Screening In Denmark Research Articles

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Tele-ophthalmology-Based Retinal Screening.

This study reports our experiences with systematic retinal screening in Denmark through optometrists with access to tele-ophthalmological services before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated an optometrist-based retinal screening system with a referral option for tele-ophthalmological service by a consultant ophthalmologist within the time period of August1, 2018 to September30, 2023. The optometrist collected patient history, refraction, best-corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, basic slit-lamp examination, 4-in-1 visual field report, and retinal imaging using color fundus 45° photography. Tele-ophthalmological services were provided by consultant ophthalmologists. Within pre-defined periods of pre-COVID-19, COVID-19, and post-COVID-19, we evaluated the rate of referrals to the tele-ophthalmological service, diagnoses made, and referrals to the public healthcare system. A total of 1,142,028 unique individuals, which corresponded to 19.1% of the entire population of Denmark, underwent screening by the optometrists; 50,612 (4.4%) of these individuals were referred to the tele-ophthalmological examination by consultant ophthalmologists. A referral for further ophthalmic examination, either at hospital or at an ophthalmic practice, was made for 10,300 individuals (20.4% of those referred for tele-ophthalmology, corresponding to 0.9% of the population screened). The referral rate from the screening to the tele-ophthalmological service increased from before COVID-19 (3.4%) to during COVID-19 (4.3%) and further after COVID-19 (6.4%). This increase coincided with an increasing prevalence of conditions seen in the tele-ophthalmological service. During a period of 5years, 19.1% of the entire population of Denmark underwent retinal screening. This provided an adjunctive health service during a period of severe strain on the public healthcare system, while limiting the number of excessive referrals to the public healthcare system. Temporal trends illustrated an increased pattern of use of a large-scale tele-ophthalmological system.

Non-participation in breast screening in Denmark: Sociodemographic determinants

BackgroundInternationally, non-participation in breast screening increased with decreasing level of education indicating importance of information campaigns to enhance awareness of screening. However, in Denmark in the 1990s the association between education and non-participation was U-shaped. We therefore analyzed recent Danish data.MethodsData derived from the Capital Region of Denmark, biennial, organized breast screening program 2008–2020, where women aged 50–69 were personally invited to screening. Non-participation was measured as number of women with no participation out of women eligible for at least three invitations. Sociodemographic determinants were identified by linkage to public registers. Results were reported as age adjusted odds ratios (OR) of non-participation including 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsAmong 196,085 women, 86% participated. Using women with low education as baseline, the OR for professional bachelors was 0.64; and for academics 0.75. The strongest determinants of non-participation were being non-married OR 2.03; born outside Denmark OR 2.04; being self-employed OR 1.67; retired OR 3.12; on public support OR 3.66; or having co-morbidity OR 1.56.ConclusionThe U-shaped association between education and non-participation in breast screening prevailed. The data further indicated that screening participation was low in women with pertinent health and social problems.

How follow-up rates in cervical cancer screening depend on organizational factors: A comparison of two population-based organized screening programmes.

This study compares the follow-up rates of non-normal cervical screening samples between Denmark and Flanders (Belgium) to illuminate whether organizational differences between the health systems might affect the follow-up rates, e.g. sending of reminders in Denmark since 2012 compared to Flanders with no such system in place. The study population included 48,082 Danish women and 22,271 Flemish women who received abnormal or inadequate primary screening results from 2014 to 2016. The participants were followed for 24 months, and the timeliness and appropriateness of the recommended follow-up, according to national guidelines, were evaluated. After 18 months over 90% of the Danish women had received some form of follow-up, while in Flanders, this level is achieved only for those who test positive for human papillomavirus. The analysis also revealed that 10-28% of follow-ups were performed too early, with Danish women showing the highest proportions. In both regions, general practitioners (GPs) exhibited better follow-up rates compared to gynaecologists, with gynaecologists displaying a tendency towards earlier re-testing than recommended. An important factor influencing the follow-up rate may be the sending of reminders in Denmark since 2012, as the follow-up rates in general were higher in this period. It is noteworthy that a reminder system is currently being implemented in Flanders and further studies on the potential effects should be studied. Additionally, the organization of the health system might influence the follow-up rate, as engaging the GP for screening in Denmark may have had a positive effect.

