Emergency Department Screening Research Articles

Previous exposure to violence among emergency department patients without trauma-related complaints: A cross sectional analysis

IntroductionThe Emergency Department (ED) is a critical setting for the treatment of acute violence-related complaints and violent victimization is associated with numerous long-term negative health outcomes. A trauma-informed care framework can prevent re-traumatization of victims within the healthcare setting, but currently there are insufficient mechanisms to detect previous exposures to community violence within the ED. The current study sought to determine the prevalence of community violence and characterize the types of violence exposures among adult ED patients without trauma-related complaints to determine if there may be a need for expanded screening for previous exposure to violence for ED patients. MethodsThis was a prospective cross-sectional observational study of adult ED patients without a trauma-related chief complaint at an urban public hospital. Adult patients were approached by trained research staff and answered questions adapted from the Survey of Exposure to Community Violence (SECV), which measures lifetime exposure to community violence, including both witnessing and victimization. The SECV was modified for clarity, brevity, and to assess exposure to violence within the previous 3 months and 3 years from enrollment, in addition to lifetime exposure. Enrollment occurred from June 2019 to September 2022 with a 19-month gap due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Demographics and results within SECV domains were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Comparisons between males and females in types of violence experienced during one's lifetime were made by fitting logistic regression models adjusting for age. ResultsA total of 222 respondents completed some or all of the modified SECV. Ages ranged from 19 to 88, with 47.7% of respondents identifying as female and 50.9% as male. Of all respondents, 43.7% reported directly witnessing violence during their lifetime, 69.4% being personally victimized by violence, and 55.4% personally knowing someone killed by a violent act. Of those personally victimized, 47.4% occurred within the preceding 3 years and 20.1% within 3 months. Among all respondents, lifetime victimization was reported in the following domains: slapping, hitting, or punching (45.9%); robbings or muggings (33.8%); physical threats (28.8%); verbal or emotional abuse (27.5%); being shot at (18.0%); uncomfortable physical touch (15.3%); forced entry while home (14.4%); sexual assault, molestation, or rape (13.5%); or being attacked with a knife (13.5%). Comparing male and female respondents, 63.5% of females and 76.6% of males reported any violent victimization over their lifetime (aOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.04–3.43). Additionally, 31.7% of females and 56.3% of males reported witnessing violence (aOR 2.86; 95% CI 1.64–5.06). Males were more commonly exposed to physical violence, violence with weapons, and threats while females more commonly reported sexual assault, molestation, and rape. ConclusionBoth lifetime and recent exposure to community violence was common among adult ED patients without trauma-related complaints. Broader adoption of a trauma-informed care framework and the development of efficient ED screening tools for previous exposure to trauma is reasonable in areas where community violence exposure is highly prevalent.

Child physical abuse screening in a pediatric ED; Does TRAIN(ing) Help?

BackgroundChild maltreatment is distressingly prevalent yet remains under-recognized by healthcare providers. In 2015 the Ohio Children's Hospital Association developed the Timely Recognition of Abusive INjuries (TRAIN) collaborative in an effort to promote child physical abuse (CPA) screening. Our institution implemented the TRAIN initiative in 2019. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of the TRAIN initiative at this institution.MethodsIn this retrospective chart review we recorded the incidence of sentinel injuries (SIS) in children presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) of an independent level 2 pediatric trauma center. SIS were defined and identified by a diagnosis of ecchymosis, contusion, fracture, head injury, intracranial hemorrhage, abdominal trauma, open wound, laceration, abrasion, oropharyngeal injury, genital injury, intoxication, or burn in a child < 6.01 months of age. Patients were stratified into pre-TRAIN (PRE), 1/2017–9/2018, or post-TRAIN (POST), 10/2019–7/2020, periods. Repeat injury was defined as a subsequent visit for any of the previously mentioned diagnoses within 12 months of the initial visit. Demographics/visit characteristics were analyzed using Chi square analysis, Fischer’s exact test, and student’s paired t-test.ResultsIn the PRE period, 12,812 ED visits were made by children < 6.01 months old; 2.8% of these visits were made by patients with SIS. In the POST period there were 5,372 ED visits, 2.6% involved SIS (p = .4). The rate of skeletal surveys performed on patients with SIS increased from 17.1% in the PRE period to 27.2% in the POST period (p = .01). The positivity rate of skeletal surveys in the PRE versus POST period was 18.9% and 26.3% respectively (p = .45). Repeat injury rates did not differ significantly in patients with SIS pre- versus post-TRAIN (p = .44).ConclusionImplementation of TRAIN at this institution appears to be associated with increased skeletal survey rates.

