Scoliosis Research Society Total Scores Research Articles

Pregabalin and Persistent Postoperative Pain Following Posterior Spinal Fusion in Children and Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Surgical correction of spinal deformity requires major surgical intervention with extensive manipulation of the spine and neural elements. Persistent postoperative pain affects patient quality of life and can also cause financial burden for patient families and for society. We aimed to investigate the effect of perioperative pregabalin on the incidence of persistent pain following instrumented spinal fusion. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled single-center clinical trial. Adolescents and children 10 to 21 years old with a spinal deformity who were scheduled for pedicle screw instrumentation and fusion were randomized into either the pregabalin or placebo group. Patients received 2 mg/kg of pregabalin or a placebo twice daily preoperatively and for 5 days postoperatively. The duration of follow-up was 2 years. The primary outcomes were cumulative opioid consumption during the first 48 hours postoperatively and the incidence of persistent postoperative pain over the course of the 2-year follow-up. Sixty-four of 77 eligible patients were enrolled in the study, with all patients completing the 2-year follow-up. Thirty-three patients were randomized into the pregabalin group and 31 into the placebo group. There was no significant difference in cumulative 48-hour opioid consumption between the study groups. The Scoliosis Research Society 24-Item Questionnaire pain domain score improved significantly, from a mean value of 3.8 in both groups to 4.3 in the pregabalin and 4.0 in the placebo group at 2 years postoperatively, with no differences between the study groups at any time point (p = 0.317). The Scoliosis Research Society total scores of the study groups were similar (p = 0.678). Back pain, as measured with use of a visual analogue scale, improved significantly (p = 0.001) with no significant differences at any time point (preoperatively and 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively). Perioperative pregabalin does not reduce postoperative opioid consumption or the incidence of persistent postoperative pain following instrumented posterior spinal fusion for spinal deformities in an adolescent population. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Health-related quality of life after posterior vertebral column resection in children: comparison with healthy controls.

PurposeVertebral column resection (VCR) is a technique performed for short, angular spinal deformities. Several studies have reported good radiographic results with VCR regarding curve correction. However, only a few studies have reported the impact of this technique on the health-related quality-of-life measures (HRQoL).MethodsA single surgeon series of 27 consecutive children (mean age at surgery 12.3 years, range 1.1–20.7 years) undergoing posterior VCR with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The comparison was made to age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Outcome measures included Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) questionnaire both pre- and postoperatively, radiographic outcomes, and complications.ResultsThe average major curve correction was 60.3% in the VCR patients. Complications were noted in 12 out of 27 (44%) of the VCR patients but all patients recovered fully during follow-up. The SRS pain domain scores improved significantly after VCR (p = 0.0002). The SRS total and domain scores were significantly lower than in the healthy controls especially in the self-image and function domains, but the pain and activity domains improved from preoperative to similar level than in the control group.ConclusionsHRQoL showed significant improvement in pain scores despite 44% risk of transient complications after VCR in pediatric patients. This health-related quality-of-life improvement remained at a significantly lower level than in the healthy control group.Level of EvidenceTherapeutic Level III.

Is the Cranial Sagittal Vertical Axis (Cr-SVA) a Better Midterm Predictor of Clinical Results Than C7-SVA in Adult Patients Operated on Spinal Deformity After a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up?

This is nonconcurrent prospective study approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee. The purpose of this study is to determine if the cranial sagittal vertical axis (Cr-SVA) measured in full spine standing radiographs is a better predictor of clinical results than the C7 sagittal vertical axis (C7-SVA) in adult patients operated on spinal deformity with a minimum 2-year follow-up after surgery. The Cr-SVA has recently been described as a better predictor of health-related quality of life outcomes than the C7-SVA for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) before undergoing surgery. This has not been confirmed in patients after ASD surgery. Inclusion criteria were age at surgery more than 25 years and a minimum 2-year follow-up after a ≥5 level fusion for ASD. Full-length standing lateral radiographs (including nasion-inion line, spine, and femoral heads) and Scoliosis Research Society 22 Questionnaire and SF36 questionnaires were available for every patient at the final follow-up. The distance from the Cr-SVA to the posterior corner of S1 (Cr-SVA-S) and to the centers of the hip (Cr-SVA-H) was measured and also the C7-SVA, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and PI-LL. Sixty-five patients (58 female individuals) operated on ASD in a single institution were included. Age at surgery was 61 years (26-67). The mean follow-up was 53 months (24-120). Spearman rank-order test showed several significant correlations. After multivariable analysis, only Cr-SVA-S and age persisted as predictors for Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) image scores, Cr-SVA-H for SRS satisfaction, Cr-SVA-H and age for SRS total scores, Cr-SVA-H and age for SF36 Physical Function, Cr-SVA-S for SF36 Role Physical, Cr-SVA-H for SF36 Bodily Pain, and Cr-SVA-H for SF36 Role Emotional. The Cr-SVA measured in full spine standing radiographs seems to be a better predictor of health-related quality of life outcomes than the C7-SVA for adults operated on spinal deformity >2 years after surgery.

