SET IN A MYTHICAL CHINA, Octave Mirbeau's 1899 novel Jardin des supplices is a sustained narrative in which scenes of bloody torture are set against a story of a decadent love affair between the narrator and the female protagonist, Clara. The novel is divided into three sections, of which the first is a frontispiece, consisting in the main of reworked material from Divagations sur le meurtre (1896) and loi du meurtre (1892). The frontispiece is a somewhat sardonic and ironic defense of murder reminiscent of the preand post-coital philosophical treatises in Sade's novels. The second section, En Mission, the first part of the novel per se, is told in flashback and is a disquisition on the petty and tawdry politics of Europe. In the middle of this section, the narrator first meets Clara. They go to the Indies and then head toward the China of hallucinatory scenarios, of fantastic justice, of torture, eroticism, and death. The third and longest part, entitled Le Jardin des Supplices, is a tour of the Chinese torture garden that gives its name to the book; it is a series of tableaux serving as fantasized image of Chinese justice and punishment. The dimensions of the love affair resemble many of those masterfully described by Mario Praz in his classic work, La Carne, la morte e il diavolo. More singular, however, is the discussion of politics. Through its construction, which opposes a satire about European politics and institutions to the depiction of the scenes of torture, Jardin des supplices has often been seen as an indication of the author's disgust with the Western world's hypocritical smugness about democracy and freedom.1 For Mirbeau, modern Western societies parade their violence as virtuous justice, their abuses as economic and moral strengths, their chicanery as a fair political system (Ziegler 162-65). Mirbeau rails against the inhuman, depersonalized world of the West for which Kafka will provide the most poignant literary version in works like The Castle and of which Hannah Arendt will eventually say, Today we ought to add the latest and perhaps most formidable form of such domination [of man over man]: bureaucracy or the rule of an intricate system of bureaus in which no men, neither one nor the best,