Scapholunate Advanced Collapse Research Articles

Proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis: a retrospective comparative study.

Four-corner arthrodesis with scaphoid excision (FCA) and proximal row carpal resection (PRC) are frequently performed in wrists with post-traumatic Scaphoid Non- Union Advanced Collapse (SNAC)/Scapho-Lunate Advanced Collapse (SLAC) osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of these two procedures. This single-center, retrospective cohort study included all patients who had PRC or FCA between January 1st, 2009 and January 1st, 2019 and who were followed up. Follow-up included: mobility (radial deviation, ulnar deviation, flexion, extension), strength (grip test, pinch test), function (QuickDash, patient-rated wrist evaluation [PRWE]), subjective mobility, and global satisfaction scores. Among 25 patients included, 11 had PRC and 14 had FCA with a mean follow-up of 69.5 months [12-132]. Radial deviation was 18° versus 14° (p = 0.7), ulnar deviation was 21° versus 22° (p = 0.15), flexion was 39° versus 30° (p = 0.32), extension was 32.5° versus 29.5° (p = 0.09), grip test compared to the controlateral side was 72% versus 62% (p = 0.53), Quick Dash score was 12.5 versus 17.6 (p = 0.84), PRWE was 18.7 versus 17.6 (p = 0.38), subjective mobility was 7.8 versus 7.5 (p = 0.23), and satisfaction score was 8.7 versus 9 (p = 0.76), respectively, in the FCA group and the PRC group. Re-operation rates were 14% patients in the FCA group and 0% in the PRC group. This study found no significant difference between FCA and PRC on strength, mobility, and function in patients with post-traumatic SLAC or SNAC stage II wrist arthritis. Both FCA and PRC seem to be reliable surgical techniques with good outcomes with more revision in the FCA group.

Spontaneous union of neglected proximal pole scaphoid fracture: A case report

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal bone fractures and usually occur due to trauma, typically a fall on an outstretched hand. The scaphoid bone is integral to wrist biomechanics, linking the proximal carpal row to the distal row. Neglected scaphoid fractures can lead to significant long-term complications, with degenerative changes likely to occur. The most common consequence of a neglected scaphoid fracture is known as scaphoid non-union advanced collapse, which typically begins within five years following the injury. It is widely accepted that scaphoid fractures, in general, should be treated to avoid long-term complications. Many surgeons aggressively treat proximal pole fractures with surgical fixation due to the high risk of avascular necrosis. Although some surgeons may consider a period of immobilization, none would argue against the need for treatment of proximal pole fractures, either through immobilization or surgical fixation. In this case, we present an instance of spontaneous union of a neglected proximal pole fracture non-union in a mature adult. This report aims to provide awareness of the possible spontaneous union of neglected proximal pole scaphoid fracture. It also challenges the call for acute aggressive surgical intervention in such fractures. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging scan images before and after union are presented, along with a review of the available literature.

Scapholunate Advanced Collapse (SLAC) and Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse (SNAC): A Review of Treatment Options for Stage II.

Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) represent clinical entities identified by a pattern of predictable degenerative changes. They are the most common causes of wrist arthritis. Both entities can remain asymptomatic for many years and may go undiagnosed. Diagnosis is usually confirmed through clinical examination, which reveals progressive wrist pain and instability. Radiographically, degenerative changes in the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints are present, as well as nonunion of the scaphoid fracture in SNAC. The management differs according to the stage. Particularly in this review article, we reviewed the treatment options for stage II SLAC and SNAC wrist. In addition to the well-described surgical techniques such as proximal row carpectomy and four-corner fusion, alternatives such as capitolunate arthrodesis, three-corner fusion, and soft tissue procedures like capsulodesis and tenodesis are available. Proximal row carpectomy and partial arthrodeses yield comparable results. Soft tissue procedures are viable alternatives and are preferred in younger patients to avoid early salvage operations.

