Scalp Nerve Block Research Articles

The Scalp Nerve Block Combined with Intercostal Nerve Block Improves Recovery After Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

The Scalp Nerve Block Combined with Intercostal Nerve Block Improves Recovery After Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson’s Disease: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of the Effect of Scalp Block With Ropivacaine vs. Ropivacaine and Clonidine on Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy Surgery Under General Anesthesia.

Introduction Clonidine, an α2 agonist known for its hypotensive and analgesic effects, has proven beneficial in various routes of administration such as oral, intravenous, and local infiltration. Scalp blocks enhance hemodynamic stability during surgery and reduce intraoperative opioid requirements compared to controls in numerous studies. Additionally, they are effective in managing postoperative pain, resulting in reduced opioid consumption. Research has shown that clonidine can enhance and prolong the effects of intrathecal, epidural, and peripheral nerve blocks (e.g., brachial plexus, peribulbar). Here, we investigated the impact of adding clonidine at a dose of 1 μg/kg to scalp blocks performed with 0.5% ropivacaine for supra-tentorial craniotomy Material and methods This study was conducted on 60 patients under theAmerican Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I and II who were scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy. Patients were divided into two equal groups of 30 and received a scalp block following general anesthesia. Patients in Group A (n=30) received a scalp block of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 1 ml of normal saline (total 21 cc). Patients in Group B (n=30) received a scalp block of 0.5% ropivacaine and clonidine (1 μg/kg) combined with 0.5 ml of normal saline (total 21 cc). Blood pressure, heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), visual analog score, Ramsay sedation score, duration of analgesia, and analgesia requirement in the first 24 hours were recorded from baseline and postoperatively. Results The duration of first rescue analgesia for Group A was 4.30 ± 1.5 hours and that of Group B was 9.10 ± 1.4 hours. Duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in patients receiving ropivacaine with clonidine for scalp nerve block. The amount of tramadol given in the first 24 hours in Group A, 62.50 ± 25.00 mg, was highcompared to Group B, 57.14 ± 18.89 mg. The mean arterial blood pressure differed significantly in both groups at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, and 12 hours after scalp block postoperatively and lower in Group B. Although changes in pulse rate, and SpO2 were not statistically significant in both groups, patients were hemodynamically stable and did not require any ionotropic support. Ramsay sedation score and visual analog score postoperatively were not significant. There were no significant adverse effects noted in any groups. Conclusion Our study concluded that administering clonidine at a dosage of 1 μg/kg, in combination with 0.5% ropivacaine for scalp nerve block procedures, significantly extends the duration of analgesia and enhances its quality, all while maintaining stable hemodynamic parameters.

Role of scalp nerve block in improving the quality of rehabilitation in patients after meningioma resection: A randomized controlled clinical trial.

In this study, we analyzed whether scalp nerve block with ropivacaine can improve the quality of rehabilitation in patients after meningioma resection. We included 150 patients who were undergoing craniotomy in our hospital and categorized them into 2 groups - observation group (patients received an additional regional scalp nerve block anesthesia) and control group (patients underwent intravenous general anesthesia for surgery), using the random number table method approach (75 patients in each group). The main indicator of the study was the Karnofsky Performance Scale scores of patients at 3 days postoperatively, and the secondary indicator was the anesthesia satisfaction scores of patients after awakening from anesthesia. The application value of different anesthesia modes was studied and compared in the 2 groups. Patients in the observation group showed better anesthesia effects than those in the control group, with significantly higher Karnofsky Performance Scale scores at 3 days postoperatively (75.02 vs 66.43, P < .05) and anesthesia satisfaction scores. Compared with patients in the control group, patients in the observation group had lower pain degrees at different times after the surgery, markedly lower dose of propofol and remifentanil for anesthesia, and lower incidence of adverse reactions and postoperative complications. In addition, the satisfaction score of the patients and their families for the treatment was higher and the results of all the indicators were better in the observation group than in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < .05). Scalp nerve block with ropivacaine significantly improves the quality of short-term postoperative rehabilitation in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for meningioma resection. This is presumably related to the improvements in intraoperative hemodynamics, relief from postoperative pain, and reduction in postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Scalp Nerve Block for Enhanced Pain Control and Analgesic Optimization in Elective Craniotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Analgesia Nociception Index Monitoring

