Scalp Donor Sites Research Articles

A child developing alopecia areata at the scalp donor site after split-thickness skin grafting

A child developing alopecia areata at the scalp donor site after split-thickness skin grafting

Scalp as a skin graft donor site: Literature review and technical refinements

Background. We carried out a literature review to evaluate the status of the scalp as a donor site and examine claims that the scalp donor site in black patients was less suitable than in other races. Objectives. To ascertain whether the finding that using the scalp as a donor site was less successful in black patients than in other races was credible. Methods. A Pubmed search was done for ‘scalp as donor site in burns’. There were 91 hits for the period 1977 - 2020. Results. Twenty-three articles were included for the final review. Of the 23 articles identified, 13 included ≥28 patients. Of these 13 larger articles, the number presumed to have a multiracial population of patients was 7. Of the 7 studies, only 1 study found a noticeable difference in hair growth in all their white patients but none in the black patients. Conclusion. We did an extensive literature review of the scalp as a donor site and found that most authors found it to be an excellent donor site irrespective of race. The report that complications of scalp grafting are related to racial issues such as hair structure by a burn centre in South Africa is not supported by the literature or by another burn centre in the same city.

A systematic review of the scalp donor site for split-thickness skin grafting.

Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is the gold standard for coverage of acute burns and reconstructive wounds. However, the choice of the donor site for STSG varies among surgeons, and the scalp represents a relatively under-utilized donor site. Understanding the validity of potential risks will assist in optimizing wound management. A comprehensive literature search was conducted of the PubMed database to identify studies evaluating scalp skin grafting in human subjects published between January 1, 1964 and December 31, 2019. Data were collected on early and late complications at the scalp donor site. In total, 27 articles comparing scalp donor site complications were included. The selected studies included analyses of acute burn patients only (21 of 27 articles), mean total body surface area (20 of 27), age distribution (22 of 27), sex (12 of 27), ethnicity (5 of 27), tumescent technique (21 of 27), depth setting of the dermatome (24 of 27), number of harvests (20 of 27), mean days of epithelization (18 of 27), and early and late complications (27 of 27). The total rate of early complications was 3.82% (117 of 3,062 patients). The total rate of late complications was 5.19% (159 of 3,062 patients). The literature on scalp skin grafting has not yet identified an ideal surgical technique for preventing donor site complications. Although scalp skin grafting provided superior outcomes with fewer donor site complications, there continues to be a lack of standardization. The use of scalp donor sites for STSG can prevent early and late complications if proper surgical planning, procedures, and postoperative care are performed.

106 Heads or Tails? Scalp versus Non-scalp Donor Sites for Split-thickness Skin Grafting of Burns: A Systematic Review and Retrospective Review

Abstract Introduction The scalp is an appealing donor site for split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) of burns due to its concealment upon hair regrowth and healing potential; however, it is often reserved for massive burns with limited donor sites. This study aims to understand scalp donor site (SDS) outcomes and complications to elucidate viability of the SDS as a first-line option for coverage of burns. Methods A systematic review across five databases was conducted. Original research reporting cohort outcomes of STSG coverage of burns using the SDS was included. Donor site healing time, graft thickness, graft take, and complications were analyzed. Thereafter, a retrospective chart review of patients who had SDS-STSGs for burns from 2010–2018 was done. Outcomes and complications were compared to non-SDS-STSGs (NSDS-STSGs) in criteria-matched controls. Results Systematic Review: 1489 articles were reviewed. 15 cohort studies met inclusion criteria, yielding 1761 patients who has SDS-STSG (mean age=17 yrs, mean TBSA=37%). Alopecia and folliculitis occurred in 5% and 3% of patients, respectively; folliculitis was associated with certain hair types. Other complications (eg. hypertrophic scarring, hair transfer) were seen in less than 1.5% of patients. Rapid donor site healing times (mean=8 days) and capacity for re-harvest (mean=2 harvests/patient) were noted. Retrospective Review: 30 patients underwent grafting with SDS-STSGs, 23 of whom also received NSDS-STSGs and were thus self-controls; criteria-matched controls were found for the remaining 7. Graft thickness and graft take did not differ between SDS and NSDS groups, while donor site healing time was faster for SDSs vs NSDSs (9 vs 11 days, p=0.02). SDS complications included: alopecia (n=2), delayed healing (3), and folliculitis (1). NSDS complications included: delayed healing (n=1), dyspigmentation (2), and hypertrophic scarring (3). These complications could not be attributed to age, ethnicity, graft thickness, number of graft harvests, comorbidity burden, TBSA, or inhalational injury status. Conclusions The scalp donor site may represent a viable first-line option for split-thickness skin grafting of burns. Our cohort suggests that scalp donor sites pose comparable risks to non-scalp donor sites. Further studies elucidating the role of hair type in SDS-STSG complications are required to optimize outcomes with patient-specific donor site selection. Applicability of Research to Practice In select patients, the scalp may be considered as a first-line donor site for split-thickness skin grafting of burns, with potentially faster donor site healing time and comparable risks to non-scalp donor sites. Some scalp-specific complications may be linked to differences in hair type.