Proximal Row Carpectomy with and without Capitate Resurfacing: A Preliminary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

In wrist salvage, proximal row carpectomy (PRC) has increasingly shown superior outcomes to four-corner fusion (4CF). Furthermore, PRC with resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implants (PRC + RCPIs) provides a treatment option that may allow patients to avoid 4CF or wrist arthrodesis and help restore natural joint function and distribute loads evenly across the implant, though RCPI has yet to be evaluated on a large scale. We aimed to compare outcomes between PRC and PRC + RCPI for the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for articles on PRC and PRC + RCPI performed for SLAC and SNAC wrist with minimum 12-month follow-up. Primary outcomes included wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and outcome scores including Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and QuickDASH scores, Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), and visual analog scale pain scores. Twenty-two studies reporting on 1,804 wrists were included (1,718 PRC alone, 86 PRC + RCPI). PRC + RCPI was associated with greater postoperative radial deviation, but poorer flexion. PRC + RCPI also had significantly lower postoperative QuickDASH (less disability and symptoms) and postoperative PRWHE (lower pain and disability) scores and an improvement in PRWHE compared with PRC. There was no significant difference in grip strength. PRC + RCPI demonstrated similar postoperative ROM to PRC alone. While PRC + RCPI was associated with more favorable outcome scores, further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess the incidence and profile of complications related to RCPIs. Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Wrist & Hand

The April 2024 Wrist & Hand Roundup360 looks at: Lunocapitate versus four-corner fusion in scapholunate or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse: a randomized controlled trial; Postoperative scaphoid alignment, smoking, and avascular necrosis determine outcomes; Grip strength signals broader health concerns in females with distal radius fractures; Clearing the smoke: how smoking status influences recovery from open carpal tunnel release surgery; Age matters: assessing the likelihood of corrective surgery after distal radius fractures; Is pronator quadratus muscle repair required after anterior plate fixation for distal radius fractures?; Efficacy of total wrist arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of inflammatory and non-inflammatory arthritis outcomes; A comprehensive review of the one-bone forearm as a salvage technique.

Distal Scaphoid Excision for Chronic and Nonchronic Scaphoid Fracture Nonunion

PurposeThe indications for distal scaphoid excision are limited to localized wrist arthritis surrounding the scaphoid as a result of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse or scapho-trapezio-trapezoid (STT) joint arthritis. The procedure historically has led to relief of symptoms and improvement in strength. Our aim was to examine the outcomes of this procedure in patients with scaphoid fracture nonunion. MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective case series of 12 consecutive patients who underwent distal scaphoid excision after scaphoid fracture nonunion. Patients were divided into two groups based on nonunion chronicity: chronic (more than a year) and non-chronic (less than a year). Clinical and radiographic data were examined using descriptive statistics. ResultsOur cohort consisted of 12 patients, 10 men (83%) and 2 women (17%), with a mean age 37.6±13.6 years. Eight patients had a chronic scaphoid fracture nonunion (6 had a neglected scaphoid fracture and 2 had a nonunion after scaphoid open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with bone graft) and 4 patients had non-chronic fracture non-union (2 had failed cast treatment and 2 had nonunion after scaphoid ORIF with bone graft). Pre-operatively, all patients complained of pain and 4 had numbness (all in chronic group). After an average 21 weeks post-operatively, 7 patients (58%) reported continued pain. Two patients reported ulnar side pain, one underwent arthroscopic synovectomy. All patients who started with normal radiolunate angle continued to have normal angle, whereas patients who had DISI prior to surgery persisted after surgery except for a patient who underwent midcarpal fusion and had their radiolunate angle corrected. ConclusionsDistal scaphoid excision is an effective procedure for carefully selected patients with periscaphoid wrist arthrosis. Patients with recent scaphoid fracture that failed treatment may also be treated with distal scaphoid resection.