In patients who are candidates for craniotomy, scalp nerve blocks have been shown to be effective in relieving pain intensity as well as postoperative hemodynamic stability after surgery, but the results have been inconsistent. We aimed to assess the effect of scalp block on pain control, intraoperative drug use under Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) monitoring, and postoperative pain in patients who were candidates for elective craniotomy. In this randomized, single-blinded clinical trial study, candidates for craniotomy were randomly (using the block randomization method) divided into 2 groups before entering the operating room. The first group received a scalp block with bupivacaine (intervention), and the second group did not receive a scalp block (control) besides the routine anesthetic procedure in these patients. ANI, hemodynamic parameters, and the amounts of received remifentanil were conducted and compared. Patients under scalp block received less dosage of fentanyl than the nonscalp block group (mean=57.14±15.59 mcg vs. 250.00±65.04 mcg, respectively). Similarly, the dose of remifentanil required in the scalp block group was less (mean=3.04±1.95mg and 5.54±2.57mg, respectively). No difference was observed in hemodynamic parameters such as blood pressure and heart rate (before, during, and after surgery). However, the group receiving scalp block had higher ANI means than the control group. Scalp nerve block has an effective role in pain control (increasing ANI), consequently reducing the need for analgesic drugs such as fentanyl and remifentanil following craniotomy without changing the hemodynamic condition.

Scalp Nerve Block Alleviates Headaches Associated With Sonication During Transcranial Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound.

In magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) procedures, headache is a frequent symptom and cause of treatment discontinuation. Herein, we assessed the efficacy of scalp nerve block (SNB) for alleviating headache during MRgFUS procedures. The effect of SNB on intraprocedural headache was examined by retrospectively comparing 2 patient cohorts at a single institution. During the study period from April 2020 to February 2022, an SNB protocol for all patients with a skull density ratio ≤0.55 was instituted on October 6, 2021. The number of patients with a skull density ratio ≤0.55 was 34 before the protocol and 36 afterward. Headache intensity was evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) after each sonication. To evaluate the effect of SNB on headache intensity, multiple regression analysis was performed per patient and per sonication. In the per-patient analysis, the effect of SNB was evaluated using the maximum NRS, mean NRS, and NRS at the first ultrasound exposure that reached 52.5°C. In the per-sonication analysis, the effect of SNB was evaluated not only for the entire sonication but also for sonications classified into ≤9999 J, 10 000 to 29 999 J, and ≥30 000 J energy doses. With SNB, headache alleviation was observed in the NRS after the first sonication that reached 52.5°C in each patient (β = -2.40, 95% CI -4.05 to -0.758, P = .00499), in the NRS when all sonications were evaluated (β = -0.647, 95% CI -1.19 to -0.106, P = .0201), and in the NRS when all sonications were classified into 10 000 to 29 999 J (β = -1.83, 95% CI -3.17 to -0.485, P = .00889). SNB significantly reduced headache intensity during MRgFUS, especially that caused by sonication with a moderate-energy dose. These findings suggest that scalp nerves play a role in headache mechanisms during MRgFUS.

Perioperative management of awake craniotomy: Role of anesthesiologist

Awake craniotomy is performed for resection of lesions located within or close to the eloquent areas of the brain. Both asleep-awake-asleep technique and conscious sedation have been used effectively for awake craniotomies, and the choice of optimal anesthetic regime is mainly as per the preferences of the anesthesiologist and surgical team. Propofol, remifentanil, dexmedetomidine, and scalp nerve block have been used successfully for intraoperative brain mapping. Appropriate patient selection, adequate perioperative psychological support, and proper anesthetic management for patients in every stage of surgery are essential for the safety and success of the surgery.

