Second-line Agents Research Articles

Management of Status Epilepticus by Different Pediatric Departments: Neurology, Intensive Care, and Emergency Medicine

Introduction: The aim of this study was to explore the differences in status epilepticus (SE) management among pediatric neurology, emergency medicine, and intensive care specialists in Turkey. Methods: A 22-item questionnaire regarding first-, second-, and third-line management strategies of SE including demographic characteristics and common etiologies according to the specialty of participants was mailed to 370 specialists working in Turkey. Results: A total of 334 participants (response rate 90%) comprising 136 pediatric neurologists, 102 pediatric emergency medicine specialists, and 96 pediatric intensive care specialists completed the survey. While intensive care specialists frequently managed SE due to metabolic and autoimmune reasons, the most common etiologies encountered by emergency medicine specialists were epilepsy and infections. More than half of the intensive care specialists (64.6%) reported using non-BZD antiseizure medications in the 5th minute of the seizure. Most of the neurologists (76.4%) preferred to administer intravenous (IV) levetiracetam infusion as a second-line agent. About half of intensive care specialists and neurologists tried immunomodulatory therapies in super-refractory SE. Intensive care and emergency medicine specialists were less likely to favor ketogenic diet and pyridoxine therapy for the treatment of super-refractory SE. The rate of requesting EEG monitoring to recognize nonconvulsive SE (NCSE) was found to be very low except for neurologists. Conclusion: There was no consensus among neurologists, intensive care specialists, and emergency medicine specialists in the management of SE in Turkey. Familiarity with particular antiseizure medications and the etiologies they manage seem to be the most important factors influencing the attitudes.

Comparison of Endophthalmitis Rates after Alcohol-Based Chlorhexidine and Povidone-Iodine Antisepsis for Intravitreal Injections

Intravitreal injections (IVIs) are the most frequently performed intraocular procedure in Canada. Povidone-iodine (PI) is the current gold standard for antisepsis for IVI and is widely used; chlorhexidine (CH) is a possible alternative antiseptic agent. This study aims to compare rates of endophthalmitis after IVI with 0.05% chlorhexidine with a 4% alcohol base antisepsis to rates of endophthalmitis after IVI with 10% PI antisepsis. Retrospective cohort study. Eyes that received IVI between May 2019 and October 2022 at a group retina practice in Edmonton, Canada. Eyes at a single center received focal conjunctival application of either 10% PI antisepsis or 0.05% CH in 4% alcohol antisepsis for 30 seconds before each IVI. Rates of endophthalmitis between the PI and CH groups. A total of 170 952 IVIs were performed during the study period. A total of 31 135 were performed using CH prophylaxis compared with 139 817 with PI prophylaxis. Among all IVIs there were 49 total cases of endophthalmitis, 29 in the PI group (0.021%) and 20 in the CH group (0.064%). There was a statistically significant difference in the rates of endophthalmitis between the 2 groups (P < 0.001). The odds ratio for developing endophthalmitis with CH antisepsis was 3.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.9-5.2) compared with PI antisepsis. There were increased odds of developing endophthalmitis with aflibercept injection compared with bevacizumab (odds ratio, 3.48; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-7.24). There is a statistically significant difference in rates of endophthalmitis between alcohol-based CH and PI antisepsis for IVI in our patient population utilizing the methods discussed. In our center, alcohol-based CH is now considered a second-line antiseptic agent. Further studies are warranted to further assess the endophthalmitis rate utilizing these 2 antiseptic agents. Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Real-World Use of Immunotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and accounts for 90% of all primary liver cancers. Chronic inflammation is the hallmark across most prevalent etiologies among which HBV is the leading cause worldwide (33%), followed by alcohol (30%), HCV (21%), other factors like non-alcoholic steatohepatitis linked to insulin resistance/metabolic syndrome, and obesity associated inflammation (16%). Deregulation of the tightly controlled immunological network leads to liver disease, including chronic infection, autoimmunity, and tumor development. While inflammation drives oncogenesis in the liver, HCC also recruits ICOS+ FOXP3+ Tregs and MDSCs and upregulates immune checkpoints to induce a state of immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. As such, research is focused on targeting and modulating the immune system to treat HCC. The Checkmate 040 and Keynote 224 studies established the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with HCC. In Phase I and II trials, nivolumab and pembrolizumab demonstrated durable response rates of 15-20% and were subsequently approved as second-line agents after sorafenib. Due to the success of the IMbrave 150 and HIMALAYA trials, which examined the combination of atezolizumab/bevacizumab and tremelimumab/durvalumab, respectively, the FDA approved these regimens as first-time treatment options for patients with advanced HCC. The encouraging results of immunotherapy in the management of HCC has led researchers to evaluate if combination with locoregional therapies may result in a synergistic effect. Real-world studies represent an invaluable tool to assess and verify the applicability of clinical trials in the bedside setting with a more varied patient population. We herein review current real-life use of ICIs in the management of HCC and highlight some of the ongoing clinical trials that are expected to change current recommended first-line treatment in the near future.

