Scientific Ontologies Research Articles

Indigenous knowledges: Circumspection, metaphysics, and scientific ontologies.

still to be written by author

A Grid Service-Based Infrastructure for Accessing Scientific Collections: The Case of the ARION System

The ARION system provides basic e-services of search and retrieval of objects in scientific collections, such as datasets, simulation models and tools necessary for statistical and/or visualization processing. These collections may represent application software of scientific areas, they reside in geographically disperse organizations and constitute the system content. The user may invoke on-line computations of scientific datasets when the latter are not found into the system. The underlying grid used consists of hardware and software resources in the various participating organizations. ARION manages these resources providing a computing framework that produces datasets required by the user. In addition, the system offers semantic description of its content in terms of scientific ontologies and metadata information. Thus, ARION provides the basic infrastructure for accessing and deriving scientific information in an open, distributed and federated system.

Sellars without homogeneity

Central to Wilfrid Sellars' philosophical system is his belief that science's current ontology is inadequate as it fails to provide for an acceptable account of perceptual experience. Unfortunately, this remains the most puzzling plank in his philosophy. Sellars himself argues for this position via his wellknown example of a pink ice cube and its homogeneous colour. This homogeneity, says Sellars, bars the acceptance of science's present ontology of achromatic particles, and requires the introduction of items which are truly coloured. Only with such a revised and expanded ontology, with all that entails, can science adequately meet its explanatory demands. I aim here to remedy at least some of the confusions and misunderstandings this position has engendered. But I mean to take a different route from Sellars. In short, given the problems with Sellars' views on homogeneity, I will argue for the Sellarsian conclusion as to the inadequacy of present scientific ontologies, yet without reliance on the puzzling doctrine of homogeneity. I begin then with a detailed examination of Sellars official position, indicate the trouble spots, and begin an alternative route. As I conceive things, however, the position I will sketch is still thoroughly Sellarsian, for it proceeds from premises Sellars himself has endorsed.

Ontological Progress in Science

In the grand tradition, philosophical ontology was considered logically and epistemologically prior to scientific ontology. Like many contemporary philosophers of science, we consider this to be a mistake. There is two-way traffic between philosophical and scientific ontologies; the more we learn about what there actually is, the more we learn about what can be and what must be, and vice versa. But that is not the present topic; here we focus on the ontology or ontologies of science, not traditional philosophical ontologies or the traffic between scientific and philosophical ontologies.