Lunate Shift Index (LSI): A New Parameter for the Evaluation of Residual Ulnar Side Wrist Pain in Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis Undergoing Three-Corners Arthrodesis vs. Four-Corners Arthrodesis—A Retrospective Comparative Study with Minimum 2 Years of Follow-up

Lunate Shift Index (LSI): A New Parameter for the Evaluation of Residual Ulnar Side Wrist Pain in Patients with Wrist Osteoarthritis Undergoing Three-Corners Arthrodesis vs. Four-Corners Arthrodesis—A Retrospective Comparative Study with Minimum 2 Years of Follow-up

Should we always perform scaphoid nonunion surgery in patients with minor preoperative symptoms?

The objective of this study was to assess the downsides of surgical treatment of scaphoid fracture nonunion in patients with minor preoperative symptoms. Patients were classified with minor symptoms based on the Patient-Rated Hand/Wrist Evaluation questionnaire. Of the 35 included patients, most patients encountered problems with patient-specific activities; 9% reported worse postoperative functional outcomes, 34% were not satisfied with the treatment and 9% were reoperated. The risk of a worse functional outcome after surgery with the need for further operations and the chance of developing wrist osteoarthritis, along with the possibility of poor patient satisfaction and ongoing daily functional impairment, should be considered during preoperative counselling.Level of evidence: III.

Four-Corner Fusion Versus Proximal Row Carpectomy for Scapholunate Advanced Collapse and Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse Wrist: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Although proximal row carpectomy (PRC) has increasingly been shown to have superior features to four-corner fusion (4CF), individual surgeons may remain convinced of the superiority of one procedure based on personal experience and individual biases. Hence, we sought to perform an updated meta-analysis with some of the largest studies to date to compare outcomes and complications between these procedures in the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrists. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for articles on PRC and 4CF performed for scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrist. Primary outcomes included wrist range of motion; grip strength; outcome measures, including Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation, and visual analog scale pain scores; and surgical complications. Sixty-one studies reported on 3,174 wrists, of which 54% were treated with PRC and 46% were treated with 4CF. The weighted mean follow-up was 61 months (range, 12-216 months). Meta-analysis comparing PRC and 4CF demonstrated that PRC had significantly greater postoperative extension; ulnar deviation; postoperative improvement in extension, flexion, ulnar deviation; and visual analog scale score. No comparisons showed significant differences in grip strength. The percentage of wrists requiring arthrodesis was 5.2% for PRC and 11% for 4CF. There was an 8.9% (57/640 wrists) 4CF nonunion rate and 2.2% (17/789) hardware removal rate after 4CF. In the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrists, PRC results in better outcomes and a lower complication rate compared to 4CF. Therapeutic IV.

Snapping Wrist From Bowstringing of the Digital Flexors After Carpal Tunnel Release: A Case Report.

Symptomatic bowstringing of digital flexor tendons is a rare complication of carpal tunnel release (CTR). Two weeks after open CTR, a 47-year-old man with severe carpal tunnel syndrome had relief of his preoperative median paresthesia but complained of new-onset painful snapping of the wrist and transient ulnar paresthesia occurring with wrist dorsiflexion and concomitant digital flexion. Physical examination localized the audible snapping to the hook of hamate (HOH) where manual pressure eliminated the wrist motion-induced snapping and the associated ulnar paresthesia. Wrist radiographs showed stage III scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) with marked palmar subluxation of the lunate. Wrist magnetic resonance imaging revealed palmar and ulnar subluxation of the digital flexors over the HOH due to the mass effect of the palmarly displaced lunate and the chronic carpal malalignment. The snapping wrist and accompanying ulnar paresthesia resolved after HOH excision, and no additional treatment for the asymptomatic SLAC wrist deformity was required. Satisfactory clinical outcome was observed at 5-year follow-up.

Reconstruction of an early stage SLAC wrist with the 3-LT procedure: A controversial reappraisal.