A comparative overview of SSRI-sertraline and SNRI-desvenlafaxine

Depression is a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest. The common features of all the depressive disorders are sadness, emptiness, or irritable mood, accompanied by somatic and cognitive changes that significantly affect the individual’s capacity to function. Depression is commonly treated in primary care, and SSRI drugs are frequently used as the first line of treatment. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) have the advantage of the ease of dosing and low toxicity in overdose. They are also the first-line medications for late-onset depression. Selective Serotonin and Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs), which include venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, and levomilnacipran can be used as first-line agents, particularly in patients with significant fatigue or pain syndromes associated with the episode of depression. SNRIs also have an important role as second-line agents in patients who have not responded to SSRIs. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, uses, side effects, and contraindications of desvenlafaxine, an SNRI, and sertraline, an SSRI are compared in this article.

The Vasopressin Loading for Refractory septic shock (VALOR) study: a prospective observational study

BackgroundVasopressin is a second-line vasoactive agent for refractory septic shock. Vasopressin loading is not generally performed because of the lack of evidence for its effects and safety. However, based on our previous findings, we hypothesized it can predict the responsibility to vasopressin infusion with safety, and prospectively examined it in the present study.MethodsVasopressin loading was performed via the intravenous administration of a bolus of 1 U, followed by its continuous infusion at 1U/h in patients with septic shock treated with ≥ 0.2 μg/kg/min noradrenaline. An arterial pressure wave analysis was conducted, and endocrinological tests were performed immediately prior to vasopressin loading. We classified patients into responders/non-responders based on mean arterial pressure (MAP) changes after vasopressin loading. Based on our previous findings, the lower tertile of MAP changes was selected as the cut-off. The change in the catecholamine index (CAI) after 6 h was assigned as the primary outcome. Digital ischemia, mesenteric ischemia, and myocardial ischemia during the admission period were prospectively and systematically recorded as adverse events.ResultsNinety-two patients were registered during the study period and examined. Sixty-two patients with a MAP change > 22 mmHg were assigned as responders and the others as non-responders. Blood adrenocorticotropic hormone levels were significantly higher in non-responders. Stroke volume variations were higher in responders before loading, while stroke volume and dP/dtmax were higher in responders after loading. Median CAI changes were − 10 in responders and 0 in non-responders, which was significantly lower in the former (p < 0.0001). AUROC of MAP change with vasopressin loading to predict CAI change < 0 after continuous infusion was 0.843 with sensitivity of 0.92 and specificity of 0.77. Ischemia events were observed in 5 cases (5.4%).ConclusionsVasopressin loading may be safely introduced for septic shock. Vasopressin loading may be used to predict responses to its continuous infusion and select appropriate strategies to increase blood pressure.

Achieving comparability in glycemic control between antidiabetic treatment strategies in pregnancy when using real world data.