Application of Superficial Temporal Artery Flap in Wound Repairing After the Resection of Craniofacial Malignant Tumors.

Craniofacial malignant tumors require not only extended resection but also appropriate reconstruction to restore appearance, which remains a major challenge. Here the authors introduced the application of superficial temporal artery (STA) flap in wound repairing after the resection of craniofacial malignant tumors. From January 2015 to December 2018, 16 patients with craniofacial malignant tumors were enrolled into the study, including squamous cell carcinoma (n = 6), basal cell carcinoma (n = 3), melanoma (n = 4), neuroendocrine carcinoma (n = 2), and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberance (n = 1). All of the tumors underwent extended resection. The defects formed were repaired by flaps pedicled with superior or frontal branch of STA. Donor sites were repaired with skin grafts. Patients were followed up for 6 months to 3 years to monitor the recurrence of tumor. All the flaps survived well. Venous congestion occurred in two cases but resolved after blood-letting and application of drugs promoting venous draining. During the follow-up, no recurrence of tumors was observed and the appearance of flaps was satisfying. But flap donor sites suffered from relatively poor appearance or alopecia deformity. The STA flap is reliable for wound repairing after resection of craniofacial malignant tumors. The STA parietal branch flap is preferred for repairing scalp defects, while the STA frontal branch flap is preferred for repairing facial defects. However, the STA flap should be used prudently due to its disadvantage of the deformity in scalp donor sites.

Simultaneous two-layer harvesting of scalp split-thickness skin and dermal grafts for acute burns and postburn scar deformities.

BackgroundThe scalp, an excellent donor site for thin skin grafts, presents a limited surface but is rich in stem cells. The purpose of this study was to test a double harvesting procedure from the scalp and to evaluate the capacity of the dermal layer.MethodsTwo layers corresponding to a split-thickness skin graft (SSG) and a split-thickness dermal graft (SDG) were harvested from the scalp using a Zimmer dermatome during the same procedure. Healing of the scalp donor site, reason for recipient site grafting, and the percentage of graft loss were evaluated.ResultsFourteen patients, comprising six men and eight women with a mean age of 34.2 years, were treated according to our protocol. The most common reason for a recipient site graft was a postburn scar deformity (10/14 patients). The mean area of scalp SSGs was 151.8 cm2. The mean area of scalp SDGs was 88.2 cm2. The mean healing time of scalp donors was 9.9 days. The only donor complication was a tufted scar deformity.ConclusionsSkin defects in the scalp of donors healed faster and led to less scarring than defects at other donor sites. Scalp SDGs needed 10 days for adequate epithelization. The scalp was the best donor site for SSGs and SDGs for burn reconstructive patients.

Scalp as a donor site in children: Is it really the best option?

