Abstract
Background. We carried out a literature review to evaluate the status of the scalp as a donor site and examine claims that the scalp donor site in black patients was less suitable than in other races. Objectives. To ascertain whether the finding that using the scalp as a donor site was less successful in black patients than in other races was credible. Methods. A Pubmed search was done for ‘scalp as donor site in burns’. There were 91 hits for the period 1977 - 2020. Results. Twenty-three articles were included for the final review. Of the 23 articles identified, 13 included ≥28 patients. Of these 13 larger articles, the number presumed to have a multiracial population of patients was 7. Of the 7 studies, only 1 study found a noticeable difference in hair growth in all their white patients but none in the black patients. Conclusion. We did an extensive literature review of the scalp as a donor site and found that most authors found it to be an excellent donor site irrespective of race. The report that complications of scalp grafting are related to racial issues such as hair structure by a burn centre in South Africa is not supported by the literature or by another burn centre in the same city.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: South African Journal of Plastic & Reconstructive Aesthetic Surgery & Burns
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
