Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence Program Research Articles

Geopolitical Implications of a Successful SETI Program

We discuss the recent “realpolitik” analysis of Wisian and Traphagan (2020) of the potential geopolitical fallout of the success of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI). They conclude that “passive” SETI involves an underexplored yet significant risk. This is the risk that, in the event of a successful, passive detection of extraterrestrial technology, state-level actors could seek to gain an information monopoly on communications with an extraterrestrial intelligence. These attempts could lead to international conflict and potentially disastrous consequences. In response to this possibility, they argue that scientists and facilities engaged in SETI should preemptively engage in significant security protocols to forestall this risk. We find several flaws in their analysis. While we do not dispute that a realpolitik response is possible, we uncover concerns with Wisian and Traphagan's presentation of the realpolitik paradigm, and we argue that sufficient reason is not given to justify treating this potential scenario as action-guiding over other candidate geopolitical responses. Furthermore, even if one assumes that a realpolitik response is the most relevant geopolitical response, we show that it is highly unlikely that a nation could successfully monopolize communication with ETI. Instead, the real threat that the authors identify is based on the perception by state actors that an information monopoly is likely. However, as we show, this perception is based on an overly narrow contact scenario. Overall, we critique Wisian and Traphagan's argument and resulting recommendations on technical, political, and ethical grounds. Ultimately, we find that not only are Wisian and Traphagan's recommendations unlikely to work, they may also precipitate the very ills that they foresee. As an alternative to the Wisian and Traphagan recommendations, we recommend transparency and data sharing (which are consistent with currently accepted best practices), further development of postdetection protocols, and better education of policymakers in this space.

Art, anatomy, and the stars: Russell and Séguin’s dinosauroid1

It takes a bold, innovative mind to publish an exercise in speculative evolution pertaining to an alternative timeline. Dale Russell’s studies of the troodontid Stenonychosaurus and of ornithomimid theropods, published in 1969 and 1972, inspired him to consider the possibility that some theropod dinosaur lineages might have given rise to big-brained species had they never died out. By late 1980, Russell had considered the invention of a hypothetical descendant of Stenonychosaurus dubbed the “dinosauroid”. There is likely no specific inspiration for the dinosauroid given Russell’s overlapping areas of interest, but his correspondence with Carl Sagan and his involvement in the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence program were likely of special influence. The early-1980s creation of a life-size Stenonychosaurus model with Ron Séguin gave Russell the impetus to bring the dinosauroid to life. Authors have disagreed on whether the dinosauroid’s creation was an exercise in scientific extrapolation or one of speculative fiction, and on whether its form reflects bias or an honest experiment: Russell justified his decisions on the basis of the dinosauroid’s anatomy being adaptive and linked to efficiency, but he also stated or implied that the human form may be considered a predictable evolutionary outcome among big-brained organisms, and expressed a preference for directionist views that posit humans as close to the pinnacle of evolution. Both derided and praised at the time of its construction, the dinosauroid is undergoing a resurgence of interest. Given that its aim was to spark discussion and invite alternative solutions, it can only be considered an extraordinary success.

Lick Observatory Optical SETI: Targeted Search and New Directions

Lick Observatory's Optical SETI (search for extraterrestrial intelligence) program has been in regular operation for 4.5 years. We have observed 4,605 stars of spectral types F-M within 200 light-years of Earth. Occasionally, we have appended objects of special interest, such as stars with known planetary systems. We have observed 14 candidate signals ("triple coincidences"), all but one of which are explained by transient local difficulties. Additional observations of the remaining candidate have failed to confirm arriving pulse events. We now plan to proceed in a more economical manner by operating in an unattended drift scan mode. Between operational and equipment modifications, efficiency will more than double.

The impact of gravitational microlensing on searches for extraterrestrial intelligence at optical wavelengths

The search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) at optical wavelengths counts photons from target stars. The rationale is that the number of photons received from a solar-type star in a nanosecond is typically much less than unity and that an excess number of photons may be indicative of a laser pulse from a technological civilization. Extreme magnification gravitational microlensing is a possible contaminant to optical SETI programs as it would increase the photon rate and could masquerade as an optical pulse. We show that extreme magnification gravitational microlensing is unimportant, both because the required amplifications are difficult to obtain and because the time scales are too large. This conclusion holds both for the case of background stars in the field of view of the target star and from objects (such as planets) orbiting the target star.