Healthcare utilization databases often lack information on glycemic control, a key confounder when studying the safety of antidiabetic treatments, since patients with worse control are channeled to second-line agents, in particular insulin, versus first-line agents such as metformin. We evaluated whether adjustment for measured characteristics attains balance in glycemic control when comparing antidiabetic treatment strategies in pregnant women with pregestational type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In a US insurance claims database, we identified 3360 women with T2DM pregnant between 2004 and 2015, of whom a subset of 996 had data on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ) levels. We selected insulin only as the comparator group and used propensity score (PS)-matching on comorbidities and proxies of diabetes severity, but not on HbA1c , to adjust for confounding. We used standardized differences (st.diff) to assess balance in claims-based covariates and mean HbA1c (% ± SD) in the subset. There were imbalances in claims-based covariates before PS-matching, with smaller differences when both treatment strategies included insulin. After PS-matching, balance was achieved in most claims-based covariates (st.diff <0.1). Mean HbA1c was similar before and after PS-matching when both treatments included insulin (e.g., 7.1 ± 1.5 vs. 7.7 ± 1.8 and 7.1 ± 1.5 vs. 7.5 ± 1.7, respectively, for metformin + insulin vs. insulin only). Differences in mean HbA1c remained after PS-matching when non-insulin treatments were compared to treatments including insulin (e.g., 6.3 ± 1.1 vs. 7.6 ± 1.7 for metformin only vs. insulin only). Balance in both claims-based characteristics and glycemic control was attained after restricting the population to women with T2DM and comparing treatment strategies indicated for patients with similar diabetes severity. When comparing treatment strategies with versus without insulin, differences in glycemic control persisted after PS-matching even when balance was attained for other measured characteristics.

Contemporary trends in the utilization of second-line pharmacological therapies for type 2 diabetes in the United States and the United Kingdom.

To examine trends of second-line glucose-lowering therapies among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating first-line metformin in the United States and the United Kingdom, overall and by subgroups of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and calendar time. Using the US Optum Clinformatics and the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, we identified adults with T2D who initiated first-line metformin or sulphonylurea monotherapy, separately, from 2013 to 2019. Within both cohorts, we identified patterns of second-line medications through June 2021. We stratified patterns by CVD and calendar time to investigate the impact of rapidly evolving treatment guidelines. We identified 148 511 and 169 316 patients initiating treatment with metformin monotherapy in the United States and the United Kingdom, respectively. Throughout the study period, sulphonylureas and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were the most frequently initiated second-line medications in the United States (43.4% and 18.2%, respectively) and the United Kingdom (42.5% and 35.8%, respectively). After 2018, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists were more commonly used as second-line agents in the United States and the United Kingdom, although these agents were not preferentially prescribed among patients with CVD. Initiation of first-line sulphonylureas was much less common, and most sulphonylurea initiators had metformin added as the second-line agent. This international cohort study shows that sulphonylureas remain the most common second-line medications prescribed following metformin in both the United States and the United Kingdom. Despite recommendations, the use of newer glucose-lowering therapies with cardiovascular benefits remains low.

Antimycobacterial pyridine carboxamides: From design to in vivo activity

Tuberculosis is the number one killer of infectious diseases caused by a single microbe, namely Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). The success rate of curing this infection is decreasing due to emerging antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, novel treatments are urgently needed. As an attempt to develop new antituberculars effective against both drugs-sensitive and drug-resistant Mtb, we report the synthesis of a novel series inspired by combining fragments from the first-line agents isoniazid and pyrazinamide (series I) and isoniazid with the second-line agent 4-aminosalicylic acid (series II). We identified compound 10c from series II with selective, potent in vitro antimycobacterial activity against both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant Mtb H37Rv strains with no in vitro or in vivo cytotoxicity. In the murine model of tuberculosis, compound 10c caused a statistically significant decrease in colony-forming units (CFU) in spleen. Despite having a 4-aminosalicylic acid fragment in its structure, biochemical studies showed that compound 10c does not directly affect the folate pathway but rather methionine metabolism. In silico simulations indicated the possibility of binding to mycobacterial methionine-tRNA synthetase. Metabolic study in human liver microsomes revealed that compound 10c does not have any known toxic metabolites and has a half-life of 630 min, overcoming the main drawbacks of isoniazid (toxic metabolites) and 4-aminosalicylic acid (short half-life).