BackgroundSince 2003 we have used the scalp as a donor site for split skin grafts (SSGs) in major burns when there was a shortage of conventional donor areas. However, we seen a high incidence of complications, contrary to international experience. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the results and complications related to the scalp as a donor site and to determine whether there is an association between our specific patient population and the complications encountered. MethodsA retrospective review of our scalp donor site outcomes over a 12-year period was conducted. The cohort included 25 patients, 15 of black African descent, nine of mixed race and one Caucasian. The various hair types were identified based on ethnicity and classified into eight types. Most of our patients had hair types VI–VIII. None of these patients had scalp burns and all received standard burn treatment. The SSGs were taken with an electric dermatome with a standard micrometric setting of 0.2mm. Complications were categorized into short- or long-term, with a mean follow-up time of 1.59years. ResultsThe mean age of the 25 children was 5.7years. Nineteen sustained flame burns and 6 sustained hot water burns, with a mean total body surface area of 44.9%. A total of 43 scalp procurements were performed in the 25 patients studied. The group of 15 black African patients (hair types VI–VIII) had a total of 22 procurements, the nine patients of mixed race (hair types III–V) had 18 procurements and the single Caucasian patient (hair types II–III) had two procurements. The median healing time was 15days, 11.8days and 8.5days, respectively, per group. Significant complications were encountered, including folliculitis 44%, non-healing wounds 52%, alopecia 16% and visible, hypopigmented scars 3%. One patient had a hypertrophic scar and no hair transfers to the recipient areas were observed. The various hair types correlated with the complications encountered. Five children, with an average burn size of 65.2% (range: 40–85%) died of sepsis. Due to the small sample size, the only statistically significant findings were related to the total body surface area of the burn and the number of times skin was harvested from the scalp, with a p-value of 0.005. The p-values for the healing times related to the first, second and third croppings, were p=0.022, p=0.00032 and p<0.001 respectively. ConclusionOur study suggests that in pediatric patients of black African descent (hair types VI–VIII) the scalp is not an ideal donor area, due to the unacceptably high incidence of complications. Hence, every precaution should be taken when it becomes necessary to harvest donor skin from the scalp.

The scalp as a donor site for skin grafting in burns: retrospective study on complications

BackgroundSplit skin grafting (SSG) is the cornerstone in the treatment of deep burns and large skin defects. Frequently used donor sites are the thigh, abdomen and buttocks. The scalp is less common while considered as a reliable donor site. Advantages are a large surface area, rapid wound healing, cosmetically favourable results and multiple harvests from the same donor site. Complications include scab formation, chronic folliculitis and alopecia but have been recorded sporadically in previous studies. This article evaluates the complication rate of the scalp donor site in the treatment of deep burns in the Beverwijk Burn Centre.MethodsA retrospective study was performed of all patients who received a skin graft from the scalp at the Beverwijk Burn Centre between January 2004 and December 2012. Data were collected from medical files of included patients, including gender, age, type of burn (scald, flame, other) and total body surface area (TBSA) burned at the time of first surgery. Postoperative variables were healing time of the donor site and incidence of complications. During follow-up, the incidence of late complications was reviewed.ResultsA total number of 105 grafts were analysed in 93 patients: 58 males (62 %) and 35 females (38 %), with a median age of 2 years and 3 months old. Of the patients, 30 (32 %) had flame burns and 57 (61 %) had scald burns. Eighty-seven percent of patients had a TBSA burned of 5 % or less. All donor sites healed within 14 days. No alopecia or scar hypertrophy developed at the donor sites. Two patients (2.2 %) developed folliculitis; one patient (1.1 %) showed scab formation.ConclusionsThe scalp as a donor site in our Burn Centre shows a comparable short-term complication rate to the previous literature, with quick healing and no long-term complications. Therefore, we propose the consideration of the scalp as a primary donor site, especially in young children, where the scalp offers a larger donor site area than the buttocks or thighs.

Subcostal Skin Graft Donor Site for Autologous Ear Construction.

Autologous ear construction for microtia creates an auricle using a costal cartilage framework. To separate the construct from the mastoid, a skin graft is required to form a retroauricular sulcus. Skin graft donor sites that have been described include the inguinal area (split or full-thickness) or scalp (split-thickness). The purpose of this study is to report a novel skin graft donor site for ear construction. We harvest a full-thickness graft from the subcostal area based on the previous scar from the cartilage harvest. Unlike the inguinal donor site, this method does not place an additional scar on the child. In contrast to the scalp donor site, the technique is simpler and a full-thickness graft minimizes contraction of the retroauricular sulcus.