COVID-19 Screening in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

Screening for COVID-19 infection in pediatrics is challenging as its clinical presentation may be asymptomatic or mimic other common childhood infections. We examined the use of a COVID-19 screening protocol (CSP) in the pediatric emergency department (PED) to determine the incidence of positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests in patients who are CSP+ and CSP-. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2 testing completed in an urban tertiary care PED from November 1 to December 31, 2020. Demographics, CSP designation, test results, and disposition were compared. Statistical significance was determined using chi-square or a comparison of means. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. A total of 1,613 patients had SARS-CoV-2 tests completed with 9.1% (N=147) having positive test results.Of 1,014 (62.9%) patients who were CSP+, 12.9% tested positive. Comparatively, 599 (37.1%) patients were CSP- with only 2.7% positive tests, p<0.0001.The sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of the CSP in all tested patients were 89.1%, 39.8%, 97.3%, and 12.9%, respectively. Of tested patients, 887 (55.0%) were admitted to the hospital and were more likely to be positive if CSP+, p≤0.001. Within the admitted group, 16.8% were admitted to the operating room, of whom 83.9% were CSP- with 4.0% testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 screening in the pediatric population is a useful modality to risk stratify most patients presenting to the PED for the purpose of selective testing and guiding personal protective equipment use. This may be particularly useful in low-resource settings.

Missed opportunities for diagnosis of HIV in the emergency department using non-risk-based testing strategy.

The objective of this study was to identify the number of missed opportunities (MO) for humanimmunodeficiencyvirus(HIV) diagnoses within our emergency departments (EDs) and assess any significant associated patient characteristics. Following current Centers for Disease Control guidelines, an opt-out HIV screening program was implemented in 2 of 7 EDs within a large Southern healthcare system. This study sought to differentiate the risk of MO in opt-out compared to clinician-initiated, risk-based ED screening protocols. A retrospective analysis was conducted from August 2019 to March 2022 of adult patients (≥18 years old) screened for HIV, comparing the ED screening method and characterization of all MOs. MO was defined as any ED visit, before HIV seropositivity, that included sexually transmitted infection screening and/or treatment with no HIV screening. Two EDs implemented generalized opt-out screening for all adult patients (>18years old); whereas, the remaining 5 sites relied on clinician-initiated screening. Patient characteristics associated with an MO were evaluated by χ2, t tests, and multivariable logistic regression. In total, 19,423 patients were screened for HIV, 142 of who tested positive. Of the 142 HIV-positive individuals, 12 (8.5%) had 1 MO and 3 of 12 (25%) had 2. The proportion of patients with a MO was significantly higher at clinician-initiated EDs as compared opt-out EDs (41.7%vs 13.9%, P=0.01). After adjusting for demographics, individuals seen at clinician-initiated EDs were more likely to have a MO compared opt-out EDs (adjusted odds ratio, 4.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-18.27; P=0.02). This novel study highlights the success and overall high positivity (0.7%) of an ED-based opt-out screening program. Taken together, the implementation of generalized opt-out screening within a large Southern healthcare system can rapidly increase overall screening, uncover a surprisingly high positivity rate, and decrease MOs for HIV diagnosis.