Outcomes of Non-Operative Management for Pseudarthrosis after Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies at Minimum 5 Years Follow-Up.

ObjectiveMinimal data exist regarding non-operative management of suspected pseudarthrosis after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). This study reports radiographic and clinical outcomes of non-operative management for post-PSO pseudarthrosis at a minimum 5 years post-detection. MethodsNineteen consecutive patients with implant breakage indicating probable pseudarthrosis after PSO surgery (13 women/ six men; mean age at surgery, 58 years) without severe pain and disability were treated with non-operative management (mean follow-up, 5.8 years; range, 5–10 years). Non-operative management included medication, intermittent brace wearing and avoidance of excessive back strain. Radiographic and clinical outcomes analysis was performed. ResultsSagittal vertical axis (SVA), proximal junctional angle, thoracic kyphosis achieved by a PSO were maintained after detection of pseudarthrosis through ultimate follow-up. Lumbar lordosis and PSO angle decreased at final follow-up. There was no significant change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) total score, or subscales of pain, self-image, function, satisfaction and mental health between detection of pseudarthrosis and ultimate follow-up. SVA greater than 11 cm showed poorer ODI and SRS total score, as well as the pain, self-image, and function subscales (p<0.05). ConclusionNon-operative management of implant failure of probable pseudarthrosis after PSO offers acceptable outcomes even at 5 years after detection of implant breakage, provided SVA is maintained. As SVA increased, outcome scores decreased in this patient population.

Improvement in Scoliosis Research Society-22R Pain Scores After Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Longitudinal cohort. To investigate whether patients with painful adolescent idiopathic scoliosis experience pain relief with surgical treatment. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was previously thought to be a painless condition, but recent studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients have pain. Little information is available regarding pain relief with surgical treatment for AIS. Patients enrolled in a prospective database of surgically treated AIS were divided into two groups based on their preoperative Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22R pain domain score. Patients with a preoperative pain domain score of 4 or more (N = 1005) were classified as nonpainful. If the preoperative pain domain score was less than 4 (N = 505), they were classified as painful. Demographics, SRS total and domain scores, and changes with treatment were compared for the two groups. The two groups had similar demographics and preoperative coronal curve magnitude. Patients with painful scoliosis experienced significant improvement in SRS-22R pain scores, from 3.29 preoperatively to 4.03 postoperatively (P < 0.000). Eighty-one percent of these patients reached the minimum clinically important difference threshold (0.20) for improvement in pain score. Painful scoliosis patients also had greater 2-year improvement in total and all domain scores than the nonpainful scoliosis patients (P < 0.000). Absolute values of SRS-22R total and domain scores were all greater at 2 years in the nonpainful group than the painful group. Patients with AIS with substantial back pain can be cautiously counseled to expect significant improvement in pain level with surgical correction of their deformity, even if curve progression is the primary indication for surgery. Although these patients achieve greater improvements in health-related quality of life compared with patients with mild or no pain, 2-year SRS-22R scores were still better in patients with mild or no pain preoperatively. 2.

Factors in Surgical Decision Making for Thoracolumbar/Lumbar AIS: It's About More Than Just the Curve Magnitude.