Comparisons of assessment pathways after abnormal mammography screening in Denmark, Norway, and Spain

PurposeTo ensure high-quality screening programmes and effective utilization of resources, it is important to monitor how cancer detection is affected by different strategies performed at recall assessment. This study aimed to describe procedures performed at recall assessment and compare and evaluate the performance of the assessment in Denmark, Norway, and Spain in terms of screen-detected cancer (SDC) and interval cancer (IC) rates.MethodsWe included women aged 50–69 years from Denmark, Norway, and Spain, who were recalled for assessment after screening mammography, and recorded all procedures performed during six months after diagnosis, and the timing of the procedures. Women were followed for two years and screen-detected and interval cancer, and sensitivity of recall was calculated and compared.ResultsIn total, data from 24,645 Danish, 30,050 Norwegian, and 41,809 Spanish women were included in the study. Most of the women had some assessment within 2 months in all three countries. SDC rates were higher in Denmark (0.57) and Norway (0.60) compared to Spain (0.38), as were the IC rates, i.e. 0.25 and 0.18 vs. 0.12, respectively. The sensitivity of the diagnostic follow-up was somewhat higher in Denmark (98.3%) and Norway (98.2%), compared to Spain (95.4%), but when excluding non-invasive assessment pathways, the sensitivities were comparable.ConclusionThis comparison study showed variation in the assessment procedures used in the three countries as well as the SDC and IC rates and the sensitivity of recall.

"We're the very bottom, so it's going to be hard for you to 'catch any fish' around here…" understanding vulnerable Greenlanders' perspectives on cancer and barriers to screening in Denmark- A qualitative study.

Cancer is a major global health concern. Unfortunately, Indigenous populations such as Greenlanders living in Denmark, face significant disparities in cancer risk, incidence, diagnosis, care quality, and outcomes. In Denmark, vulnerable Greenlanders face challenges accessing cancer screening. The aim of this study was to explore their perceptions of cancer, barriers to participation in cancer screening, and potential for developing a tailored intervention. This qualitative study was based on participant observations and qualitative interviews. The sample comprised 46 participants from four distinct drop-in centres. Of these, 28 were vulnerable Greenlanders (19 women and 9 men), 9 were staff members (6 women and 3 men), and 6 were relatives (4 women and 2 men). The data were analysed through inductive content analysis. Vulnerable Greenlanders in Denmark believed they were responsible for their own health and were generally satisfied with the healthcare system. However, they found it challenging to manage their own health and many depended on support from others. Fear of cancer and death shaped their attitudes towards screening. For vulnerable Greenlanders in Denmark participation in cancer screening programmes was positively viewed for most but could be challenging. Different intervention ideas raised by the vulnerable Greenlanders, relatives and staff members could guide the development of strategies to increase participation rates.

Investigating the putative unforeseen link between football fervour and colorectal cancer screening in Denmark.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks as the third most prevalent cancer globally, often remaining asymptomatic in its early stages but posing high mortality risks in advanced tumours. Screening for CRC (sCRC) has shown to effectively reduce both incidence and mortality rates. In this study, we investigate a potential association between a decline in sCRC participation in Denmark and a major sporting event. We conducted an association cohort study encompassing all citizens aged 50 to 74, who were invited to undergo sCRC screening in Region Zealand, Denmark, spanning from 2014 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a noticeable reduction in sCRC participation specifically during the 2-week period in autumn 2022 coinciding with the participation of the Danish football team in the Football World Cup 2022 held in Qatar. To our knowledge, this is the first instance where an international sporting event has been linked to a decline in national sCRC participation, suggesting that the fervour of sports enthusiasts may divert attention away from preventive health measures. Notably, no similar reductions in sCRC participation were observed during any other sporting events throughout the entire study period (2014-2022) in Denmark.

Pre-eclampsia Screening in Denmark (PRESIDE): National Validation Study

(Abstracted from Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2023;61:682–690) Preeclampsia (PE) is a significant obstetrical and perinatal problem, affecting 2% to 8% of all pregnancies. Research has shown some treatments are effective for reducing the incidence of PE when started early in pregnancy and when risk factors for PE have been identified.

Maternal age and the risk of fetal aneuploidy: A nationwide cohort study of more than 500 000 singleton pregnancies in Denmark from 2008 to 2017.

