Screw Cut-out Research Articles

Comparison of Twin Screw Derotation Type Versus Single Helical Blade Type Cephalomedullary Nail in Trochanteric Fractures in Geriatric Population.

Introduction The aim of this study was to compare the usage of two devices, the twin screw derotation typeand the helical blade type, in intertrochanteric fractures in the geriatric population at a tertiary-level center. Methods Forty-six eligible patients with intertrochanteric fractures operated with the standard proximal femoral nail (PFN) or proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA2) were included for analysis. This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data over the study period. Demographics, various operative parameters, outcome parameters, and complications were assessed. Medical management of osteoporosis was provided to all patients. The student t-test and chi-square test were used with SPSS V22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) for statistical analysis. Results The mean follow-up was 14 months. The hospital stay and Harris hip score were similar in both groups, but the radiation exposure, surgical time, and blood loss were significantly less in the case of PFNA2. Screw cut-out was also not observed in our study. Conclusion Both PFNA2 and PFN are effective in treating unstable trochanteric fractures in terms of functional outcomes. However, PFNA2 is better because it requires less radiation exposure (p<0.05) due to single guidewire use, a short learning curve, less blood loss, shorter surgical time(p<0.05), and fewer complications. We suggest it to be the preferred implant in trochanteric fractures in the geriatric population and other age groups.

Dynamic hip screw with stabilization plate in unstable intertrochanteric fractures: a case series

Background: Unstable intertrochanteric fractures represent about 60% of all trochanteric fractures. Dynamic hip screw alone in an unstable fracture pattern has a high failure rate of about 50%. Proximal femoral nail is technically a difficult surgery and has complications including nail failure, femoral shaft fracture, malreduction, screw cut-out, and nonunion. Putting a buttress like a trochanteric-stabilization plate acts as a support to the dynamic hip screw and gives good lateral wall buttress, which prevents excessive shaft medialization. Methods: Twenty-one patients with closed unstable trochanteric fractures were treated by dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilization plate. Results: According to the modified Harris Hip Scoring system, 11 patients had excellent results, five patients had good results, four patients had fair results, and one patient had a poor result. Conclusions: The dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilization plate provides a stable construct for unstable intertrochanteric fractures as it gives a good lateral wall buttress which prevents excessive fracture collapse, femoral shaft medialization, and consecutive limb shortening. It effectively supports the unstable greater trochanteric fragment and can maintain the lever arm with adequate abductor strength. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Testing of an enhanced leaf model for improved dose calculation in a commercial treatment planning system.

With the ever-increasing complexity of dynamic radiotherapy treatments, dose calculation algorithms are challenged to accurately calculate the dose resulting from small, on- and off-axis multileaf collimator (MLC) aperture movements. Although the currently available Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto) dose calculation algorithms still use a simplified, binary MLC model, a more advanced and detailed modeling of the MLC could be beneficial for the dose calculation precision of high-end treatments. To improve the modeling of the MLC in the dose calculation algorithms of the Eclipse treatment planning system, an enhanced MLC attenuation model was constructed through ray tracing through the actual leaf designs for the most commonly used Varian MLC types. The enhanced leaf model (ELM) thus includes the rounded leaf tip shape, the drive screw cutout, and the leaf body thickness. The purpose of this work is to test out this new model and explore possible improvements compared to the previous model. Dose calculations were performed in a research Eclipse environment equipped with the original and enhanced MLC model. Measurements were performed on TrueBeam and on Halcyon dual MLC treatment units. Dedicated static and dynamic MLC test plans were designed to challenge the dose calculation and highlight differences between both models while keeping the experimental setup simple in order to minimize measurement uncertainties. Measurements were performed with single ion chambers, 2D ion chamber arrays and film. The improved MLC model considerably improves the accuracy of the dose calculation for the test fields used in this study. For the TrueBeam MLC, improvements are most prominent for off-axis dose delivery through narrow (static or dynamic) MLC gaps. For 3mm narrow sweeping gap deliveries at 12cm off-axis, the advanced model agrees within 2% with the measurement, in contrast to the 12% deviation observed with the original MLC model. For the Halcyon MLC, improvements are especially prominent when the leaves of both MLC stacks are aligned, regardless of their position in the field. Sweeping gap measurements improve from a 7%-10% deviation with the original model to within 2% with the new model. Although test fields designed in this study emphasize the flaws in the original MLC dose calculation model, the enhanced MLC model resolves all of the observed discrepancies, showing excellent on- and off-axis agreements with all of the performed measurements.