A retrospective review of prospective data OBJECTIVE:: The purpose of this study was to compare operative and nonoperative patients with similar curve magnitudes to determine motivating factors associated with surgical correction in "smaller" curves. Despite traditional treatment recommendations on major curve angle measurements, many patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar (TH/L) curves of smaller magnitudes are unhappy and desire correction. A prospectively enrolled multicenter adolescent idiopathic scoliosis database was queried. Patients with major TH/L curves <50 degrees and low risk of progression (Risser 3, 4, and 5) were identified and grouped based on their treatment (operative vs. nonoperative). Preoperative demographic, radiographic, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome scores, and trunk shape values were compared. A total of 126 patients undergoing surgical intervention and 17 patients pursuing nonoperative treatment were analyzed. The average lumbar curve of the operative group was 43 degrees (range, 35 to 49 degrees) and for the nonoperative group was 39 degrees (range, 26 to 49 degrees). The operative group was significantly younger, had larger lumbar major curve angles, lower thoracic to lumbar curve ratio, increased TH/L apical translation, and greater trunk shift (P<0.05). Only lumbar curve (P=0.018, OR=1.19) and trunk shift (P=0.01, OR=3.22) remained significant predictors of surgery in a multivariate regression analysis. SRS scores were significantly lower in the operative group for pain, self-image, function, mental health, and total (P<0.05). When SRS total score was entered into the regression, it was the only significant predictor of surgical intervention (P=0.004, OR=0.03). Many patients with smaller lumbar curves have clinical deformities that are more consistent with larger curves. These smaller curves can produce similar coronal imbalance and trunk shift, with lower SRS domains that may drive patients to seek surgical treatment. What is unclear is the reason for this greater degree of imbalance in this select group of patients and whether the natural history is different for a more balanced TH/L curve. Level II-Prognostic.

Results of revision surgery after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance with pseudarthrosis at the prior osteotomy site or elsewhere: minimum 5 years post-revision.

Retrospective review of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) cases. To report our results, radiographic and clinical outcomes at a minimum 5 years following revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after a PSO. To our knowledge, there is no report on the results of revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after a PSO. Eighteen consecutive patients with pseudarthrosis after PSO (16 females/2 males; average age at surgery, 49.8 yr) treated with revision surgery at one institution were analyzed (average follow-up, 6.5 yr; range, 5-12 yr). Radiographic and clinical outcomes analysis was performed. Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and lumbar lordosis (LL) improved significantly after revision surgery (SVA, P = 0.000; LL, P = 0.024) and were maintained until ultimate post-revision follow-up (SVA, P = 0.170; LL, P = 0.729). Proximal junctional angle (P = 0.828), thoracic kyphosis (P = 0.828), and PSO angle (P = 0.717) achieved by the primary surgery were also maintained until ultimate post-revision. We increased the number of rods and/or changed them to 6.35-mm diameter in all patients. There were significant improvements post-revision in Oswestry Disability Index (45 vs. 37.9, P = 0.041) and Scoliosis Research Society pain subscale (2.6 vs. 3.1, P = 0.047) but not in Scoliosis Research Society total score or other subscales. Pelvic incidence greater than 60° demonstrated a trend toward poorer Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society scores (P > 0.05), but there were no significant differences between SVA greater or less than 11 cm. Revision surgery for pseudarthrosis after PSO can provide acceptable radiographic and clinical outcomes at a minimum 5 years post-revision. Successful surgical outcomes may be achieved by using an increased number or size of implants and ample bone graft for complete fusion after revision surgery. 4.

Increased Body Mass Index Negatively Affects Patient Satisfaction After a Posterior Fusion and Instrumentation for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study DesignRetrospective. Summary of Background DataPrevious studies have reported the correlation of body mass index (BMI) with non-spine surgical outcomes; however, only a few reviewed the correlation of BMI to outcomes after spine surgery. ObjectivesTo review the influence of preoperative BMI on the follow-up clinical and functional outcomes after posterior-only fusion (PSF) and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in a larger patient cohort. MethodsRetrospective review of a consecutive series of patients treated with PSF for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from 2002 to 2009 at a single institution. There were 3 categories: underweight (UW), normal weight (NML), and overweight (OW). Percent correction of the major curve was collected at 2 years postoperatively and patient outcome scores were analyzed preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Differences between groups were analyzed using analysis of variance, with p < .05. ResultsA total of 459 patients at an average age of 15.0 years (range, 10.0–21.3 years) treated with PSF instrumentation were included. At 2 years, all groups achieved and maintained equal percent correction with no differences between groups. Regarding preoperative Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome scores, OW patients reported more pain than NML (p = .002) and UW patients (p < .001) despite less reported activity than for the NML (p = .033) and UW groups (p = .005). The total SRS score was also lower in the OW patients compared with NML (p = .009) and UW patients (p = .002). At 2 years, the OW group reported more pain than the UW (p = .031) and NML groups (p = .018), lower mental scores (p = .011) and lower SRS total scores (p = .005) than the NML group. ConclusionsAt follow-up, preoperative overweight adolescents reported more pain and lower mental, activity, and appearance domain scores after surgery than UW and NML patients despite equal percent curve correction. This information may help the surgeon with preoperative counseling of OW patients by stressing that their own assessment of outcome is influenced by BMI, which may help promote a healthy weight management program in this patient group.