Pros and cons in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence

I propose a new term, ‘galactic organism with distinct intelligence’, for the extraterrestrial forms, with which humans can make contact. This is because, among the three existing terms: (a) ‘the search for extraterrestrial intelligence#x02019; ‘excludes biology and is inelegant#x02019; (b) ‘extraterrestrial#x02019; does not distinguish between the micro-organisms and highly-evolved intelligent life-forms; and (c) 'unidentified flying object' projects a sense of mysticism. On the presence of galactic organisms with distinct intelligence, scientists belong to three camps. Astronomers, physicists and some biochemists belong to the believers group. Evolutionists are in the doubters category. The third camp is represented by the ‘uncommitted#x02019;. Approaches for contacting galactic organisms with distinct intelligence would take three steps. These are: (a) radioastronomical observations in the galaxy and interstellar space for the presence of organic matter; (b) initiating radio contact and listening to any transmitted message, as set out by the search for extraterrestrial intelligence program, and (c) landing instruments and humans in the galaxy.

The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence and the Nasa High Resolution Microwave Survey (HRMS): Historical perspectives

The modern era of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI), which began with the paper of Cocconi and Morrison in 1959, reached a landmark with the inauguration of NASA's High Resolution Microwave Survey (HRMS) in 1992. SETI programs stand in the tradition of humanity's quest for its place in the Universe, and seek to test whether cosmic evolution results in widespread intelligence in our Galaxy. This paper reviews the history of the modern SETI era, with emphasis on the development of the NASA SETI program.

SETI and the media: Views from inside and out

Results are presented from a detailed questionnaire sent to members of the international SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) community and the international science media. Both groups are compared on the following dimensions: perceived importance of SETI, perceived level of information about SETI available to the media and public, perceived credibility of SETI, and attitudes toward information policy options to govern an announcement of a SETI discovery. The results indicate that SETI is perceived to be an extremely important endeavor, but it enjoys only marginal credibility among the public and the SETI community's professional constituencies. Both the SETI community and the media agree that an erroneous announcement of a discovery of extraterrestrial intelligence could be very damaging. In order to minimize the dangers of false announcement and to bring a degree of order to SETI, a scientific protocol agreement and the establishment of a contact verification committee have been recommended. Both received endorsement from the SETI community and the international science media. The science media feels that from its viewpoint, a contact verification committee would be a more effective way of assuring accurate information about SETI programs and discoveries.

As Bad as Things are for Radio Astronomy in the Protected Bands -- They are Worse for SETI!

ABSTRACTIf the funding that has been requested in NASA’s FY89 budget is forthcoming, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) will inaugurate its microwave search program on Columbus Day, 1992. This systematic search for evidence of narrowband microwave signals generated by another technology will continue at several sites around the world until at least 1998. The search will be conducted in two modes: a sensitive targeted search of selected solar type stars covering 1 to 3 GHz, and an all sky survey that covers 1 to 10 GHz. This region of the spectrum is the quietest in terms of natural background noise from astrophysical sources and/or the terrestrial atmosphere, which is why it was chosen. Unfortunately, at the same time that terrestrial technology has enabled this systematic search, it also threatens to render the search all but impossible from the surface of the Earth. Terrestrial transmissions generated for an enormous number of different purposes will be the signals most frequently detected by the SETI systems! This paper describes the design decisions and observing plans that the SETI Program is now making in order to have a chance of successfully “listening” throujgh this heavily utilized portion of the spectrum. We do not yet know precisely how heroic our efforts to discriminate against and identify RFI may have to be, but we have been accumulating observational experience and data that demonstrate convincingly that the situation is rapidly growing worse. Because of the real-time nature of the signal processing being planned, SETI systems will provide an excellent opportunity to monitor, and perhaps identify, sources of narrowband interference within the radio astronomy bands at each site where observations are being conducted.

A wide-band high-resolution spectrum analyzer.

This paper describes a two-million-channel 40-MHz-bandwidth, digital spectrum analyzer under development at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The analyzer system will serve as a prototype processor for the sky survey portion of NASA's Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence program and for other applications in the Deep Space Network. The analyzer digitizes an analog input, performs a 2(21)-point, Discrete Fourier Transform, accumulates the output power, normalizes the output to remove frequency-dependent gain, and automates simple signal detection algorithms. Due to its built-in frequency-domain processing functions and configuration flexibility, the analyzer is a very powerful tool for real-time signal analysis and detection.

Finding a Needle in a Haystack When You've Never Seen a Needle: A Human Factors Analysis of Seti

An analysis of some key human factors aspects of NASA's SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) program is presented. The results of some preliminary studies in human discrimination and recognition of patterns embedded in gaussian noise fields where the nature of the signal is unknown are discussed. A strategy for employing human pattern recognition capabilities in the SETI context, or in similar applications where signal attributes cannot be determined apriori, is offered.