ABSTRACT Based on narrative interviews with Syrian refugees arriving in Europe via the Mediterranean Sea, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the decision-making processes involved in migration. It explores the interplay between the subjective factors such as risk perception and desire experienced by Syirans who took risky sea crossings. The primary analytical approach involves comparing the judgment of risk in one's own realized migration versus the potential migration of others. Participants who successfully crossed the sea and arrived in Europe considered their decisions valid, yet they would not recommend the same path to others. This contradiction can be explained by the significant role that the desire for a life change played in their decision-making, as it influenced their own risk assessment but was absent in their assessment of risk for others. The study further suggests that decision-making in risky migration is not solely about weighing the risks of staying versus leaving. Rather, it involves evaluating the worth of a desired life transformation against the perceived risks associated with the migratory journey.