This article examines the recent development in Scottish literature and criticism, away from the critical commonplace that describes how Scottish culture has, in the decades since the 1979 referendum, been aligned with Scottish nationalism. Starting from the definitions of nationalism given by Michael Billig, Michael Ignatieff, Ernest Renan, and the analyses of Scottish historians and cultural nationalists, it shows how what it calls the “representational trope” is at last being abandoned. This renewal of our critical perspective involves looking at the various ways the future can be envisaged, and at the variety of responses to what Riach describes as the fundamental goal for the arts—to further our understanding of our common humanity. Those responses involve for artists the necessity to (re)construct the future rather than to represent the people. By focusing on the works of artists such as James Kelman, James Robertson, Alan Riach, Tom Leonard, Jackie Kay and Kathleen Jamie, but also on some artists’ comments on an independent Scotland, and by using the theoretical framework of Jacques Rancière’s politics of literature, his notions of the various modes of identification for the arts, and of the partition of the sensible, the paper traces the way that Scottish writers today engage with a renewed, more fluid myth of Scotland, and focuses on literature’s capacity to build what Rancière describes as the hermeneutics of the social body.