Second-Line Antibiotic Agents in Patient-Reported Penicillin or Cephalosporin Allergy Have No Negative Impact on Antibiotic Resistance After Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to compare causative bacteria and their antibiotic resistance profiles in patients developing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) based on preoperative prophylactic antibiotic regimens in primary total hip (THA) and primary total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (TKA/UKA). MethodsWe reviewed all cases of PJI occurring after primary THA and primary TKA/UKA, between 2011 and 2020 in a tertiary referral hospital. The standard preoperative prophylactic antibiotic for primary joint arthroplasty was cefuroxime and recommended second-line agent was clindamycin. Patients were divided by the replaced joint and analyzed independently. ResultsIn the THA group, culture-positive PJI was detected in 61 of 3,123 (2.0%) cefuroxime-administered cases and 6 of 206 (2.9%) noncefuroxime-administered cases. In the TKA/UKA group, culture positive PJI was identified in 21 of 2,455 (0.9%) cefuroxime-administered cases and in 3 of 211 (1.4%) noncefuroxime administered cases. The most commonly isolated bacteria in both groups were coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS). There were no statistically significant differences of pathogen spectrum depending on the preoperative antibiotic regimen detected. Antibiotic resistance of isolated bacteria was significantly different in 4 of 27 (14.8%) analyzed antibiotics in THA and in 3 of 22 (13.6%) analyzed antibiotics in TKA/UKA. In all cohorts, a high occurrence of oxacillin-resistant CNS (50.0 to 100.0%) and clindamycin-resistant CNS (56.3 to 100.0%) has been observed. ConclusionThe use of the second-line antibiotic did not influence the pathogen spectrum or antibiotic resistance. However, an alarmingly high proportion of CNS strains was resistant to clindamycin.

A study of frontline therapy in adults &gt;80 years with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

12057 Background: AlthoughCLL primarily affects older adults (median age 71 years), limited data exists about the outcomes of adults who are ≥80 years old because they are under-enrolled on clinical trials. Methods: The Mayo Clinic CLL Database was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study of adults ≥80 years at the time of frontline CLL treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to plot OS, and cumulative incidence was used to plot TTNT, accounting for competing risk of death. The Mayo Clinic IRB approved the study. Results: Our study included 216 patients with CLL who were age ≥80 years at the time of frontline CLL therapy between 1/1995 and 11/2022 (Table). The median time from CLL diagnosis to initiation of frontline therapy was 3.1 years. The median OS after start of frontline therapy was 3.9 years. The median OS was 3.3 years (95% CI 2.6–4.2) for patients who received alkylating agents (e.g., chlorambucil, n=96), 3.8 years (95% CI 2.8–not reached [NR]) for purine analogues (e.g., fludarabine, n=11), 3.9 years (95% CI 3.2–4.9) for anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody monotherapy (e.g., obinutuzumab, n=64), and not reached (95% CI 3.3-NR) for novel agents (n=43) (P=0.02). The types of novel agents included ibrutinib (n=19), acalabrutinib (n=16), venetoclax (n=7), and orelabrutinib (n=1). There was no difference in OS between 36 patients who received a BTKi compared to the 7 patients who received venetoclax-based therapy. At a median follow-up time of 6.7 years from the first visit, 143 patients died from the following: progressive CLL (n=63), infections (n=12), other cancer (n=11), non-CLL reasons (n=21). Cause of death was unavailable for 36 patients. On multivariable analyses, older age (i.e., any 5-year increase in age) was associated with a 50% increased risk of death (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.9, p=0.001), and treatment with non-novel agents was associated with 3.2 times increased risk of death (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.2-8.9, p=0.02). Of the 216 patients, 76 patients required second-line therapy; the median TTNT was 4.2 years (95% CI 2.9-NE). The most used second-line agents were monoclonal antibodies alone (20/76, 26%) and single-agent alkylators (18/76, 24%). Conclusions: When compared to all other CLL treatments, novel agents such as BTKi and venetoclax-based treatments are associated with significantly improved OS in patients with CLL ≥80 years old when used in the frontline setting. [Table: see text]

Iron Rim Lesions as a Specific and Prognostic Biomarker of Multiple Sclerosis: 3T-Based Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging.

This study aimed to identify the clinical significance of iron rim lesions (IRLs) in distinguishing multiple sclerosis (MS) from other central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating diseases, determine the relationship between IRLs and disease severity, and understand the long-term dynamic changes in IRLs in MS. We retrospectively evaluated 76 patients with CNS demyelinating diseases. CNS demyelinating diseases were classified into three groups: MS (n = 30), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (n = 23), and other CNS demyelinating diseases (n = 23). MRI images were obtained using conventional 3T MRI including susceptibility-weighted imaging. Sixteen of 76 patients (21.1%) had IRLs. Of the 16 patients with IRLs, 14 were in the MS group (87.5%), indicating that IRLs were significantly specific for MS. In the MS group, patients with IRLs had a significantly higher number of total WMLs, experienced more frequent recurrence, and were treated more with second-line immunosuppressive agents than were patients without IRLs. In addition to IRLs, T1-blackhole lesions were observed more frequently in the MS group than in the other groups. IRLs are specific for MS and could represent a reliable imaging biomarker to improve the diagnosis of MS. Additionally, the presence of IRLs seems to reflect more severe disease progression in MS.