In this register-based study of pregnancies in Denmark, we assessed the associations between maternal age and the risk of fetal aneuploidies (trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, triploidy, monosomy X and other sex chromosome aberrations). Additionally, we aimed to disentangle the maternal age-related effect on fetal aneuploidies by cases with translocation trisomies and mosaicisms. We followed a nationwide cohort of 542 375 singleton-pregnant women attending first trimester screening in Denmark between 2008 and 2017 until delivery, miscarriage or termination of pregnancy. We used six maternal age categories and retrieved information on genetically confirmed aneuploidies of the fetus and infant from the national cytogenetic register. We confirmed the known associations between advanced maternal age and higher risk of trisomy 21, 18, 13 and other sex chromosome aberrations, especially in women aged ≥35 years, whereas we found no age-related associations with triploidy or monosomy X. Cases with translocation trisomies and mosaicisms did not influence the overall reported association between maternal age and aneuploidies. This study provides insight into the accurate risk of fetal aneuploidies that pregnant women of advanced ages encounter.

Inter-grader reliability in the Danish screening programme for diabetic retinopathy.

The Danish Registry of Diabetic Retinopathy includes information from >200 000 patients who attends diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in Denmark. Screening of patients with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes is often performed by practicing ophthalmologists, while patients with type 1 and complicated type 2 diabetes attends screening at hospitals. We performed a clinical reliability study of retinal images from Danish screening facilities to explore the inter-grader agreement between the primary screening ophthalmologist and a blinded, certified grader. Invitations to participate were sent to screening facilities across Denmark. The primary grader uploaded fundus photographs with information on estimated level of DR (International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy scale as 0 [no DR], 1-3 [mild, moderate or severe nonproliferative DR {NPDR}], or 4 [proliferative DR {PDR}]), region of screening, image style, and screening facility. Images were then regraded by a blinded, certified, secondary grader. Weighted kappa analysis was performed to evaluate agreement. Fundus photographs from 230 patients (458 eyes) were received from practicing ophthalmologists (52.6%) and hospital-based grading centres (47.4%) from all Danish regions. Reported levels of DR by the primary graders were 66.8%, 12.2%, 13.1%, 1.3% and 5.5% for DR levels 0-4. The overall agreement between primary and secondary graders was 93% (κ = 0.83). Based on screening facility agreement was 96% (κ = 0.89) and 90% (κ = 0.76) for practicing ophthalmologists and hospital-based graders. In this nationwide study, we observed a high overall inter-grader agreement and based on this, it is reasonable to assume that reported DR gradings in the screening programme in Denmark, accurately reflect the truth.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on breast and cervical cancer screening in Denmark: A register-based study.

Denmark was one of the few countries where it was politically decided to continue cancer screening during the COVID-19 pandemic. We assessed the actual population uptake of mammography and cervical screening during this period. The first COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark was announced on 11 March 2020. To investigate possible changes in cancer screening activity due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we analysed data from the beginning of 2017 until the end of 2021. A time series analysis was carried out to discover possible trends and outliers in the screening activities in the period 2017-2021. Data on mammography screening and cervical screening were retrieved from governmental pandemic-specific monitoring of health care activities. A brief drop was seen in screening activity right after the first COVID-19 lockdown, but the activity quickly returned to its previous level. A short-term deficit of 43% [CI -49 to -37] was found for mammography screening. A short-term deficit of 62% [CI -65 to -58] was found for cervical screening. Furthermore, a slight, statistically significant downward trend in cervical screening from 2018 to 2021 was probably unrelated to the pandemic. Other changes, for example, a marked drop in mammography screening towards the end of 2021, also seem unrelated to the pandemic. Denmark continued cancer screening during the pandemic, but following the first lockdown a temporary drop was seen in breast and cervical screening activity. Region Zealand (R22-A597).

Implementation of SCID Screening in Denmark

Screening for SCID was added to the Danish Neonatal Screening Program in February 2020. The screening uses a RealtimePCR kit and we here present the results and experiences with the validation of the kit and the first 10 months of screening.