Does preoperative narcotic use adversely affect outcomes and complications after spinal deformity surgery? A comparison of nonnarcotic- with narcotic-using groups

Background contextThe role of preoperative (preop) narcotic use and its influence on outcomes after spinal deformity surgery are unknown. It is important to determine which patient factors and comorbidities can affect the success of spinal deformity surgery, a challenging surgery with high rates of complications at baseline. PurposeTo evaluate if preop narcotic use persists after spinal deformity surgery and whether the outcomes are adversely affected by preop narcotic use. Study design/settingRetrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data. Patient sampleTwo hundred fifty-three adult patients (230 females/23 males) undergoing primary spinal deformity surgery were enrolled from 2000 to 2009. Outcome measuresPreoperative and postoperative (postop) narcotic use and changes in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) pain, and SRS total scores. MethodsPreoperative, 2-year postop, and latest follow-up pain medication use were collected along with ODI, SRS pain, and SRS scores. Preoperative insurance status, surgical and hospitalization demographics, and complications were collected. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up (average 47.4 months). ResultsOne hundred sixty-eight nonnarcotic (NoNarc) patients were taking no pain meds or only nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories preoperatively. Eighty-five patients were taking mild/moderate/heavy narcotics before surgery. The average age was 48.2 years for the NoNarc group versus 53.6 years for the Narc group (p<.005). There were significantly more patients with degenerative than adult scoliosis in the Narc group (47 vs. 28, p<.001; mild 19 vs. 24, p<.02; moderate 6 vs. 14, p<.0003; heavy 3 vs. 10, p<.0002). Insurance status (private/Medicare/Medicaid) was similar between the groups (p=.39). At latest follow-up, 137/156 (88%) prior NoNarc patients were still not taking narcotics whereas 48/79 (61%) prior narcotic patients were now off narcotics (p<.001). Significant postop improvements were seen in Narc versus NoNarc groups with regard to ODI (26–15 vs. 44–30.3, p<.001), SRS pain (3.36–3.9 vs. 2.3–3.38, p<.001), and overall SRS outcome (3.36–4 vs. 2.78–3.68, p<.001) scores. A comparison of change in outcome scores between the two groups showed a higher improvement in SRS pain scores for the Narc versus NoNarc group (p<.001). ConclusionsIn adults with degenerative scoliosis taking narcotics a significant decrease in pain medication use was noted after surgery. All outcome scores significantly improved postop in both groups. However, the Narc group had significantly greater improvements in SRS pain scores versus the NoNarc group.

Does Higher Anchor Density Result in Increased Curve Correction and Improved Clinical Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. To determine whether anchor density is associated with curve correction and patient-reported outcomes. There is limited information as to whether anchor density affects the results of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. A total of 952 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis met inclusion criteria (Lenke 1, 2, and 5 curves) with predominantly screw constructs (no. of screws/no. of total anchors >75%). Anchor density was defined as the number of screws, hooks, and wires per level fused, with less than 1.54 considered low density. Analysis of covariance was undertaken to determine association of anchor density with percent curve correction, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS), and Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) scores, controlling for flexibility, fusion length, demographics, and surgeon. High- compared with low-anchor density was associated with increased percent curve correction in Lenke 1 curves at 1 year (69% vs. 66% correction, P = 0.0022), controlling for percent preoperative curve flexibility, length of fusion, and sex (model, P < 0.0001). Similar associations held at 2-year follow-up and for Lenke 2 curves. Decreased thoracic kyphosis was found with increased anchor density for Lenke 1 and 2 curve patterns. There were no associations found between anchor density and Lenke 5 curves. For Lenke 1 curve patterns at 2 years postoperatively, in the high- versus low-anchor density cohorts, there were statistically higher SRS Activity (4.3 vs. 4.2, P = 0.019), Appearance (4.3 vs. 4.1, P = 0.0005), Satisfaction (4.5 vs. 4.3, P = 0.028), and Total scores (4.3 vs. 4.2; P = 0.024). Similarly, the SAQ Appearance score at 1 year similarly was improved in the high-anchor density group (high: 14.1 vs. low: 15.0, P = 0.03) for Lenke 1 curve patterns only. For Lenke 1 and 2 curve patterns, improved percent correction of major coronal curve was noted in the high-screw density cohort. Although statistical significance was reached, it is unclear whether screw density resulted in clinically significant differences in patient-reported outcomes.