Outcomes of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures treated with cement-augmented proximal femoral nail

Background/Aim: Implant failure due to poor bone quality in osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures increases mortality and morbidity, leading to secondary surgery and complications in patients. Our study aims to evaluate the early functional and radiologic outcomes and complications of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures using a cement-augmented proximal femoral nail design. Methods: This case series included 24 patients AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen type 31-A2.2 in 10 patients, A2.3 in 7 patients, 31-A3.1 in 4 patients, and A3.2 in 3 patients). Proximal femoral nail cement augmentation was invariably accomplished by injecting polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement into the femoral head. The clinical outcome was rated using the Harris Hip Score (HSS) at the time of the final follow-up. The results were recorded as excellent (score &gt;90), decent (score 89–70), and poor (score 70–0). Radiographs were reviewed for implant failure and union. Implant failure was defined as lag screw cut-out or perforation. Results: The average age of our sample was 73.8 (6.9) years, And the mean follow-up time was 13.6 months. In all patients, union was accomplished. Implant failure and cut-out were not observed in any of the patients. The average Harris score at the final follow-up was 80.6. According to the HSS, four patients had excellent, 15 had good, and 5 had poor functional results. Conclusion: Cement-augmented femoral nails can be used safely with a low complication rate in osteoporotic intertrochanteric femur fractures. In future studies, controlled studies should be conducted for this nail design.

A Novel Technique for Treatment of Metaphyseal Voids in Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients.

Background and Objectives: The treatment of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients is challenging, with reported high complication rates mostly related to implant failure involving screw cut-out and penetration. Metaphyseal defects are common in osteoporotic bone and weaken the osteosynthesis construct. A novel technique for augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement was developed for the treatment of patients in advanced age with complex proximal humerus fractures and metaphyseal voids, whereby the cement was allowed to partially cure for 5–7 min after mixing to achieve medium viscosity, and then it was manually placed into the defect through the traumatic lateral window with a volume of 4–6 mL per patient. The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to assess this technique versus autologous bone graft augmentation and no augmentation. Materials and Methods: The outcomes of 120 patients with plated Neer three- and four-part fractures, assigned to groups of 63 cases with no augmentation, 28 with bone graft augmentation and 29 with cement augmentation, were assessed in this study. DASH, CS, pain scores and range of motion were analyzed at 3, 6 and 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed with factors for treatment and age groups, Neer fracture types and follow-up periods, and with the consideration of age as a covariate. Results: DASH and CS improved following cement augmentation at three and six months compared to bone grafting, being significant when correcting for age as a covariate (p ≤ 0.007). While the age group had a significant effect on both these scores with worsened values at a higher age for non-augmented and grafted patients (p ≤ 0.044), this was not the case for cement augmented patients (p ≥ 0.128). Cement augmentation demonstrated good clinical results at 12 months with a mean DASH of 10.21 and mean CS percentage of 84.83% versus the contralateral side, not being significantly different among the techniques (p ≥ 0.372), despite the cement augmented group representing the older population with more four-part fractures. There were no concerning adverse events specifically related to the novel technique. Conclusions: This study has detailed a novel technique for the treatment of metaphyseal defects with PMMA cement augmentation in elderly patients with complex proximal humerus fractures and follow-up to one year, whereby the cement was allowed to partially cure to achieve medium viscosity, and then it was manually placed into the defect through the traumatic lateral window. The results demonstrate clinically equivalent short-term results to 6 months compared to augmentation with bone graft or no augmentation—despite the patient group being older and with a higher rate of more severe fracture patterns. The technique appears to be safe with no specifically related adverse events and can be added in the surgeon’s armamentarium for the treatment of these difficult to manage fractures.