Can Simvastatin Reduce the Need for Immunomodulatory Drugs to Treat Uveitis?: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

To assess the efficacy of simvastatin 80 mg/day versus placebo in patients with noninfectious nonanterior uveitis receiving prednisolone ≥ 10 mg/day. Randomized, double-masked, controlled trial. Adult patients with noninfectious nonanterior uveitis on oral prednisolone dose of ≥ 10 mg/day. Patients were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive either simvastatin 80 mg/day or placebo. A total of 32 patients were enrolled (16 in each arm), all of whom completed the primary end point, and 21 reached the 2-year visit (secondary end points). The primary end point was mean reduction in the daily prednisolone dose at 12 months follow-up. Secondary end points were mean reduction in prednisolone dose at 24 months, percent of patients with a reduction in second-line immunomodulatory agents, time to disease relapse, and adverse events. Our results show that simvastatin 80 mg/day did not have a significant corticosteroid-sparing effect at 12 months (estimate: 3.62; 95% confidence interval [CI]:-8.15 to 15.38; P= 0.54). There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to prednisolone dose or change in dose at 12 and 24 months. There was no difference between the 2 groups in percent of patients with reduction in second-line agent by 24 months. Among patients who achieved disease quiescence, the median time to first relapse was longer for those receiving simvastatin (38 weeks, 95% CI: 14-54) than placebo (14 weeks, 95% CI: 12-52), although this was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in adverse events or serious adverse events between the 2 groups. Simvastatin 80 mg/day did not have an effect on the dose reduction of corticosteroids or conventional immunomodulatory drugs at 1 and 2 years. The results suggest that it may extend the time to disease relapse among those who achieve disease quiescence. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Final Report on Real-World Effectiveness of Sequential Afatinib and Osimertinib in EGFR Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Updated Analysis of the RESET Study.

To report the final analysis of time-on-treatment (TOT) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced-stage EGFR+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received sequential afatinib and osimertinib and to compare the outcomes with other second-line regimens (comparator group). In this updated report, the existing medical records were reviewed and rechecked. TOT and OS were updated and analyzed according to clinical features using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. TOT and OS were compared with those of the comparator group, in which most patients received pemetrexed-based treatments. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate features that could affect survival outcomes. The median observation time was 31.0 months. The follow-up period was extended to 20 months. A total of 401 patients who received first-line afatinib were analyzed (166 with T790M+ and second-line osimertinib, and 235 with unproven T790M and other second-line agents). Median TOTs on afatinib and osimertinib were 15.0 months (95% CI:14.0-16.1) and 11.9 months (95% CI:8.9-14.6), respectively. The median OS in the osimertinib group was 54.3 months (95%CI:46.7-61.9), much longer than that in the comparator group. In patients who received osimertinib, the OS was longest with Del19+ (median 59.1, 95% CI:48.7-69.5). This is one of the largest real-world studies reporting the encouraging activity of sequential afatinib and osimertinib in Asian patients with EGFR+ NSCLC who acquired the T790M mutation, particularly Del19+.

Effect of early vasopressin combined with norepinephrine on short-term mortality in septic shock: A retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database

