412 PHOENIX propose that, in spite of wealth, the urbanized Roman lifestyle led to deteriorating health during the empire; he concludes that further evidence and analyses are required. In the final chapter he succinctly summarizes his main arguments and places them in an even broader context, suggesting that the impact of private-order enforcement may have reduced economic performance and stifled innovation. Overall, Terpstra’s work is credible, rational, and particularly stimulating at both the micro- and macro-economic level. While it is well argued, sometimes one wonders whether the broad strokes with which he paints his picture of the ancient Mediterranean economy are adequately served by the theoretical approaches and the quantitative evidence that he uses. Although generally reasonable throughout, in Chapter Five this approach becomes rather more precarious: for instance, “economic trust” should perhaps have been considered in the context of social capital,4 and the links between the destruction of sanctuaries and the trade diasporas who used them are arguably speculative. He may well be correct—admittedly, I suspect there is something in what he says—but the evidence is hardly definitive. Minor quibbles aside, however, this book is a thoughtful and thoughtprovoking addition to the study of ancient Mediterranean economies. MacEwan University Matt Gibbs The Reception of Cicero in the Early Roman Empire: The Rhetorical Schoolroom and the Creation of a Cultural Legend. By Thomas J. Keeline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2018. Pp. xii, 375. Thomas Keeline's new book is avowedly about a “shadow,” but a “towering shadow” (2): the figure of Cicero as it was created and deployed in schoolrooms (and beyond) in roughly the century and a half following Cicero’s death. Engagingly and entertainingly written, this book synthesizes, and brings a contemporary reception studies approach to, previous scholarship on the legend of Cicero, drawing on underappreciated texts to reconstruct the pedagogy of the rhetor’s classroom—how elite adolescent males learned the arts of oratory and advocacy via a curriculum based on studying the speeches, and a version of the life, of the greatest advocate and orator of all. The introductory chapter expounds the book’s core argument: the rhetorical schoolroom was central to the creation of the Cicero legend starting in the years just after his death, framing what the figure of “Cicero” was and could be. This figuration persisted at least into the age of Trajan, providing “a wealth of material that could be accommodated by enterprising speakers to the demands of the case at hand” (10). In Chapter One, “Pro Milone: Reading Cicero in the Schoolroom,” Keeline shows that, through the first century c.e. and likely beyond, Cicero’s great undelivered speech Pro Milone was a foundational school text studied by students under the tutelage of the rhetor, providing a model of powerful, persuasive, eloquent oratory. Keeline’s demonstration is compelling and novel. Through an extraordinarily careful reading of the surviving commentaries on this speech by Asconius and in the Scholia Bobbiensia, supported by incidental remarks in Quintilian, Keeline reconstructs the concerns and even the curriculum of the rhetor’s classroom. The chapter’s organization follows the structure of the speech itself, as Keeline demonstrates how ancient teachers introduced the speech, and 4 On which, see R. D. Putnum, Making Democracy Work (Princeton 1993) 167. BOOK REVIEWS/COMPTES RENDUS 413 then how they and their students worked with the exordium, praeiudicia, narratio, argumentatio , and peroratio. Teachers were especially interested in the rhetorical strategy and argumentation of the speech, as well as its execution; hence teachers (and commentators) acknowledge Cicero’s lies and deceptions, yet turn them into rhetorical virtues that show how one goes about persuading an audience even when one has a bad case. In Chapter Two, “Eloquence (Dis)embodied: The Textualization of Cicero,” Keeline covers territory that is more familiar. He discusses how the figuration of Cicero that emerged in the rhetorical classroom simplifies and schematizes the highly complicated living orator, person, and politician—producing a kind of cartoon, crafted for student consumption, of “The Apotheosis of Eloquence.” This textualized Cicero was crucial for the second key activity of the rhetor’s classroom, namely declamation—the practice of composing speeches of one’s own on set...
Read full abstract