192 - Pediatric ED saves: analyzing the emergency department screen of direct admissions

192 - Pediatric ED saves: analyzing the emergency department screen of direct admissions

Routine, Opt-Out, Emergency Department Syphilis Testing Increases HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Uptake.

Many people vulnerable to HIV do not perceive themselves at risk or consider preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). This study hypothesizes that syphilis diagnosis through universal, emergency department (ED) screening would increase PrEP uptake. This prospective cohort study enrolled patients tested for syphilis through ED screening between July 2019 and July 2021. Participants completed a survey about behaviors, HIV and PrEP knowledge, and opinions at the time of enrollment. All were offered PrEP if they met Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for PrEP use. Information about PrEP use and HIV status was collected 6 months later. Bivariate analysis was used to compare outcomes between groups testing positive versus negative for syphilis. The study enrolled 97 participants, 49 with syphilis and 48 testing negative. Overall, 11 (11.3%) started PrEP, all in the syphilis group, despite 28 (58.3%) in the negative group having indications for PrEP. Participants with syphilis less frequently reported low perceived HIV risk than syphilis-negative participants who reported HIV transmission behaviors (83.7% vs. 92.9%). Participants reporting moderate to high HIV risk perception were significantly more likely to start PrEP (odds ratio, 10.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-78.1; P = 0.02). At 6 months, 3 participants remained on PrEP (follow-up data available for 63.5% of PrEP-eligible participants). Syphilis diagnosis was associated with increased perception of HIV risk and increased PrEP initiation. Individuals who otherwise might not seek testing for syphilis because of perceived low risk may be identified through routine screening, thus providing an important opportunity to link more people to HIV prevention and PrEP services.

Impact of an Emergency Department Isolation Policy for Patients With Suspected COVID-19 on Door-to-Electrocardiography Time and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Rapid electrocardiography diagnosis within 10 minutes of presentation is critical for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients in the emergency department (ED). However, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has significantly impacted the emergency care system. Screening for COVID-19 symptoms and implementing isolation policies in EDs may delay the door-to-electrocardiography (DTE) time. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 1,458 AMI patients who presented to a single ED in South Korea from January 2019 to December 2021. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic and ED isolation policies on DTE time and clinical outcomes. We found that the mean DTE time increased significantly from 5.5 to 11.9 minutes (P < 0.01) in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients and 22.3 to 26.7 minutes (P < 0.01) in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Isolated patients had a longer mean DTE time compared to non-isolated patients in both STEMI (9.2 vs. 24.4 minutes) and NSTEMI (22.4 vs. 61.7 minutes) groups (P < 0.01). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the effect of COVID-19 duration on DTE ≥ 10 minutes was 1.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.51-2.47), and the aOR for isolation status was 5.62 (95% CI, 3.54-8.93) in all patients. We did not find a significant association between in-hospital mortality and the duration of COVID-19 (aOR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.52-1.56) or isolation status (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 0.71-3.68). Our study showed that ED screening or isolation policies in response to the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to delays in DTE time. Timely evaluation and treatment of emergency patients during pandemics are essential to prevent potential delays that may impact their clinical outcomes.

Mobile Social Screening and Referral Intervention in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

Many families in pediatric emergency departments (PED) have unmet social needs, which may be detected and addressed with the use of a digital social needs intervention. Our objective was to characterize the feasibility and effectiveness of utilizing personal phones or a PED tablet for screening and referral to social services. We conducted a prospective single-arm intervention study using a convenience sample of caregivers and adult patients in an urban PED between May 2019 and October 2020. Participants chose either their personal phone or a PED-provided tablet to use an app, "HelpSteps." Participants self-selected need(s) then referrals to service agencies. Participants completed a 1-month follow-up. Clinicians were surveyed about screening and impact on visit. Of 266 participants enrolled, 55% of participants elected to use their personal phone. Of all participants, 67% self-selected at least 1 health-related social need; 34% selected 3 or more. The top 3 "most important" needs were housing (14%), education (12%), and fitness (12%). At one month follow-up, 44% of participants reported their top need was "completely" or "somewhat" solved. For 95% of encounters, clinicians reported the intervention did not increase length of stay. A mobile social needs intervention was feasible and effective at identifying and referring participants in the PED setting. While more than half of participants used their personal phones, several smartphone owners cited barriers and elected to use a tablet. Overall, participants found the app easy to use, appropriate for the PED, and the intervention had minimal impact on clinical flow.