High-Dose rhBMP-2 for Adults: Major and Minor Complications

Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) has increased considerably since its introduction in 2002. The complications associated with high-dose rhBMP-2 (≥ 40 mg) are unknown. The purpose of our study was to determine outcomes and medical and surgical complications associated with high-dose rhBMP-2 at short-term and long-term follow-up evaluations. Five hundred and two consecutive adult patients who had received high-dose rhBMP-2 as a part of spinal surgery from 2002 to 2009 at one institution were enrolled. Data were entered prospectively and studied and analyzed retrospectively. Surgical procedures in the thoracic and lumbar spine were included. Major and minor complications were documented intraoperatively, perioperatively, and at the latest follow-up examination. Complications potentially associated with rhBMP-2 use were evaluated for correlation with rhBMP-2 dose. Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) outcome measures were obtained before and after surgery. On average, 115 mg (range, 40 to 351 mg) of rhBMP-2 was used. The average age of the patients (410 women and ninety-two men) at the time of the index procedure was 52.4 years (range, eighteen to eighty years). There were 265 primary and 237 revision procedures, and 261 patients had interbody fusion. An average of 11.5 vertebrae were instrumented. The average duration of follow-up was forty-two months (range, fourteen to ninety-two months). The diagnoses included idiopathic scoliosis (41%), degenerative scoliosis (31%), fixed sagittal imbalance (18%), and other diagnoses (10%). The rate of intraoperative complications was 8.2%. The rate of perioperative major surgical complications was 11.6%. The rate of perioperative major medical complications was 11.6%. Minor medical complications occurred in 18.9% of the cases, and minor surgical complications occurred in 2.6%. Logistic regression analysis and Pearson correlation did not identify a significant correlation between rhBMP-2 dosage and radiculopathy (r = -0.006), seroma (r = -0.003), or cancer (r = -0.05). Significant improvements in the ODI score (from a mean of 41 points to a mean of 26 points; p < 0.001) and the SRS total score (from a mean of 3.0 points to a mean of 3.7 points; p < 0.001) were noted at the latest follow-up evaluation. This is the largest study of which we are aware that examines complications associated with high-dose rhBMP-2. Major surgical complications occurred in 11.6% of patients, and 11.6% experienced major medical complications. There was a cancer prevalence of 3.4%, but no correlation between increasing rhBMP-2 dosage and cancer, radiculopathy (seen in 1% of the patients), or seroma (seen in 0.6%) was found.

Discriminative Properties of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire Compared With the Scoliosis Research Society–22 Revised

Study DesignLongitudinal cohort. ObjectivesTo determine the responsiveness of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (SAQ) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing surgical correction of the deformity. Summary of Background DataThe SAQ has been found to be a valid and reliable measure in patients with AIS. A recently published factor analysis and scoring system has been shown to be applicable to all Lenke types and had greater correlation to the curve magnitude than the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Appearance and Total score. MethodsFrom a prospective multicenter database, 126 AIS patients who underwent correction of the spinal deformity with complete SAQ and SRS-22 Revised data at baseline and 2-year follow-up were identified. Discriminative properties of the SAQ domains (Expectations, Appearance, and Total) and SRS domains (Appearance, Activity, Pain, Mental, Satisfaction, and Total) were compared by computing the effect size (ES) and the standardized response mean (SRM). ResultsThe SAQ Total had the largest ES (1.8) and SRM (1.5). This was followed by the SAQ Appearance, with an ES of 1.7 and SRM of 1.4; and the SAQ Expectations, with an ES of 1.5 and SRM of 1.2. Among the different SRS domains, only the Appearance (ES = 1.2, SRM = 1.1), Satisfaction (ES = 0.8, SRM = 0.6), and Total scores (ES = 0.8, SRM = 0.9) had effect sizes that were considered large. The SRS Mental domain had a moderate effect size (ES = 0.3, SRM = 0.3), whereas the Activity (ES = 0.0, SRM = 0.0) and Pain (ES = 0.2, SRM = 0.2) domains had small effect sizes. ConclusionsThe SAQ is sensitive and responsive to change, as evidenced by the large effect size for both domain and the Total score. The effect sizes are larger than those for any of the SRS domains, including Appearance and Total scores.