Comparison of scalp and abdomen as split-thickness skin graft donor sites for aural stenosis repair

To evaluate and compare the scalp and the abdomen as split-thickness skin graft donor sites for aural stenosis repair. A total of 34 patients with aural stenosis were included in the study. All the patients underwent meatoplasty using split-thickness skin grafts. Among them, the skin graft donor site was the scalp in 11 patients and the abdomen in the other 23 patients. The surgical team followed the patients in the outpatient department for at least 6 months after surgery. Evaluations concerned healing of the donor site, hair regeneration of the donor site, survival of split-thickness skin grafts, reoccurrence of aural stenosis and hair growth in the ear canal. The incidences of reoccurrence of aural stenosis in the two groups were compared. Subjective scar evaluation of the donor sites was performed using the Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PASA). The scale items were pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness and irregularity. All the scalp and abdominal donor sites healed well with no sign of infection. Hair regrowth and reepithelialization was observed at all the scalp donor sites. Pink discoloration was observed at the scalp donor sites in six patients 2-3 months after surgery and disappeared 6-9 months after surgery. Scars were observed at the scalp donor sites in two patients 6 months after surgery. No alopecia was observed at the scalp donor sites. The scars and pink discoloration were hidden in the hair. Scars and/or discoloration were observed at all the abdominal donor sites 12 months after surgery. All the scalp and abdominal skin grafts survived with no sign of infection. Hair growth was observed in the ear canals in two patients in the scalp group. The incidences of reoccurrence of aural stenosis were 0 % (0/23) in the abdominal group and 9.1 % (1/11) in the scalp group, respectively (Chi square test, p > 0.05). The PASA values about color, stiffness, thickness and irregularity were higher in the abdominal group than in the scalp group (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001). The PASA values about pain and itching were the same (Mann-Whitney U test, p > 0.05). The scalp meets most requirements of an ideal donor site of skin grafts for aural stenosis. The advantages of scalp as a donor site include easy accessibility in the operative field, simple postoperative care, low risk of infection, rapid wound healing, minimal interference with rehabilitation, and minimal scar formation.

Reepithelialization from Stem Cells of Hair Follicles of Dermal Graft of the Scalp in Acute Treatment of Third-Degree Burns

The scalp, an excellent donor site for thin skin grafts, presents a limited surface but is rich in keratinocyte stem cells. The purpose of this study was to double scalp harvesting in one procedure and to evaluate the capacity of the dermal layer to spontaneously reepithelialize from hair follicle stem cells. Two layers of 0.2-mm split-thickness skin graft, a dermoepidermal graft and a dermal graft, were harvested from scalp during the same procedure. Fifteen burn patients were included in this study. Healing of the scalp donor site and percentage of graft taken were evaluated. The Vancouver Scar Scale was used at 3 months and 1 year. Histologic studies were performed at day 0 and 3 months on grafts, and on the scalp at day 28. Nine patients were treated on the limbs with meshed dermal graft. Six were treated on the hands with unmeshed dermal graft. Graft take was good for both types of grafts. The mean time for scalp healing was 9.3 days. Histologic study confirmed that the second layer was a dermal graft with numerous annexes and that, at 3 months, the dermis had normal thickness but with rarer and smaller epidermal crests than dermal graft. The difference between the mean Vancouver Scar Scale score of dermal graft and dermoepidermal graft was not significant. The authors' study shows the efficacy of dermal graft from the scalp and good scalp healing. Therapeutic, II.

Late Outcomes After Grafting of the Severely Burned Face

Many approaches to surgical management of the severely burned face are described, but there are few objective outcome studies. The purpose of this study was to perform a detailed evaluation of the late outcomes in adult patients who have undergone grafting using a standardized surgical and rehabilitation approach for full-thickness (FT) facial burns to identify areas for improvement in the treatment strategy of authors. This was a prospective observational study in which patients who had undergone grafting for FT facial burns by the senior investigator at a regional burn centre between 1999 and 2010 were examined by a single evaluator. The surgical approach included tangential excision based on the facial aesthetic units, temporary cover with allograft then autografting with scalp skin preferentially, split grafts for the upper eyelid, and FT grafts for the lower eyelid. Rehabilitation included compression (uvex and or soft cloth), scar massage, and silicone gel sheeting. Of 35 patients with facial grafts, 14 subjects (age 43 ± 16 years with 22 ± 21% TBSA burns) returned for late follow-up at 40 ± 33 months (range, 5-91 months). A mean of four facial aesthetic units per patient were grafted (range, 1-9 units), with six full facial grafts performed. Scalp was used as donor in 10 of 14 cases. Scalp donor sites were well tolerated with minor alopecia visible in only one case although the donor site visibly extended slightly past the hairline in two cases. Color match with native skin was rated at 8.8 ± 0.8 of 10 when scalp skin was used compared with 7.5 ± 1.6 with other donor sites (P = .06). On the lip and chin, hypertrophic scars were significantly worse compared with the rest of the facial grafts (Vancouver scar scale 8 ± 2 vs 3 ± 1, P < .01). Sensory recovery was poor with overall moving two-point discrimination at 11 ± 3 mm (range, 4-15 mm), and monofilament light touch was 3.8 ± 0.6. Graft borders were significantly more elevated than graft seams. On the forehead, the most notable problem was a gap between the graft and hairlines of the frontal scalp and eyebrows (range, 0-40 mm). Grafted eyelids required one or more subsequent ectropion releases in the majority of cases. The most common problem for the nose was asymmetry of the nostril apertures. The most problematic late outcomes that the authors identified after facial grafting for FT facial burns included relatively poor sensory return, elevation of graft edges, eyelid ectropion, gaps between grafts and hairline, and marked hypertrophic scarring around the mouth and chin. The results indicate that possible areas for quality improvement include greater attention to the limits of scalp harvest, more attention to pressure application to graft borders and the lip and chin during rehabilitation, greater accuracy in excision and graft placement on the forehead to avoid gaps with the hairlines, and counseling of the patient regarding the high probability of diminished facial sensation.

