On the night of October 9, 1604, Italian citizens recorded their astonishment that the universe had changed for the first time in centuries. As they looked to the night sky, they found new star had appeared. They knew nothing about the process for the creation of stars; rather, they believed that the heavens were fixed and immutable. same stars in the same arrangements made up the map of the heavens for their entire lives and going back for generations. What did mean to man and society if the heavens could change their composition? Johannes Kepler was especially intrigued by this new object. He studied the new star in detail, writing an entire book on his observations, De Stella Nova in Pede Serpentarii (On the New Star in Ophiuchus's Foot). His book contained an original drawing of the position of the stars with the shadow of Ophiuchus framing the constellation. new star appears in the heel of the constellation, labeled 'N'. As result of this work, SN1604 is now also known as Kepler's Supernova. supernova and Kepler's methodical observations of planted the seeds for new approach to scientific discovery. appearance of new star opened people's eyes to new possibilities: if there is more in the heavens than has been known in the past, then perhaps there is more on earth as well. If even the heavens are subject to change, then questioning the accepted knowledge received from the ancients might be permissible, beneficial, even essential. SN1604 did not change the physical earth, but did begin to change the mental framework of earth's inhabitants. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] This natural philosophy took some time to coalesce. Its first expression might be seen in the formation of small group of natural philosophers in the area around London, England in the late seventeenth century. On November 28, 1660, this of met to hear lecture by Christopher Wren and afterward formally declared themselves a Colledge for the Promoting of Physico-Mathematicall Experimentall Learning. Two years later, they were officially recognized by the Crown with Royal Charter and the loose title The Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge--and took the motto Nullius in verba, Latin for Take nobody's word for it (Royal Society 2012). Christopher Wren and the Committee of 12 laid the groundwork for the acceptance of inquiry, innovation, invention, and change in the natural and mechanical worlds. They made acceptable to question what is held to be true and extended their thinking to the question of what might be. For Wren and his compatriots, knowledge and were not--as they had been believed to be--derived exclusively from the wisdom of the ancients. They offered new structure for pursuing knowledge, new understanding of innovation as positive force. However, the boundaries of scientific inquiry were not yet defined. Astrology and astronomy were one practice, and alchemy was just beginning to grow into chemistry. Scientists explored fortune telling and divination alongside mathematics and physics. Gradually, through the development of an objective method of inquiry and the accumulation of results from repeated, well-structured experiments, the parameters of science and disciplined method of inquiry emerged. As natural philosophers uncovered how the physical world worked, they provided essential knowledge for manipulating that world to meet practical needs. birth of real science led to the birth of real engineering. This mother-daughter pair equipped thousands of intelligent and inquisitive minds to invent, discover, and innovate their way out of the Dark Ages, creating scientific Renaissance that would eventually give us the Industrial Revolution. work of the Committee of 12 and their generations of successors opened people's minds to the possibilities of inquiry, enabling them to question accepted knowledge and test their own theories about how the world might work and how might be changed for the better. …
Read full abstract