Effectiveness of Scalp Nerves Block in Reducing the Immediate Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy in Elective Neurosurgical Procedures

Objective: To determine the usefulness of regional scalp block in controlling pain after craniotomy. Methodology: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at the Pakistan Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad from November 2021 to April 2022. Adult patients aged 18 to 65 years, scheduled for elective craniotomy for neurosurgical procedures with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of I or II, of either gender, were included. Patients underwent craniotomy for their respective lesions. Patients were randomized into two groups: one receiving a regional scalp nerve block of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine after general anesthesia, and the other undergoing general anesthesia as a placebo. Pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score at baseline (preoperatively), at 1 hour postoperatively, and at 6 hours postoperatively. Results: The mean age of patients in the treatment group was 43.14 years, while in the control group, it was 42.55 years. The treatment group had 26 males (54.2%) and 22 females (45.8%), while the control group had 25 males (52.1%) and 23 females (47.9%). There was no significant difference in the VAS score preoperatively (p &gt; 0.05). Patients undergoing surgeries lasting less than 3 hours showed that the treatment group had a significantly lower mean VAS score of 3.08 at 1 hour compared to the control group's score of 5.11 (p = 0.027), while at the 6-hour post-surgery it was insignificant (p = 0.844). For surgeries lasting more than 3 hours, the treatment group had a significantly lower mean VAS score at 1 hour and at 6 hours post-surgery compared to the control group (p &lt; 0.05). There were no overall complications associated with the subcutaneous injection of epinephrine and bupivacaine in blocking the scalp nerves. Conclusion: The administration of scalp nerve blocks using bupivacaine and epinephrine prior to surgical incisions has demonstrated notable advantages in terms of postoperative pain management. Such nerve blocks can offer superior postoperative analgesia compared to the control group.

Ultrasound-guided scalp nerve block in anesthesia of children receiving cranial suture reconstruction

ObjectiveAnalgesia is very important for children with craniosynostosis who are undergoing cranial suture reconstruction. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of an analgesic technique based on scalp nerve block combined with general anesthesia versus general anesthesia alone.MethodsThis was a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled study. A total of 60 children aged 6-24 months who underwent cranial suture reconstruction were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (general anesthesia combined with scalp nerve block) and Group N (general anesthesia). The hemodynamics were recorded preoperatively, at 5 min after incision and at 1, 6 and 12 h after surgery; the pain was scored at 1, 6 and 12 h after surgery, and blood glucose was detected at 1 h after surgery.ResultsThe mean arterial pressure and heart rate at 5 min after incision and 1 h after surgery in Group N were higher than those in Group A; the blood glucose and FLACC score in Group N were higher than those in Group A; and the number of postoperative analgesic pump presses were also significantly increased in Group N.ConclusionPreoperative scalp nerve block can reduce hemodynamic fluctuation and postoperative pain in children undergoing cranial suture reconstruction for craniosynostosis. Thus, it can be safely and effectively applied in the anesthesia of these children.

The Efficacy of Scalp Nerve Block in Postoperative Pain Management after Microvascular Decompression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The scalp nerve block, created by injecting local anesthetics around the scalp nerves, is reported to effectively reduce pain after surgery. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of scalp nerve block in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS) undergoing microvascular decompression (MVD). Seventy-four patients who underwent MVD for HFS were enrolled. The block group received scalp nerve block with 0.5% ropivacaine before surgery. The primary outcome was cumulative dose of rescue analgesics 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were included pain scores, postoperative antiemetic consumption, and Quality of Recovery-15 scale. The cumulative dose of rescue analgesics at 24 h postoperatively was not significantly different between the two groups (4.80 ± 3.64 mg vs. 5.92 ± 3.95 mg, p = 0.633). However, the pain score was significantly reduced in the block group at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. Postoperative antiemetic consumption was lower in the block group than the control group at 12 h. There were no significant differences between the two groups for other secondary outcomes. In MVD for HFS, a preoperative scalp nerve block might reduce postoperative pain in the early postoperative period, but a larger study using a multimodal approach is needed to confirm the efficacy of a scalp block.