Risk Factor of Proximal Lag Screw Cut-Out After Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation in Trochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Retrospective Analytic Study

Objective: A cephalomedullary nail is the treatment of choice for trochanteric fractures; however, a lag screw cutout is one of the most devastating complications. The lag screw cut-out rate was reported to be around 2.5%–8.3%. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of lag screw cut-outs and identify the associated risk factors.Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of 267 trochanteric fracture patients treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation from January 2007 to December 2017 was conducted. The demographic variables were documented, comprising age, gender, fracture pattern, and AO/OTA classification. Immediate postoperative radiographs were assessed for quality of reduction and implant position. Lag screw cut-outs or radiographic union were determined using the final follow-up radiograph. Prognostic factors associated with lag screw cut-out were determined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.Results: Of the 175 patients, 154 were successfully treated, and 21 had a lag screw cut-out. There were no significant differences in mean ages or genders of the union and cut-out groups. No lag screw cut-outs were observed in patients with AO/OTA 31-A1. Patients with AO/OTA 31-B2.1 had a higher rate of screw cut-out (OR 10.5, [3.22, 34.25] p &lt; .001). The disintegration of basicervical fragments was significantly associated with lag screw cut-out (OR 5.51, [2.01, 15.12] p = .001). The highest cut-out rate was found in the superoanterior and superoposterior positions of the lag screw. However, the screw position did not reach the significance level in a multivariate analysis (p = .094).Conclusion: The prevalence of lag screw cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation for trochanteric fractures was 12%. A simple, two-part, basicervical trochanteric fracture hads a significantly higher risk of lag screw cut-out.

Biomechanical comparison between various screw fixation angles for Latarjet procedure: a cadaveric biomechanical study.

The Latarjet procedure is a reliable treatment for the management of anterior glenohumeral instability with glenoid bone loss. However, the biomechanical properties of different fixation angles between screw and glenoid surface (α angle) have rarely been studied. The aim of the study was to investigate and compare the fixation stability, failure load, and failure mechanism between different α angles for Latarjet procedures, which were performed on cadaver specimens. Twenty-four shoulder specimens (8 in each of 3 groups) were dissected free of all soft tissue, and a 25% glenoid defect was created. The coracoid process was osteomized and fixed with 2 screws at 3 different α angles: 0° (group A), 15° (group B), and 30° (group C). Specimens were mounted to a testing apparatus, and cyclic loading (100 cycles at 1Hz) was applied with a staircase protocol (50, 100, 150, and 200N). Gross graft displacement and interface displacement were measured. The ultimate failure loads and failure mechanisms were recorded. There was no significant difference in gross displacement under any cyclic load between 3 groups. However, a significant larger interface displacement was noted in group C than in group A in 150-N cyclic loading (P=.017). Under failure strength testing, all 24 specimens failed because of screw cutout from the glenoid, and the ultimate failure load was similar among the three groups. Compared with the 0° α angle, the displacement after cyclic loading did not significantly increase when the α angle was increased to 15° but significantly increased at 30° for Latarjet procedures, which were performed on cadaver specimens. The results suggest that surgeons should apply the screws as parallel as possible to the glenoid surface when performing the Latarjet procedure. Although mild deviation may not reduce fixation stability, α angles greater than 30° should be avoided.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Cemented or Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty for Failed Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Following Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: A Retrospective Observational Study.

IntroductionThe aim of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical outcomes of cemented or uncemented total hip arthroplasty (CTHA or UTHA) following prior failed proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) fixation in patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures (IFFs).Materials and methodsData from 244 patients with IFFs who experienced a conversion of PFNA to CTHA (n = 120) or to UTHA (n = 124) due to screw cut-out, mal/nonunion, or osteonecrosis during 2008-2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up occurred 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter. The primary outcome was the incidence of orthopedic complications; the secondary outcome was the Harris hip score (HHS).ResultsThe median follow-up was 60 months (range, 50-67 months). The incidences of orthopedic complications were 10% in the PFNA to CTHA group and 19.3% in the PFNA to UTHA group (P = .040). Significant differences were also observed regarding the incidence of prosthesis revision (1.7% for PFNA to CTHA vs 7.2% for PFNA to UTHA, P = .036). From the three years after conversion surgery to the final follow-up, significant differences were detected in HHS between groups (each P < .05). At the final follow-up, a statistically significant difference was detected in the HHS (79.54±18.85 for PFNA to CTHA vs. 75.26±18.27 for PFNA to UTHA, P = .014).ConclusionThe results of the study may demonstrate a significant statistical advantage with respect to the orthopedic complication rate and HHS in favor of CTHA compared to UTHA in patients with failed PFNA.