Does Thoracic Hypokyphosis Matter in Lenke Type 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Study DesignWe analyzed a prospective cohort of Lenke 1ABC adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients based on differences in T5–T12 sagittal alignment. ObjectiveOur objective was to determine whether patients with hypokyphotic scoliosis demonstrate unique characteristics in terms of baseline health status and response to surgery. Background SummaryRight thoracic AIS often presents as a hypokyphotic scoliosis, with rotatory deformity resulting in a diminution of the normal thoracic kyphosis. The perceived importance is indicated by the inclusion of a sagittal plane modifier within Lenke’s classification system for AIS and studies examining reduction strategies to restore thoracic kyphosis. MethodsWe grouped patients based on thoracic kyphosis, measured from T5 to T12, as either less than 10° (hypokyphotic) or greater than or equal to 10° (normal/kyphotic). We used Student t test for independent samples to compare continuous variables between the hypokyphotic and normal/kyphotic groups. ResultsThere was a significant difference in age between groups (mean age, 14.9 years in the hypokyphotic group versus 13.4 years in the normal/kyphotic group; p = .007). Differences in baseline health status measures were statistically significant but small. Hypokyphotic patients reported less pain than normal/kyphotic patients, with a mean Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Pain score of 4.15 versus 4.03 (p = .044), better SRS Mental Domain scores (4.06 vs. 3.92; p = .026), and better SRS Total scores (3.92 vs. 3.83, p = .027). The hypokyphotic group also had better SRS Appearance (3.36 vs. 3.30) and Activity scores (4.20 vs. 4.13), but these differences did not reach statistical significance. ConclusionsThere were no differences in baseline or 2-year postoperative outcome scores in Lenke 1 AIS patients with hypokyphosis compared with patients with normal sagittal alignment. Maintenance of or restoration to normal kyphosis in hypokyphotic patients with Lenke 1 AIS may not improve clinical outcome compared with patients who remain lordotic after surgical correction.

Direct repair of spondylolysis presenting after correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background context Although spondylolysis is found in 6% of idiopathic scoliosis patients, very little was reported on management of pars defects in this group. These patients with painful spondylolysis are most eligible for direct repair of the defect rather than lumbosacral fusion in an attempt to save motion segments. Purpose The aim of this work was to analyze the clinical and radiologic outcome of pars repair in a group of adolescents who presented after surgical correction of their idiopathic scoliosis. Study design A prospective nonrandomized study. Patient sample Ten consecutive patients with spondylolysis presenting after an average of 3 months (range, 2–7 months) from correction of their idiopathic scoliosis with low back pain not responding to conservative therapy and interfering with everyday activities. The mean age at operation was 16 years (range, 14–19 years). Outcome measures Total blood loss, operative time, and hospital stay were recorded. Clinical outcome was assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 questionnaire. Fusion of the pars interarticularis was assessed using plain, lateral, and oblique radiographs and a computed tomography (CT) scan. Methods The surgical technique consisted of thorough debridement of the defect, impacting the gap created with a tricortical iliac crest graft, and rigid fixation by either pedicle screws and a V-shaped rod (five patients) or a cable-screw construct (five patients). Results Patients were followed up for an average of 4.5 years (range, 2–7 years). Nine patients had a good-to-excellent result, returned to normal everyday life, and participated in sports when desired. The mean ODI, VAS, and SRS total scores were 11 (range, 0–34), 1.1 (range, 0–2), and 92 (range, 61–108), respectively. Follow-up radiographs and CT scans revealed healing of all defects in nine cases, no signs of disc degeneration in any, and no implant-related complications. Conclusions The results of direct repair of spondylolysis in idiopathic scoliosis patients were very satisfactory both clinically and radiologically. Direct repair appears to be a logical alternative to spinal fusion; lumbar spine mobility was preserved, and precocious motion segments were saved with a relatively simple operation.