We hypothesized that the three-ligament tenodesis (3-LT) procedure is still sufficient - even in scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) cases - to reduce pain and improve wrist function. We compared patient-reported outcomes of scapholunate interosseus ligament (SLIL) injury patients with SLAC to SLIL injury patients treated with 3-LT, and then to patients who received proximal row carpectomy (PRC), as a control group. We included all patients with a traumatic SLIL injury and associated SLAC components treated with 3-LT and completed Patient Reported Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires preoperative and at 12 months follow-up. First, we compared matched patients with SLIL injury and SLIL injury with SLAC, stage 1-3, who received 3-LT. Second, we compared patients who received 3-LT, with patients who underwent PRC, while having SLAC stage 2-3. We compared 51 patients with SLAC to 95 with SLIL injury who had a 3-LT procedure, and 10 3-LT patients were compared to 18 patients undergoing PRC, given SLAC 2-3. In both analyses, the PRWE scores had significantly improved in all groups, however no significant differences in PRWE were found between 3-LT in SLIL injury and SLIL injury with SLAC, 6.9 points (95% CI [-14.92; 1.22], p = 0.096) and between 3-LT and PRC, given SLAC stage 2-3, 15.1 points (not enough power). There is no difference in PRWE between matched SLIL injury patients with or without degenerative changes treated with a 3-LT. Therefore, the 3-LT procedure seems to be a viable treatment option for patients with early-stage SLAC wrist. Therapeutic III.

Effects of a neuromuscular joint-protective exercise therapy program for treatment of wrist osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundIndividuals with wrist osteoarthritis (OA) can suffer from pain, muscular weakness, and impaired motion of the wrist, which can reduce the quality of life. While there is strong evidence that all patients with OA should receive first-line treatment with education and exercises, this approach has not yet been proposed for individuals with wrist OA. Therefore, this trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a first line neuromuscular joint-protective exercise therapy program compared to a training program with range of motion (ROM) exercises in patients with wrist OA.MethodsIn this randomized controlled trial (RCT), 48 patients with symptomatic and radiographically confirmed wrist OA were randomly allocated to a 12-week self-management program with either a neuromuscular joint-protective exercise therapy program (intervention group) or a training program with ROM exercises only (control group). Our primary outcome measure was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) with secondary outcome measures of grip strength, range of wrist motion, the Numerical Pain Rating, Scale (NPRS), the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). The outcome measures were evaluated by a blinded assessor at baseline and 12 weeks. Between-groups differences were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test and within-group differences were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.ResultsA total of 41 participants were analyzed at 12 weeks. There were no significant differences in PRWE between the groups at 12 weeks (p = 0.27). However, DASH improved significantly in the intervention group compared to the control group (p = 0.02) and NPRS on load within the intervention group (p = 0.006). The difference in DASH should be interpreted with caution since it could be due to a non-significant increase (worsening) from baseline in the control group in combination with a non-significant decrease (improvement) in the intervention group.ConclusionsThis RCT showed that the novel neuromuscular joint-protective exercise therapy program was not superior in reducing pain and improving function compared to a training program with ROM exercises at 12 weeks. Future research is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of forthcoming exercise therapy treatment programs for patients with wrist OA.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05367817. Retrospectively registered on 10/05/2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Outcomes of Dorsal Capsule-Based Vascularized Radius Grafting Without a Radius Styloidectomy For The Treatment of Stage 1 Scaphoid Non-union Advanced Collapse