2083. HIV Testing Rates in NC Emergency Departments Before and During Covid Mitigation

Abstract Background During the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, non-emergent services were limited or suspended in multiple ways. Restrictions in primary care may have limited STI testing, such as HIV, where timely access to testing and care is critical to mitigation efforts. Conversely, Emergency Departments (ED) operated with fewer restrictions and more in-person options. Even though patient census numbers decreased in some areas from those seen pre-covid lockdown, EDs and hospitals often became overwhelmed with patients seeking care for both severe acute illness but just importantly services that might normally have been received in outpatient settings. Methods Observational study of HIV screening year-over-year in four EDs that are part of a large healthcare system located in the Southeast. Screenings of individuals 18 and over seen in the EDs were normalized per 1000 patients. Rates were also compared to two primary care clinics, located in the same metropolitan area, serving mainly Medicaid and uninsured patients. Results From March 2019 through February 2020 there were 33.47 tests per 1000 patients at two community clinics and 7.79 tests per 1000 patient at four EDs located in the same region during that span. From March 2020 to February 2021, screening numbers in the primary care clinics dropped to an average of 22.7/1000; however, screenings in the ED remained stable and slightly increased to 10.7/1000. From March 2021 to February 2022, screenings in the primary care clinics returned to an average 36.9/1000 with screenings in the ED still above pre-covid levels at 9.48/1000. These trends in the ED screening remained consistent across gender, race, and ethnicity. Patient census at four ED sites located in the southwestern region of North Carolina dropped significantly during the first year of physical distancing covid-19 mitigation measures when compared to the two years prior. These census numbers increased during the second year of covid-19 but failed to return to previous levels. During the first year of physical distancing covid-19 mitigation measures HIV testing rates in the emergency department remained constant, and even increased in more urban areas, despite the significant decrease in overall patient census. Conclusion With the observation that HIV screening decreased in primary care settings during the beginning of the covid-19 pandemic, there exists the possibility that new HIV infections may yet remain undiagnosed. That HIV testing remained constant in the ED, however, reinforces the importance of having embedded procedures in place for screening and linking both newly positive and at-risk patients into care to help mitigate the HIV epidemic. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Improving detection of undiagnosed HIV through routine screening in a central London emergency department

HIV is a global public health issue. Routine testing for HIV should be performed on all 16–59 years old attending emergency departments (EDs) in high-prevalence areas in the UK.In August...

Obesity screening in the pediatric emergency department – A missed opportunity?

ObjectivesThere is a low rate of body mass index measurements and obesity screening in primary pediatric care. Pediatric emergency department (PED) visits, with their large volumes and routine weight measurements, provide a unique opportunity to identify and address obesity. The study objectives were to examine the rate of addressing obesity in the PED and to identify its predicting factors. MethodsFrom electronic medical records of PED visits during 2010–2019, we extracted data on age, gender, weight, time, listed diagnoses, and discharge texts. The primary outcome was a listed diagnosis of “obesity” on discharge letters of children with obesity. Secondary outcomes were addressing weight in the discharge letter and written recommendations for obesity-related treatment. Mixed models were used to test for associations between each of the three outcomes and patient/visit characteristics. ResultsThere were 150,250 PED visits by 88,253 different children and adolescents. Obesity was found in 10,691 children (12.1%). Among these, listed “obesity” diagnosis was present in only 240 (1.5%) visits. Text addressing overweight/obesity was recorded in 721 (4.4%) visits, and weight-related recommendations were documented in 716 (4.4%) visits. “Obesity” was documented in females more often than in males, in older children, in children with higher weights, and in visits conducted during the mornings. ConclusionsThe rate of obesity diagnosis in the PED was extremely low, hence the potential screening ability of the PED in this matter is highly under-utilized. PEDs could increase the recognition of obesity, thus assisting in the global efforts in tackling this disease.