P–537 What is the attitude of gamete donors towards expanded genetic testing

Abstract Study question What is the opinion of gamete donors on extended carrier screening in Denmark and in US? Summary answer This study showed that the overwhelming majority of the donors were very positive towards genetic testing in general and the expanded carrier screening. What is known already There is a lack of empirical studies on the experiences of and attitudes of donors towards expanded carrier screening (ECS) (Amor et al. 2018). Oocyte donors in a Spanish clinic were surprised by the information on testing and the possibility of being carriers (Abuli et al., 2016). After adequate genetic counselling before and after the test, the results of testing did not seem to have a meaningful emotional or psychological impact on the donors. Study design, size, duration A questionnaire was emailed to all active sperm donors in a sperm bank in Denmark and in a sperm bank in US. Participants/materials, setting, methods A total of 393 donors received the email of which 233 donors completed the questionnaire, 196 in Denmark (response rate of 60.7%) and 37 in the United States (response rate of 52.9%). Main results and the role of chance We systematically compared the US and DK donors and ID-release versus non-ID-release donors for all characteristics and items. ID-release donors with a partner significantly more informed their partner about their donor status than non-ID-release donors (90.5% vs. 72.4%, p 0.027). ID-release donors significantly more intended to tell their own children (57.5% vs. 21.2%, p 0.001). ID-release donors significantly more thought about their potential donor children (56.2% vs. 35.0%; p 0.002) and significantly more likely to want information on whether a pregnancy occurred from their donation (70.6% vs. 55.0%, p 0.017). In addition, they also significantly more wished to obtain information about the children conceived with their sperm: the number of children (64.0% vs. 50.0%, p 0.048), their gender (40% vs. 26.2%, p 0.042), and their health (59.3% vs. 42.5%, p 0.018). The ID-release donors were much less likely than the other type not to want any information (19.3% vs. 32.5%, p 0.034). This general attitude is extended to the wish to be informed if a child with a hereditary disease is born after using their sperm. The ID-release donors were more likely to desire contact if their genetic child was diagnosed with a genetic disease (73.9% vs. 55.0%, p 0.003). Limitations, reasons for caution The main element that makes the study unique (i.e., the choice between ID-release and non-ID-release) also renders the generalization of the findings more difficult. Wider implications of the findings: A better understanding of the attitude among gamete doners will possibly guide future legislation and ensure the safety and welfare of the donors too. Trial registration number none

Breast cancer mortality and overdiagnosis after implementation of population-based screening in Denmark

IntroductionService breast cancer screening is difficult to evaluate because there is no unscreened control group. Due to a natural experiment, where 20% of women were offered screening in two regions up to 17 years before other women, Denmark is in a unique position. We utilized this opportunity to assess outcome of service screening.Materials and methodsScreening was offered in Copenhagen from 1991 and Funen from 1993 to women aged 50–69 years. We used difference-in-differences methodology with a study group offered screening; a historical control group; a regional control group; and a regional–historical control group, comparing breast cancer mortality and incidence, including ductal carcinoma in situ, between study and historical control group adjusted for changes in other regions, and calculating ratios of rate ratios (RRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data came from Central Population Register; mammography screening databases; Cause of Death Register; and Danish Cancer Register.ResultsFor breast cancer mortality, the study group accumulated 1,551,465 person-years and 911 deaths. Long-term breast cancer mortality in Copenhagen was 20% below expected in absence of screening; RRR 0.80 (95% CI 0.71–0.90), and in Funen 22% below; RRR 0.78 (95% CI 0.68–0.89). Combined, cumulative breast cancer incidence in women followed 8+ years post-screening was 2.3% above expected in absence of screening; RRR 1.023 (95% CI 0.97–1.08).DiscussionBenefit-to-harm ratio of the two Danish screening programs was 2.6 saved breast cancer deaths per overdiagnosed case. Screening can affect only breast cancers diagnosed in screening age. Due to high breast cancer incidence after age 70, only one-third of breast cancer deaths after age 50 could potentially be affected by screening. Increasing upper age limit could be considered, but might affect benefit-to-harm ratio negatively.

