests that the density profile obtained with the ARZ model is equivalent to Hughes' first-order model. In contrast, the PW and AR models have proven to effectively replicate complex, unstable pedestrian phenomena such as stop-and-go waves. Finally, Helbing's counter-intuitive idea that strategically positioned barriers upstream of a bottleneck can essentially expedite evacuation is numerically investigated across various parameter choices.