333 FRAILTY KNOWLEDGE, USE OF FRAILTY SCREENING TOOLS AND EDUCATIONAL CHALLENGES IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS: A MIXED-METHODS MULTI-SITE ED STAFF SURVEY

Abstract Background Limited information is available on the extent of Emergency Department (ED) staff knowledge of frailty and frailty screening tools. Educational challenges unique to the ED environment are also little researched. This multi-site staff survey explores frailty knowledge and use of frailty screening tools in Irish emergency departments, as well as detailing educational challenges faced in the ED environment Methods A mixed-methods multi-site survey of twenty-five Irish adult emergency departments, aimed at all grades of ED staff. An anonymous online survey consisting of twenty-five statements across five categories was distributed via staff email at these sites. Five free-text sections were included after each category. Quantitative data were managed and analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics software. Qualitative results were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis Results 181 ED staff (nursing, medical and allied health) across all grades responded to the survey. ED nursing staff made up the largest staff category (n=80, 44%). Less than half of respondents had received training on frailty identification (n=88, 48%,p=0.028), yet the majority felt confident of identifying frailty (n=99, 54%, p=0.007). ED staff aged under 35 years felt nursing staff were the most appropriate group to screen for frailty in ED (N=88, 87%, P=0.017). Most respondents felt overwhelmed by time pressures in ED, which left little opportunity for dedicated teaching (n=77, 45%). A thematic map was created to explore obstacles to frailty screening in ED. Conclusion The opinion of ED staff surveyed was that frailty screening is feasible to undertake in ED but quick, user-friendly frailty screening instruments are lacking. Most ED staff surveyed relied on clinical judgement rather than frailty teaching experience to diagnose frailty syndromes. The provision of inclusive education in ED is challenging. Learning strategies in ED should reflect the demands of the acute care environment and incorporate a flexible, hybrid multi-disciplinary teaching model

Finding Cases of Hepatitis C for Treatment Using Automated Screening in the Emergency Department is Effective, but What Is the Cost?

Case detection remains a major challenge for hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination. We have previously published results from a pilot of an emergency department (ED) semiautomated screening program, SEARCH; Screening Emergency Admissions at Risk of Chronic HCV. Several refinements to SEARCH have been developed to streamline and reduce cost. All direct costs of HCV testing until direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy initiation were calculated. Cost was assessed in 2018 Australian Dollars. A cost analysis of the initial program and refinements are presented. Sensitivity analysis to understand impact of variation in staff time, laboratory test cost, changes in HCV antibody (Ab) prevalence, RNA positivity percentage, and rate of linkage to care was conducted. Impact of refinements (SEARCH (2)) to cost is presented. The total SEARCH pilot, testing 5000 patients was estimated to cost $110,549.52 (range $92,109.79–$129,581.24) comprising of $68,278.67 for HCV Ab testing, $21,568.99 for follow-up and linkage to care of positive patients and $20,701.86 to prepare HCV RNA positive patients for treatment. Internal program refinements resulted in a 25% cost reduction. Following refinements, the cost of HCV antibody screening was $8.46 per test and the total cost per positive HCV Ab, positive HCV RNA, and per treated patient were $611.77, $2,168.64, and $3,566.11, respectively. Our sensitivity analysis indicates costs per HCV case found are modest so long as HCV Ab prevalence was at least 1%. ED screening is an affordable strategy for HCV case detection and elimination.