Objectives: We report the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with stage 1 scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC) treated via placement of a dorsal capsule-based, vascularized, distal radius graft in the absence of radial styloidectomy. Methods: This retrospective study included 15 patients (13 men, 2 women). Radial styloidectomy was not performed in any patient. Radiological assessment was conducted using the scapholunate angle, as well as the original and revised carpal height ratios. The short version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QDASH) score and the modified Mayo wrist score (MMWS) were used for functional assessment; Pain was rated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). At the last follow-up visit, range of motion, grip strength and key pinch strength were measured on both affected and unaffected sides. Results: The mean patient age was 32 (+/-10.4) years; the mean follow-up time was 23.2 (+/-6.8) months. All patients achieved complete bony union. No complications were observed. Although significant decreases in wrist flexion and extension were observed on the affected side, compared with the unaffected side, there were no significant differences in terms of radial or ulnar deviation. Both the MMWS and QDASH scores improved postoperatively, whereas the mean VAS pain score decreased. At the final follow-up, there was no decrease in mean carpal ratios, but the mean scapholunate angle had decreased. Conclusion: Dorsal capsule-based, vascularized, distal radius grafting without a radial styloidectomy is reproducible and reliable. The functional and radiological results are satisfactory for patients with stage 1 SNAC.

Approach to chronic wrist pain in adults: Review of common pathologies for primary care practitioners.

To develop an approach for identifying, investigating, and initially managing common causes of chronic wrist pain seen by primary care practitioners. Relevant clinical evidence and literature were identified using the PubMed database. Chronic wrist pain is a common presentation in the primary care setting. The complex anatomy of the wrist leads to a broad differential diagnosis. Elements of history, findings of physical examinations and investigations, and management relevant to the following pathologies are discussed, including scaphoid fracture nonunion, thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis, scapholunate ligament instability, triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries, de Quervain tenosynovitis, extensor carpi ulnaris tendinopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome, and ganglion cysts. When evaluating chronic wrist pain, diagnostic imaging with x-ray scans can serve as an important ancillary investigation tool but should not override clinical suspicion. Advanced imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) is generally best ordered by a hand surgeon when it will help clarify a diagnosis and guide treatment. Chronic wrist pain is a functionally limiting problem best managed with timely diagnosis and treatment. A thorough history and physical examination are the cornerstones of an effective evaluation. When diagnosis is delayed, some wrist pathologies can lead to relatively poor outcomes, such as a scaphoid fracture nonunion resulting in diffuse wrist osteoarthritis.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and SLAC: Implications for Oro-Dentists and Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgeons

Scapholunate Advanced Collapse (SLAC) is a progressive condition that can cause wrist pain and functional impairment. This condition often results from injury to the scapholunate ligament, which connects two important bones in the wrist. While SLAC can affect anyone, it is particularly relevant to dentists and maxillofacial surgeons due to the repetitive hand and wrist motions associated with these professions. In addition, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), a common neurological disorder that occurs when the median nerve becomes pressed or squeezed at the wrist, is another occupational hazard that can impact dental and surgical professionals. Given the considerable prevalence and sensing that awareness among dental students and surgeons is subpar, alongside the lack of studies investigating such issues, this personal experience-based editorial briefly explores the etiology, classification, diagnosis, and available treatment options for SLAC and CTS, principally, with the dental and maxillofacial professional on mind, to communicate significance and emphasize the importance of implementing proper ergonomics, frequent short stretch breaks and regular strengthening exercise into our daily clinical and surgical work habits; a step towards a real paradigm shift to prevent chronic pain. It can also serve as a valuable and distinct resource for healthcare professionals dealing with SLAC and CTS, accompanying challenges and emphasizing the importance of early detection and adaptation in patient care and surgical techniques. In the demanding fields of dentistry and maxillo-facial surgery, where precision and dexterity are paramount, we perform intricate procedures that require the use of our hands and wrists for long periods of time. Alas, the repetitive motions and awkward postures associated with these procedures can lead to a painful and debilitating condition known as CTS. In addition, recent studies have suggested that SLAC, a degenerative condition of the wrist joint, may increase the risk of developing CTS (more severe form), an ongoing spectre experienced by the author himself.