The scalp as a donor site for split-thickness skin graft: A rare complication case report

The scalp is a useful and reliable donor site for the paediatric burn population that can be harvested several times with minimal morbidity. However, the scalp cannot be used as skin graft donor site with impunity. Scalp alopecia and chronic folliculitis can be observed among the complications. In these cases, the reconstruction phase offers different surgical procedures such as primary closure, staged excision or tissue expansion. We report the case of a patient (29-years-old), treated 20 years ago for second-degree burns covering up to 20% total body surface area (TBSA) by using thin split-thickness skin grafts of his scalp. As a teenager, he developed multiple episodes of folliculitis at the donor site of the scalp and then of recurrent abscesses, resistant to all existing medical treatments. Surgical treatment consisted in the skin excision of his scalp donor site which was immediately covered by a thin split-thickness skin graft. Four months after surgery, the patient was satisfied with the functional and aesthetic result.

Epidermal Overgrafting Improves Coloration in Remote Flaps and Grafts Applied to the Face for Reconstruction

Flaps and grafts applied to the face from sites below the clavicles are mismatched with regard to their coloration compared with normal facial skin. The color can be improved by removing the epidermis and overgrafting with a thin, split-thickness skin graft of scalp epidermis. This report reviews the authors' clinical experience using this technique. A retrospective review of 15 consecutive patients who underwent scalp epidermal overgrafting of flaps and grafts to the face from July 1, 1995, through January 1, 2006, was performed. The resulting color was compared with the adjacent facial skin using a digital scale color analysis. Results were subjected to a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Scalp donor sites were evaluated for hair growth and density. Postoperative graft color analysis revealed significant improvement in graft/flap coloration compared with preoperative values. Evaluation of the scalp donor sites revealed no evidence of scarring, hair thinning, or hair loss. There have been no complications to date. This study is the first to demonstrate the feasibility of altering the coloration of flaps and grafts applied from remote body sites to the face using epidermal overgrafting from the scalp in Caucasian patients. Significant improvement in coloration in the treated areas compared with the adjacent facial skin has been demonstrated by this technique. The authors believe that epidermal overgrafting is a useful adjunct for enhancing color aesthetics in facial reconstruction and may well lower the threshold for use of remote flaps and grafts previously ignored because of poor color match.

Évaluation de l’efficacité et de la tolérance d’Algostéril® (compresse d’alginate de calcium) versus Jelonet® (Gaze Paraffinée) dans le traitement du site donneur de greffe dermo-épidermique du cuir chevelu. Résultats d’un essai pédiatrique