Effects of Scalp Nerve Block on the Quality of Recovery after Minicraniotomy for Clipping of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms : A Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study compared the quality of recovery (QoR) after minicraniotomy for clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) between patients with and without scalp nerve block (SNB). Patients were randomly assigned to the SNB (SNB using ropivacaine with epinephrine, n = 27) and control (SNB using normal saline, n = 25) groups. SNB was performed at the end of surgery. To assess postoperative QoR, the QoR-40, a patient-reported questionnaire, was used. The QoR-40 scores were measured preoperatively, 1-3 days postoperatively, at hospital discharge, and 1 month postoperatively. Pain and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) consumption were evaluated 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours and 1-3 days postoperatively. All QoR-40 scores, including those measured 1 day postoperatively (primary outcome measure; 155.0 [141.0-176.0] vs. 161.0 [140.5-179.5], P = 0.464), did not significantly differ between the SNB and control groups. The SNB group had significantly less severe pain 3 (numeric rating scale [NRS]; 3.0 [2.0-4.0] vs. 5.0 [3.5-5.5], P = 0.029), 9 (NRS; 3.0 [2.0-4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-5.0], P = 0.048), and 12 (NRS; 3.0 [2.0-4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-5.0], P = 0.035) hours postoperatively. The total amount of IV-PCA consumed was significantly less 3 hours postoperatively in the SNB group (2.0 [1.0-4.0] vs. 4.0 [2.0-5.0] mL, P = 0.044). After minicraniotomy for clipping of UIAs, SNB reduced pain and IV-PCA consumption in the early postoperative period but did not improve the QoR-40 scores.

Anesthesia management in patients with neurological diseases: an updated systematic review

Prior literature discouraged anesthesiologists from administering regional anesthesia on patients with pre-existing neurologic disorders. Anesthesiologists are occasionally faced with adopting a regional anesthetic method in patients with pre-existing neurological diseases. There is uncertainty about whether secondary variables such as patient characteristics and anesthetic and surgical risk factors might influence the post-operative neurological outcome. To review the current literature on the anesthetic management of patients with neurological diseases. Studies related to our subject were explored using PubMed and Google scholar databases. The keywords included were &amp;quot;Anesthesia, anesthetic management, neurological disease, regional anesthesia,&amp;quot; and were used in various combinations. The inclusion criteria were original studies that reported Anesthesia management in patients with neurological disease and full text- articles. A total of 100 articles were obtained, only 8 articles were eligible for the inclusion criteria were published between 2004 and 2021. The detailed studies were conducted on 156 participants, two of them were case series, and six were case reports. Patients with central nervous system (CNS) problems such as multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Tuberous sclerosis, and brain tumors were included in our study. General anesthesia has been associated with worsening MS. A bupivacaine-based scalp nerve block and Dexmedetomidine were used as the primary hypnotic-sedative medicine to perform awake craniotomies on 10 patients, allowing safe tumor removal. The study shows that the risks associated with neuraxial anesthesia and analgesia in those with pre-existing CNS illnesses may be less prevalent than previously thought.

The effectiveness of scalp nerve block on hemodynamic response in craniotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Strategies that blunt noxious stimuli and stabilize hemodynamics may reduce perioperative cardiovascular complications and enhance recovery after craniotomy. Our systematic literature review and meta-analysis investigated whether scalp nerve block (SNB) reduces the acute hemodynamic response compared with non-SNB (scalp infiltration or control) in adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and two Chinese databases for randomized trials. Primary outcomes included mean arterial pressure and heart rate during skull pin insertion and surgical incision in craniotomy. Secondary outcomes included incidence of hypertension and dosage of intraoperative analgesic opioids used. Random-effects models were used for meta-analyses. SNB significantly reduced the mean arterial pressure (mean difference: -14.00 mmHg; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -19.71 to -8.28) and heart rate (mean difference: -11.55 beat/min; 95% CI: -19.31 to -3.80), when compared with non-SNB during skull pin insertion. A similar trend was observed during skin incisions (SNB vs. non-SNB, mean difference in mean arterial pressure: -9.46 mmHg; 95% CI: -14.53 to -4.38; mean difference in heart rate: -9.34 beat/min; 95% CI: -15.40 to -3.28). Subgroup analysis showed that, compared with scalp infiltration, SNB reduced mean arterial pressure and heart during pin insertion but not during skin incisions. SNB also reduced the incidence of intraoperative hypertension, but no difference was observed in intraoperative opioid consumption when compared with non-SNB. SNB alleviated the craniotomy-associated hemodynamic response. SNB may be superior to scalp infiltration in maintaining hemodynamic stability during pin insertion. However, high-quality trials are still needed to provide more conclusive evidence.

