Sea Lice Abundance Research Articles

THE OCCURRENCE OF LEPEOPHTHEIRUS SALMONIS AND CALIGUS CLEMENSI (COPEPODA: CALIGIDAE) ON THREE-SPINE STICKLEBACK GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS IN COASTAL BRITISH COLUMBIA

Infections with sea lice species belonging to Lepeophtheirus and Caligus are reported from examinations of 1,309 three-spine sticklebacks collected in coastal British Columbia. Over 97% of the 19,960 Lepeophtheirus specimens and nearly 96% of the 2,340 Caligus specimens were in the copepodid and chalimus developmental stages. The parasites were identified as Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus clemensi based on morphology of adult stages. Between 1,763 and 1,766 base pairs (bp) of 18S rDNA from adult specimens collected from sticklebacks and salmon differed from the GenBank L. salmonis reference sequence by a single bp and were distinct from those of 2 other Lepeophtheirus species. A 530-bp region of 18S rDNA from chalimus stages of Lepeophtheirus obtained from sticklebacks and salmon was identical to that of the L. salmonis reference sequence. The three-spine stickleback is a new host record for L. salmonis. The prevalence of L. salmonis was 83.6% and that of C. clemensi was 42.8%. The intensities of these infections were 18.3 and 4.2, respectively. There was no significant relationship between sea lice abundance and stickleback condition factor. Significant spatial and temporal variations both in abundance of sea lice and surface seawater salinities were measured. The abundance of both sea lice species was lowest in zones in which surface seawater salinity was also lowest. Sticklebacks appear to serve as temporary hosts, suggesting a role of this host in the epizootiology of L. salmonis. The stickleback may be a useful sentinel species with which to monitor spatial and temporal changes in the abundance of L. salmonis and C. clemensi.

Temporal stability of sea louse Lepeophtheirus salmonis Krøyer populations on Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. of wild, farm and hybrid parentage

Atlantic salmon salmo salar smolts of wild, hybrid and farmed parentage were individually tagged then reared in a sea cage for 8 months. The fish were sampled three times during this period. On all occasions, farmed Atlantic salmon displayed the highest abundance and density of sea lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis, whilst no significant differences were observed between hybrid and wild Atlantic salmon. Percentage variation between the lowest and highest infected groups was as high as 175 and 144% for L. salmonis abundance and density respectively (sample 2). The temporal stability of interindividual sea lice infection levels was investigated pair‐wise between samples using correlation (sample 1 v. 2, 1 v. 3 and 2 v. 3). When calculated using sea louse abundance, correlations ranged from r2 = 0·11, P < 0·01 to r2 = 0·39, P < 0·001, but, when the effects of fish size were controlled for by converting abundance to density, all correlations were < r2 = 0·1. Therefore, these data indicate that a fish‘s relative infection level in one sample was a weak predictor of its relative infection level in another sample. This suggests that identification of individual Atlantic salmon that display reduced susceptibility to sea lice, may be problematic.

Response of the Sea Louse <em>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</em> Infestation Levels on Juvenile Wild Pink, <em>Oncorhynchus gorbuscha</em>, and Chum, <em>O. keta</em>, Salmon to Arrival of Parasitized Wild Adult Pink Salmon

Recent recurring infestations of Sea Lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis, on juvenile Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) and subsequent annual declines of these stocks have made it imperative to identify the source of Sea Lice. While several studies now identify farm salmon populations as sources of Sea Louse larvae, it is unclear to what extent wild salmonid hosts also contribute Sea Lice. We measured Sea Louse numbers on adult Pink Salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) migrating inshore. We also measured Sea Louse numbers on wild juvenile Pink and Chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) migrating to sea before the adults returned, and as the two age cohorts mingled. Adult Pink Salmon carried an average of 9.89 (SE 0.90) gravid lice per fish, and thus were capable of infecting the adjacent juveniles. Salinity and temperature remained favourable to Sea Louse reproduction throughout the study. However, all accepted measures of Sea Louse infestation failed to show significant increase on the juvenile salmon, either in overall abundance of Sea Lice or of the initial infective-stage juvenile lice, while the adult wild salmon were present in the study area. This study suggests that even during periods of peak interaction, wild adult salmon are not the primary source of the recent and unprecedented infestations of Sea Lice on juvenile Pacific Pink and Chum salmon in the inshore waters of British Columbia.

Sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) infection rates on juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum (Oncorhynchus keta) salmon in the nearshore marine environment of British Columbia, Canada

This study compared sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) infestation rates on juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum (Oncorhynchus keta) salmon in five nearshore areas of the British Columbia coast selected on the basis of proximity to salmon farms. A 10-week study in the Broughton Archipelago found sea lice were 8.8 times more abundant on wild fish near farms holding adult salmon and 5.0 times more abundant on wild fish near farms holding smolts than in areas distant from salmon farms. We found that 90% of juvenile pink and chum salmon sampled near salmon farms in the Broughton Archipelago were infected with more than 1.6 lice·(g host mass)–1, a proposed lethal limit when the lice reach mobile stages. Sea lice abundance was near zero in all areas without salmon farms. Salinity and temperature differences could not account for the higher infestation rates near the fish farms. The most immature life stages dominated the lice population throughout the study, suggesting the source of lice was a stationary, local salmonid population. No such wild population could be identified. The evidence from this control–impact study points to a relationship between salmon farms and sea lice on adjacent, wild, juvenile salmon.