Comparison of proximal row carpectomy with RCPI® versus proximal row carpectomy with Eaton's capsular interposition in the management of advanced wrist osteoarthritis

IntroductionProximal row carpectomy (PRC) is one of the recommended techniques for managing wrist osteoarthritis, it implies the integrity of the lunate fossa of the radius and the proximal pole of the capitate. If PRC is not possible, it is suggested to consider combining it with a capsule interposition (such as Eaton's flap) or opting for intra- or radiocarpal arthrodesis. Another alternative is to combine capitate resurfacing with a pyrocarbon implant (RCPi®). The aims of this study was to assessed the results between proximal PRC+Eaton and those associated PRC+RCPi® for advanced wrist osteoarthritis. HypothesisWe hypothesized that there would be no differences in clinical or functional outcome between proximal row carpectomy associated with RCPI® and those associated with Eaton capsular flap. Material and methodsIt is a monocentric, retrospective, multi-operator study involving 83 wrists with osteoarthritis, included between January 2000 and December 2020 with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Thirty-nine patients underwent PRC+Eaton and 44 patients underwent RCPI® resurfacing. Data such as pain, flexion, extension and strength as well as functional scores (PRWE, Mayo and quick DASH) were collected from the patient files at the last check-up. ResultsResults were comparable between the two groups in terms pain (VAS), mobility (flexion and extension), strength (GRASP) and functional scores (PRWE, Mayo and quick DASH). Carpal height was better preserved in the PRC+RCPI® group, with a Youm and McMurtry index evaluated at 0.3 in the PRC+Eaton group compared to 0.4 in the PRC+RCPI® group (p-value<0.001). Radiocarpal arthrodesis was required in 16% of the PRC+Eaton group and 6.8% of the PRC+RCPI® group, with a statistically significant difference (p-value=0.023). DiscussionThis study reports clinical and functional results that suggest RCPI® is an interesting alternative and can be associated with proximal row carpectomy in advanced wrist osteoarthritis. Level of evidenceIV; retrospective study.

Arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid fracture nonunion with bone graft and Kirschner wire combined with screw fixation

To explore the effectiveness of arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid fracture nonunion with bone graft and Kirschner wire combined with screw fixation. The clinical data of 14 patients with scaphoid fracture nonunion who met the selection criteria between February 2021 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 13 males and 1 female with an average age of 32 years ranging from 17 to 54 years. The time from injury to operation ranged from 6 to 15 months, with an average of 9.6 months. According to the Slade-Geissler classification of scaphoid fracture nonunion, there were 3 cases of grade Ⅲ, 8 cases of grade Ⅳ, and 3 cases of grade Ⅴ. The preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 5.9±1.0, and the modified Mayo wrist score was 53.2±9.1. There were 2 cases of scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse, both of which were stage Ⅰ. All patients were treated with arthroscopic bone graft and Kirschner wire combined with screw fixation, and the fracture healing was observed by X-ray film monthly after operation, and the effectiveness was evaluated by VAS score and modified Mayo wrist score before and after operation. All patients were followed up 6-14 months, with an average of 8.4 months. All fractures healed in 4-8 months, with an average of 6.3 months. The postoperative pain symptoms and wrist function of the patients significantly improved when compared with those before operation, and the VAS score at last follow-up was 2.4±1.3, and the modified Mayo wrist score was 87.1±6.7, which were significantly different from those before operation ( t=12.851, P<0.001; t=-14.410, P<0.001). According to the modified Mayo wrist evaluation, 9 cases were excellent, 3 cases were good, and 2 cases were fair. Arthroscopic bone graft and Kirschner wire combined with screw fixation is an effective surgical method for the treatment of scaphoid fracture nonunion.