Scalp Nerve Block, Local Anesthetic Infiltration, and Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

The most efficacious methods for controlling postoperative pain in craniotomy remain unknown. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to compare the efficacies of different strategies of scalp nerve block (SNB), scalp infiltration (SI), and control in patients undergoing craniotomy. MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was postoperative 24-hour pain score, and the secondary outcome was opioid consumption within the first 24hour after surgery. The effect was estimated using the between-group mean difference and ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score. Twenty-four randomized trials were identified for inclusion. SNB using ropivacaine reduced postoperative 24-hour pain score when compared with control (mean difference [95% credible interval], -2.04 [-3.13, -0.94]; low quality), and when compared with SI using ropivacaine (-1.77 [-3.04, -0.51]; low quality) or bupivacaine (-1.96 [-3.65, -0.22]; low quality). SNB using ropivacaine was likely the most efficacious method for pain control (SUCRA, 91%), and also reduced opioid consumption within the first postoperative 24 hours as compared with control (mean difference [95% credible interval], -11.91 [-22.42, -1.4]; low quality). SNB using bupivacaine, lidocaine, and epinephrine combined, and SNB using ropivacaine, were likely the most efficacious methods for opioid consumption reduction (SUCRA, 88% and 80%, respectively). In summary, different methods of SNB / SI seem to have different efficacies after craniotomy. SNB using ropivacaine may be superior to other methods for postcraniotomy pain control; however, the overall quality of evidence was low.

Effect of Scalp Nerve Block Combined with Intercostal Nerve Block on the Quality of Recovery in Patients with Parkinson's Disease after Deep Brain Stimulation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients who receive deep brain stimulation (DBS) have a higher risk of postoperative pain, which will affect their postoperative quality of recovery (QoR). Scalp nerve block (SNB) and intercostal nerve block (ICNB) can alleviate postoperative pain, yet their effect on postoperative QoR in PD patients has proven to be unclear. Therefore, we have aimed to explore the effect of SNB paired with ICNB on postoperative QoR. Methods: To explore the effect, we have designed a randomized controlled trial in which 88 patients with PD will be randomly assigned to either an SNB group or control group, receiving either SNB combined with ICNB or without before surgery. The primary outcome will be a 15-item QoR score at 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes will include: 15-item QoR scores at 72 h and 1 month after surgery; the numeric rating scale pain scores before discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) at 24 h, 72 h, and 1 month after surgery; rescue analgesics; nausea and vomiting 24 h after operation and remifentanil consumption during operation; emergence agitation; the duration of anesthesia and surgery; time to respiratory recovery, time to response, and time to extubation; the PACU length of stay; as well as adverse events. Proposed protocol and conclusion: Our findings will provide a novel method for the management of recovery and acute pain after DBS in PD patients. This research was registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT05353764 on 19 April 2022.