Split skin graft is frequently needed in the treatment of burned patients. Scalp is often free of burns. Due to its good skin quality and important surface, scalp is a very interesting skin donor site, specially in case of children. A controlled, randomised clinical trial was carried out in 10 French Plastic Surgery or Burns Units. It assessed the efficacy and the acceptability of calcium alginate dressing (Algosteril® 2 2 Algosteril is a Brothier Trade Mark. ) versus paraffin gauze dressing (Jelonet®) in the treatment of scalp donor sites in children. 67 children (mean age 54 months) entered the study, 34 in the alginate group and 33 in the control group. Follow-up visits were on day 2/d3, d5/d6, Day complete healing, d30 and d60 after surgery. The two groups were comparable on inclusion (demographic characteristics, burn nature and surface, donor site surface and thickness of split skin graft). The mean healing time was 10 and 11 days for Algosteril® and Jelonet® group respectively (ns). The quality of the newly formed tissue was estimated to permit a sooner skin reharvesting in the Algosteril® group than in the control group ( p = 0.003). Bleeding through dressing was significantly less important in the Algosteril® group ( p = 0.02). Changes were considered by investigators less painful with Algosteril® on day complete healing ( p = 0.0096). Hair growth is homogenous in both groups on day 30 and day 60 (ns). These results showed that scalp is a very interesting skin donor site and that Algosteril® is of a real interest in donor site treatment.

Effect of topical and subcutaneous epinephrine in combination with topical thrombin in blood loss during immediate near-total burn wound excision in pediatric burned patients

Bleeding is a major concern during burn wound excision. To evaluate the efficacy of epinephrine to control blood loss, a prospective cohort of 42 pediatric patients were examined. Half of the patients received topical epinephrine to excised wounds and donor sites and subcutaneous epinephrine to scalp donor sites during total burn excision, while the other half did not. Both groups of patients received bovine topical thrombin sprayed at a concentration of 1000 U/ml. Mean blood loss in the epinephrine group was 1090 ml (range 20–4000), with a blood loss of 0.48±0.12 ml/cm 2 excised, while the control group was 1271 ml (range 40–3750) and 0.51±0.15 ml/cm 2. Differences in preoperative and postoperative hematocrits were respectively −3.4±7.8 and −4.6±7.5. The groups were not statistically different in this analysis. Subgroup analysis by age, burn size and time of burn to excision showed no differences. No complications or side effects of the use of the vasopressor solution occurred. In conclusion, no differences in blood loss were found between the groups. The routine use of local epinephrine during total wound excision in combination with topical thrombin in pediatric patients operated within 24 h after the admission may not be necessary. The effect of topical thrombin on blood loss should be analyzed separately.

Outcome of Scalp Donor Sites in 450 Consecutive Pediatric Burn Patients

The scalp is a useful and reliable donor site in pediatric burn patients that can be multiply harvested with minimal morbidity. Healing complications, however, may include alopecia and chronic folliculitis. To investigate scalp donor-site morbidity, a consecutive series of 2478 pediatric burn patients treated over a 10-year period were reviewed. A total of 450 of these patients had scalp donor sites for wound closure. Percent of total body surface area burned was 46+/-23 percent (mean+/-standard deviation), and the mean number of sequential scalp donor-site harvests was 2.2+/-2 (range, 1 to 10) with mean intervals between harvesting of 6+/-0.6 days. Ten patients (2.2 percent) had related complications. Eight patients developed scalp folliculitis, with Staphylococcus sp as the predominant organism (80 percent). Two patients were managed successfully with wound care alone; the other six patients required surgical debridement and split-thickness skin grafting to achieve wound healing. These eight patients developed varying degrees of alopecia. Two patients developed alopecia without previous folliculitis. Six patients required reconstructive surgery, which consisted of primary closure (3), staged excision (1), and tissue expansion (2). A number of variables were examined to determine any differences in the group that had complications compared with the group of patients that did not. No differences in age, sex, race, burn type, burn size, septic episodes, time to wound closure, or number of times the scalp was harvested were detected. Healed second-degree burns to the scalp that were subsequently taken as donor sites seemed to be a risk factor (p < 0.05) for folliculitis and alopecia. Our study confirms that scalp donor sites are reliable with low morbidity. Complications include alopecia and chronic folliculitis that can be avoided by meticulous technique and avoidance of previously burned areas.

Outcome of scalp donor sites in 450 consecutive pediatric burn patients.