2021 SAEM Consensus Conference Proceedings: Research Priorities for Developing Emergency Department Screening Tools for Social Risks and Needs.

The Emergency Department (ED) acts as a safety net for our healthcare system. While studies have shown increased prevalence of social risks and needs among ED patients, there are many outstanding questions about the validity and use of social risks and needs screening tools in the ED setting. In this paper, we present research gaps and priorities pertaining to social risks and needs screening tools used in the ED, identified through a consensus approach informed by literature review and external expert feedback as part of the 2021 SAEM Consensus Conference -- From Bedside to Policy: Advancing Social Emergency Medicine and Population Health. Four overarching research gaps were identified: (1) Defining the purpose and ethical implications of ED-based screening; (2) Identifying domains of social risks and needs; (3) Developing and validating screening tools; and (4) Defining the patient population and type of screening performed. Furthermore, the following research questions were determined to be of highest priority: (1) What screening tools should be used to identify social risks and needs? (2) Should individual EDs use a national standard screening tools or customized screening tools? (3) What are the most prevalent social risks and needs in the ED? and (4) Which social risks and needs are most amenable to intervention in the ED setting? Answering these research questions will facilitate the use of evidence-based social risks and needs screening tools that address knowledge gaps and improve the health of our communities by better understanding the underlying determinants contributing to their presentation and health outcomes.

1.113 Efficacy of Emergency Department (ED) Screening Tests for Children Admitted to an Inpatient Psychiatric Unit for Acute Mental Health Emergencies

1.113 Efficacy of Emergency Department (ED) Screening Tests for Children Admitted to an Inpatient Psychiatric Unit for Acute Mental Health Emergencies

368 Determining the Combined Impact of Geriatric-Specific Predictors of Hospitalization Among Geriatric Emergency Department Patients

368 Determining the Combined Impact of Geriatric-Specific Predictors of Hospitalization Among Geriatric Emergency Department Patients

Routine screening of emergency admissions at risk of chronic hepatitis (SEARCH) identifies and links hepatitis B cases to care.

Significant barriers exist with hepatitis B (HBV) case detection and effective linkage to care (LTC). The emergency department (ED) is a unique healthcare interaction where hepatitis screening and LTC could be achieved. We examined the efficacy and utility of automated ED HBV screening for Overseas Born (OB) patients. A novel-automated hepatitis screening service "SEARCH" (Screening Emergency Admissions at Risk of Chronic Hepatitis) was piloted at a metropolitan hospital. A retrospective and comparative analysis of hepatitis testing during the SEARCH pilot compared to a period of routine testing was conducted. During the SEARCH pilot, 4778 OB patients were tested for HBV (86% of eligible patient presentations), compared with 1.9% of eligible patients during a control period of clinician-initiated testing. SEARCH detected 108 (2.3%) hepatitis B surface antigen positive patients including 20 (19%) in whom the diagnosis was new. Among 88 patients with known HBV, 57% were receiving medical care, 33% had become lost to follow-up and 10% had never received HBV care. Overall, 30/88 (34%) patients with known HBV were receiving complete guideline-based care prior to re-engagement via SEARCH. Following SEARCH, LTC was successful achieved in 48/58 (83%) unlinked patients and 19 patients were commenced on anti-viral therapy. New diagnoses of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma were made in five and one patient(s) respectively. Automated ED screening of OB patients is effective in HBV diagnosis, re-diagnosis and LTC. Prior to SEARCH, the majority of patients were not receiving guideline-based care.

Non-targeted hepatitis C virus screening in acute care healthcare settings in the Southern Appalachian region.

ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of non‐targeted hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening in emergency departments (EDs) and other healthcare settings in terms of patients identified with HCV infection and linked to HCV care.MethodsIn the Southern Appalachian region of the United States, we developed non‐targeted HCV screening and linkage‐to‐care programs in 10 institutions at different healthcare settings, including EDs, outpatient clinics, and inpatient units. Serum samples were tested for HCV antibodies, and if positive, reflexed to HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) testing as a confirmatory test for active infection. Patients with positive RNA tests were contacted to link them to HCV care.ResultsBetween 2017 and 2019, among 195,152 patients screened for HCV infection, 16,529 (8.5%) were positive by antibody testing, 10,139 (5.2% of screened patients and 61.3% of patients positive by antibody test) were positive by RNA testing, and 5778 (3.0% of screened patients and 57.0% of patients positive by RNA test) were successfully linked to HCV care. Among 83,645 patients screened in EDs, 9060 (10.8%) were positive by HCV antibody, and 5243 (6.3%) were positive by RNA test. Among patients positive by RNA testing, linkage to care was lower for patients screened in the ED (44.1%) compared with outpatient clinics (67.6%) (P < 0.01) and inpatient units (50.9%) (P < 0.01).ConclusionsNon‐targeted HCV screening in acute care settings can identify large numbers of people with HCV infection. To optimize the utility of these screening programs, future work is needed to develop best practices that consistently link these patients to HCV care.

Screening for Child Abuse in Children With Isolated Skull Fractures.

Head trauma is the most common cause of death from child abuse, and each encounter for recurrent abuse is associated with greater morbidity. Isolated skull fractures (ISF) are often treated conservatively in the emergency department (ED). We determined patterns of physical abuse screening in a children's hospital ED for children with ISF. A retrospective review was performed for children aged 3 years and younger who presented to the ED with ISF from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019. Children were stratified by age (<12 mo, ≥12 mo) and witnessed versus unwitnessed injury. Primary outcome was social work (SW) assessment to prescreen for abuse. Secondary outcomes were suspicion for abuse based on Child Protective Services (CPS) referral and subsequent ED encounters within 1 year. Sixty-six ISF patients were identified. Of unwitnessed injury patients aged younger than 12 months (n = 17/22), 88.2% (n = 15/17) underwent SW assessment and 47.1% (n = 8/17) required CPS referral. Of witnessed injury patients aged younger than 12 months (n = 23/44), 60.9% (n = 14/23) underwent SW assessment, with no CPS referrals. Overall, 18.2% (n = 4/22) unwitnessed and 20.5% (n = 9/44) witnessed injury patients returned to our ED: 2 were aged younger than 12 months and had recurrent trauma. To decrease risk of missed physical abuse, SW consultation should be considered for all ISF patients.

A survey and analysis of pediatric stroke protocols

Objectives Despite their comparative rarity, about 10,000 ischemic strokes occur in children every year, and no standardized method of treatment exists. Protocols have been effective at increasing diagnosis accuracy and treatment efficacy in adults, but little has been done to evaluate such tools in children. A survey was developed to identify the proportion of pediatric hospitals that have stroke protocols and analyze the components used for diagnosis and treatment to identify consensus.Materials and methods Physicians at 50 pediatric hospitals that contributed to the Pediatric Hospital Inpatient Sample in specialties involved in the treatment of stroke (i.e, neurology, neurosurgery, radiology, pediatric intensive care, and emergency medicine) were invited in a purposive and referral manner to complete and 18-question survey. Consensus agreement was predefined as >75%.Results Of 264 surveys distributed, 93 (35%) were returned, accounting for 46 (92%) hospitals. Among the respondents, 76 (82%) reported the presence of a pediatric stroke protocol at their hospital. Consensus agreement was reached in 9 components, including the use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (90%) and mechanical thrombectomy (77%) as treatments for acute stroke. Consensus agreement was not reached in 10 components, including the use of prehospital (16%) and emergency department (59%) screening tools and a centralized contact method (57%).Conclusions Pediatric ischemic stroke is a potentially devastating disease that is potentially reversible if treated early. Most pediatric hospitals have developed stroke protocols to aid in diagnosis and treatment, but there is a lack of consensus on what the protocols should contain.