Locking in trochanteric fractures: a comparison of static versus dynamic locking using the Gamma3 nail.

The Gamma3 nail (Stryker®) is an intramedullary device consisting of a proximal lag screw and distal interlocking screw. It is still unknown whether the screw locking mode could influence clinical outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare static and dynamic screw locking regarding their influence on surgical revisions and lag screw displacement. A retrospective single-centre study was performed on patients ≥ 60years admitted for a trochanteric fracture between September 2016 and January 2020. Surgical revisions and lag screw displacement were evaluated at6 weeks and 1-year follow-up, respectively. A total of 142 patients were included for analysis. Surgical revisions were needed in 13 cases (9.2%). Indications included implant breakage (n = 3), lag screw cut-out (n = 3), lateral hip pain (n = 6) and non-union (n = 1). The number of surgical revisions was not different between static and dynamic locking (OR 2.55; 95%CI 0.73-8.56; p 0.142). The median lag screw displacement was 2.5mm, which was similar for static and dynamic locking (2.3mm versus 2.7mm; p 0.785). The screw locking mode of the Gamma3 nail is not associated with a higher risk of surgical revisions. However, the design of the Gamma3 nail may not be suitable for static locking.

Comparison of Dynamic Versus Static Lag Screw Modes for Short Cephalomedullary Nails in the Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose: To compare the static locked and sliding proximal lag screw modes of short cephalomedullary nail in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: Ninety-four patients (age&gt;60 years) with low energy unstable intertrochanteric fractures were randomized for treatment into two groups. They were treated with static and sliding proximal lag screw modes of short cephalomedullary nail. The pre-operative variables, operative time, fluoroscopy time, blood loss, tip apex distance, and reduction quality were recorded for each patient. Post-operative follow-ups were undertaken every other week until bone union or implant failure occurred. Plain anteroposterior and lateral radiographs (both hip) were obtained at all visits. Ipsilateral leg length discrepancy (LLD), radiographic union score for hip complications, and fixation failure were recorded. Results: The mean follow-up time was 16.7 months (range 12–24). The mean bone union times of static locked (n=35) and sliding proximal (n=34) screw mode groups were 12.4 weeks and more than 11.2 weeks, respectively; the difference was not significant (p=0.213). The ipsilateral LLD of the sliding proximal (mean 4 mm) and static locked (mean 2 mm) screw mode groups showed a statistically significant difference (p&lt;0.001). Post-operative complications (lag screw perforated to hip joint, lag screw cutout from the femoral head, and excessive inferolateral lag screw sliding) developed in 8.82% patients in sliding proximal group, whereas, no complications were reported in the static locked group. Conclusions: Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture using static locked proximal lag screw mode of cephalomedullary nail showed some advantages over sliding proximal lag screw in terms of less complication and ipsilateral LLD; however, the bone union times were not different. Therefore, a static locked proximal screw mode is preferable over sliding proximal screw mode in treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Comparison Between Femoral Neck Systems and Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.

BackgroundWe performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of the femoral neck system (FNS) with cannulated cancellous screws (CCSs) in treating femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in controlled clinical trials.MethodsEligible scientific articles published prior to September 2021 were retrieved from the PubMed, Web of Science, Springer, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library databases. The statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.1.ResultsSeven retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that there were significant differences in perioperative blood loss, the postoperative Harris score, healing time, fluoroscopy frequency, total complications, femoral head necrosis, femoral neck shortening and screw cutout. No significant differences were found regarding operation time, length of hospital stay or nonunion between the two groups.ConclusionCompared with CCSs, the FNS showed better clinical efficacy and fewer complications in treating FNFs. Due to the limited quality and data of the currently available evidence, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed.