BackgroundSeptic shock is a leading cause of death in intensive care units (ICUs), with short-term mortality rates of 35–40%. Vasopressin (AVP) is a second-line vasoactive agent for septic shock, and recent studies suggest that early AVP use can be beneficial. However, differences between early initiation of AVP combined with norepinephrine (NE) and nonearly AVP with NE are unclear. A retrospective cohort research was designed to explore the effects of early AVP initiation versus nonearly AVP initiation. MethodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study included adult patients with septic shock from the MIMIC (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care)-IV database. According to whether AVP was used early in the ICU (intensive care unit), patients were assigned to the early- (within 6 h of septic shock onset) and non-early-AVP (at least 6 h after septic shock onset) groups. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were ICU and hospital mortality, the numbers of vasopressor-free and ventilation-free days at 28 days, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score on days 2 and 3, and renal replacement therapy (RRT) use on days 2 and 3. Univariate and multivariate cox proportional-hazards regression, propensity-score matching were used to analyze the differences between the groups. ResultsThe study included 531 patients with septic shock: 331 (62.5%) in the early-AVP group and 200 (37.5%) in the non-early-AVP group. For 1:1 matching, 158 patients in the early-AVP group were matched with the same number of patients with nonearly AVP. Regarding the primary outcome, there was no significant difference between the early- and non-early-AVP groups in 28-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.68–1.24). For the secondary outcomes, there were no differences between the early- and non-early-AVP groups in ICU mortality (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.67–1.35), hospital mortality (HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.69–1.31), the numbers of vasopressor-free and ventilation-free days at 28 days, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, SOFA score on days 2 and 3, and RRT use on days 2 and 3. ConclusionsThere was no difference in short-term mortality between early AVP combined with NE and nonearly AVP with NE in septic shock.

Retrospective review of antimicrobial use for gastroschisis patients in Kigali, Rwanda: can improved stewardship reduce late inpatient deaths?

We identified frequent late deaths, prolonged antibiotic courses, and regular use of second-line antibiotic agents in this retrospective cohort of Rwandan gastroschisis patients. Future studies are needed to evaluate antimicrobial resistance in pediatric surgical patients in Rwanda. • Global disparities in gastroschisis outcomes are extreme, with <4% mortality in high-income settings and 75-100% mortality in low-income settings. • Antimicrobial surveillance data is sparse across Africa, but existing evidence suggests high levels of resistance to first-line antibiotics in Rwanda. • In-hospital survival for gastroschisis was 23% from 2016-2019 and most deaths occurred late (>48hrs after admission) due to sepsis. • Rwandan gastroschisis patients received prolonged courses of antibiotics and second-line antibiotics were frequently used without culture data, raising concern for antimicrobial resistance.

Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem in patients undergoing automated peritoneal dialysis.

Meropenem is a second-line agent for the treatment of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PD peritonitis), while information on pharmacokinetics (PK) of intraperitoneal (i.p.) meropenem is limited in this patient group. The objective of the present evaluation was to assess a pharmacokinetic rationale for the selection of meropenem doses in automated PD (APD) patients based on population PK modelling. Data were available from a PK study in six patients undergoing APD who received a single 500 mg dose of meropenem intravenous or i.p. A population PK model was developed for plasma and dialysate concentrations (n = 360) using Monolix. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to assess the probability of achieving meropenem concentrations above minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 2 and 8 mg/L, representing susceptible and less susceptible pathogens respectively, for at least 40% of the dosing interval (T >MIC ≥ 40%). A two-compartment model for each plasma and dialysate concentrations with one transit compartment for the transfer from plasma to dialysate fluid described the data well. An i.p. dose of 250 and 750 mg, for an MIC of 2 and 8 mg/L respectively, was sufficient to attain the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target (T >MIC ≥ 40%) in more than 90% patients in plasma and dialysate. Additionally, the model predicted that no relevant meropenem accumulation in plasma and/or peritoneal fluid would occur with prolonged treatment. Our results suggest that an i.p. dose of 750 mg daily is optimal for pathogens with an MIC 2-8 mg/L in APD patients.

Adverse effects of hydroxyurea used for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms

Background: Hydroxyurea is administered to control elevated blood counts in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) to reduce the risk of thrombosis and mortality. We reviewed the side effects of hydroxyurea, development of secondary malignancies, and drug resistance observed in some patients.Current Concepts: The low incidences of malformed births, intrauterine deaths, and spontaneous abortions associated with hydroxyurea therapy suggest that adverse pregnancy and fetal effects are unlikely. However, animal studies have reported malformations; therefore, the use of hydroxyurea during pregnancy is not recommended. Low-grade adverse events associated with hydroxyurea therapy include gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, upper gastrointestinal discomfort, and diarrhea. These symptoms are usually resolved by dose adjustment or temporary discontinuation. Approximately 10% of patients with MPNs are resistant to hydroxyurea, and another 10% are unable to tolerate it owing to side effects. Drug intolerance and resistance are the most common causes of inadequate cytoreductive control in patients with MPNs. Second-line cytoreductive agents should be considered to overcome the high risk of thrombosis and poor survival. The evolution to secondary hematologic cancers is related to the duration of the disease, not hydroxyurea administration.Discussion and Conclusion: In pregnant patients accidentally exposed to hydroxyurea, the risk should be discussed with the patient to determine whether to continue the pregnancy. Hydroxyurea administration increases the risk of skin cancer but does not affect the incidence of other secondary hematologic or solid cancers. Ropeginterferon or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including ruxolitinib, are recommended as alternative treatments if the patient is intolerant or resistant to hydroxyurea, as this is associated with poorer survival.