A self-managed exercise therapy program for wrist osteoarthritis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPost-traumatic wrist osteoarthritis (OA) can eventually lead to pain, muscular weakness, and stiffness of the wrist, which can affect the function of the entire upper limb and reduce the quality of life. Although there is strong evidence that all patients with OA should be offered adequate education and exercises as a first-line treatment, an effective self-management program, including structured education and therapeutic exercises, has not yet been introduced for individuals with wrist OA. This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an exercise therapy program with joint protective strategies to improve neuromuscular control (intervention group) compared to a training program with range of motion exercises (control group).MethodsThis is a single-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two treatment arms in patients with symptomatic and radiographically confirmed wrist OA. The trial will be conducted at a hand surgery department. The participants will be randomly assigned either to a neuromuscular exercise therapy program or to a training program with range of motion exercises only. Participants in both groups will receive a wrist orthosis and structured education on wrist anatomy, pathophysiology, and joint protective self-management strategies. The programs consist of home exercises that will be performed twice a day for 12 weeks. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) is the primary outcome measure of pain and function. Wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, the Numeric Pain Rating scale (NPRS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), Global Rating of Change (GROC), and conversion to surgery are the secondary measures of outcome. Assessments will be performed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after baseline by a blinded assessor.DiscussionThe upcoming results from this trial may add new knowledge about the effectiveness of a self-managed exercise therapy program on pain and function for individuals with wrist OA. If the present self-management program proves to be effective, it can redefine current treatment strategies and may be implemented in wrist OA treatment protocols.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05367817. Retrospectively registered on 27 April 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov.

Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the distribution of cartilage damage in scaphoid nonunion.

This study aimed to evaluate the distribution and severity of cartilage damage using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with scaphoid nonunion without advanced wrist arthritis. We retrospectively analysed MRI of patients who underwent osteosynthesis for scaphoid nonunion. Cartilage damage was assessed in eight wrist regions using a modified Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score. The frequencies of regions affected by any cartilage damage (Score ≥2.5) depicted on MRI were analysed. The study included 32 patients (31 men and one woman), with a mean age of 32 years (SD 11). The distal radioscaphoid (29/32), scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) (22/32), proximal radioscaphoid (14/32) and scaphocapitate (11/32) joints were most commonly affected by degenerative cartilage damage. The STT and proximal radioscaphoid joint were especially likely to be involved in early-stage scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse. We recommend that surgeons should investigate the cartilage status of these joints during decision-making for scaphoid nonunion surgery.Level of evidence: III.

Proximal ROw carpectOmy versus four-corner Fusion (PROOF-trial) for osteoarthritis of the wrist: study protocol for multi-institutional double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BackgroundScapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC) are common types of wrist osteoarthritis (OA). Non-operative treatment consists of pain medication, splinting, and avoiding activities that induce pain. However, in case a course of conservative treatment is unsuccessful, operative treatment is needed. The two most conventional operative approaches for SLAC/SNAC OA are four-corner arthrodesis (FCA) and proximal row carpectomy (PRC). Although FCA is the gold-standard operative technique and may lead to superior grip strength, the evident benefit of PRC is that it obviates any need for hardware removal and controlling for bony union. To date, no high-quality randomized controlled trial comparing FCA and PRC exists. As clinical outcomes seem comparable, a trial that assesses patient-reported outcomes, adverse events, and secondary operations may guide clinical decision making between these two procedures. Thus, the aim of this multi-institutional double-blind randomized controlled trial is to study whether PRC is non-inferior to FCA in treating SLAC/SNAC OA. We hypothesize that PRC is non-inferior to FCA with lower economic expanses.MethodsThe trial is designed as a randomized, controlled, patient- and outcome-assessor blinded multicenter, two-armed 1:1 non-inferiority trial. Patients with SLAC/SNAC-induced wrist pain meeting trial inclusion criteria will undergo wrist arthroscopy to further assess eligibility. Each patient eligible for the trial will be randomly assigned to undergo either FCA or PRC. The primary endpoint of this study is the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at 1-year after FCA versus PRC. Secondary outcomes include Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, EQ-5D-5L, pain, grip strength, wrist active range of motion, radiographic evaluation, and adverse events. Trial design, methods, and statistical analysis plan will be presented here.DiscussionWe present an RCT design comparing FCA vs PRC for SLAC/SNAC-induced OA. The results of this trial will assist in decision making when planning surgery for SLAC/SNAC.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04260165. Registered February 7, 2020.