Trabecular Bone Remodeling as a New Indicator of Osteointegration After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Retrospective cohort study. We newly found that trabecular bone remodeling (TBR) often appeared in the fixed adjacent vertebrae during bony fusion. Thus, TBR might indicate osteointegration. Hence, we aimed to investigate whether TBR in the early postoperative period could predict future bony fusion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). We retrospectively analyzed 78 patients who underwent one-level PLIF. Demographic data were reviewed. Using computed tomography (CT) images taken at 3months and 1year postoperatively, we investigated the vertebral endplate cyst (VEC) formation, TBR in the vertebral body, cage subsidence, and clear zone around pedicle screw (CZPS). TBR had high interobserver reliability regardless of cage materials. VECs, TBR, and both were found in 30, 53, and 16 patients at 3months postoperatively and in 30, 65, and 22 patients at 1year postoperatively, respectively. The incidence of VEC, which indicates poor fixation, was lower in early (3months postoperatively) TBR-positive patients, with a significant difference at 1year postoperatively (3months, P = .074; 1year, P = .003). Furthermore, 3 (5.7%) of the 53 early TBR-positive patients had CZPS without instability at 1year postoperatively. In 25 TBR-negative patients, 1 (4.0%) had pedicle screw cutout requiring reoperation, 1 (4.0%) had pseudarthrosis, and 4 (16%) had CZPS. Patients with early TBR (3months) did not experience pedicle screw cutout nor pseudarthrosis and had significantly fewer VECs than those without early TBR. Thus, TBR may be a new radiological marker of initial fixation after PLIF.

Postoperative subtype P as a risk factor for excessive postoperative sliding of cephalomedullary nail in femoral trochanteric fractures in old patients: A case series of 263 patients using computed tomography analysis

IntroductionAlthough excellent results of cephalomedullary nailing for femoral trochanteric fractures have been reported, excessive sliding has recently been noted as a cause of lag screw cut-out. Excessive sliding is reported as sliding of ≥8mm, which occurs in approximately 40%of cases. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for excessive sliding. Patients and MethodsOverall, 551 patients who underwent cephalomedullary nail surgery between 2016 and 2021 were recruited. Patients aged ≥65 years who underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT), experienced low-energy trauma, and received follow-up for >4 months were included. Cases were retrospectively reviewed for their postoperative sliding distance and the percentage of excessive sliding (>8 mm). 3D-CT classification, reduction pattern (subtypes A, N, and P) in the lateral view, medullary mismatch, and implant type (short/long Gamma3 nail and INTERTAN) were investigated fortheirimpact on sliding distance andtheincidence of excessive sliding. Complication rates (lag screw cut-out and non-union) were also assessed. ResultsOverall, 263 patients (mean age, 84.0±7.4; 186 women) were recruited. The median (range) sliding distance was 3.5 (0–20) mm, and 42 cases (16.0%) had excessive sliding. Sliding distance was significantly smaller in the 2-fragment group than in the 3-fragment group (GP+GA and GP+L) (p=0.02); however, there were no significant differences between the 2-fragment and other fracture-type groups, including the 3-fragment group (GP, GA, GP ± GA, GP ± L), 4-fragmentgroup(GP/L, GP ± L/GA, GP±GA/L), and 5-fragmentgroup. There was no significant difference in sliding distance according to postoperative reduction type between the groups (p=0.83) and no correlation between medullary mismatch and sliding distance. The amount of sliding and rate of excessive sliding were significantly lower in the INTERTAN group than in the Gamma3 nail groups (p<0.01). Logistic regression analysis with excessive sliding as the variable revealed reduction type P as the only risk factor (p=0.024, odds ratio 2.99). There were three lag screw cut-out (1.1%) cases and one non-union (0.4%) case. ConclusionsPostoperative subtype P is a risk factor for excessive sliding; there was significantly less sliding in the INTERTAN nail group. It is necessary to avoid reduction to subtype P to prevent postoperative excessive sliding.Level of Evidence: IV

Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study

The choices of the treatments for femoral neck fractures (FNF) remain controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognoses of the variable pitch fully threaded headless cannulated screws (HCS) in the fixation of femoral neck fractures and to compare them with those of partially threaded cannulated screws (PCS). Between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2016, there were 89 patients with the main diagnose of FNF who accepted the treatment of closed reduction cannulated screw fixation in Peking University People’s Hospital. 34 cases of PCS and 23 cases of HCS met the criterion. The characteristics, prognoses and the imaging changes of all cases were described and the differences between the two groups were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). Mann–Whitney U test, Analysis of Variance and Chi-square test were used. Statistical significance was defined as P value (two sided) less than 0.05. There was no significant difference in the general characteristics, fracture classifications and reduction quality between the two groups. HCS group had a significant lower angle decrease rate (30.4% vs. 58.8%, P = 0.035), femoral neck shortening rate (26.1% vs. 52.9%, P = 0.044) and screw back-sliding rate (21.7% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.032), but a higher screw cut-out rate (21.7% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.008). In non-displacement fracture subgroup, HCS had significant higher Harris Score (92 vs. 90, P = 0.048). Compared with PCS, HCS had a lower screw back-sliding rate, femoral shortening rate, angle decrease rate and similar function score, but would result in more screw cut-outs in displaced FNF. As a conclusion, HCS should not be used in displaced FNF due to its higher screw cut-out rate, and its potential advantage in non-displaced FNF needs to be further proved. Further qualified investigations with a larger scale of patients and longer follow-up are needed in the future.

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MANAGEMENT AND CLINICAL OUTCOME OF INTRAMEDULLARY VERSUS EXTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION FOR UNSTABLE INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES

Introduction: Surgery is the common therapy for intertrochanteric fractures as this fracture takes a long time to heal on its own. Open reduction and internal xation (ORIF) is one of the surgical treatments for this fracture (4). Based on the location and type of the fracture different kinds of xation devices are used. However, the best repairing method for intertrochanteric fractures is still controversial. To Evaluate Aim And Objective: functional outcome and Compare the result of treatment with intramedullary (PFN) versus extramedullary (DHS and PFLCP) xation for unstable intertrochantric fracture. In this prospective study from March 2018 to October 2019, 40 conse Methodology: cutive patients with unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures having an unstable pattern, of either sex were randomized by computer generated tables to undergo xation with either Intramedullary and extramedullary xation.A detailed history and clinical examination was done in a systemic manner and noted on a specially designed proforma. Plain radiographs were obtained on admission and all fractures categorized according to AO/ASIF. In Result: intramedullary group the mean blood loss was 142.5 ml whereas in DHS group it was 330 ml and PFLCP group it was 415 ml. In intramedullary group 5% subjects had wound infection, In DHS group 10% subjects each had malunion, wound infection and screw cutout, whereas in PFLCP group 2(20%) subjects each had wound infection and screw cutout. in unstable intertrochante Conclusion: ric fractures, the intramedullary xation has signicantly better outcome in terms of early restoration of walking ability, shorter operative time, a smaller incision and less blood loss during surgery as compare to extramedullary xation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Cut-out risk factor analysis after intramedullary nailing for the treatment of extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur: a retrospective study

BackgroundsThe basic method of surgical treatment for extracapsular hip fractures (ECFs), including intertrochanteric fracture and basicervical fracture (BCF), is osteosynthesis. Intramedullary nails are among the most commonly used fixation devices for these fractures. Our study aimed to report the clinical outcomes of ECF treatment with two different nail devices and to analyze the risk factors associated with screw cut-out.Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 273 patients (300 cases) from a single institution who underwent surgical treatment for ECF between January 2013 and October 2018. Overall, 138 patients were eligible for the study and were divided into two groups according to the osteosynthesis device used. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of fracture surgery and performed univariate and multivariate regression analyses to identify risk factors associated with screw cut-out in each group.ResultsWe used proximal femoral nails (group 1) to treat 83 patients and cephalomedullary nails (group 2) to treat 55 patients. Nine cut-outs (group 1, 6 cases; group 2, 3 cases) occurred during follow-up. The patients’ high body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.019), BCFs (p = 0.007), non-extramedullary reduction in the anteroposterior and lateral planes (p = 0.032 and p = 0.043, respectively), and anti-rotation screw pull-outs (p = 0.041) showed a positive correlation to screw cut-out in the univariate analysis of group 1. In group 2, only BCFs was positively correlated (p = 0.020). In the multivariate analysis of group 1, the patients’ BMIs (p = 0.024) and BCFs (p = 0.024) showed a positive correlation with cut-out. Meanwhile, the multivariate analysis of group 2 did not identify any factors associated with cut-out.ConclusionsThe cut-out risk was significantly higher in the BCF cases, regardless of the nail design used. Considerable attention should be paid to treating such unstable fractures. We expect that new-generation nails using a helical blade, or interlocking derotation and interlocking screws may improve surgical outcomes.