Non-participation in cervical cancer screening according to health, lifestyle and sexual behavior: A population-based study of nearly 15,000 Danish women aged 23–45 years

High participation in cervical cancer screening is essential for an effective screening program. In this population-based study, we investigated associations between general health, lifestyle and sexual behavior, and non-participation in cervical cancer screening in Denmark. During 2011–2012, a random sample of women aged 18–45 years from the general female population were invited to participate in a survey regarding health, lifestyle and sexual habits. Altogether 18,631 women responded (response rate: 75.1%), of whom 14,271 women aged 23–45 years were included in this analysis. Information on screening participation within four years after response, and data on sociodemographic characteristics, was obtained from nationwide registers. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for non-participation, crude and adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Overall, 13.9% of the women were not screened during follow-up. The odds of non-participation was increased in women who were overweight (ORadj. = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.06–1.35), obese (ORadj. = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27–1.67), perceived themselves as much too fat (ORadj. = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.29–1.74), had poor self-perceived health (ORadj. = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.03–1.45) or smoked daily (ORadj. = 1.81; 95% CI, 1.61–2.03). Conversely, women with previous genital warts or other sexually transmitted infections, and young women with ≥10 lifetime sexual partners or ≥2 new recent partners, had decreased odds of non-participation. In conclusion, obesity, poor self-perceived health and daily smoking were associated with lower participation in cervical cancer screening. Interventions targeting these groups are needed.

Direct and indirect healthcare costs of lung cancer CT screening in Denmark: a registry study

IntroductionA study based on the Danish Randomised Controlled Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST) calculated the healthcare costs of lung cancer screening by comparing costs in an intervention group with a...

Cystic fibrosis newborn screening in Denmark: Experience from the first 2 years.

In Denmark, newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) was introduced on 1 May 2016. The implementation and results from the first 2 years of the national newborn CF screening program are presented. The screening included immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT), followed by evaluation for the F508del mutation when a value at or above the 50 ng/mL cutoff was present. In cases with a single F508del mutation or a very high IRT value above 145 ng/mL, next-generation sequencing of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) was performed. Of 126 522 newborn infants 126 338 were tested (99.85%), and 4730 samples (3.7%) were assessed for CFTR mutations. Twenty-six infants were screen-positive and referred for diagnostic follow-up of whom 22 were confirmed to have a CF diagnosis, four had one known and one CFTR allele with unknown pathogenicity, classified as cystic fibrosis screening positive inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID), PPV 84.6%. One of the four children classified as CFSPID was later found to carry the two identified CFTR variants in cis and was reclassified as a carrier of CF. We found two false negatives; one exhibited an IRT level above the 50 ng/mL cutoff but was below the 145 ng/mL very high cutoff and with no F508del mutation present. The second false-negative fell below the 50 ng/mL IRT cutoff but was diagnosed shortly after birth on the basis of meconium ileus. Screening sensitivity, 91.7%. Two hundred thirty-two children were identified as carriers of CF, which is twofold above the estimated annual number of carriers. All but one carrier were heterozygous for the F508del CFTR mutation. Sixteen percent of the sequenced samples revealed rare CFTR variants, which were classified as nonpathogenic in relation to CF. During the first 2 years of NBS CF screening in Denmark, we identified close to the expected number of infants with CF using an algorithm based on IRT, presence of F508del mutation and comprehensive genetic analysis. CFSPID accounted for only a small minority, despite comprehensive CFTR sequencing, whereas more carriers than initially expected were identified.

The LEAD trial—The effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: A randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesThis trial tested the effectiveness of a self-administered web-based decision aid, targeted at citizens with lower educational attainment, on informed choice about colorectal cancer screening participation as assessed by group levels of knowledge, attitudes and uptake. MethodsThe randomised controlled trial was conducted among 2702 screening-naïve Danish citizens, 53–74 years old, with lower educational attainment. Baseline questionnaire respondents (62%) were allocated to intervention and control groups. Intervention group citizens received the decision aid.Outcomes were informed choice, worries and decisional conflict. ResultsAnalyses were conducted among 339 eligible citizens. The mean difference in knowledge score change between intervention and control group was 0.00 (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.38;0.38). Trends towards more positive screening attitudes (mean difference in score change: 0.72, 95% CI: -0.38;1.81) and higher screening uptake (7.6%, 95% CI:−2.2;17.4%) were observed. Worries (−0.33, 95% CI: −0.97;0.32) and decisional conflict (mean difference: −3.5, 95%CI: −7.0;−0.1) were slightly reduced. ConclusionsThe decision aid did not affect informed choice or knowledge. However, there were trends towards increased screening uptake and more positive screening attitudes. Practice implicationsBeing a simple intervention and easily administered, the decision aid could represent a cost-effective way of enhancing screening uptake, and some elements of informed decision-making.