Changes in Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes With Primary Treatment Adult Spinal Deformity Surgeries From Two Years to Three- to Five-Years Follow-up

Retrospective analysis of data entered prospectively into a multicenter database-clinical and radiographic outcomes assessment. Our hypothesis is that between the 2-year and the 3- to 5-year points surgically treated adult spinal deformity patients will show significant reduction in outcomes by Scoliosis Research Society (SRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and numerical rating scale back and leg pain scores and will show increasing thoracic kyphosis, loss of lumbar lordosis, and loss of coronal and sagittal balance. Most analyses of primary presentation adult spinal deformity surgery assess 2-year follow-up. However, it is established that in some patients unfavorable events occur between the 2-year and 5-year points. The cohort of 113 patients entered into a multicenter database with complete preoperative, 2-year, and 3- to 5-year data. All patients who had adult spinal deformity and surgical treatment represented their first reconstruction. Diagnoses were scoliosis (82.5%), kyphosis (10%), and scoliosis and kyphosis combined (7.5%). Outcome measures and basic radiographic parameters (curve size, thoracic and lumbar sagittal plane, coronal and sagittal balance) were assessed at those 3 time intervals. Complications (pseudarthrosis/implant failure, infection, and junctional deformities) were assessed at the 2-year and the 3- to 5-year (mean, 3.76 years) points. RESULTS.: The mean major curve Cobb angle (preoperative, 57°; 2-year, 29°; 3-5 year, 26°); thoracic kyphosis T5 to T12 (30°, 31°, 32°) and lumbar lordosis T12 to sacrum (48°, 49°, 51°) did not change from the 2-year to ultimate follow-up. Likewise, coronal and sagittal balance parameters were the same at 2-year and ultimate follow-up. SRS total scores and modified ODI were similar at the 2 year and final follow-up (SRS: 3.89-3.88; ODI: 19-18). Preoperative SRS total score was 3.17. Six patients demonstrated complications at the 2-year point and additional 9 patients demonstrated complications at the 3- to 5-year point. Those 9 patients with complications at ultimate follow-up demonstrated significant deterioration in their ODI and SRS scores when compared with the patients who did not have complications at ultimate follow-up. Contrary to our hypothesis, we could not establish deterioration in mean radiographic or clinical outcomes between the 2-year and 3- to 5-year follow-up points when analyzing the group as a whole. However, for the 9 patients who experienced complications between 3- and 5-year follow-up, their outcomes were significantly worse than for the other 104 patients.One should not anticipate an overall radiographic and clinical deterioration of the outcomes of surgically treated primary presentation adult spinal deformity patients in this studied time interval. However, close to 10% of patients will experience a new complication at the 3- to 5-year point, most commonly implant failure/nonunion and/or junctional kyphosis, which will negatively effect the patient-reported outcome.

Treatment of Severe Spondylolisthesis in Adolescence With Reduction or Fusion In Situ: Long-term Clinical, Radiologic, and Functional Outcome

Retrospective follow-up study with two cohorts: one treated with reduction and the other with fusion in situ. To assess the long-term effects of reduction versus fusion in situ on lumbar spine in children and adolescents with severe L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Severe isthmic spondylolisthesis is commonly treated with fusion in situ, but modern surgical techniques and instrumentation permit the reduction of a severely slipped fifth lumbar vertebra. Advocates of one or another of these procedures present different claims to defend their choice. However, to our knowledge, no long-term results of the reduction maneuver exist. Between 1983 and 1991, 22 adolescents with severe (more than 60%) slip were treated surgically. In 11 of them, reduction was performed with a Magerl/Dick transpedicular device, followed by fusion posteriorly from L4 or L5 to S1 and anteriorly from L5 to S1. In the others, fusion was performed in situ posteriorly from L4 (n = 7) or L5 (n = 4) to S1 and anteriorly from L5 to S1. The average age of patients at surgery was 14.7 years (range 10.7-18.5). Radiographs obtained before surgery, after surgery, and at the final follow-up evaluation were assessed for quality of fusion. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging was obtained at the last follow-up visit. Average follow-up time was 14.8 years (range 11.6-18.7). Physical examination, spinal mobility, and nondynamometric trunk strength measurements were used to assess, and Oswestry Disability Index and Scoliosis Research Society scores were used to calculate outcome at the last follow-up visit. In the reduction group, mean Oswestry Disability Index was 7.2 (range 0-20) and in the fusion in situ group, was 1.6 (range 0-4) (P = 0.0096). The Scoliosis Research Society total score averaged 90.0 (range 39-107) in the reduction group and 103.9 (range 93-120) in the fusion in situ group (P = 0.046). At the last follow-up evaluation, mean vertebral slip had decreased from the preoperative value of 90% to 57% in the reduction group but remained the same (80% vs. 78%) in the fusion in situ group (P = 0.04 and 0.013, respectively, for preoperative and postoperative comparison). On magnetic resonance imaging, disc degeneration above the fusion was more common in the reduction group (P = 0.004). None of the patients had spinal stenosis above the fusion. Nerve root canal impingement at the L5-S1 level was more common in the fusion in situ group (P = 0.03), but all patients were free of L5 nerve root symptoms. There was no difference in spinal mobility or trunk strength measurements between the groups. The fusion in situ group seems to perform better in almost all clinical parameters measured. These findings suggest that fusion in situ should be considered as a method of choice in severe L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Posterolateral, Anterior, or Circumferential Fusion In Situ for High-Grade Spondylolisthesis in Young Patients: A Long-Term Evaluation Using The Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire

A retrospective, comparative follow-up study. To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterolateral, anterior, or circumferential fusion in situ for high-grade spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Controversial opinions still exist about the surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis. There are no long-term comparative studies of different fusion in situ techniques in these patients. A total of 21 patients treated using posterolateral, 23 using anterior, and 26 using the circumferential fusion technique without instrumentation for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (>or=50% slip) participated. Their mean age at surgery was 14.4 years (range 8.0-19.6). The follow-up rate was 84% after a mean of 17.2 years (range 10.7-26.0). Radiographs were obtained before surgery, at 2-year follow-up, and at final follow-up. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires were completed, and a physical examination was performed at the final follow-up visit. Progression of lumbosacral kyphosis (>or=10 degrees ) was found in 9 (43%), 3 (13%), and 3 (12%) patients of the posterolateral, anterior, and circumferential fusion groups, respectively (P = 0.017). The SRS total score averaged 89.7 (range 56-105) in the posterolateral, 93.2 (range 66-114) in the anterior, and 100.0 (range 71-117) in the circumferential fusion groups (P = 0.021). Patients in the circumferential fusion group had better values for pain (P = 0.023) and function from back condition domains (P = 0.079) than patients in the posterolateral or anterior groups. The Oswestry Disability Index averaged 9.7 (range 0-62) in the posterolateral, 8.9 (range 0-32) in the anterior, and 3.0 (range 0-16) in the circumferential fusion groups (P = 0.035). Circumferential fusion provided significantly better long-term clinical, radiographic, and SRS total score than posterolateral or anterior fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Instrument in Evaluation of Long-Term Surgical Results in Spondylolysis and Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis in Young Patients

A retrospective follow-up study of low-grade (slip < or = 50%) isthmic spondylolisthesis after posterior or posterolateral fusion in young patients. To evaluate the usefulness of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire and compare it with Oswestry Disability Index and radiographic parameters in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. A few studies have examined long-term patient outcome using validated questionnaires or compared it with radiographic parameters after surgery for isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients. The Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire provides patient-oriented information on back pain, cosmetic aspects, patient satisfaction, and level of activity and might therefore be suitable for evaluation of surgical outcome after isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients. However, there are no studies assessing the usefulness of the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire for these patients. One hundred and eight patients treated at a mean (range) age of 15.9 (range, 8.1-19.8) years with posterior (n = 29) or posterolateral (n = 79) in situ fusion for isthmic spondylolisthesis participated in the present study. The follow-up rate was 83% after a mean of 20.8 (range, 15.1-25.9) years. The mean age at follow-up observation was 36.7 years. Radiographs were obtained before surgery, at 2-year follow-up observation, and at final follow-up review. The Scoliosis Research Society and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaires were completed, and a physical examination was performed at the final follow-up visit. Nonunion after primary operation was found in 10 (34%) patients after posterior fusion and in 10 (13%) patients after posterolateral fusion (P = 0.0017). The mean (range) anterior slip was 25.2% (0-50%) before surgery and 24.2% (0-78%) at final follow-up observation. Lumbosacral kyphosis increased significantly during the follow-up period. The Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire yielded a total of 94.0 (range, 44-114) points. On the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire, 14 (14%) patients reported back pain often or very often at rest. The Oswestry Disability Index scores averaged 8.2 (range, 0-68). There was a significant correlation between the Scoliosis Research Society total score and the Oswestry Disability Index. The percentage slip showed significant inverse correlations with the scores for appearance in clothes, attractiveness, and self image (Scoliosis Research Society questions 5, 14, and 15). Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after posterolateral fusion of low-grade spondylolisthesis were satisfactory. Cosmetic aspects of this deformity should be included as one of the outcome measurements, since cosmetic questions on the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire showed inverse correlations between the amount of slip at final follow-up observation. The Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire could be used as a primary patient-oriented outcome tool after back surgery in young patients.