The scalp is a useful and reliable donor site in pediatric burn patients that can be multiply harvested with minimal morbidity. Healing complications, however, may include alopecia and chronic folliculitis. To investigate scalp donor-site morbidity, a consecutive series of 2478 pediatric burn patients treated over a 10-year period were reviewed. A total of 450 of these patients had scalp donor sites for wound closure. Percent of total body surface area burned was 46+/-23 percent (mean+/-standard deviation), and the mean number of sequential scalp donor-site harvests was 2.2+/-2 (range, 1 to 10) with mean intervals between harvesting of 6+/-0.6 days. Ten patients (2.2 percent) had related complications. Eight patients developed scalp folliculitis, with Staphylococcus sp as the predominant organism (80 percent). Two patients were managed successfully with wound care alone; the other six patients required surgical debridement and split-thickness skin grafting to achieve wound healing. These eight patients developed varying degrees of alopecia. Two patients developed alopecia without previous folliculitis. Six patients required reconstructive surgery, which consisted of primary closure (3), staged excision (1), and tissue expansion (2). A number of variables were examined to determine any differences in the group that had complications compared with the group of patients that did not. No differences in age, sex, race, burn type, burn size, septic episodes, time to wound closure, or number of times the scalp was harvested were detected. Healed second-degree burns to the scalp that were subsequently taken as donor sites seemed to be a risk factor (p < 0.05) for folliculitis and alopecia. Our study confirms that scalp donor sites are reliable with low morbidity. Complications include alopecia and chronic folliculitis that can be avoided by meticulous technique and avoidance of previously burned areas.

Scalp autografts and hair transfer to the face in the burned child.

Hair transfer from split-thickness skin grafts harvested from the scalp is not a widely reported problem. The authors present their experience with hair transfer from scalp autografts in a pediatric burn population, with particular emphasis on hair transfer to the face. They retrospectively reviewed 3307 acute and reconstructive pediatric burn admissions over a 4-year period at a single institution and identified 109 cases in which the scalp had been used as a donor site and in which the patient survived the acute burn period. Data from 73 male and 36 female patients were analyzed with respect to age, race, sex, percent total body surface area burned, graft thickness, number of scalp harvests and time between harvests, and presence of donor site alopecia. Eighteen of the 109 patients had noticeable hair growth from their scalp grafts (17 percent). Fourteen of 18 cases of hair growth involved face or neck grafts (13 percent); the remaining 4 patients had hair growth elsewhere on the body. There was no difference between the two groups (hair growth versus no hair growth) when compared by age, sex, or graft thickness. There was a correlation between larger burn size and greater incidence of hair growth. Those who had multiple harvests of the same scalp donor site were more than twice as likely to have hair transfer (9 of 34 versus 9 of 75 patients), although time between harvests was not a significant variable. Caucasian children represented 77 percent of the study population yet 100 percent of the cases of problem hair growth. Thirty-three percent of the hair growth group (6 of 18 patients) and 4 percent of the remaining patients (4 of 91) had some degree of donor site alopecia. The scalp is a reliable and valuable donor site for skin grafting in children, particularly for facial burns. The authors note a moderate incidence of hair transfer (17 percent) and propose both suggestions for prevention and recommendations for management.

Outcome of Scalp Donor Sites in 450 Consecutive Pediatric Burn Patients

The scalp is a useful and reliable donor site in pediatric burn patients that can be multiply harvested with minimal morbidity. Healing complications, however, may include alopecia and chronic folliculitis. To investigate scalp donor-site morbidity, a consecutive series of 2478 pediatric burn patients treated over a 10-year period were reviewed. A total of 450 of these patients had scalp donor sites for wound closure. Percent of total body surface area burned was 46 ± 23 percent (mean ± standard deviation), and the mean number of sequential scalp donor-site harvests was 2.2 ± 2 (range, 1 to 10) with mean intervals between harvesting of 6 ± 0.6 days. Ten patients (2.2 percent) had related complications. Eight patients developed scalp folliculitis, with Staphylococcus sp as the predominant organism (80 percent). Two patients were managed successfully with wound care alone; the other six patients required surgical debridement and split-thickness skin grafting to achieve wound healing. These eight patients developed varying degrees of alopecia. Two patients developed alopecia without previous folliculitis. Six patients required reconstructive surgery, which consisted of primary closure (3), staged excision (1), and tissue expansion (2). A number of variables were examined to determine any differences in the group that had complications compared with the group of patients that did not. No differences in age, sex, race, burn type, burn size, septic episodes, time to wound closure, or number of times the scalp was harvested were detected. Healed second-degree burns to the scalp that were subsequently taken as donor sites seemed to be a risk factor (p < 0.05) for folliculitis and alopecia. Out study confirms that scalp donor sites are reliable with low morbidity. Complications include alopecia and chronic folliculitis that can be avoided by meticulous technique and avoidance of previously burned areas.