REDUCE trial: the effects of perineural dexamethasone on scalp nerve blocks for relief of postcraniotomy pain\u2014a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundPain is common in the first 2 days after major craniotomy. Inadequate analgesia may lead to an increased risk of postoperative complications. Most pain following craniotomy arises from the pericranial muscles and soft tissues of the scalp. Scalp nerve blocks with local anesthesia seem to provide effective, safe, however, transient postoperative analgesia which does not seem to meet the requirements of craniotomy. Currently, peripheral dexamethasone has been observed to significantly prolong the duration of analgesia of nerve blocks (e.g., saphenous nerve block, adductor canal block, thoracic paravertebral block, brachial plexus nerve block). On the contrary, a study reported that perineural dexamethasone did not appear to prolong the analgesic time after supratentorial craniotomy. However, all patients in this study were given 24 mg of oral or intravenous dexamethasone regularly for at least 7 days during the perioperative period, which possibly masked the role of single local low doses of perineural dexamethasone. Therefore, the analgesic effect of single dexamethasone for scalp nerve blocks without the background of perioperative glucocorticoid deserves further clarification.MethodsThe REDUCE trial is a prospective, single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial involving a total of 156 adults scheduled for elective craniotomy with general anesthesia. Patients will be randomly divided among two groups: the control group (n = 78) will receive scalp nerve blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine, plus normal saline with epinephrine at 1:200,000; the DEX4mg group (n = 78) will receive scalp nerve blocks with 0.5% bupivacaine, plus 4 mg dexamethasone with epinephrine at 1:200,000. The primary outcome will be the duration of analgesia, defined as the time between the performance of the block and the first analgesic request.DiscussionThe REDUCE trial aims to further assess the analgesic effect of single dexamethasone as an adjuvant to scalp nerve blocks for relief of postcraniotomy pain without the background of perioperative glucocorticoid.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.govNCT04648358. Registered on November 30, 2020.

Monitored Anesthetic Care Combined with Scalp Nerve Block in Awake Craniotomy: An Effective Attempt at Enhanced Recovery After Neurosurgery

Enhanced recovery after surgery has been attempted in neurosurgery at a greater rate. However, concern exists regarding the feasibility of using enhanced recovery after neurosurgery (ERANS). How to manage available resources to safely perform ERANS and improve clinical outcomes has been the subject of much debate and discussion. Owing to the paucity of data available on the use of ERANS protocols, we performed the present feasibility study. We studied the outcomes of the protocols used within a tertiary referral neurosurgery center. Data from patients who had undergone awake craniotomy within an ERANS protocol were prospectively recorded in our institution from September 2017 to December 2018. We also evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the novel ERANS protocol. A total of 20 patients (mean age, 49.5 ± 17.8 years) were included in the present study. Intraoperative hypertension, hypotension, and bradycardia were present in 4 (20%), 1 (5%), and 1 (5%) patient, respectively. The postoperative morbidities included epilepsy in 1 (5%), pain in 3 (15%), and nausea or vomiting in 2 (10%). No significant changes had occurred in the mean arterial pressure, heart rate, blood glucose, or lactic acid level throughout the procedure. The median length of intensive care unit stay and postoperative hospital stay were 1 and 9.5 days, respectively. No 30-day readmissions or reoperations occurred during the present study. Applying an ERANS protocol was feasible, associated with a low incidence of complications, and acceptable intensive care unit and postoperative hospital lengths of stay. The findings from the present study might provide a new approach for the further research of ERANS.

966 Implementation of Regional Scalp Blockade for Painless Removal of ICP Bolts: A Quality Improvement Project

Abstract Introduction Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring through insertion of a bolt is a common neurosurgical procedure for diagnosing cerebrospinal fluid disorders. The first step of our quality improvement project identified ICP bolt removal the most painful part of the procedure. We implemented and tested the efficacy of a scalp nerve block for bolt removal. Method Two groups were identified: (A) receiving oral analgesia only and (B) receiving ipsilateral supraorbital and supratrochlear nerve blocks. We then retrospectively compared satisfaction ratings of insertion versus removal process for the two bolt types using a telephonic questionnaire Results Eighty-five patients had ICP bolts (32M:53F, mean age 42.7±16.0 SD). Fifty-four were removed with oral analgesia (A) and 31 with oral and regional anaesthesia (B). Removal experience was reported as worse for group A than for group B (p &amp;lt; 0.01). Most patients (66%) reported would have preferred local anesthetic during removal. No complications occurred from the block. Conclusions Regional nerve blocks are a safe and effective adjuvant for the painless removal of frontal ICP monitoring bolts. The final stage of the project was to implement nerve blocks as standard practice for bolt removal, to improve patient experience.