Pertrochanteric hip fracture fixation with 3 hole and 4 hole dhs side plates - A retrospective patient record review

Introduction: Dynamic hip screw fixation (DHS) with a 4-hole side plate and 4 bi-cortical screws is considered by many to be the standard implant for extracapsular hip fractures. The 4-hole side plate, however, has several disadvantages including longer incision, increase in operating time, bleeding and increased wound morbidity. Biomechanical studies have shown that most of the force in a 4-hole DHS fixation is borne by the proximal three screws. This study (specifically) compares the outcome of fixation using 3-hole and 4-hole DHS in extracapsular hip fracture fixations (with the hypothesis being that 3-hole plate is adequate even in unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Patients and Methods: A total of 72 consecutive patients who had DHS fixation with either a 3 hole or 4 hole DHS side plate and who were either directly operated or supervised by a single consultant were recruited. Fractures were classified using the AO fracture classification system as stable (AO/OTA 31A1–31A2.1) and unstable (31A2.2–31A3.3 subtypes) for ease of comparison. Failure was defined as metalwork breakage, nonunion, screw cut-out or pull out or any other complications of bone healing requiring a revision. Results: A total of 23 patients (68.1%) were female, whereas 49 patients (31.9%) were male. Fractures in 33 patients were classified as stable with the (AO/OTA 31A1–31A2.1) and unstable in 39 patients with (31A2.2–31A3.3 subtypes). Thirty-three (45.8%) patients had fixation with 3-hole side plate, whereas 39 (55.2%) patients had fixation with 4-hole side plate. In the 3 hole group, 17 patients had stable fractures, whereas 16 patients had unstable fracture configuration while in the 4-hole DHS side plate group, 16 patients had stable fracture configuration, whereas 23 patients had unstable fracture. The mean change in hemoglobin was lower for the 3-hole DHS group (3 hole-6.64 g/l versus 4Hole 12.41 g/l) (t = 1.732, P = 0.090, P ≤ 0.05). One patient in each group also had metalwork failure with screw cut-out through the head and the other being (screw breakage) complete failure of the screw necessitating conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Conclusion: Three-hole DHS plate offers comparable outcome with its 4-hole counterpart even with unstable intertrochanteric fractures, with slightly less blood loss and smaller scars.

ANTEGRADE NAILING VERSUS LOCKING PLATE OF 2-AND 3-PART PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURES.

To evaluate and compare the proportions of complications and radiographic findings of osteosynthesis of 2- and 3-part proximal humerus fractures with two methods of treatment: third-generation antegrade nailing and locking plate. 46 patients with a mean age of 58.9 ± 16.6 years between January 2020 and January 2021 were evaluated. In sixteen cases (34.8%), antegrade nailing was used, and in thirty cases (65, 2%), a locking proximal humerus plate. The method used included the rate of complications with a minimum follow-up of 6 months after surgery and radiographic evaluation. There was no difference between the groups regarding the proportion of complications (nail group 18.8%, plate group 13.3%; p = 0.681). The nail group had less residual varus loss (cervicodiaphyseal angle nail group with 132.1º ± 2.3º, plate group 123.8º ± 10.1º; p < 0.001). In the plate group, women had the lowest value (1.43 ± 0.22) of the deltoid tuberosity index (DTI) compared to men (1.58 ± 0.11) (p = 0.022). Osteosynthesis, with a locking plate and antegrade nailing, did not show differences in the proportion of complications. The nail group had less change in the postoperative cervicodiaphyseal angle, however, there were two serious complications with screw cut-out and varus deviation, requiring surgical reapproach. Level of Evidence II, Retrospective Observational Study.

Sliding Hip Screw and Side Plate for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

