Sirs, Primary hydatidosis of the kidney is very rare, even in endemic areas such as our country [1–4]. Diagnosis of the hydatid cyst is mainly on the basis of serologic tests and/or imaging studies [1–3]. Ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) are the important imaging modalities for hydatid disease and may clearly demonstrate the floating membranes, and typical daughter cysts in the cystic lesions [1, 2]. A 9-year-old boy was referred to our center with the chief complaint of right flank pain and weight loss. He had no history of fever. On physical examination a mildly tender bulging at the right flank area was palpated. Laboratory investigations, including those for blood sugar, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, liver enzymes, and urinalysis, gave normal findings. Complete blood count was normal except for mild leukocytosis [white blood cells (WBCs): 12,000]. On transabdominal ultrasound, multiple anechoic cystic masses were demonstrated in the right kidney. For further delineation of the cystic masses computed tomography (CT) was performed, the scan revealing multiple cystic space-occupying lesions and excellently depicting the daughter cysts in the kidney (Fig. 1a). On the 7th day of admission, after we had obtained informed consent, the patient underwent surgical exploration under general anesthesia for confirmation of the diagnosis of hydatid disease and for the ruling out of other renal masses such as cystic renal cell carcinoma or cystic nephroma. During the operation, one of the cysts was completely removed, and the surgical specimen was diagnosed as the hydatid cyst. Owing to extensive involvement of the kidney and high risk of life-threatening rupture, complete removal of the cysts was very difficult; therefore right-sided nephrectomy was carried out. The rest of the abdomen and pelvis showed no evidence of involvement. Microscopic examination disclosed the scolices of Echinococcus granulosus, with adjacent laminated membrane, and confirmed the diagnosis (Fig. 1b). CT may be superior to ultrasonographic examination because of its capability of better evaluation of the cystic masses and for its demonstration of any enhancement in other lesions such as renal abscess, tumors, and focal pyelonephritis. In our case we observed that the CT scan could detect the daughter cysts more satisfactorily. The possibility of a striking clinical resemblance between a hydatid cyst and malignant disease of the kidney such as cystic renal cell carcinoma or cystic nephroma has been emphasized in the English literature [3–6]. We also indicate this important point in our patient. In conclusion, the most important factor in the diagnosis of hydatid disease is the high index of suspicion about its possibility. Primary hydatidosis of the kidney should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of any cystic renal mass in the pediatric groups, even in the absence of accompanying involvement of liver or other visceral organs. Pediatr Nephrol (2009) 24:1251–1252 DOI 10.1007/s00467-008-0963-2
Read full abstract