A Randomized Control Trial on Comparative Effect of Scalp Nerve Block Using Levobupivacaine Versus Fentanyl on the Attenuation of Pain and Hemodynamic Response to Pin Fixation

Abstract Background: The application of head fixation device and tightening of the pins on the scalp acts as an intense noxious stimulus with an increased hemodynamic response. We aimed at comparing the efficacy of scalp nerve block (SNB) using levobupivacaine against intravenous fentanyl bolus dose followed by continuous intravenous infusion for attenuation of pain and hemodynamic response to pin fixation. Methods: One hundred and eight patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups: Group F received a bolus of intravenous fentanyl (2 μg/kg) followed by continuous maintenance infusion and Group S, in which a bilateral SNB was performed with 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine. Hemodynamic variables and pain scores were the primary outcomes noted. Intraoperative isoflurane and additional fentanyl requirements, emergence time and any side effects were also recorded. Results: The variation in hemodynamics in terms of heart rate (per minute) at pin fixation (Group F [95.88 ± 7.79] and Group S [89.02 ± 5.42]) was significant (P &lt; 0.001). There was a significant change in mean arterial blood pressure (mm Hg) between the groups at pin fixation Group F (104.70 ± 9.18) and Group S (92.88 ± 6.92) (P &lt; 0.001). A significant reduction in pain and intraoperative fentanyl requirements was also seen. Emergence from anesthesia was significantly longer in Group F as compared to Group S (P &lt; 0.001). No group had any significant complication. Conclusion: SNB is a reasonably safe and effective means for smooth control over hemodynamics and lesser intraoperative analgesic requirements compared to the fentanyl infusion in adult patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomies.

Efficacy of scalp nerve blocks using ropivacaïne 0,75% associated with intravenous dexamethasone for postoperative pain relief in craniotomies

Pain after supratentorial craniotomy is common, 55 % to 80 % of patients experience moderate to severe pain in the first 48 h(1–7).The importance of intravenous dexamethasone as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics is increasingly applied(1–7), however its role in scalp nerve blocks with ropivacaine 0.75 % remains unexplored in post-operative analgesia.We analyzed 134 supratentorial craniotomies under general anaesthesia, 46 of which had preoperatively bilateral scalp nerve blocks with ropivacaine 0.75 %. The general anaesthesia was standardized and included 8 mg of intravenous dexamethasone at the induction. The postoperative pain was assessed using the numerical rating scale with patients in the post anaesthesia care unit and subsequently every 8 h in the neurosurgery unit until the 48th hour. A NRS value above 3 led to the administration of a rescue analgesic according to the defined protocol until an efficient analgesia was obtained. Postoperative pain was controlled in both groups, however the need for rescue analgesics in the scalp nerve blocks group was reduced by 40 % (39 % vs. 65 %; p = 0.006) compared to the control group. More than 60 % of the patients from the scalp nerve blocks group had an efficient analgesia without any rescue analgesic.Peroperatively the scalp nerve blocks group showed a decrease in opioid consumption and a better hemodynamic stability. No anesthetic or chirurgical complications related to the use of scalp blocks were observed. Scalp nerve blocks associated with intravenous dexamethasone are found to be a straightforward and efficient analgesic approach during supratentorial craniotomies.

Anesthetic considerations for awake craniotomy.

Awake craniotomy is a gold standard of care for resection of brain tumors located within or close to the eloquent areas. Both asleep-awake-asleep technique and monitored anesthesia care have been used effectively for awake craniotomy and the choice of optimal anesthetic approach is primarily based on the preferences of the anesthesiologist and surgical team. Propofol, remifentanil, dexmedetomidine, and scalp nerve block provide the reliable conditions for intraoperative brain mapping. Appropriate patient selection, adequate perioperative psychological support, and proper anesthetic management for individual patients in each stage of surgery are crucial for procedural safety, success, and patient satisfaction.