The sliding hip screw procedure can be divided into (1) preoperative planning; (2) patient positioning; (3) C-arm setup; (4) closed reduction of fracture; (5) sterile preparation and draping; (6) lateral hip approach; (7) guide pin insertion; (8) triple-reaming the proximal aspect of the femur; (9) sliding hip screw insertion into the femoral neck and head; (10) side plate insertion, engaging the sliding hip screw, and fixation to the femur; (11) lag compression screw insertion (if appropriate); and (12) final fluoroscopic images and wound closure. Intertrochanteric hip fractures must be surgically treated to avoid morbidity and increased risk of mortality. Nonoperative treatment is occasionally indicated in nonambulatory patients or those with high perioperative risk. If treated surgically, a common alternative implant option includes the intramedullary nail. Finally, for severely comminuted fractures or failed internal fixation, total hip arthroplasty may be necessary. Sliding hip screws are as effective as intramedullary nails and often less costly6. In general, the quality of fracture reduction is more critical than the choice of implant7. A prospective study found no significant difference in walking ability with either sliding hip screws or intramedullary nails for stable intertrochanteric fractures8. By 6 months, the majority of fractures will have healed; according to a prospective randomized study, 91% of stable fractures and 85% of unstable fractures had achieved radiographic union by that time9. Another study showed radiographically healed fractures in all 106 patients treated with sliding hip screws at median follow-up of 13.6 months8. Watch out for comminution of the greater or lesser trochanter, which may require supplemental fixation.Prior to completely reflecting the vastus lateralis muscle, control the bleeding from any perforators with use of 2-0 silk ties. This prevents recurrent bleeding, which often occurs if only cautery is utilized to coagulate these vessels.Utilize a 4.5-mm drill hole in the lateral cortex of the femur in order to allow for minor adjustments of the anterior femoral neck guide pin; otherwise, the pin will be held tightly and continue to be bound in the same direction by the lateral cortex on repeated attempts.If the guide pin is inadvertently withdrawn along with the reamer after reaming, a lag screw may be placed backward in the newly reamed hole and the guide pin passed back through the lag screw to reposition it.Extracapsular hip fractures should be carefully scrutinized for signs of instability, such as lateral wall comminution or reverse obliquity. The fracture may displace posteriorly when the patient is supine on the fracture table.While placing the guidewire, multiple entry attempts can weaken the lateral cortex and propagate the fracture into the subtrochanteric region.Superior placement of the lag screw results in poor tip-apex distance and a higher chance of screw cut-out.Be careful to prevent guidewire penetration into the hip joint.Loss of reduction or femoral head malrotation may occur during lag screw insertion. AP = anteroposteriorfx's = fracturesIMN = intramedullary nailIV = intravenousPDS = polydioxanone sutureSHS = sliding hip screwTFL = tensor fascia lata.

One size may not fit all: patient-specific computational optimization of locking plates for improved proximal humerus fracture fixation.

Optimal treatment options for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are still debated because of persisting high fixation failure rates experienced with locking plates. Optimization of the implants and development of patient-specific designs may help improve the primary fixation stability of PHFs and reduce the rate of mechanical failures. Optimizing the screw orientations in locking plates has shown promising results; however, the potential benefit of subject-specific designs has not been explored yet. The purpose of this study was to evaluate by means of finite element (FE) analyses whether subject-specific optimization of the screw orientations in a fixed-angle locking plate can reduce the predicted cutout failure risk in unstable3-part fractures. FE models of 19 low-density proximal humeri were generated from high-resolution computed tomographic images using a previously developed and validated computational osteosynthesis framework. The specimens were virtually osteotomized to simulate unstable malreduced 3-part fractures and fixed with the PHILOS plates using 6 proximal locking screws. The average principal compressive strain in cylindrical bone regions around the screw tips-a biomechanically validated surrogate for the risk of cyclic screw cutout failure-was defined as the main outcome measure. The angles of the 6 proximal locking screws were optimized via parametric analysis for each humerus individually, resulting in subject-specific screw orientations (SSO). The average peri-implant strains of the SSO were statistically compared with the previously reported cohort-specific (CSO) and original PHILOS screw orientations (PSO) for females vs. males. The optimized SSO significantly reduced the peri-screw bone strain vs. CSO (6.8% ± 4.0%, P = .006) and PSO (25.24% ± 7.93%, P < .001), indicating lower cutout risk for subject-specific configurations. The benefits of SSO vs. PSO were significantly higher for women than men. The findings of this study suggest that subject-specific optimization of the locking screw orientations could lead to lower cutout risk and improved PHF fixation. These computer simulation results require biomechanical and clinical corroboration. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether the potential benefit in stability could justify the increased efforts related to implementation of individualized implants. Nevertheless, computational exploration of the biomechanical factors influencing the outcome of fracture fixations could help better understand the fixation failures and reduce their incidence.