Health educational background as a predictor of non-participation in national colorectal cancer screening: A cross-sectional population study among 886,088 invited Danes

Health information knowledge may affect attitude toward colorectal cancer screening, but the participation of health educated citizens are unknown. Therefore, we investigated non-participation in a sample of 886,088 invited participants, based on educational length, type, and level. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the odds of non-participation in Danish men and women based on educational type and length. Models were adjusted for age, income, marital status and immigration status. Information was derived from National registers. Men with long educational length level had increased odds of non-participation if their education was within the field of medicine/medical science (OR 1.87) or belonged to other long health educations, but not in nursing and health care, compared to other long educations after full model adjustment. Women with long educational length level had increased odds of non-participation if they were educated in the field of medicine/medical science (OR 1.47), whereas they had decreased odds in the fields of nursing and health care and other long health educations, compared to other long educations after full model adjustment. Men within short educational length level did not have different odds of nonparticipation, after full model adjustments, whereas women within short health educations were at increased odds in the youngest age group and at decreased odds in the eldest age group. Having an education in the field of medicine/medical science is associated with non-participation in colorectal cancer screening in Denmark 2014–2015. Opposite, an educational background in nursing and health care increased participation in women, but not in men.

HPV-prevalence in elderly women in Denmark

AimIn countries like Denmark, cervical cancer incidence is at present relatively high in elderly women, while routine screening stops at age 65 years. On this background, all women aged 69 and above were invited to human papillomavirus (HPV)-screening in Denmark in 2017. MethodsWomen were identified from the Central Population Register and personally invited by digital or ordinary mail to have a screening sample taken by their general practitioner. In four regions, samples were tested for high risk (HPV) with the cobas 4800® HPV-assay, and in the last region with the BD Onclarity® HPV-assay. Participation rate, prevalence of high risk HPV, and proportion of positive samples with HPV16, HPV18, and other high risk HPV-types were tabulated by 5-year age-groups. Results455,612 women were invited, and 30.2% (95 confidence interval (CI) 30.0–30.3) participated. Average age of participants was 74.6 years. Overall, 4.3% (95% CI 4.1–4.4) of participants were HPV-positive, of whom 24% had HPV 16/18. HPV-prevalence decreased slightly from 4.5% in women aged 69–73 years to 3.1% in women aged 84–88 years, but was 5.2% in the very small group of participants aged 89+ years. ConclusionInvitation to HPV-screening was well received by elderly women. The HPV-prevalence decreased slightly with increasing age. No rebound of HPV-prevalence after menopause was found when our data were combined with previously published Danish data from younger women. The presently relatively high cervical cancer incidence in elderly women was not reflected in the HPV-prevalence.

Determinants for Participation in Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling among Nonattenders to Cervical Cancer Screening in Denmark.

Background: Offering human papillomavirus-based self-sampling to nonparticipants in routine cervical cancer screening can increase screening participation. However, little is known about characteristics of women who accept self-sampling. In this population-based study, we investigated determinants for participation in self-sampling among Danish nonattenders to routine cervical cancer screening.Methods: During 2014 to 2015, a random sample of screening nonparticipants ages 27 to 65 years living in the Capital Region of Denmark were invited for self-sampling. Of 21,314 eligible women, 4,743 participated in self-sampling. Information on sociodemographic characteristics and mental and physical health of all the women was obtained from nationwide registries, and 3,707 women completed a questionnaire on lifestyle, sexual behavior, and reasons for nonparticipation in routine screening. We used logistic regression to estimate ORs for participation in self-sampling, crude, and adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics.Results: Basic education [ORadjusted = 0.79; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-0.88], low income (ORadjusted = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.73), origin from a nonwestern country (ORadjusted = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.38-0.48), and being unmarried (ORadjusted = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.61-0.72) were associated with lower self-sampling participation. Long-term unscreened women (ORadjusted = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.45-0.53), women with prior schizophrenia or other psychoses (ORadjusted = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.80), women with poor self-perceived health (ORadjusted = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.69), and women who perceived screening as unnecessary (ORadjusted = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.80) or irrelevant (ORadjusted = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96) were less likely to self-sample.Conclusions: Certain population groups, including women with low socioeconomic position or of nonwestern origin, were less likely to participate in self-sampling.Impact: Targeted approaches may be needed to increase screening participation in these groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 27(11); 1342-51. ©2018 AACR.