Tacrolimus for the Management of Delayed Onset and Treatment-Refractory Immune-Related Hepatitis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as pembrolizumab, are effective in the management of metastatic malignancies, such as melanoma, and are associated with a spectrum of immune-related organ toxicities, including immune-related hepatitis (ir-hepatitis). The clinical presentation of ir-hepatitis varies in onset and severity, and management involves immunosuppression with corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil as first and second-line agents. Several agents have been proposed as third-line options for treatment-refractory disease. We report the successful use of tacrolimus for delayed onset and treatment-refractory ir-hepatitis secondary to pembrolizumab.

MarR-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation of mmpSL5 Induces Ethionamide Resistance in Mycobacterium abscessus.

Mycobacterium abscessus (Mabs) is an emerging nontuberculosis mycobacterial (NTM) pathogen responsible for a wide variety of respiratory and cutaneous infections that are difficult to treat with standard antibacterial therapy. Mabs has a high degree of both innate and acquired antibiotic resistance to most clinically relevant drugs, including standard anti-mycobacterial agents. Ethionamide (ETH), an inhibitor of mycolic acid biosynthesis, is currently utilized as a second-line agent for treating multidrug-resistant tuberculosis infections. Here, we show that ETH displays activity against clinical strains of Mabs in vitro at concentrations that are >100× lower than other mycolic acid targeting drugs. Using transposon mutagenesis followed by transposon sequencing (Tn-Seq) and whole-genome sequencing of spontaneous ETH-resistant mutants, we identified MAB_2648c as a genetic determinant of ETH sensitivity in Mabs. MAB_2648c encodes a MarR family transcriptional regulator of the TetR class of regulators. We show that MAB_2648c represses expression of MAB_2649 (mmpS5) and MAB_2650 (mmpL5). Further, we show that derepression of these genes in MAB_2648c mutants confers resistance to ETH, but not other antibiotics. To identify determinants of resistance that may be shared across antibiotics with distinct mechanisms of action, we also performed Tn-Seq during treatment with amikacin and clarithromycin, drugs currently used clinically to treat Mabs. We found very little overlap in genes that modulate the sensitivity of Mabs to all three antibiotics, suggesting a high degree of specificity for resistance mechanisms in this emerging pathogen.

Incidence of Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients without Human Immunodeficiency Virus on Intravenous Pentamidine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) is a first-line Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) prophylaxis agent, but monthly intravenous pentamidine (IVP) is used in immunocompromised hosts without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection because IVP is not associated with cytopenia and delayed engraftment. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate breakthrough PCP incidence and adverse reactions in HIV-uninfected immunocompromised patients receiving IVP. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception until 15 December 2022. The pooled incidence of breakthrough PCP with IVP was 0.7% (95% CI, 0.3-1.4%, 16 studies, 3025 patients) and was similar when used as first-line prophylaxis (0.5%; 95% CI, 0.2-1.4%, 7 studies, 752 patients). The pooled incidence of adverse reactions was 11.3% (95% CI, 6.7-18.6%, 14 studies, 2068 patients). The pooled adverse event-related discontinuation was 3.7% (95% CI, 1.8-7.3%, 11 studies, 1802 patients), but was lower in patients receiving IVP monthly (2.0%; 95% CI 0.7-5.7%, 7 studies, 1182 patients). Monthly IVP is an appropriate second-line agent for PCP prophylaxis in certain non-HIV immunocompromised hosts, especially in patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Using IVP for PCP prophylaxis as an alternative to oral TMP-SMX while patients are unable to tolerate enteral medication administration is feasible.