Advancement in mobile ad-hoc network (MANET's) has offered solutions to wide range of real-time applications. MANET's consist of group of battery operated wireless mobile nodes that forms a dynamic topology and functions autonomously without infrastructure. Mobile nodes are limited to resource, bandwidth, energy and memory. Due to mobile nature of the nodes, mobility and resource limitations are the two major factors that affect MANET's performance. Frequent topology changes and mobility affects the link stability between two nodes, frequent link interruption results in network congestion, lead to packet drop and increase retransmission delays. During multihop data transmissions, the wireless channel is shared among neighbour nodes. Determining the channel status and predicting the quality of link is still a challenging issue. Existing MANET's routing scheme considers optimal hop count as a metric for data transmission and selects the shortest path. Due to nodes movement, frequent link failure occurs, resulting in packet loss and retransmission of packet, which restablished path avoids packets loss, and alternate paths can be discovered within time such that congestion is controlled and delay is minimised. Therefore, it is required to design routing scheme for MANET's that can adapt to network changes and conditions to support quality of service (QoS). In this paper, we propose an Adaptive Congestion and Energy Aware Multipath Routing Scheme (ACEAMR) to provision QoS requirements in MANET's. ACEAMR discovers stable, energy aware, and congestion free paths towards destination. The congestion level at node is determined by computing queue utilization through adaptive feedback mechanism. ACEAMR integrates stable link prediction (SLP) to estimate the link quality and channel availability for reliable data transmission. Energy aware nodes are computed using fitness function of nodes having sufficient energy to extend network lifetime. Simulation results show that proposed ACEAMR achieves 30 % of higher throughput, 25 % more in packet delivery ratio, 27 % less delay and 28 % energy efficient compared to LLECP-AOMDV, OLEADM and AOMDV schemes.
Read full abstract